User talk:Dartelaar

Welcome!

Hello, Dartelaar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  frummer 01:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noahide Laws

Hi! Please can you expand and update the Noahide Laws article in the Dutch wiki!? Thanks. frummer 01:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am mainly working on the Dutch Wikipedia. What is your concern? Is the Dutch version not good enough? It is logical that the English version is much more extensive. Do you understand and/or write Dutch too?

How did you find me, on what grounds do you think I can edit this article? I guess because of my editing in the article Holocaust. But alas, I am not jewish. Sometimes I wish I were: life would be more challenging :). I went via your page to the kosher category and well, alphabetically it is not kosher. I would expect under the F. If you wanna know: I was, in that same order, a catholic, a born again Christian and since 1985 a `backslider´, a non-believer. Back in 1983 I witnessed the presence of two singers/guitar players on a gospel meeting in France during holidays, they were "born again Jews". I was amazed. I related this incident in Antwerp, back in Belgium (I myself am from G(h)ent, Belgium) before a assembly for growing understanding between Christians and Jews, and guess what?... I was kicked out literally, I was brought to the train station immediately. They had misinterpreted me totally, thought I was trying to convert them... I was not, honestly! They learned me the notion "Jews for Jesus". I guess most of them got a fit of paranoia, you suggest having also some paranoia on your user page. Do not bother. The nice thing about Jewish culture is that they name what they experience/feel. A lot of goj people don't give much bio-info on their page either, but they don't call themselves paranoiac. So be informed, I cannot write nor read Hebrew. And so you see, less than 2 years later, I left every religious environment. Extremely disgusted by the quarrels man can have there. It doesn't seem to stop, on the contrary. So, tonight and tomorrow I don't celebrate Christmas. It is pretty lonely business here at my home. But intellectually, yes, I am still interested in religious topics here at Wikipedia. I still have the tendency to perfectionism, haha. Dartelaar 16:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lolZ!!!! They nearly chucked you out in anwerpen?!?! you can call that your claim to fame! yes, we are VERY paranoid about being missionedised, and very happy to remain so!! even if it means chucking out Innocent gojim in the process! I don't speak dutch, but my mother is from Antwerp, i think antwerpener Jews are over paranoid since they grew up in a post holocaust orthodox environment. many Christians fail to understand orthodox Jews, and perhaps Jew in the general have a deep loathing for Christianity, my grandmother who was in Ravensbrück told me that on this day the nazi guards used to go to watch the church drama of the last supper and when they came back they had tears in their eyes and they where double as cruel. her concentration camp wasn't the worst, over a fifth survived, but the rape was the worst. in the christian mind, there is no understanding of the nature of our loathing for their belief beyond the intellectual problem, and thus it is dealt with wrongly. "suffering for the sins of your fathers" is not a concept in Christianity anyways so they don't see our persecution in the past taints their creed for us. anyways, I hope you haven't got any scars from your experiences. i would love for the dutch article to be comprehensive. I haven't finished rewriting up the English one up yet though. frummer 02:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Bonham-Carter

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Bonham-Carter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of David Bonham-Carter. J Milburn (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

Hi, if you go to [1] you will see that an article did exist but was deleted. Unfortunately on the English-language Wikipedia, we aren't allowed to see which, if any, of our contributions have been deleted. DuncanHill (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to your post on Village Pump. I'm an admin on en-wiki. Let me know if you'd like a copy of the article that you can no longer see, I'll add it to your userspace. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mondegreen

Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia. I undid your edit on Mondegreen. The reference to a google hit is not a reliable source. You may wish to read WP:RS to find out more about what types of material are considered reliable sources for Wikipedia purposes. Please feel free to continue to contribute with those guidelines in mind. :-) TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitrous oxide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rocketry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that but it is not yet reverted and it shouldn't, I think. The previous version was also unclear: it used the word "rocketry" and detoured the existing disambiguation. I now un-wikilinked "rocketry". --Dartelaar [write me!] 14:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dartelaar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dartelaar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dartelaar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]