User talk:DavidEfraim

Request on 14:43:06, 24 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Sierra52

• Sierra52 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Yeti Farm Creative (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello David thank you for reviewing the page so quickly. I don't suppose there is any chance you would be able to help/advise me on anything I can do better to get this page up and running? Any and all help obviously greatly appreciated. I took a course on best practices and how to, which advised me to leave it at 1 sentence with no more than 5 references. I do have several more references and other materials (Infobox & Production lists) I was planning to add later on, again advised by a course ~ in the hopes of not wasting anyone's time. Would you be interested in reviewing these somehow as now I'm scared to re-submit. Thank you for your time. Sierra52 (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Sierra52 (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article for a company that comes under WP:NCORP. The citations must satisfy NCORP. DavidEfraim (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Christian Lavernier

Dear @DavidEfraim,

thanks for your help. I can't understand what information is not correct and what sources I should change, thank you if you can help me, there is a lot of material on this artist online but I don't know what appropriate information I need to select. Thanks for your help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christian_Lavernier Kastalia81 (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft contains many unreliable sources. You need to remove all those. DavidEfraim (talk) 05:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @DavidEfraim, Thank you for your answer. Can you give me an example of what is considered unreliable, in this way I can clean the sources as much as possible --Kastalia81 (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have that much time to list all. I will just show you an [1]. DavidEfraim (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @DavidEfraim Thanks, for help me, I understand. --Kastalia81 (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @DavidEfraim I'm really sorry, you're right, I didn't realize that there were still some reliable sources that weren't correct, now i checked, and everything seems to be working, I hope.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christian_Lavernier thanks --Kastalia81 (talk) 10:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering

Hi, David - were you able to get signed-up at NPPSCHOOL? Atsme 💬 📧 13:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Atsme. Later, after giving it some more thinking, I changed my mind. My profession is the first issue. I occasionally have to make long trips. I'm unable to make edits for a while as a result of this. This inactivity may extend for a longer period depending on the work. On the contrary, I edits a lot while at home. I don't want this to ruin the continuity of my learning process. I thus considered learning it on my own. I'm getting help User:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting to patrol some unreviewed pages. I really appreciate your concern about me. DavidEfraim (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:11:58, 1 September 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Tcastles

• Tcastles (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Immuta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi DavidEfraim, thanks for your attention to this article. Can you please clarify where this article falls short? The reason you left was that "The submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article," however, every source I used in this article is a published, reliable, secondary source that is independent of the subject.

Please let me know what I can do to improve this article.

Thank you!

Tcastles (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Alphaonekannan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alphaonekannan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GeneralNotability, I didnt understood any of the technical terms in that SPI. Im sure something has gone wrong here. Can you explain it more simply. Did you ran check user on my ID. Is there any way I could see the checkuser evidence. DavidEfraim (talk) 03:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I ran a checkuser investigation on your account. The technical findings showed a significant overlap between your account and Alphaonekannan socks, particularly that you have been on the same IP address as other Alphaonekannan socks on multiple occasions, enough that it cannot be explained as mere coincidence. I cannot provide further technical details to you publicly or privately. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GeneralNotability, I have no connection with this sock. You said that the socks are interested in Kerala and football related topics whereas Im not interested in that stuffs. There is no editing overlap between my ID and those socks. I checked the contributions of Alphaonekannan and the socks. Its evident that they have been using mobile for making edits whereas Im editing from my computer connected to a public wifi accessible to many people. In a city where millions lives, yes this can be a mere coincidence. I wanted to say the evidence submitted in the SPI is not enough to justify a block. Its totally frustrating to get blocked for something which you dont even know. There are no strong evidences against me. Please reconsider your decision. DavidEfraim (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]