User talk:DasallmächtigeJ

Your GA nomination of Steep (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Steep (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Steep (video game)

The article Steep (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Steep (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Steep (video game)

The article Steep (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Steep (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 07:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ezio Auditore da Firenze

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ezio Auditore da Firenze you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ezio Auditore da Firenze

The article Ezio Auditore da Firenze you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ezio Auditore da Firenze for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ezio Auditore da Firenze

The article Ezio Auditore da Firenze you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ezio Auditore da Firenze for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ezio

I gathered a couple sources while doing research on other subjects, so I figured I would let you know. You can view them here. I might find others, so I will let you know when I do if you're interested. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of WWE Crown Jewel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WWE Crown Jewel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of WWE Crown Jewel

The article WWE Crown Jewel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WWE Crown Jewel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 23:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of WWE Crown Jewel

The article WWE Crown Jewel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WWE Crown Jewel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 06:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EricSparrowTHUG.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EricSparrowTHUG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yooka-Laylee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yooka-Laylee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 15:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yooka-Laylee

The article Yooka-Laylee you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yooka-Laylee for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Brilliant! I love love your work on Mangus Walker! Can I hire you? Please let me know [e-mail] Maverick928Porsche (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ezio Auditore da Firenze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Womanizer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:EricSparrow.png

Thanks for uploading File:EricSparrow.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^(Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:EricSparrow.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EricSparrow.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EricSparrow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EricSparrow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EricSparrowTHPG.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EricSparrowTHPG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wizards of the Lost Kingdom II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Impale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Hawk Pro Skater article

Hi, regarding the edit here, I still have some problems with including it -- You say it's sourced, but a game manual is not an independent source. That's probably not that big a problem, what's more critical is that we're repeating the manual, dumping its contents into the article which gets into gameguide territory as well as gamecruft. More broadly, we're listing information just to list information by listing listing the characters in this manner without any source to cover how or why each specific one is notable for mention. My idea to mitigate all this would be to limit the mention to a few of the characters and keep it as a passing mention in the gameplay section; Mention that the game features prominent skaters such as X, Y and Z, cite the manual and leave it at that. Eik Corell (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eik Corell: Thanks for reaching out! Well, I could easily find a third party source, that's not that big of a deal, I simply have all the manuals at home. I actually wanted to do a list of characters for a long time, as also all fighting games have one and I think the same principle applies here: all characters/pro skaters have a stand-alone recognition and name value, so they should be listed. I simply thought doing it the same way all fighting games aticles do would be more coherent, also I thought it would look stupid to just list them in the text in one big numeration. However, I think you have a point: I overreached a bit when I listed the original characters, since they are not really notable in most cases, I think I will remove them from the articles and we should be just fine.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 15:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haytham Kenway

I appreciate the work that has been done here, but the consensus for that page is that Haytham is not independently notable enough for a solo article, seeing that it was a redirect for nearly seven years. Any information that was added there can be added to his list article entry. You mentioned the all-time lists and BAFTA nom, but those do not satisfy the notability guidelines for fictional subjects, as the lists are not in-depth coverage of the character and the BAFTA nomination is just that -- a nomination. The other passing mentions in the game reviews do not satisfy the general notability guideline. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 14:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Etzedek24 Thanks for reaching out, however; I disagree with your assessment. The article changed in such a fashion that the 2016 redirect no longer applies as a consensus. I would not call it a consensus in the first place, considering that the article has always been only a redirect. That no one was willing to put the work in as of yet does not mean the article/character does not possess relevance, Connor doesn't have an article either, and I'd argue his relevance is even higher.

The article meets every requirement listed for general notability, it has significant coverage by multiple independent, reliable sources. As per notability is not temporary, third party sources that cover the article's relevance over a longer period of time are needed to establish relevance, the article lists sources that almost span the entire last decade, showing his relevance when the game was released, how his grown relevance impacted the the design of Rogue, and the most recent sources show how he continues to impact the franchise to this date. You can't tell me he his not relevant enough if you have sources spanning nine years that tell you otherwise, especially the later articles about him/the game, that almost exclusively concern themselves with him when talking about story/characters. Furthermore, according to WP:NBIO, which I would say also applies here, being nominated for a major award establishes notability on its own. If that does not convince you, I suggest we seek a third opinion or nominate the article for deletion. Until we have sorted that out, I think the article should remain in it's edited form until a consensus is reached.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 15:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly don't think it should be deleted, just redirected. But yes, a WP:3O would probably serve us well here. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 15:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I am going to do a closer analysis of the sources and post on the article talk page. So we will wait to do the 3O until I have done that. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 16:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Etzedek24 To make things easier for you, you can completely ignore the references in the biography section. It is only sourced because the media he appears in have intersecting timelines.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Etzedek24, just because no one has bothered to write an article on Wikipedia about the character in the 8 years since their first appearance, does not in any way indicate that there is consensus for a standalone article not to exist. Contrary to your claim about a supposed consensus, there is no AfD record or prior discussions about the subject manner's notability that we know of, so there is simply no positive or negative consensus at this point in time. In my opinion, the current extent of the sourcing on the article seems to meet the WP:GNG threshold.

Good work on the article so far DasallmächtigeJ. There is definitely room for improvement, but then again there's certainly no deadline and we can work incrementally. A Google Scholar search turned up some potentially useful academic or scholarly sources too. Haleth (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haleth Thanks a lot! I’ll look into the sources as soon as I can. The article surely needs some restructuring, but I think if we find some more sources and do some clean-up it could be brought up to GA status.DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you intend to bring this article up to GA status, there are a couple of sources which need to be removed, like Lakebit (dubiously reliable) and Gamerant (vetted as unreliable by WP:VG/S). I did entertain the idea of an article for Haytham when I was on a writing spree creating standalone articles for Assassin's Creed characters a while ago. My overall impression is that while the topic satisfies WP:GNG, I think the extent of available reliable sourcing lacks the length and breadth for the article to attain GA status, but you might be able to find more, particularly on Google Scholar. Haleth (talk) 07:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Slaughtering Grounds GAN

Hi DasallmächtigeJ. You can probably imagine that I am disappointed that the GAN for The Slaughtering Grounds was quick-failed. Although I will note that notability is not actually a GAN criterium, I also have to agree that moving the content to Digital Homicide Studios might be the best option. Consequently, I have requested the game's article be moved to the company's name. Once the conversion is done (which should not be too far in the future), will you be available to re-review/continue reviewing the article? IceWelder [✉] 22:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely will, just ping me when you have finished preparing the article. While I imagine that Slaughtering Grounds will still ne a focal point, I would imagine that there are also other controversies/interesting aspects about the company that could be included with the new broader focus the switch to Digital Homicide will allow. I‘m looking forward to the new article! DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ping, ping! I had The Slaughtering Grounds moved to Digital Homicide Studios and reworked the elements pertaining only to the game. I have re-opened the GAN under the new name and I hope to see you there. Furthermore, most points from your wishlist were already checked off, with one exception: a list of games released. As the article notes, there were 21 games on Steam and about sixty total (incl. on other sites) by the time they were banned from the platform. A list of the Steam games is here. However, there does not seem to be any reliable source that even mentions the games besides The Slaughtering Grounds, let alone those never seen on Steam. IceWelder [✉] 08:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5

The article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5

The article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2

The article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2

The article Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 GAN Backlog drive

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for completing 6 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk Work 13:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haytham Kenway

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Haytham Kenway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haytham Kenway

The article Haytham Kenway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Haytham Kenway for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haytham Kenway

The article Haytham Kenway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Haytham Kenway for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alonzo Clemons

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alonzo Clemons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alonzo Clemons

The article Alonzo Clemons you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alonzo Clemons for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alonzo Clemons

The article Alonzo Clemons you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alonzo Clemons for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AlfonzoClemons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlfonzoClemons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LikwitRhymes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LikwitRhymes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Mcmahon

Mcmahon leaving wwe doesn't meet wp:rumor. Several independent third party sources reported his departure. No need to include an official statement from wwe, a company that has interest and hides information. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there were third party reports but there were also others stating he was never released at all several days later. Since WWE is a stock company and Shane not only a performer and producer but also a minority owner, they would have had to make an official statement concerning everything possibly affecting stock (like with other big releases) which is also a huge red flag for me… DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foresight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Expendables 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q&A.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm P.greenlink. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pokémon Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. P.greenlink (talk) 22:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tales of the Jedi (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order 66.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pay Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Lee

Dear DasallmächtigeJ, I would like to gently ask you to add one of the most important awards Bruce Lee received to/on his main page: "EMMA (Ethnic Multicultural Media Academy): Legend Award — London (2004)". Please, check the Honors section here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Lee I'm from 'List of Awards and Honors...' page. I'm not allowed to improve the main page. Thanks in advance. 83.223.167.159 (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Brock Anderson

You formatted your nomination for Brock Anderson incorrectly so that it didn't show up properly in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2023_August_14. I reformatted it using the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO

{{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~

Replace PageName with the name of the page, Category with a letter from the list M, O, B, S, W, G, T, F, and P to categorize the debate, and Why the page should be deleted with the reasons the page should be deleted.

Alternatively,

1. Enable Twinkle in the Gadgets tab of your preferences.
2. Go back to the article, and choose "XFD" from the new Twinkle ("TW") menu.
3. Fill in the form and submit it.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haytham Kenway and Ezio Auditore da Firenze

You might be interested. Both of these GA articles may need some help a bit. 2001:4455:304:CB00:4138:AFB3:AA6E:3789 (talk) 10:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sometimes fans tend to add too much lore and the articles need a little trimming, I’m on vacation right now, but I can look into it in a few weeks. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Ben Starr (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Way Out.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zak Zodiac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Knight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 07:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haytham Kenway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haytham Kenway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haytham Kenway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Doggerland. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Excessive reverting may result in the loss of editing privileges. Feline Hymnic (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You gotta be kidding me. I consistently pointed out why it relevant and why it falls under WP:NOTCITE, I gave several warnings (as per the guidelines) while the other user simply reverted out of spite and didn’t seek any consensus whatsoever, and obviously didn’t even bother researching what he reverting. And you didn’t bother lecturing him although he constantly reverts, why is that? He is clearly at fault here. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HaythamKenway.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HaythamKenway.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arto Saari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blackpool Combat Club, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AmritR012 (talk) 06:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? All sources about the new members alignment are already present in the article‘s history section and the member/timeline sections do not feature sources anyways. Maybe you want to look at the guidelines yourself? Acting like Pac is not an associate when he literally holds a title with them is ludicrous. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julius Fučík (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 19:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DasallmächtigeJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This block is a joke. I am a PhD researcher on the topic and got blocked for stating the obvious: that this section is A. not neutral/objective and that B. if the major source used is someone who uses neo-pronouns this need to be contextualized. I was threatened by multiple editors with no quantifiable knowledge on the subject, despite using neutral language and staying civil. This block is purely political and if Wikipedia starts blocking people over others political bias and hurt feelings, that is just poor. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While Talk pages on contentious topics can, on occasion, become heated, charging into a relatively mild discussion with things like "I don’t know if you went to college, but this is basic stuff and I don’t need you to guilt-trip me over someone’s pronouns." [1] is unlikely to do much but disrupt the situation. Because you have affirmed your opinion that the "block is a joke", I feel relatively certain that lifting it would only see continued disruption of the type just cited. At this time, WP does not offer differential behavioral guidelines based on educational attainment so your PhD is also not an applicable point of consideration for lifting the block. Chetsford (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, DasallmächtigeJ,

You are a longtime editor of this project and highly educated, can you tell me how other editors "threatened" you? I think if you want to edit here, you need to accept that any editor, even a PhD researcher, can have their edits challenged based on policy grounds. No one is immune from being critiqued. Liz ^Read! Talk! 07:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delon Wright

Hi. Sorry, I clicked the wrong thing, so your edits on Delon Wright were reverted without a suitable comment. Could you cite a source for what you added? The present source doesn't say this. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Am I Racist?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subterfuge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lia Thomas. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. To be honest, my finger was about to hit the 'block' button. This article is under WP:BLP, so you should be extra careful. And you have already been advised that gender-and-sexuality are contentious topics and therefore that you need an especially high behavior standard if you edit in those areas. Given the various warnings and block history you have, I urge you to re-examine your approach, as the community will likely run out of patience at some point soon. DMacks (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? I undid an unjustified revert ONCE. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 19:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, seriously. Please learn from, for example, previous WP:ANI discussion and its results. DMacks (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I have learned is that as soon as you are mildly criticizing bias towards woke culture (in a constructive manner) you are immediately harassed and punished. And at this point it’s leading me to question whether I want to invest my spare time in such an environment at all. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of topic-areas I avoid because I am not comfortable writing about them on Wikipedia or dealing with certain editors who do, for all sorts of reasons. We each choose how to spend our time, such as where we think it can have an impact and where it makes us feel good about what we're doing. DMacks (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]