This is an archive of past discussions with User:DareshMohan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NFILM. The sources are mostly from viggy.com, which is unreliable. Please remove them and find sources like film reviews, screening at a notable film festival/event, awards, e t c.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Y2K (2004 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meendum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Damn it Daresh, why do you still trust the AfC process so much? They won't accept any article until its C or B class worthy. [[User:|Kailash29792]] (talk)07:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
In this instance if I were to review the article, I'd decline it as well. If the article is created in the mainspace directly, I'd probably wait a few days and if there're no more improvements, I'd move it to draftspace. I don't see how this article survives the WP:NFILM notability criteria — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 09:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Well you're right. Initially, I decided not to waste time on this film, but now I was bored so made it as a draft and put through AfC even though it wasn't notable as I was still hopeful maybe there are more sources somewhere (didn't expect AfC process to be this fast -- it was slow in the past). When I have enough sources, obviously I make it as an article. I understand that AfC for poorly sourced films is a waste of time but some editors have preconceived notions such as that viggy.com is unreliable at Draft:Y2K (2004 film) while some editors at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavru (2003 film) claim viggy to be okay. @Kailash29792:DareshMohan (talk) 16:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
@DareshMohanO (2022 film) release date? The reviews for the film were released on 12 November 2022, but the film was listed in December 2022 in the List of Kannada films of 2022. 🤔 Manick22 (talk) 18:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Woman Who Climbs Trees, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vikas Vasishta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
If you notice many such Kannada film don't get many reviews. Some in the past even get a single review by The Times of India by Sunayana Suresh. But, note that 2 reviews is not a necessary criteria when there are enough production sources. @Manick22: Non-Indian users are against The Times of India sources for their bias (or maybe லஞ்சம்) and even notable film The Family Star remained as a draft despite release due to this [11]. DareshMohan (talk) 18:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Should it have a separate article? Per this, it's a remake (albeit partially reshot) and it appears Kalaippuli S. Thanu wasn't involved in the Telugu version. Kailash29792(talk)04:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
I don't support them having an article. No matter how many sources mention Archana only Kalpathi S. Aghoram, Kalpathi S. Ganesh and Kalpathi S. Suresh are credited as the producers. The source you linked only mentions Archana. DareshMohan (talk) 08:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
May i know about you
Hi Daresh,
i am prasad from Hyderabad, you are recently edited Dhanunjay seepana page, you know the dhanunjay seepana. why you remved more content here. Narasingprasad (talk) 06:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
First things first, Wikipedia pages have to have a neutral tone and is not a resume. The main reason for the removal is that your version had a bunch of fake songs that the said person did not officially sing so they had to be removed [12]. "Arima Arima" is sung by Hariharan then why did you add it? Same goes for other fake songs. DareshMohan (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
yes i added by mistakes songs list i plan to meet him and asking songs list today. so in this time you removed all things sorry, he is big singer in tollywood. please support me. Narasingprasad (talk) 06:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
The sad part is that is Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You have to put a message on your user page of any people you meet in person and have talked to in real life. Not sure why you want to meet him when the songs list is available through a simple Google search [13]. I didn't add the songs of films without Wikipedia pages but you can add them. DareshMohan (talk) 06:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Vijay Sathya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Mr. Painter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D. Sathyaprakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, DareshMohan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
VV Prasanna
Theres a singer called VV Prasanna who sang many songs especially kooda mela kooda vechu surprisingly except for his youtube interviews there isnt much about his life as articles. The articles about him is pretty less mostly covering only his albums and independent songs. Srivin (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@DareshMohan:, The Tamil version of David (2013 film) had a very good publicity and respect than the Hindi version, the Tamil David is available in the Netflix (the Hindi version of the film is not available anywhere, even not in Dvd), the Tamil song vazhkaiye is very popular than it's Hindi version, please consider about restoring the Tamil David's article in this Wikipedia, I want your elaborate explanation regarding this. Hamwal (talk) 08:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
@Hamwal: It's not that I don't believe you. It's just that it was unsourced and the fact that it was a dubbed/reshot film makes it less important. It's not in the Zamin Ryot review either. I tried adding the Telugu names to Kuruthipunal (film) but had to put it in comments since it was unsourced. I look up to Kailash for following Wikipedia rules in regards to reliable sourcing. DareshMohan (talk) 06:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Aadi Thallupadi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kokkoroko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antharangam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
This is one of many reasons why I'm starting to hate life. Humans hurting others for fun with nothing to gain, what did IA do to deserve this? I just hope all archives aren't lost forever. Kailash29792(talk)09:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
@DareshMohan:, Please watch the Tamil version of David in Netflix and I have found the Hindi version of the film in dailymotion, if you do not have Netflix subscription then please watch the Tamil version of the film in the dailymotion (besides the Hindi version the dailymotion has the Tamil version of the film); after watching you shall be able to understand that the two films have major differences, not only Jiiva replaces Vinay Virmani, some other actors are also different, Vikram's voice and Nassar's voice in the Tamil version is real (definitely real, trust me), in the Hindi version Nassar's voice is not real, his voice was dubbed by other man.
@Hamwal: Dubbing for yourself doesn't mean they reshot. I know that all of Jiiva's segments and other actors that were in his segment were reshot. I just wanted to highlight the fact that they dubbed Vikram's version. Only other difference in cast is Sunder Ramu and a few unknown actors, rest are same. DareshMohan (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
C. Prem Kumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Poornachandra Mysore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neenyare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi DareshMohan, I've removed your copy-edit requests for Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal from the GOCE Requests pagehere (diff). I've done this because we only allow two requests per editor at any one time, and you already have two c/e requests pending (one is currently on hold). Please don't add any more c/e requests until at least one of your existing two has been processed. We enforce this rule so all requests have a fair chance of being copy-edited within a reasonable time. If you'd like any of these two articles to be copy-edited before Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra, you can replace these in situ with the new requests. Thanks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, Baffle☿gab02:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
My bad. I already removed the unsourced statements from the short articles Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra so they are in better state than the long articles Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kolaiyadithaal. So if you dont mind can you replace my 1st 2 requests with my most recent requests. @Baffle gab1978:DareshMohan (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks your reply, and for removing the uncited material from those articles. Yes, I'll replace your two earlier requests with these latest two at their current positions, so you won't need to do anything else. Cheers, Baffle☿gab20:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
I have merged both Tamil and Hindi articles back to one form. Hamwal very crudely attempted to separate the two, resulting in the Tamil article resembling an older, half baked version. Let the RM stay, that will be consensus whether the two films should have separate articles or not. If the consensus is to split, let me and you do the bifurcation, not Hamwal. Kailash29792(talk)09:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murivu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Sorry. Please add multiple critical reviews from reliable sources and resubmit and let me know. This will be significant enough to pass notability. RangersRus (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ayesha Khan (Indian actress) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Ok sure. There was some "gossip" sources that she appeared in a film although there was no confirmation of ehat her role was. 18:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mims Mentor was:
Based on the current references, the article does have some sources that provide significant coverage of the film, which is crucial for establishing notability. I would suggest expanding the article with more independent, reliable, and significant coverage to ensure it meets the GNG standards for a stand-alone article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Billa Ranga (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, DareshMohan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MimsMENTORtalk18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
Does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM at this point in time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
@Hey man im josh hello, and hello again, DareshMohan.... I was just passing on DareshMohan's TP to leave a Barnstar and I see this. The subject will very likely never meet WP:NALBUM and for a perfectly good reason.....because it's a film. Consider having a second look, please. On a more general note, the fact that so many articles are declined by various reviewers with boilerplate messages is terribly ....how can I put it mildly? ...sad and demoralising! Generic reasons, not even the slightest effort to be specific, seem to be the rule. It gives the impression that some reviewers barely have a look at the page. Maybe you did and maybe they do but that's not the feeling I get when I read their short and dismissive comments, to be perfectly honest with you.Thank you. Mushy Yank (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
@Mushy Yank: Perhaps consider how you approach people who make mistakes because I believe your comment to be far more demoralizing than a genuine mistake on my part, which I believe was based on having a number of tabs open at once and responding to the wrong one. Do you REALLY think this is the best way to approach someone about an issue? Things happen, but your attitude is what leads to a giant backlog instead of people making genuine efforts to help others. But, given your bad attitude, I suspect this will fall on deaf ears. @DareshMohan, I apologize about the mistake. I genuinely hope I have not deterred you, because I do appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
PS, I will not be reviewing the article, I believe it's been implied I'm not competent enough to do so, so perhaps I'll take a break from reviewing drafts and helping with the backlog all together. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
@Hey man im josh A bit surprised by your message. Did I imply you were incompetent? I certainly did not mean to. And was I rude and insulting in any way? If you perceived that in my message, that was not my intent and I'm sorry. I explained the comment you had left could give the impression that you had read the page too fast (I understand that was not the case, and you probably meant FILM not ALBUM? Sure, as I said, it may be the case, and if you say so, then it is, but that's not the effect the comment has (or might have), don't you agree?) and then, and for the main part of my message, I expanded to a more general issue: the lack of specific reasons present in many comments declining subsmissions (plural, absolutely nothing personal, I don't even know you) and the impression it can give. Do you disagree with my comment? Shouldn't comments declining an article be more specific? (My "attitude"? What attitude?) Mushy Yank (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
@Mushy Yank: I do not review film articles, that is not my area of familiarity, and I only review the areas that I am comfortable with. It is clear as day that this is an article about a film, which is why I'm fairly confident it was an incorrect tab. You are welcome to join the AfC project to be the change you want to see or suggest changes there. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your work and your consistent efforts to improve things.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
Please find reliable sources with significant coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muthukumar Wanted, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Alright. It's a tragedy then that many journalists from other reliable sources like Thinkal Menon (Times of India) shifted to this. RangersRus, your perspective? Or should we reopen this discussion? Kailash29792(talk)08:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Is Aahuthi a remake of Rajavinte Makan (1986)? I did not come across that information in any Telugu articles on the film. The source cited on the latter page for remakes also does not mention Aahuthi. L5boat (talk) 06:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pokelego999 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Decline per past reviewers.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Y2K (2004 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Image (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
What's the criteria for creating a page on a shelved project? Is it only about substantial coverage or anything else is also needed? I notice that some unfinished ones like Marudanayagam have articles. L5boat (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Does Pawan Kalyan's Satyagrahi count? It had a high-profile launch and received significant media coverage, though the project was active for only a short period. L5boat (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
It did not complete a great deal of filming AFAIK. But they signed all big technicians. Then probably it won’t pass notability guidelines. L5boat (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huck Milner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moon Nila, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
@DareshMohan
I hope you are doing well, and I have created few articles and they aren't listed in Google or any Search engines! infact they are not visible on any web platforms! could you please help me with the possible reason behind this mechanism and to avoid/overcome this Thesazh (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
@Kailash29792 Thanks for the reply, but, a few pages of mine were listed in a short period of time, but a few are still not listed yet! I was wondering, did I make any mistake/code error while publishing the article! Anyway, I'll wait though, thanks once again! 🙂 Thesazh (talk) 12:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
@Thesazh: Google sometimes doesn't create infoboxes when the article is created after the film releases and only lists the wiki page in the search results. [15]@Manick22: Samuthirakani-ku intha half-dubbed half-reshot padam panni பொழப்பா போச்சு. First, Vaathi (mostly Tamil), Vimanam (one reshot dialogue), tp Ramam Raghavam (half and half) [16]. நீ தெலுங்குல பேசு நான் தமிழா பேசுறேன். DareshMohan (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Title song of ETV serial Anveshitha and the song "Incharave" from Kannada film Neelambari sound slightly similar i felt. Do u think both the songs sound somewhat similar ?. Srivin (talk) 16:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I am not in any position to confirm but looks different because they have different wiki pages. @Kailash29792: did you take paatu class, how can the recreation of one song be in a different raga? DareshMohan (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The film was noticed during release but ended up as a flop. The hero is now enjoying good star value.
Soorya Kireedam is a different film and there is no Soorya Universe mentioned anywhere, someone just made it up, I guess. Anish Viswa 04:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I saw your message yesterday and then got caught up in some other things and completely slipped my mind. Glad you were able to resolve it though! I think your approach was appropriate, using redirects. Ravensfire (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi DareshMohan, I've now finished my c/e; I decided not to remove the uncited material here because it is not negative or potentially libellous, and could probably be cited fairly easily, given the subject's apparent popularity. I have marked the section with a BLP-refimprove tag. Cheers, Baffle☿gab02:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
RRR
Can you remove "internationally as Rise Roar Revolt" part from the lead section of RRR. The extended title is only for the Hindi version, there is no evidence that it was released under the previously mentioned title. It was released and nominated as "RRR" in every award ceremony and screenings. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
The Hindi dubbed version was famous on Netflix and watched by international audience. [25] Although the title may be unofficial, it is used in a ton of sources. Also the makers used those three words in a deleted tweet [26]. DareshMohan (talk) 10:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
![[18]](https://fs2.extraimage.org/files/2024/12/02/20241202_021854.jpg){kind=link}