User talk:Dimsar01

Archives

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Welcome to my Talk Page! Feel free to leave me a message here.

Unexplained revert

Just as an FYI, this revert was done as part of a mass rollback of edits by a banned LTA. You're perfectly entitled to take put the edit back if you think it has merit of course, but I thought you should know. Canterbury Tail talk 22:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, and yes I checked that there was nothing wrong with it, just typo/capitalization fixes and some things to bring the destination table in line with the tables in other airlines' pages. —Dimsar01 ^Talk ⌚→ 22:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Their edits are a revert on sight (so hopefully they will eventually realize they're wasting their time and the edits that take hours are undone in seconds), but it's fine, you're perfectly allowed to go "that's a good edit, I'll keep it". Canterbury Tail talk 00:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts to Thessaloniki Metro

Your recent editing history at Thessaloniki Metro shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please engage with the relevant talk page before making any further reverts on Thessaloniki Metro. The edits you reverted were the previous version that had consensus. The claim that "all metros" use date and age is factually incorrect, and the resizing of the infobox when the map is opened (when not set to 300px) creates a disruptive reading experience. Michail (blah) 16:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to take these edits [1] [2] [3] (16:13 to 16:19) as evidence that you did in fact see my post on the talk page (14:09) before you decided to start reverting again. Please engage with the talk page and reach consensus instead of just editing all the examples I used to indicate that the edits you are reverting are not, in fact, a universal standard on Wikipedia. Michail (blah) 16:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]