en User talk:Cutekitten05

Hi everyone. I'm kinda new to this but I hope to contribute to the articles here. Please dont hesitate to tell me if I've done anything wrong and I appreciate all comments. Thanks! Cutekitten05 (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geraldine Fahey

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geraldine Fahey, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rte.ie/tv/faircity/geraldine.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of residences in Weatherfield

I have nominated List of residences in Weatherfield, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of residences in Weatherfield. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 11:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Magioladitis (talk) 11:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tracy Kavanagh

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tracy Kavanagh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No notability outside the show, no real world information (not even actor's name!) , no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 00:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachel Brennan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rachel Brennan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No notability outside the show, no real world information (not even actor's name!) , no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orla Kirwan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Orla Kirwan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No notability outside the show, no real world information (not even actor's name!) , no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rachel Brennan

I have nominated Rachel Brennan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Brennan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 16:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD nominations of Fair City character articles

Hello. I have nominated a batch of Fair City characters' articles for deletion at Articles for deletion, some of which are articles that you started. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali O'Shea, which is where they are all listed, and you are welcome to also edit any articles that you desire to, in order to address the concerns noted at the articles for deletion discussion. Thanks, Raven1977 (talk) 07:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cutekitten05. You have new messages at Raven1977's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletion of Template:EEMedeemeys

Deletion discussions for templates belong at WP:TFD, not WP:AFD. I've taken the liberty of removing your nomination from the Articles for Deletion log, and creating a Templates for Deletion discussion, which you can find at WP:TFD#Template:EEMedeemeys. Deor (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Would you please add the template {{db-author}} at the top of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EastEnders Medeemys template so that an admin will delete the no-longer-relevant AfD discussion page. Deor (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Medeemey Family

The Medeemey family is almost indentical but I think it is vital to remember that even though the Medeemeys and the Beales have almost the same family members but Albert Beale is a spouse of Lou Beale and Flo Medeemey and Nellie Ellis aren't Beales but Medeemeys. That is the sole reason why I created 'EEMedeemeys'. For example, The Clarke family of Eastenders have: Bobby Beale, Ian Beale, Jane Beale. Half of the Clarkes are Beales. But you wouldn't delete the Clarke family because they have members who aren't Beales.

Articles for deletion nomination of Rory Goff

I have nominated Rory Goff, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Goff. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FCFahey

Template:FCFahey has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FCHalpin

Template:FCHalpin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 12:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Geraldine Fahey

I have nominated Geraldine Fahey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geraldine Fahey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 01:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Orla Kirwan

I have nominated Orla Kirwan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orla Kirwan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FCPhelan

Template:FCPhelan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christy Phelan

I have nominated Christy Phelan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christy Phelan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 21:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Gleeson for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mike Gleeson, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gleeson until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Magioladitis (talk) 08:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damien Halpin

The article Damien Halpin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to prove notability, not even existence. Page contains no real world information but only some piece of a plot.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ray O'Connell

The article Ray O'Connell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to prove notability, not even existence. Only external link is broken. Page contains no real world information but only some piece of a plot.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jo Fahey

The article Jo Fahey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to prove notability, not even existence. Page contains no real world information but only some piece of a plot.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jo Fahey for deletion

The article Jo Fahey is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Fahey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Magioladitis (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Storylines of Fair City

The article Storylines of Fair City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tracy Kavanagh

The article Tracy Kavanagh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unrefererced page with no notability. It consists only from unverified plot. We have a list of character which serves the purpose.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 23:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tracy Kavanagh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Kavanagh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Kavanagh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Magioladitis (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]