User talk:DarkfireII2

Welcome to my talk page

Please be respectful

Hello, DarkfireII2. You have new messages at User:Banaticus/archive2011a.
Message added 04:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I archived my talk page as it was nearing 90kb and was taking a bit too long to load. The course you were just on was moved -- let me know on my talk page when you've taken a look at it. :) Banaticus (talk) 04:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ya umm,i have one suggestion,move all that to the discussion,then put somthing on the page

• What privileges do acccountcreators have and why?
• What are administrators able to do? (I added more information to the course page -- also, see what a bureaucrat can do)
• How do you request adminship? (very close page, though)
• What technical abilities do stewards have? (they can do a lot more) ;)
• What type of a user must you be to be granted oversight? (missed one)

Did you want some more help with these? :) Banaticus (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page User:Jimbo Wales worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why did you put a semi-protection notice on my talk page?--BabbaQ (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry......i hate my little brother,he keeps messin with my account,i forget to log in and he does something to my account.Sorry bout that

Ok. Thats fine!--BabbaQ (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's not fine. You are responsible for the use of your account. If you cannot prevent unauthorized use of your account, it may become necessary to block the account to prevent further misuse. —C.Fred (talk) 18:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you C.Fred. After actually looking trough the users edits I find it almost certain that the user is not here to produce good material.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry guys,but about my little bro messin with my account isw true,ive been trying to update some actors pictures,which,wikipedia wasn't responding to them,even after I uploaded them,Is this a new type of glitch?oh well.

What's with the unusual edits?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Selena Gomez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your edits show a pattern of odd changes: templates that don't apply, images that don't exist, items in people's user pages. It raises the question of whether the edits are honest errors or whether they're an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for three reasons. 1) Vandalism. 2)block evasion 3) You claim your account was compromised. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 19:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HElp

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I think I'm getting banned for somthing I didn't do...

You have explained this in the unblock templates below. Please wait for your unblock requests to be reviewed -- a helpme doesn't speed that up. Cheers – GorillaWarfare ^talk • contribs 16:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DarkfireII2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I really want my account back DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DarkfireII2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

what happened to freedom of speech,oh and btw,wikipedia didn't upload my files.......before the ban. DarkfireII2 (talk) 13:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no free speech on Wikipedia. Even if there was, vandalism is not free speech. Regardless, compromised accounts are never unblocked, and we don't care if your little brother did it. --jpgordon^::==( o ) 15:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DarkfireII2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I never was beigng evasive,this account is the only one i have,yes i will make sure my bro doesn't get on my account,it will never happen again....Happy? DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If your brother got a hold of the account that's it. Over. Fat lady sang. Goodbye. We do not unblock admittedly compromised accounts. Start a new one if you want to edit productively. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --jpgordon^::==( o ) 16:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DarkfireII2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not vandilize again. DarkfireII2 (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your repeated requests to be unblocked are anything but convincing, and are becoming a nuisance. You have been advised on how to proceed from here -- continued requests such as these will only result in revocation of talk page editing privileges. – GorillaWarfare ^talk • contribs 16:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access has been revoked. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]