Getting started
|
|
|
Finding your way around
|
|
|
Editing articles
|
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
|
How you can help
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Smosh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Smosh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your new article requires reliable sources to fly; the ones you've added all fail WP:RS. Until you've established that article with the relevant sources to avoid deletion, please leave the technical death metal and death metal articles alone until you've discussed the changes on the talk pages (as it has been discussed previously). Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, progarchieves.com don't meet the criteria to be considered reliable. And about sources, i put some ones treating technical and progressive as same. ABC paulista (talk) 21:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! According to Template:Track listing, "Avoid redundancy, if all or most songs on a record were written by the same person(s), consider using the all_writing option and note fields for exceptions." Showing one song with a whole column devoted to writing credits is unnecessary and looks bad. I've undone several of your edits to Opeth pages where you have done this, in accordance with Template:Track listing. Additionally, per WP:&, avoid using the "&" (ampersand) symbol in articles; use the word "and" instead. Per WP:LASTNAME, once a proper name has been used in an article, you can just use the person's last name when using the first name again later in the article. Per WP:REPEATLINK, once something has been wikilinked, it doesn't need to be wikilinked again (such as linking Akerfeldt's name several times within a track listing).
Just thought I'd let you know. Thanks! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 06:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Curb Chain (talk) 08:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
