User talk:DonCalo/Archive 2015

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Banca Romana scandal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Piromalli 'ndrina

Hi, the reason I left the figures was because they were the same as quoted on the same page in Italian Wiki. Regards Denisarona (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camorra in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racket. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calogero Vizzini reversion

Hello, DonCalo. You reverted an edit I made that removed euphemistic language, specifically "passed away", which the manual of style explicitly highlights as not neutral. Because you commented that my edit was "Nonsense", I will assume you simply disagree with the rule. However I'm interested in your complete thoughts on the subject. fds^Talk 16:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting again, DonCalo. I want to rescind my objection to your reversion. The edit, now that I examine it again, was an error on my part. Cheers. fds^Talk 06:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charles C. Lockwood

Please refrain from making blind-reverts. Feel free to add any text to any article, as long as the info is factually correct, and the text complies with the guidelines of the WP:Manual of Style. I'll revert your revert, and then (if you like) read the text, read what you had added, and then revise the text and the refs in an intelligent manner. Thanks. Kraxler (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My above comment was prompted by the revert notification. I just saw that you first reverted, and then revised the text. I'll have a look later, but I can see already that there are a lot of things that need fixing. I'll leave edit summaries so that you know what it is about. Kraxler (talk) 16:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See my amendments to the article, and read the edit summaries. Although anybody is welcome to improve Wikipedia at any time, I wish people would be more careful and more knowledgeable when doing so. Kraxler (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tatata, look at your own mistakes in the first versions, OK? - DonCalo (talk) 17:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salvatore A. Cotillo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salvatore A. Cotillo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricEnfermero -- EricEnfermero (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salvatore A. Cotillo

The article Salvatore A. Cotillo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salvatore A. Cotillo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricEnfermero -- EricEnfermero (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

info removed

Hi there you removed info on Matteo messina denaro added by us regarding his daughters wedding? We have sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMN83 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have sources, why don't properly reference them? - ̴̴̴DonCalo (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our mistake we didn't realise we hadn't — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMN83 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Salvatore A. Cotillo

On 3 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salvatore A. Cotillo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Salvatore A. Cotillo was the first Italian-American to serve in both houses of the New York State Legislature and as a Justice of the New York Supreme Court? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salvatore A. Cotillo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Asino Mussolini 1924.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Asino Mussolini 1924.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Joyce Lussu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joyce Lussu.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SSP

ciao, sei sicuro che non è quello del 1893?? --SURDUSVII 18:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof that there even was an Sicilian Socialist Party in 1893. The Congress in 1893 only founded a Sicilian section of the PSI. - DonCalo (talk) 18:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

allora suggerisco la creazione di due voci da scorporare: Sicilian Socialist Party (1893) e Sicilian Socialist Party (2013), ok?? avete obiezioni, VerismoSiciliano?? --SURDUSVII 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is continued on the Sicilian Socialist Party talk page, where it belongs. - DonCalo (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1902 in Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Venezuelan crisis and Triple Alliance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1919 in Italy

added links pointing to Italian People's Party and Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye

1918 in Italy

added a link pointing to Tyrol

Biennio Rosso

added a link pointing to Lockout

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit

Senti. Those notable people are both judges and magistrates. Judge sounds much better that magistrate, as in many countries, line in the UK, magistrates refer to volunteers, those with no legal qualification and experience. You even did not explained your edits. Grazie.--78.149.113.71 (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see this

Don't know why you don't edit it.wiki. Perhaps, aren't you an Italian but possess Italian ancestry? As you have stated, you mostly edit article based on crime, but are you able to edit articles related to law or legal profession, as I am having certain problems on editing them. Could you help me. Grazie ancora.--78.149.113.71 (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]