Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Biligiriranga Hills, you may be blocked from editing. Just starting a discussion does not conclude on the consensus. You have repeatedly unilaterally moved the page. Take it to WP:RM. — LeoFrank Talk 06:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, Crashed greek. If someone objects to a bold move you've made, then you should start an RM instead of moving again. – Uanfala (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Biligiriranga Hills. — LeoFrank Talk 16:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, Crashed greek,
- You have moved Biligiriranga Hills to three different new titles which has caused disruption for all of the redirects which are changed and then must be changed back. Any time you move a page and that move is contested, you must start a discussion on the article talk page to propose a new move. Please do this in the future. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Mallandur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 02:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Crashed greek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Koo App, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I do understand that you put in sincere work on the famine template, but it is not needed. It needlessly clutters a topic that is complex and nuanced, one for which there is already a Timeline of major famines in India during British rule, to which I have now redirected your template. The Deccan famine was a stub, as was the Bihar drought of 1966-67, which was moreover mislabeled. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 12:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Backdoor delete is not ok. You can use AFD instead. Crashed greek (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
