Hello CrazyLoverFutbolLoko! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello GREG, I just recreated an account and saw you are engaged in South African football articles, I think you can help me. I started editing to improve some articles from South Africa and I posted two websites that are famous for their relevance in terms of ranking. The Football Database and the Football Ranking. However, I received a notification on my talk page that the Football Ranking one caused an automatic reversion by a bot. So, I need source help, how can I add reliable sources if bot exclude automatically all my improvements and if I leave without source will be a problem too, no? Thank you very much. CrazyLoverFutbolLoko (talk) 18:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello CrazyLoverFutbolLoko. I also had that specific problem the first time I added sources to articles. You can try reading through Reliable Sources, It can give you a pretty good idea behind good sources you can use for wikipedia articles.
Before adding a source, Read through it and confirm whether the infomation is correct and whether its from a reliable website and not from social media. Try not to write the exact words used in the source when improving an article and try not to use biased language.
The problem is that the information I added was correct. The one from FootballDataBase that they kept was correct, but also the one they deleted, from Football Ranking, as you can see here. So, this make things hard to understand.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
I joined this faction precisely to fight people like you, dictatorships, who cannot listen to other people's opinions! Quite the contrary, they comment, talk and can't hear what the other person has to say! You TRY to silence me, an user who wants the best for Wikipedia and its constant evolution, that's why I joined that task force!
"I was targeted by this user! More than that, a team that aims to make Wikipedia bigger, better and more accurate every day (of which I am member), was also the target of his attacks! He blatantly lied by claiming that we are vandalizing pages, which is not true! Quite the contrary, today our made the 1st Act, creating a new article and edited the other related ones to make them in accordance, using primary and many secondary sources as reference for it! Also, everybody can see our historic of contribution before that, always to improve Wikipedia! I don't know if he got scared with the name of the team, that use words like "revolutionize", but that is just to create an impact to make our group grow and achieve our goal, which is to make Wikipedia bigger, better and more accurate every day! Thank you very much!"CrazyLoverFutbolLoko (talk) 01:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When you come back to Wikipedia after your block is over (if you come back), I just thought I'd leave a comment to ease your return. You only edited for 3 days and you received a month-long block. So, you have to do things differently since your initial editing here was not successful. You really need to learn more about Wikipedia policies and guidelines before you start making accusations against other editors. Consider that editors who have been editing Wikipedia for 5, 10, 15 or 20 years probably have a better understanding of editing on this project than you do. Respect the advice they are offering to you and don't see disagreement as a battleground where you are trying to "win". You might have formed a new group to improve Wikipedia, which is a laudable goal, but first you have to understand our policies and practices before jumping into the deep end of the swimming pool.
A great place to bring your questions is the Teahouse, a forum for new editors to get advice and support from more experienced editors. If you, and all of your "team" is inexperienced, you really could use a mentor or more experienced editors when you run into obstacles. I hope when you return, you adopt a more collaborative attitude towards your fellow editors. We are all supposed to be on the same side, working to improve articles on this project. LizRead!Talk!04:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hello! CrazyLoverFutbolLoko,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! LizRead!Talk!04:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
September 2024
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
