This is an archive of past discussions with User:Darrenhusted. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
No, I am not going to bother. I am a Canadian, and because of Wikipedia's pro-American stance, I will not be successful, so why waste my time? Nice to see you like to stay consistent though. Killswitch Engage (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Our goal is to get the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 625. It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
TNA has posted a notice on their official website detailing a release of wrestler Kaz. This has been reported to be kayfabe by numerous other sites, but be prepared to revert edits to Kaz's article regarding this as well as List of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling alumni
Hi there. I agree with Luna that John has been far too confrontational with you, so I thought I would take the time to explain how minor edits are usually used on Wikipedia. The problem is that many of the edits you mark as "minor" are not considered minor, so the "minor" flag on your edit summaries is misleading. From Help:Minor edit, edits should be marked as minor if they are:
Spelling corrections
Simple formatting (e.g., capitalisation, punctuation, or properly adding italics to non-English words, like folie de grandeur)
Formatting that doesn't change the meaning of the page (e.g. adding horizontal lines, splitting one paragraph into two—where this is not contentious)
Obvious factual errors (e.g., changing "Nixon resigned in 1874" to "Nixon resigned in 1974")
Fixing layout errors
Adding and correcting wiki links
Removing vandalism and graffiti
In other words, changes to content--for example, adding or removing sentences--are not minor edits unless they are corrections to "obvious factual errors." It would be very helpful if you would mark substantive changes to the content of articles, even if it's just a different number or a single sentence, as "major" edits. Thanks! -- SCZenz (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah, thanks SCZenz and Gwen, both. To Darren, if you're wondering why people worry about this, it's my understanding that some people (and even some automated tools) will ignore "minor" edits in recent changes, watchlists, or page history, and some of these people don't like the idea of missing some of the edits you're making. Hopefully this makes sense. – Luna Santin (talk)17:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
you think they're minor and that's ok, but they're not
Hi! Having looked at your contribution history, most of the edits you mark as minor are not minor. WP:Minor edit says A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content... yet you are marking whole additions and deletions of text as minor. I do understand that your take on what's minor is not the same as WP:Minor edit, however we edit by consensus here and consensus will be that you're marking major edits as minor, which is misleading to most editors. So, even if you don't agree, please stop marking most/all of your edits as minor when, going by the consensus understanding at en.Wikipedia, most of your edits are not minor. Thanks so much for putting up with what you may think are our wonky comments. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This FAC, which you commented on, has been restarted.
Okay, I'll try but I'm not sure if I'll be only later tonight since I have to get up early tomorrow, but if I see him do it again I'll try to remember to report him. Before I go, I see your an atheist. If you don't mind me asking, why did you make that choice?--WillC19:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, and I understand, though I hope one day you change your mind. Also please don't use the words brainwashing or brainwashed. Christians don't brainwash. Have you ever seen a christian try to trick you or force you to believe, no. They just explain it to you and it is your decision to chose. So the normal insults of brainwashing and cult isn't a accurate depiction of the Christian belief. Though I would like to try and change your mind since I've discussed this topic many times and I'm only 17. I've had atheists cuss me out and give no good counter argument. But that is your decision, the reason I want to try is just incase I'm right, when you die and if God is real I don't want you to suffer.--WillC19:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Alright, well I won't even try to change your mind, I can see in your writing that your determined and your like most atheists, a little stubbourn (no offense, I just get the vibe). You better hope your right, since all you have to do is think like this, if I believe in God and he is real, when I die I go to heaven (sounds a little retarded but I don't care). If I believe in God and he isn't real, then nothings happens and I never know I was wrong. If I'm don't believe in God, and find out he is real, then I go to hell when I die. If I don't believe in God and find out he isn't real then nothing happens. The best choice is to believe, because what would be smarter?--WillC17:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
You want to know my story. I was born in 1991, my mother brung me to church all the time. Around the age of 12 I quit going so much. I got tired of it. I'm home schooled, my books are in Christian Perspective. They talk about all the religions of the world, and not in the way you would expect. They don't say there is no truth to them. They explain them like any high school would. I became interested in many different religions and began to read about them, discuss them, and even start to write a book about them when I was 14, which I never finished because I found out I didn't know enough about the subject yet to fill a hard back book. I talk to very intelligent atheists on Youtube, you may want to watch a few videos on that section of youtube, mainly The Amazing Atheist. Anyone else is pretty much an asshole (I'm not a very strict christian). Plus a few Christians on there, mainly VenomfangX, who I use to like until I saw he was a little pathetic. I'm rusty on this subject though since the last time I talked about it was around a few months ago. It has bored me. I chose my own path, not by my mother making me too, but because I see that God, well Creationism is reliable in my mind. I believe Creationism has more truth, since something you've probably heard before, I can see the universe and this planet all around me and I just can't see how there can't be a designer.--WillC08:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I couldn't remember the name of it, and then when I founded I didn't know if that was just for users or IPs. I posted there anyway. Hopefully I'll hear something soon. Thanks again. Hazardous Matt15:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
The guidelines for writing pay-per-view articles has been updated, see here. The new guidelines should be followed in order for an article to be nominated for Good article or Featured article status.
The project has had a cleanup listing generated here. It details all the article within the project that are tagged as having problems. Please help to fix the problems outlined.
Our goal is to get the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 625. It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Being 18 has nothing to do with anything, I have no idea what you think spam is but your age and ties to Shamwow are of no concern. I suggest you look up spam. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
The Future class rating has been incorporated into the project's assessment. It's intended use is for pay-per-views articles or video games that have not occurred or have been released, respectively.
We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 596. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
It was announced on the August 25 television episode of Raw that John Cena had suffered a herniated disc in his neck. Cena received successful surgery the following day, and will be inactive for 2-4 months.
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain this edit? I'm not saying the edit was wrong. But you removed text without explaining your reasons in an edit summary or on the talk page; frequently that will get you reverted automatically. --Trovatore (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
