User talk:Dementia13

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Dementia13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~Richmond96 t • c 03:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your kick-ass copy editing on Imaginos and for bravely enduring being jerked around by my poor syntax, you truly deserve such a honor! Lewismaster (talk) 08:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		The Barnstar
		For your excellent copy edit of KMFDM, and your great commentary at its peer review, I present you with the industrial music barnstar. Thanks! —Torchiest ^talkedits 02:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks A lot!

		Copy Editor's Barnstar
		I award you this Copy Editor's Barnstar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. {{{1}}}

Blue Stars Drum and Bugle Corps

Thanks for taking a stab at identifying the editorial needs for this article. Unfortunately, your WP:POV tag was reverted as a "drive-by tag." I really don't know how to deal with editing the article without getting into an edit war with User:GWFrog, as he reverts all edits on the dozens of drum and bugle corps articles he's worked on. Any suggestions? Mesconsing (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dementia13. I've declined the GOCE request now. Thanks for the catch. @Mesconsing, is it time for Dispute Resolution? --Stfg (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE Amor Prohibido

I would to thank you for copyediting the article. I have replied on the talk page to your comments. Best, Jona^talk to me 02:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your help in getting Episode 2 (Twin Peaks) to Featured status; I doubt the process would have been as smooth or successful without your prose polishes. :) GRAPPLE X 11:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and congratulations. That, to my knowledge, is the first article I've helped bring to that level. I'm glad to have that as my first, because David Lynch is my favorite director. I like the work you've done on that article, and I'm glad that it's been recognized. Dementia13 (talk) 00:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing favor

Hey, do you think you could do a copy edit of History of Western role-playing video games? I'd do it myself, but it's in the middle of WP:FAC and I've already done some technical fixes and cast a partial support for it, so I'd like to avoid getting too involved so there's no impropriety. I'd recommended getting a copy edit during it's WP:GAN last month, and a couple people have recommended it in the current discussion. If you're not able, I totally understand. Thanks. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 15:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sounds like an interesting subject, too. Dementia13 (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! And yes, it is; I really enjoyed reviewing it. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I put it on the GOCE requests page to make sure you get proper credit for it. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Dementia13 (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE July 2012 drive barnstars!

		Copy Editor's Barnstar
		For racking up more than 40,000 words in the July 2012 drive, I present you with the official GOCE Award. Very fine work! —Torchiest ^talkedits 02:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award—6th place, Total Words
		For copy editing 60,269 credited words in the July 2012 drive, here is the GOCE Silver Star Award. Well played! —Torchiest ^talkedits 02:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award—4th place, 5k+ Articles
		And for copy editing two 5k articles in the July 2012 drive, have a second GOCE Silver Star Award. Nice job! —Torchiest ^talkedits 02:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MIDI (reply)

Re your msg of 18 August: be glad to help with a MIDI WikiProject. It has been quite a while since I glanced through many articles, but as I recall most were created piecemeal BC (before CITATIONS) and were helpful but not well integrated. I'm familiar with the electronics and specs (programmed some translation tables once) and still have a couple of reference books somewhere. Twang (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [e-mail] your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dementia13. You have new messages at ChrisGualtieri's talk page.
Message added 00:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again btw. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Third Transjordan attack

Thank you very much for your very thorough copyedit of this article. Your time and interest are greatly appreciated. In particular I appreciate the additional advice on the talk page, all of which I will try to apply in the future. Thanks once again, --Rskp (talk) 01:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and again, good work. Dementia13 (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Game & Watch games

I pulled the ce tag out of the article before noticing that you were working the article. Removing that tag should help prevent anyone else from making that same mistake, so I left it out. Sorry if it caused any confusion. --Nouniquenames 23:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dementia13. After all the work you've done on it, I'd like to give you credit for it in the drive. Do you plan to complete it? Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 15:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, I'm working on it now. Dementia13 (talk) 16:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's included in the barnstars below. You don't need to go back to the drive page to mark it completed, as I've done that. Best, --Stfg (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE September 2012 drive barnstars

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		This barnstar is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing 12 articles to a cumulative total of 84,358 words during the Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for your outstanding contribution. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award – Longest article – 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Award is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing Third Transjordan attack (10,314 words) during the Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award – Number of words edited – 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Award is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing articles to a total of 45,243 words during the Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award – Number of 5k articles edited – Equal 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Award is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing 3 articles of 5000 words or more during the Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The 10k Copy Edit Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing Third Transjordan attack (10,314 words) during the Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive. Thank you for taking on this major task. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Awarded to Dementia13 for wading through the mass of long, wishy washy sentences as well as negotiating your way through the edit war at Third Transjordan attack to uncover a coherent article. Best wishes Rskp (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Dementia13 (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE November 2012 backlog drive awards

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Thanks for your hard work during the WP:GOCE November 2012 backlog elimination drive! For contributions totaling in excess of 12,000 words, I hereby present you with this Cleanup Barnstar. We look forward to your continuing efforts in the future. —Torchiest ^talkedits 16:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award: 5k Articles (5th Place)
		This Leaderboard Award is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing one article of 5000 words or more during the Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 GOCE drive. Thanks for your hard work, and we'll see you soon! —Torchiest ^talkedits 16:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE January barnstar

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Dementia13 for copy editing articles totalling over 12,000 words in the GOCE January copy edit drive. Thank you very much for participating! Dianna (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: American football

Hello, Dementia13. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 23:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Happy Easter!!!

Happy Easter!

So a print encyclopedia, a strawberry shortcake, and a sycamore walk into a bar - wait, have you heard this one? (talk) 22:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE March drive barnstar!

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For your working cleaning up 12,000 words during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive, please accept this token of appreciation from the Guild. We hope you'll be back in May to help again. —Torchiest ^talkedits 01:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Nice work on the page for List of progressive rock bands

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vital Articles/Expanded: include or delete Godzilla from the list of 50 all-time greatest movies?

Dementia, I have responded to your comment in the talk page discussion about the 1954 movie Godzilla, and I would ask you to reconsider your position. If you believe that the consequences of nuclear war and nuclear proliferation are not given sufficient attention on the overall VA/E list of topics, I would suggest that you address that by proposing the addition of other directly related topics to the VA/E list. Using Godzilla as some sort of "proxy" for addressing this issue avoids the more important question of what topics directly related to nuclear war and nuclear proliferation should be included. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive rock

Hi Dementia 13,

As you have noticed, I have updated the Progressive rock article 22 times over the past few days and the List of progressive rock bands article 21 times.

As you also would have noticed, 42 of these 43 updates were "legitimate" updates. Therefore, you must be scratching your head as to why an established Wikipedia editor such as myself (who is willing to spend so much time and energy in cleaning up two articles) would also be willing to "vandalise" an article.

This is the "vandalism" edit I am referring to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_progressive_rock_bands&diff=prev&oldid=556673891

This "vandalism" was a complete accident. Let me explain...

I was editing articles (mostly on Progressive rock) between 20:17 (May 23rd) and 01:50 (May 24th). I had also been reading the List of progressive rock bands article, which I planned to edit during my "next stint" on Wikipedia.

That "next stint" in question (02:09-03:56 on May 25), I edited articles mostly on List of progressive rock bands. I noticed that 20 edits had been made to that particular article since I last visited it so I selected the revision of 16:47 on May 23 so it read exactly as it read when I had previously visited the page.

However, having been reading the page for quite a while, I completely forgot it was an older revision. See revision in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_progressive_rock_bands&oldid=556452435

All I intended to do for this particular edit was to change "Amon Duul II" so it read "Amon Düül II". Having realised my error, I am completely mortified and can only apologise for deleting what appears to be 4-5 hours worth of edits.

Having explained the circumstances surrounding my edit, it is hopefully clear to you that my edit was made in good faith.

I would therefore like to ask you if you wouldn't mind amending the comments you made on my talk page to reflect this and ultimately remove the warning.

I take the comments on board regarding future tweaks on the Progressive rock article and I won't be making any alterations to the article in the near future.

All the best,

Standingfish (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GOCE May backlog drive award

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work during the Guild of Copy Editors May 2013 backlog elimination drive. For copy editing more than 8000 words during the drive, you've earned this award. Congratulations! We hope to see you again in July. —Torchiest ^talkedits 00:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE May Copy Edit of the Month Gold!

		The Guild of Copy Editors' Award
		Thanks for your submission to the May 2013 Copy Edit of the Month contest, and congratulations! For your work on progressive rock, you've earned the Gold. Great job! —Torchiest ^talkedits 00:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Prog & Twelfth Night

OK, not sure if this is the correct medium to put the case.

My main angle is being an "eye witness" in the early 80's and seeing a lot of those bands on a regular basis. Twelfth Night were one of the more innovative of the neo-progs (as they now seem to be termed) with more of a harsh edge (reflecting the realities of a country in decline and influence of harsher punk & NWOBHM music) and with some very experimental segments, along with rockier parts, and not just reproducing that early Genesis sound that most of the others seemed to aspire to. Other bands were on the scene, but Solstice were not around much and I'm afraid I'd not heard of Saga until reading this article.

It is difficult to find supporting evidence, as the music papers of the time don't seem to be online and I won't be trying to find physical copies!

A few fleeting references I've found online:

Rocking the Classics: Edward Macan References to the Marquee Club playing a seminal role for prog, and whilst referencing a number of the bands, it states "Twelfth Night was something of an unofficial house band in the 80s"

Not sure if you are willing to accept other websites as valid sources:

http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=339

"The "MANN-era" music will live on in prog as being something particularly special, as it goes several steps further than even FISH-era MARILLION, with whom the band are often (mistakenly) compared"

http://www.trebuchet-magazine.com/twelfth-night-live-and-let-live/ "Back in the early 1980s, The Reading-based band Twelfth Night were one of the leading lights of the so-called “Neo-prog” movement: the second wave of prog-rock bands who combined the complexity and ambition of progressive rock with the DIY ethos of punk."

Update: Dec 2015: The original list of examples has been removed from the article, so this latest addition is "for the record". In the 2015 Progzilla Listener's poll (http://www.progzilla.com/poll/), Twelfth Night were the only "neo-prog" band to make it into the top 10. TN had 6 entries in the top 100 (8,25,32,36,40,54) average postion 32, compared to Marillion (also 6 entries but 13,34,57,82,87,89, so all lower placed than Twelfth Night equivalent and only averaging position 60; IQ only had 3 entries, Pallas 1 and Saga don't feature at all. This could support the argument that Twelfth Night have a much greater legacy than they are credited with by authors are quoted as "references" but who are probably compiling hearsay and weren't actually present at the time.

By the way, the Marillion music clip attached to this article is not a good representation of the style. Marillion became a lot more mainstream after the departure of Fish, so to provide a useful reference, you really need something from the Fish era.....

Prog and A82

Hi. Sorry about procrastinating over the GA review for Progressive Rock, it's those samples I just want to check. I will aim to get it all closed down tomorrow, hopefully. In the meantime, if you're waiting for me to sign it off, I don't suppose you could cast your eye over A82 road? I started off work yesterday evening to see if there was a GA lurking in it, and I'm now seriously contemplating sending it straight to FAC - I'm pretty sure the comprehensiveness and sources all past muster and there are a bucketload of free images. Before I do, I'd like a good couple of copyeditors to go over it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Had a quick look, I'm brain dead. I'll do more later. The sentence about "memorable driving experiences" was troublesome: See if you like what I did. Dementia13 (talk) 02:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Progressive rock

The article Progressive rock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Progressive rock for comments about the article. Well done! In particular, during my brief time on the article, I've also been impressed at your diligence at keeping the article focused and on topic, and not degenerating into a "here's a list of everyone's favourite bands" article (as Mellotron still is), so well done for that. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superb work. congrats!!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 07:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all! Dementia13 (talk) 18:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of progressive rock bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A82 road

The FA review is up at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A82 road/archive1. I expect some comments about your copyedits will fall out of this, so it might be worth taking a look at some point. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:28, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Progressive rock may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• influential through their use of instruments borrowed from [[world music]] and [[early music]].{{sfn|Sweers|2004|p=72,204}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^t | c 15:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rtp-midi listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rtp-midi. Since you had some involvement with the Rtp-midi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —danhash (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Jackson Task-force

Hi, I'm looking to help revamp the Percy Jackson Task-force, a project dedicated to maintaining articles related to Rick Riordan and Percy Jackson & the Olympians. I noticed your edits on some articles that fall under this task-force's "jurisdiction", and I wanted to invite you to join! If you're interested, I'd like to invite you to become a full member; please note that the difficult requirements for membership are going to be lowered in the near future, so you can join worry-free (I know they scared me away on the first try.). You can also become just a "supporter", if that's more your speed.

Head on over to the project page if you're interested -- and no hard feelings if you're not. Thanks again in advance, and feel free to contact me on my Talk page. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 06:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Renaissance - Mother Russia (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Renaissance - Mother Russia (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coheed and Cambria - Key Entity Extraction 1 (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coheed and Cambria - Key Entity Extraction 1 (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emerson, Lake and Palmer - Tarkus (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emerson, Lake and Palmer - Tarkus (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dementia13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aperçu - Kansas (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aperçu - Kansas (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Genesis - Duke's Travels (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Genesis - Duke's Travels (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gentle Giant - Mobile (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gentle Giant - Mobile (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero and Heroine - Strawbs (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hero and Heroine - Strawbs (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jethro Tull - Velvet Green (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jethro Tull - Velvet Green (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yes- Close to the Edge (figured bass).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yes- Close to the Edge (figured bass).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Excerpt from "Starless" by King Crimson.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Excerpt from "Starless" by King Crimson.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Excerpt from "Starless" by King Crimson.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Excerpt from "Starless" by King Crimson.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:King Crimson - Neurotica (excerpt).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King Crimson - Neurotica (excerpt).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Marillion - The King of Sunset Town (excerpt).ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Marillion - The King of Sunset Town (excerpt).ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Procol Harum - Simple Sister (ending).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Procol Harum - Simple Sister (ending).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ozric Tentacles - Zoemetra (excerptr).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ozric Tentacles - Zoemetra (excerptr).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]