User talk:Dorvaq/Archive3
WebsiteChecking other haidressers article like Frederic Fekkai or Vidal Sassoon are showing their website listed. ( Vidal Sassoon website is listed right on the box). I would like to exactly know why Rodolfo Valentin cannot have it?. awainting your response,thankRalicia 14:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)ralicia
Justice hereHi Dorvaq. I think you will be proud of me. After contact Rodolfo Valentin, i got the sources for verification from important sources like the New York Post, the Herald and New York Magazine. I added them and I also I added a few names of relevant people with their sources for verification. ( I worked on it for several hours, exhausted!). Also, soon it is possible to add the source for verification for the "winner of National Grand Design Award". the commite of Takara-Belmont will be showing in their web Rodolfo award. Dorvaq: it is possible to add about the movie Rodolfo did starring as an actor in the role of "hairdresser" ?. The link for verification is at the New York Times and is: [1] Please let me know your comments. ( I hope I did right). justice all the way 17:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Dorvaq, thank you for your response. (you know you're my WP teacher!). Can you give me an idea of the phrase to add about Rodolfo's starring in the movie and the funny point that it was in the role as a hairdresser? (if you like, pls do it!). Also I got to my personal email (justicealltheway@gmail.com)email from Rodolfo about the "grand design award winner".It seems that TAKARA-BELMONT (the company that every year awards different salons), deleted by mistake the award winner for 2001 (Rodolfo Valentin) from their database. The Director apologized for the omission and the listing will be soon showing in their site.It will be the source for verification of that. I think after that every statement will have its source for verification, the only left without verification will be the "hair coloring techniques award". That company does not publish the winners in their website and the only documents available are the "Diploma" hanging on Rodolfos Salon and the "certificate" that the company faxed and is showing in Rodolfos website in the page "awards and accolades"..(so I don't know how we will do it), but it is a very important award that a very few hairdressers get. best regards, and million!justice all the way 14:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Now that we've settled the issue, if you and I butt heads again in the future, I would greatly appreciate if you would assume good faith on my part (as I did you) and refrain from inundating my talk page with warning templates. Cheers! — Dorvaq (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Source for verificationDorvaq, I have added a source for verification for the "Hair infusion" at Rodolfo Valentin. That is first on the list on the NOTES. But, something is wrong, the website address is correct. it is: "MODA&id=1582091&Day=3&Month=3&Year=2007 Can you please check what is wrong? A million!justice all the way 19:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Dorvaq: don't bother, I fixed the link to the source already (exhausted!) regards justice all the way 16:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Important about Hair Prosthesis articleDorvaq, I am very involved in helping with cancer ( that is why I know Rodolfo Valentin.) As you already know, besides being a great hairdresser, he is also a extraordinary good person that helps people with cancer not only giving them free $ 4,800 us dollars free hair prosthesis (cancer wigs) to the patients that cannot afford to buy one, but also giving them emotional support. At his salon has priority a person suffering from cancer than a regular "hair" client. I am telling you about this, is because probably you remember that I was complaining about that editor of name WALKER42. he/she signed up on Wikipedia past April 15, made a mess with Rodolfo article and the other two related to him ( Sofia's Hair 4 Healthand Hair prosthesis. WALKER42 after re-editing all of them ( reason why you and I went through so many headaches fixing Rodolfo's article), WALKER42 never returned to wikipedia. That is why I was insisting "how suspicious it was"... I can probably confirm an 80% that he/she is a competitor trying to establish "what is conveniente" for his/her business because has removed all the quotations that can only affect to a Rodolfo's competitor, like: 1-designer of the first hair prosthesis ( which is true!)from the hair prosthesis article. 2- offering free hair prosthesis without any outside economical help from Sofia's hair 4 health article. and many more!. Dorvaq, I would like to know if you can help me to provide the true in that "hair prosthesis" article. The current one will give a completely wrong information to the readers. If you agree to help me, I will send you more information and facts about the true. Anyway I've added external sources for verification that are showing different things that WALKER42 is trying to establish in the "hair prosthesis" article, like they are covered by insurance when it was only approved from 2001 (see the external link) and under special conditions (very few cover and less than few paid in full, almost nothing). again, best regards justice all the way 16:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Here justiceDorvaq Hi! Me and others have added "verificable sources" to the article of Rodolfo Valentin. But, a editor of name Bikeable, is "again" stating that the article looks like and add! Again I am very confused...it probably feels that way for "bikeable", because Rodolfo has a very interested life and everything he does is related to famous people and creative life. But I don't want to start anything again, it really was a nightmare just a few weeks ago what they did with the article and thanks to you it was saved, specially from competitors of Rodolfo that just showed up in WP to mess up the article. Please take a look and give me your opinion. I think all statements are having their sources! best regards justice all the way 14:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Dorvaq: thank you for your help with the article. Regarding the "ad", I am asking a magazine editor friend of mine to help me to clean up the best possible the feeling. I will be doing it asap. Thanks againjustice all the way 14:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Hi Dorvaq, you did a great job to Rodolfo Valentin article!. My friend added the source for verification for Rodolfo's Private Atelier for Hair in Manhattan as a winner of the grand design award. Now, I want to ask you something, regarding as a winner of the hair coloring techniques award, "Commco and Science" does not publish it in their website. They issue certificates. I've the approval (and the copy) of the certificate. Do you think that we can load it as a picture, noted under "Hair coloring Techniques Award", and readers as an any other picture they can click and read the award certificate?. Please let me know what you think I will be do it right away. THANKS AGAIN!justice all the way 16:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Paul McKenna archive blankingHi - sorry to not have replied earlier - it seems that I let the topic drop into my archive :). The reason that we have for blanking talk pages (etc) is to rmeove them from immeidate view, such as that used by search engines (Google). For a time, the search engine cache could still hold the incriminating remarks, but given time they references would disappear from searches. Thanks, Martinp23 21:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Hockey totals - Stanley Cups, Conference championships, etc.I noticed you reverted changes to many hockey team pages in which some anonymous user when to the trouble of adding the numbers, rather than leaving a pretty much useless list of dates. I thought it was fantastic to have the numbers there, since it is a significant statistic. Why do you deem the numbers as "unnecessary"?Ccrashh 17:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
IPHi, I just wanted to say thanks for checking the edits and responding to the IP on my talkpage! --Caltas(talk) 13:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Deletion for entry SkipintroHi, could you state why you set the entry Skipintro for deletion please?
American vs Canadian EnglishYou "fixed" the word "colours" on the Montreal Canadiens article to the American spelling. Why are we using the American spelling of words for a topic/article that is most definitely Canadian in content?Ccrashh 14:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
CanadaI did see the discussion. Both of them. They don't interest me. Editors are not required to participate in discussions, and "see discussion" is not a valid reason to revert someone. Besides which, even if I was interested in participating in the discussion, there is no consensus either way on the issue so there's no call for reverting my change out of hand. Kafziel Talk 14:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I did notice that you had reverted your edit. It has been discussed to death that "largest country in North America" is ambiguous, and so I reverted it back as necessary. Lexicon (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
The point I agreed with was Corticopia's, which didn't really have anything to do with "ambiguity". The point was a simple matter of throwing the statement regarding Canada being the largest country in North America into the geography section, and replacing it with "occupies most of northern..." in the introduction, which in effect would situate Canada within North America. Corticopia felt from a reader's perspective that it was more important to situate Canada than to establish it as the largest country. No argument regarding ambiguity was made at least on my part. Anyhow, I must stress again that I really don't care what version we use just as long as both statements are used. I really have no issue with either. — Dorvaq (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC) VandalismHi, thanks for the message, and I want to apologize for what happened. What was added to Wikipedia was not by me, I was in school and someone used my account while I was somewhere else. It won't happen again. I like to think of myself as a good and helpful Wikipedian. I thought about deleting it afterwardsbut realised that it would simply be recovered in the history and then I would have to face accusations of cowardice as well as incivility. I wrote it in response to Liberty's comment that I had rounded up a group that agreed with me to challenge him. The claim was so ludicrous, and so insulting, that I felt I couldn't let it go unanswered. Perhaps I was wrong. Still, not much I can do about it now 15:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Harry Potter politicsPlease add to talk if you feel any of the citations are false. Deletion will be considered vandalism and reported. Libertycookies 14:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I already spoke to Jossi about his delete, which he said he would add, which I did for him. You've been warned about the delete without talk, and I suggest that you choose to play by the rules, since I am trying that approach now. If you have a legitimate complaint about the material, please make your case in Talk. Libertycookies 14:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Your removal of Poland in WWII article.Why did you removed Poland from WWII article?
Re:Tardy, but thanks nonetheless...Well thanks. Hope to see ya around. -FlubecaTalk 15:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC) QuestionHi Dorvaq. Question. Why remove one person's opinions from another persons talk page? Isn't that excessive? Thanks in advance for what will surely be an illuminating answer.
I have removed the content which does not meet the Wiki criteria of Neutral Point of View. MQM is a political party in Pakistan. Those who are introducing material on MQM's page are their opponents. Their information does not meet Wiki's NPOV. If you disagree, then please let me know.
You undid a lot of my changes. How can I go back to my previous version before the massive deletes. I have 14 years of research on the subject matter, and I am working on a documentary on how Google, YouTube and Wikipedia are being used (misused?) in Pakistani politics. Who do you think I should interview for this documentary? Thanks Quebec articleCould you please leave your opinion on whether mention of the "Quebec nation" issue should be removed from the lead (see here). I'd like to get the neutrality tag removed as soon as possible as this is an important article. Thanks. --Soulscanner 23:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Settlers: Rise of an empireThanks for the help on the article =], even if it was minor, all constructive help is appreciated! Philbuck222 17:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Cheersfor the user talkpage revert. Very much appreciated!! :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC) DiacriticsHi, from Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Player pages format: "Diacritics shall be applied to all the player pages (that require them).". Not just player pages of players with diacritics in their names, but all player pages. That's the Wikiproject compromise, so leave my edits alone. Thank you! Elrith (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Race Difference ...You reverted me in this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Race_Differences_in_Intelligence&diff=196289137&oldid=196281510, however you did not respond to the discussion I started on the talk page. Can you either reply here, my talk page, or on the article talk page, with the quote from the source, in which WSP is identified as not an academic publisher. Thank you. --N4GMiraflores (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC) United Kingdom.I see you have reverted my edit at United Kingdom. However, Britain is the correct short form in this instance, not Great Britain. As the page British Isles (terminology) specifically states:
helloi added a text in my problem i posted in the editor assistance when you have some time take a look Thankyou for the attention PelasgicMoon (talk) 19:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Epygi WikiDorvaq, Glad to meet you. Would be so kind and give me some ideas on how not to describe a product in a non-advertising manner? Any constructive comments are welcome. Sincerely, |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia