|
User talk:Cplakidas/Archive 24
DYK for Isaac Komnenos (son of John II) On 1 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isaac Komnenos (son of John II), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that though Isaac Komnenos was his oldest surviving son, John II Komnenos chose Isaac's younger brother Manuel to succeed him as Byzantine emperor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isaac Komnenos (son of John II). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Isaac Komnenos (son of John II)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC) EOI, Second EditionHey Cplakidas, could you send me this entry when you have time?[1] - LouisAragon (talk) 17:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #031, 01 May 2019Back to the drawing boardImplementation of the new portal design has been culled back almost completely, and the cull is still ongoing. The cull has also affected portals that existed before the development of the automated design. Some of the reasons for the purge are:
Most of the deletions have been made without prejudice to recreation of curated portals, so that approval does not need to be sought at Deletion Review in those cases. In addition to new portals being deleted, most of the portals that were converted to an automated design have been reverted. Which puts us back to portals with manually selected content, that need to be maintained by hand, for the most part, for the time being, and back facing some of the same problems we had when we were at this crossroads before:
These and other concepts require further discussion. See you at WT:POG. However, after the purge/reversion is completed, some of the single-page portals might be left, due to having acceptable characteristics (their design varied some). If so, then those could possibly be used as a model to convert and/or build more, after the discussions on portal creation and design guidelines have reached a community consensus on what is and is not acceptable for a portal. See you at WT:POG. CurationA major theme in the deletion discussions was the need for portals to be curated, that is, each one having a dedicated maintainer. There are currently around 100 curated portals. Based on the predominant reasoning at MfD, it seems likely that all the other portals may be subject to deletion. See you at WT:POG. TrafficAn observation and argument that arose again and again during the WP:ENDPORTALS RfC and the ongoing deletion drive of {{bpsp}} default portals, was that portals simply do not get much traffic. Typically, they get a tiny fraction of what the corresponding like-titled articles get. And while this isn't generally considered a good rationale for creation or deletion of articles, portals are not articles, and portal critics insist that traffic is a key factor in the utility of portals. The implication is that portals won't be seen much, so wouldn't it be better to develop pages that are? And since such development isn't limited to editing, almost anything is possible. If we can't bring readers to portals, we could bring portal features, or even better features, to the readers (i.e., to articles)... Some potential future directions of developmentQuantum portals?An approach that has received some brainstorming is "quantum portals", meaning portals generated on-the-fly and presented directly on the view screen without any saved portal pages. This could be done by script or as a MediaWiki program feature, but would initially be done by script. The main benefits of this is that it would be opt-in (only those who wanted it would install it), and the resultant generated pages wouldn't be saved, so that there wouldn't be anything to maintain except the script itself. Non-portal integrated componentsAnother approach would be to focus on implementing specific features independently, and provide them somewhere highly visible in a non-portal presentation context (that is, on a page that wasn't a portal that has lots of traffic, i.e., articles). Such as inserted directly into an article's HTML, as a pop-up there, or as a temporary page. There are scripts that use these approaches (providing unrelated features), and so these approaches have been proven to be feasible. What kind of features could this be done with? The various components of the automated portal design are transcluded excerpts, news, did you know, image slideshows, excerpt slideshows, and so on. Some of the features, such as navigation footers and links to sister projects are already included on article pages. And some already have interface counterparts (such as image slideshows). Some of the rest may be able to be integrated directly via script, but may need further development before they are perfected. Fortunately, scripts are used on an opt-in basis, and therefore wouldn't affect readers-in-general and editors-at-large during the development process (except for those who wanted to be beta testers and installed the scripts). The development of such scripts falls under the scope of the Javascript-WikiProject/Userscript-department, and will likely be listed on Wikipedia:User scripts/List when completed enough for beta-testing. Be sure to watchlist that page. Where would that leave curated portals?Being curated. At least for the time being. New encyclopedia program features will likely eventually render most portals obsolete. For example, the pop-up feature of MediaWiki provides much the same functionality as excerpts in portals already, and there is also a slideshow feature to view all the images on the current page (just click on any image, and that activates the slideshow). Future features could also overlap portal features, until there is nothing that portals provide that isn't provided elsewhere or as part of Wikipedia's interface. But, that may be a ways off. Perhaps months or years. It depends on how rapidly programmers develop them. Keep on keepin' onThe features of Wikipedia and its articles will continue to evolve, even if Portals go by the wayside. Most, if not all of portals' functionality, or functions very similar, will likely be made available in some form or other. And who knows what else? No worries. Until next issue... — The Transhumanist 01:11, 2 May 2019 (UTC) Septinsular Republic: end in 1807, 1814, 1815?Γεια σου! I notice that you rewrote parts of Septinsular Republic and other article mentioning an end in 1807 rather than 1814 (British occupation of Corfu) or 1815 (establishment of the subsequent constitution of the United States of the Ionian Islands). I think that this is debatable, and I seem to have always seen in sources I read about the period that they consider the Septinsular Republic to include the Imperial French period. I did not immediately look for sources for this claim, but we need to debate that. In this diff comment, you write: The best would be to gather opinion of secondary sources on the issue. I have some at home, but I will be away for a week. At least one most interesting quote gathered by a first rapid search:
Did you find a source which could describe ore precisely the status of the islands during this period? Place Clichy (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Tzelepes KomnenosHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Tzelepes Komnenos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. DYK for John IV of OhridOn 9 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John IV of Ohrid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 12th-century archbishop of Ohrid John IV was born as a Byzantine prince of the Komnenos dynasty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John IV of Ohrid. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John IV of Ohrid), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
John Tzelepes KomnenosAny knowledge or preferences as to whether I should file this at GAs under J or K? Gog the Mild (talk) 09:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Tzelepes KomnenosThe article John Tzelepes Komnenos you nominated as a good article has passed DihyaHey Cplakidas, how are you? As you're interested in Roman/Byzantine and Arabic history. I thought you could change this article's condition. The historical person in question is surrounded by mystery and historical misinterpretations (some of them were to push political agendas). One of the recent reliable sources about this subject is Modéran 2005. Kind Regards --TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. MfD nomination of Portal:Umayyad Caliphate
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Thirty nine A class articles! That is impressive. Congratulations. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC) A potentially interesting sourceHi Constantine. I have come across a PDF of "Naval Warfare: Military, Institutional and Economic Aspects", a chapter from Y. Stouraitis, A Companion to the Byzantine Culture of War, 300-1204, Leiden / Boston, 2018. Let me know if you would like me to email you a copy. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.18 Hello Cplakidas,
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250 Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Books & Bytes, Issue 33
 Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC) Problems to be resolved with the Basil II articleIn the past you have said that the article on Basil II still needs improvement. Perhaps you can tell me what its flaws are and we can try to improve it. Векочел (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
ZawilaHey cplakidas, I know you're still working on the Fatimid army article. There is an entry about the zawila town and its population in the encyclopaedia of islam ed2, volume XI, p:466. -TheseusHeLl (talk) 23:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
If you are up for a challenge, could you expand Pericharaxis using the Greek sources? I can only command a basic level of Greek - certainly not up to doing the job (I'll stick with the Spanish, Italian, and Catalan translations :)). Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:11, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Hey I just nominated this one for GA. Any thoughts/suggestions? Would appreciate any input. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Isaurian dynasty templateHi Constantine. I hope that you are keeping well. I came across the template below, which I think is one of yours. Whether it is or not, "with Constantine V as co-emperor, 720–751"; should that be '720–741'? Thanks Gog the Mild (talk) 21:16, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Should be ok now. Thanks Johnbod (talk) 03:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Ways to improve DiateichismaHello, Cplakidas, Thanks for creating Diateichisma! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Boleyn (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Muhammad II of Granada and sourcesThank you again for the GA review. Re sources, yes, I'm very much interested in sources talking about the Nasrid Granada period. In the near future, I'm thinking of bringing Muhammad II to FA and then work on his son Muhammad III too. I have access to Kennedy's Muslim Spain and Portugal (as well as other sources I listed in Muhammad I, II, and III), but it seems you have other interesting sources. I can moderately read Spanish. HaEr48 (talk) 02:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi HaEr48, indeed I had not noticed your message. There is nothing in the relevant section, although it definitely hints at more. I'll have a look whether other, thematical sections of the book cover this in more detail, but as I am abroad this will happen sometime next week. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC) New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019Hello Cplakidas,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages. Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Relief of Qasr al-BahiliHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Relief of Qasr al-Bahili you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. DYK for Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-NaysaburiOn 1 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 11th-century scholar Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi, an authority on the early history of Isma'ilism, composed the first official genealogy of the Fatamid dynasty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Congratulations from the Military History Project
DYK nomination of Sarjun ibn Mansur
ThanksThanks for your red link insertion.Md iet (talk) 05:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC) Question about Spyridon MavrogenisI started an article on a Greek Ottoman doctor named Spyridon Mavrogenis. Apparently there was a "Spyridon Mavrogenis" who wrote "The Life of Constantin Carathéodory" - https://anemi.lib.uoc.gr/metadata/e/e/6/metadata-455-0000004.tkl - I wonder if it's the same guy WhisperToMe (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Emirs of Sicily A tag has been placed on Category:Emirs of Sicily requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC) ΥENED listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ΥENED. Since you had some involvement with the ΥENED redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC) University of Constantinople?I started Imperial School of Medicine which is where Spyridon Mavrogenis taught. Anyhow looking through Google Books results: Journal of the American Medical Association, Volume 79. American Medical Association, 1922. p. 646 refers to a "University of Constantinople" but it doesn't seem to be the same as University of Constantinople. Is it University of Istanbul? WhisperToMe (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Also another idea: it would be good to have French stubs/articles written on some of these subjects, such as the imperial medical school, the Mavrogenis family, etc. as well as turn-of-the-century Greek subjects as French was the major "foreign language" in both the Ottoman Empire and Greece at the time, as well as the pan-Christian language. I only have a basic level of French and don't know which French speakers are really interested in the subject, but it would be something to think about. WhisperToMe (talk) 11:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Assessment and helpHello there, I read several of your GA articles and really enjoyed them, awesome work. I would like to ask you to take a look at Serbia article and tell me your opinion as to which paragraphs should be improved and is GA status an option in the near future? I would like to work on the article and some help from more experienced editors would be great. :) Mm.srb (talk) The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. 'Amr ibn Imru' al-Qays (Lakhmids)Hi Constantine You don't happen to have any source regarding 'Amr ibn Imru' al-Qays (or the Lakhmids as a whole for that matter)? I know his father switched his allegiance to the Romans, but I can't seem to find any source about the former. According to his article the Lakhmids once again became Sasanian vassals under him, but it's unsourced. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Relief of Qasr al-BahiliThe article Relief of Qasr al-Bahili you nominated as a good article has passed Your GA nomination of Battle of KapetronHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Kapetron you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Battle of KapetronThe article Battle of Kapetron you nominated as a good article has passed DYK for Sarjun ibn MansurOn 25 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarjun ibn Mansur, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Melkite Christian Sarjun ibn Mansur, who headed the fiscal administration of Syria under the first five Umayyad caliphs, was the father of Saint John of Damascus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarjun ibn Mansur. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sarjun ibn Mansur), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Siege of Mecca (683)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Mecca (683) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Battle of VelestinoHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Velestino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Congratulations from the Military History Project
Your GA nomination of Aaron (son of Ivan Vladislav)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron (son of Ivan Vladislav) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Aaron (son of Ivan Vladislav)The article Aaron (son of Ivan Vladislav) you nominated as a good article has passed Your GA nomination of Genoese occupation of RhodesHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Genoese occupation of Rhodes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Perhaps you already know, but a book is coming out later this year that you might be interested in. Srnec (talk) 23:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Your GA nomination of Siege of Mecca (683)The article Siege of Mecca (683) you nominated as a good article has passed Your GA nomination of Genoese occupation of RhodesThe article Genoese occupation of Rhodes you nominated as a good article has passed The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. DYK for Amr ibn HindOn 20 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amr ibn Hind, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 6th-century Lakhmid ruler Amr ibn Hind was killed by the poet Amr ibn Kulthum after Hind's mother had insulted Kulthum's mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amr ibn Hind. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Amr ibn Hind), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Thank you today for Al-Mu'tadid, "one of the most (and virtually the last) capable Abbasid caliphs, and definitely an interesting figure: passionate about "women and buildings", known for his cruel and ingenious punishments and fiscal stringency, and the greatest Abbasid warrior-caliph. During his decade-long rule, by virtue of constant campaigning and adroit diplomacy he managed to stabilize the state and restore many lost territories. His reign also saw the culmination of the dominance of the Turkish military, but strangely also the start of the emergence to power of the secretarial bureaucracy. During his reign (and that of al-Muktafi, which was essentially a coda to al-Mu'tadid's) the Abbasids were truly for the last time an imperial power to be reckoned with."! -- DYK for Konstantinos SmolenskisOn 21 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Konstantinos Smolenskis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Konstantinos Smolenskis (pictured), a future general and hero of the Greco-Turkish War of 1897, was expelled from the Greek military academy by his own father for unruly behaviour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Konstantinos Smolenskis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Konstantinos Smolenskis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Backlog BanzaiIn the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Asian R1a haplogroup maps?Hello, we have so many R1a maps for Europe but none for Asia. Do we also have the Asian maps for R1a haplogroup. Any Z93 or Z94 maps we can use? Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.114.38.166 (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC) EI3Hi Constantine. Any chance you could lend me access to the EI3 entries on Mu'awiya I and Busr ibn Abi Artat? Working on rewriting the former and starting a comprehensive article on the latter. I think the EI3 info would be very helpful toward those ends. Regards, Al Ameer (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Battle of VelestinoThe article Battle of Velestino you nominated as a good article has passed Battle of ManzikertHi Constantine. I thought that you may be interested in this - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of Manzikert/1. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC) DYK for Battle of KapetronOn 27 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Kapetron, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the nocturnal Battle of Kapetron, the Byzantines in the flanks defeated their Seljuk opponents, but on the next morning learned of their Georgian allies' defeat in the centre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Kapetron. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Kapetron), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC) DYK for Abu Abdallah ibn al-HakimOn 30 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abu Abdallah ibn al-Hakim, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when an angry mob overran the palaces in Granada in 1309, the sultan was spared, but his vizier, Abu Abdallah ibn al-Hakim, was killed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abu Abdallah ibn al-Hakim. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Abu Abdallah ibn al-Hakim), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. valereee (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Timeline articles name changeGreetings. There is a discussion about changing the naming convention of the Timeline articles at Timeline of Orthodoxy in Greece. Could you perhaps weigh in on this? ΙΣΧΣΝΙΚΑ-888 (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Ottoman constitution of 1876 - additional copies in other languages?I just recently found scans of the Ottoman constitution of 1876 in Ottoman Turkish and modern Turkish, something I've wanted to get for awhile. Anyhow I am interested in finding any copies of a contemporary Greek translation. Armenian, Bulgarian, and Ladino (Judaeo-Spanish) versions would be interesting to find too. I found printed copies of a French version from third party sources but I also wonder if the Ottomans directly kept a French version and if a PDF scan was made from that. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Al-Mu'tadid scheduled for TFAThis is to let you know that the Al-Mu'tadid article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 15, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 15, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Bury and Constantinople-717Hello I am very curious. Who was the first to note the battle's significance? Spyridon? Lambros? Eickhoff? Bury? Was Bury not even the first to note it in the Anglo-saxon world? En historiker (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Constantine. I hope that things are ticking along well for you. I was about to tidy up Battle of Constantinople (1241) whan I realised that it was one of yours. I assume that you will be coming back to it in due course? Gog the Mild (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019Hello Cplakidas,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs. Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools. Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done. DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Thank youJust wanna say thank you for copyediting and expanding some of my stubs :) HaEr48 (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedG'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Four Award
And another
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way markG'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
Books & Bytes
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Al-ghuzatI think Muslim Spain and Portugal: A Political History of al-Andalus is a good source about al-ghuzat and banu abi al-Ula 's history. -TheseusHeLl (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Congratulations from the Military History Project
DYK for Uthman ibn Abi al-UlaOn 7 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uthman ibn Abi al-Ula, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after leading a failed rebellion in his native Morocco, Uthman ibn Abi al-Ula led the Volunteers of the Faith in Granada and became a major political figure at court? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uthman ibn Abi al-Ula. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Uthman ibn Abi al-Ula), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC) DYK for Volunteers of the FaithOn 7 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Volunteers of the Faith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after leading a failed rebellion in his native Morocco, Uthman ibn Abi al-Ula led the Volunteers of the Faith in Granada and became a major political figure at court? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Volunteers of the Faith), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Template:Prosopography of the Later Roman EmpireHi Constantine. Hope all is well. I've recently come upon an issue: This template, Template:Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire shows some errors for some reason, do you know what the issue behind it is? --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Flag of the First Bulgarian EmpireHi, thank you for your edits of the First Bulgarian Empire article, but if you want to make your changes effective and long lasting, then please change the description of the file in the Wikimedia Commons, of course you can also place there a special template with the inscription, that the flag is fictitious, which automatically moves it to a special category with fictitious flags, unless you do this, other editors will come and they will return the flag to the infobox in the article again and again, thinking that the flag is correct, and edit war never ends. Thank you. Adding descriptions in the Wikimedia will only take a few minutes, it's the same as writing editing summary. Obviously, you have a history knowledge, editing summaries is not enough, because only few people read them. It's for all of us. --Dragovit (talk) 9:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn TulunHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn Tulun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. QuestionWhile reading John Troglita I stumbled upon this. Are Isfidaias and Ifisdaias the same person? -TheseusHeLl (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Merge proposalHi Constantine. I wondered if you considered this a good idea? Gog the Mild (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn TulunThe article Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn Tulun you nominated as a good article has passed Four Award (2)
QuestionHello, I'm currently working on Irens of Athen on the French Wikipedia and I wanted to know if you would have any access to the book "The BYzantine Revival" written by Treadgold ? Thanks ! Spartan 117 (talk) 21:56, 25 October 2019 (UTC) SVG map queryHi, do you know why the letter "T" (bottom right) appears blurred in thumbnail mode of this SVG image? If you zoom to original quality, the T is sharp.  And do you know how to fix that? HaEr48 (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter November 2019Hello Cplakidas, This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
There are now 816 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC) About the last changes.Το οτι είσαι κομμουνιστής δεν σημαίνει οτι μπορείς να γράφεις ότι θες. Και μήν ακούσω οτι το κάνω εγώ, γιατι εγώ γράφω μόνο τις αλήθειες. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:3A0D:F500:1C5F:3FD1:6B8A:F0A6 (talk) 18:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Vandalism or improvementHi Constantine You may care to have a look at this. If it looks suspicious you may want to skim the rest of their contributions. Nothing obviously egregious jumps out at me, but they edit in some hot-button areas, which are more your territory than mine. And congratulations on another little gem. PS If you fancy a source edit of something you have already looked at, then - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Cape Ecnomus/archive1 Gog the Mild (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fatimid conquest of EgyptHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fatimid conquest of Egypt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Greek romanizationHello Constantine! In the article of Odaenathus many Greek names and words occur, and a user is "romanizing" them, but I noticed that this romanization is identical to what Google translate is giving, so I thought I ask you if its the correct spelling. Those cases are: Ὀδαίναθος Odaínathos Ὠδέναθος Ōdénathos αφανής μεν τα πρώτα (aphanḗs men ta prṓta) μεγι'στην αράμενος δοξαν (megi'stēn arámenos doxan) ὁ λαμπρότατος ὑπατικός (ho lamprótatos hupatikós Thanks in advance.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 14:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-NaysaburiHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Fatimid Caliphate/Related portalsA tag has been placed on Portal:Fatimid Caliphate/Related portals, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. ConcernsHey Cplakidas, I'm asking you this for the reason that you have experience with creating good articles and using sources/references. So I created the article Hintata using two sources EI2 and EB. Firstly, I want to know if there is any problem with these two sources? Secondly, is using just two sources a problem? If you have some time can you check the points I raised in this discussion. Regards -TheseusHeLl (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fatimid conquest of EgyptThe article Fatimid conquest of Egypt you nominated as a good article has passed Hi Constantine, how are you doing?! It's being a while since our last chat. I'm expanding the article about Nicomedia and I saw that http://www.ehw.gr/ is not opening. Do you know anything about it?--Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 03:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Byzantine naval paperHi Constantine, Just wondered if you had seen this paper: Maximilian C.G. Lau (2016) The naval reform of Emperor John II Komnenos: a re-evaluation, Mediterranean Historical Review, 31:2, 115-138, DOI:10.1080/09518967.2016.1248641To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518967.2016.1248641 Might be useful for the Byzantine Navy article or John II. Urselius (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-NaysaburiThe article Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Books & Bytes – Issue 36
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!Hello, Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia. I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in! From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community. If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org. Thank you! --User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC) al-ShamaHello once again. I translated your article about Al-Husayn ibn Zikrawayh and I still don't get it the meaning of al-Shama. "Mole" is the animal or what we understand in Portuguese as pt:verruga or any kind of mark?
Hello Cplakidas, I hope you are well. I notice that there are only two days remaining for the article to be on hold, before it can be failed. I would appreciate it if you could respond to the comments in my review before 27 November. Best wishes, Amitchell125 (talk) 08:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-NaysaburiThe article Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Naysaburi you nominated as a good article has passed Alptakin/AftakinConstantine and HistoryofIran, aren't Alptakin and Aftakin one and the same? Despite the second being considered an hamdanid officer, the information at Aftakin's articles has dates matching the ones in Alptakin's biography.--Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 02:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Constructive edits?Curious about your opinion in relation to these edits made at Abu Tahir al-Jannabi (one by Aryzad, four by a random IP)[2]-[3] Long time no speak btw! Hope all is well. Been really busy lately (uni, etc.). - LouisAragon (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail! Message added 18:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Greek to English transliteration practiceHi Constantine, I have come across an unregistered user - 85.72.101.175 - who has made a number of changes to the spelling of terms, mostly related to ancient weaponry, to a transliteration of Modern Greek pronunciation - 'eu' to 'ef' etc. I think that this goes against usage in English language scholarship, which generally uses a transliteration of Koine. I have attempted to revert one change on the Makhaira article. I just wondered if there has been a shift in scholarship towards Modern Greek that I was unaware of. Urselius (talk) 14:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail!Message added 19:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. I've sent one more section, as well as an update regarding what my plans are. I also have a question for you. Would you prefer that I continue to leave a "You've got mail!" notice every time I send a new section, or would you prefer that I only leave one every few sections (or even just once when I've sent all of them) so that I don't clutter your talk page? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Peace Dove
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. New Page Review newsletter December 2019
 This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult. Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well. Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year. Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Io Saturnalia!
Sepīd ŠahrHello Constantine! I'm taking some information of Alp Arslan's life on Irannica and in one of the paragraphs it is mentioned that his generals "rejoined the sultan to take Sepīd Šahr and Ānī (Ḥosaynī, Aḵbār, pp. 34-41; Ebn al-Aṯīr, X, pp. 37-40)" I have no clue, at least with such spelling, what fortress Sepīd Šahr could be. Looking online, I saw only Irannica mentioning such place and considering its tradition to use an almost exclusive way to transliterate names, it's difficult to figure it out. Any clues?--Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I don't think it would hurt to find other sources for the claims over at Tahir ibn Muslim. I plan on doing some research when I have time. This is not a "drive by" edit -- it's an article with one source. Give me some time, I'll add some additional sources, and then I will remove the tag. I am not doing this to frustrate you, I am doing it to further substantiate the article. Thanks. Dr42 (talk) 06:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC) DYK nomination of Irene Komnene Palaiologina
DYK for Fatimid conquest of EgyptOn 31 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatimid conquest of Egypt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Fatimid Caliphate prepared their conquest of Egypt in 969 through a long and patient propaganda effort, resulting in it being swift and almost unopposed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatimid conquest of Egypt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fatimid conquest of Egypt), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Happy New Year!.jpg) Happy New Year!
Hello Constantine: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC) 
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
.jpg)
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
