|
User talk:Cooljuno411/Archive 4
April 2007 Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to California. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 13:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Fair use image useThree times now I have removed the fair use, copyrighted image Image:Myspace logo.PNG from your userpage [1][2][3], the last being just now. Twice you have reverted these removals. Our policy as expressed at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #9 strictly forbids the use of fair use images outside of the main article namespace. You may not have this image, or any other fair use image, on your userpage. Do not add this image again. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. --Durin 13:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC) License tagging for Image:Snowplow SanDiegoCounty.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Snowplow SanDiegoCounty.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Largest cities in North AmericaPlease look at the list and note that no other list entry has a link to a metropolitan area. You can't link one to a metro just because you happen to be from that area. The list shows links to cities for consistency. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Metro areas, S.D.Hi, I understand the concept of the metropolitan area, and I know that whether the S.D. area includes TJ or not is controversial and that both figures should be given in the San Diego article. My objection is that the Escondido article should not have figures for the San Diego metropolitan area, because it is an article on Escondido and not the S.D. metro area. Why stop at the metro area? Why not also the pop of the state, and the U.S., and the World? Escondido is part of all those areas. We don't include them because they are not immediately relevant to understanding Escondido. The metropolitan area fall into the same category. Thanks for your contributions to the articles -- it's great to have your additions in general, but I disagree on this point. Best. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest that the problem is a miss understanding of how the info box is using the term "Metro" see my rely in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Southern California Dbiel (Talk) 20:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC) License tagging for Image:800px-San Diego-Tijuana Metro 3D Pinpoint, Coronado, Ca.jpgThanks for uploading Image:800px-San Diego-Tijuana Metro 3D Pinpoint, Coronado, Ca.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC) The above portal page is being considered for deletion in accord with wikipedia policy. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:San Diego. Thank you. John Carter 19:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Black Wax A tag has been placed on Black Wax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add Orphaned non-free media (Image:Black Wax Logo.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Template:Public Transportation in Greater San DiegoI prefer the previous version of {{Public Transportation in Greater San Diego}} but wanted to discuss it with you before reverting the changes. The previous version, as seen here better matches the standard appearance of navigation templates, to go on the bottom of the article rather than a box on the side. You claim that this is a variation on the infobox templates, but it isn't. Infobox templates typically are placed at the upper right side of the article and provide a summary of details about the subject of the article, not links to similar articles. Your desire to have this in a See Also section creates problems since come of the articles don't need one otherwise, and this box extends beyond that section in most cases. -- Hawaiian717 22:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gifThanks for uploading Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 22:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC) License tagging for Image:WeBot-screenshot.pngThanks for uploading Image:WeBot-screenshot.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 22:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Possibly unfree Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpgAn image that you uploaded or altered, Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jason McHuff (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:Tatu_remixes_2cd.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tatu_remixes_2cd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 09:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Jesse died and no one criedYou don't seem to care about the death of Jesse, so where does that leave you? Here's an idea. No hate crimes, just crimes. Everyone treated the same. Isn't that what gays always whine for? In fact you want special extra rights. I will mourn for Jesse and the others like him.70.108.117.53 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Your recent editsPlease don't insert text like this into the articles. Also, I suggest you read WP:BLP#Presumption_in_favor_of_privacy, if you haven't already done so. Wikipedia is not a tabloid, and we should be especially conservative when it comes to exposing the details of minors. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, henrik•talk 21:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Your recent editsHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Speedy deletion of SDMTS Signs:Orange Line-20px
Was making a template, sorry. RE:Speedy DeletionIf you read the tag, it states that it has very little context. I did not tag it with nonsense. But, as of now, the speedy tag still applies. It is a very short article with little information as to the importance of the subject. For all I know, it could be a neogolism. You never added sources to the article either. The tag has nothing to do with being "power hungry" and your comment was very uncivil. If you respond in a sense, like your before post, I will hence ignore you and delete your comments. Undeath (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Undefined sexuality A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Undefined sexuality, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Image copyright problem with Image:UndefinedSym.jpgThank you for uploading Image:UndefinedSym.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Undeath (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) AsexualityYour recent edits to the article on asexuality were recently deleted and then you undeleted them. I believe that this may be a misunderstanding of the purpose of Wikipedia. The definition of asexuality given is not how I think asexuality should be defined or how you think asexuality should be defined, but how asexuality is defined by sources of information about asexuality. This includes asexual websites, newspaper or magazine articles, and published research. While there continues to be some disagreement over how to define asexuality, Wikipedia is not the place to debate this. As such, the definition of the asexuality article should be the one mostly commonly given in sources cited in the article. This is why I deleted you edits and presumably why the other user did as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freunlaven47 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of Undefined sexualityAn article that you have been involved in editing, Undefined sexuality, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undefined sexuality. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of AnthrosexualAn editor has nominated Anthrosexual, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthrosexual and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 3RR warningYou've reverted Template:Sexual orientation three times in the past 24 hours. See WP:3RR. Fireplace (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 Cooljuno411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I was reverting edits by User:fireplace who was continuously vandalizing Template:Sexual orientation by removing Anthrosexual from the template. If you look at the template know, it is locked with my edit being the one on top. With Anthrosexual currently on the template. And the template was locked to prevent Fireplace from continuing to vandalize the article. I am currently highly offended by the actions set forth by User:Jimfbleak, the admin who blocked me. He displayed a high case of negligence and it is apparent that he did not commence any investigating before commencing my unjust ban. I feel that this incident proves that his motives are highly bias and are based on power hunger. I feel that (s)he is not fit to continue duties as an admin and that that (s)he should be relieved from his duties. This case makes it apparent that he is not fit to serve wikipedia. I would also like a formal apology, and my block recorded be fully expunged for this offensive act and that justice should take its course and User:fireplace should do the time that was wrongfully placed on me, and was properly meant for him in the first place. I strongly emphases on clearing my block record from this unjust act, It has now been permanently scared and my credentials destroyed do to a faulty admin's actions. Decline reason: You created an article. That article is under AfD. You added a link to your article on the template page. Others specifically stated in their edit summaries that you should use the talk page and/or wait for the AfD to end. You chose to edit war. There was no vandalism from fireplace and an admin need not be desysopped simply because you disagree with being blocked. — IrishGuy talk 20:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{User:Cooljuno411/Template:bgresearchfirst}} et. al.Please don't use these templates on AFD discussions. There is no policy which requires that all users "MUST justify [their] opinion in high detail" in such discussions. If you want to request that users elaborate, you may do so with an ordinary
or similar. Demanding that users do so ("MUST justify"), doing so without signing your name to the request, and doing so with ambox templates, all lend an authority to the statement which is not grounded in policy. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Comments on anthrosexual AFDYou've been making a lot of inappropriate comments on the AFD for anthrosexual. If someone disagrees with you, it doesn't mean that they haven't read the article or are uninformed. Also, you should probably review the Wikipedia policies on being civil during discussions, verifiability and original research.-Wafulz (talk) 03:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
This image was deleted for copyright reasons. It clearly used elements from an online map service, and as such is not public domain. If you'd like, you may find an alternative at WP:MAPS.-Wafulz (talk) 03:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC) AGF at AFD
Sorry to see that the article was deleted rather than merged. AfD is not a particularly happy place and editor get quite hot under the collar about the discussion. I hope that it hasn't put you off the project as a whole. Good luck with your next article and do try to remember that if you can't source a statement then you will be forever accused of original research. Kind regards -- BpEps - t@lk 06:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC) Talk:AnthrosexualI know that the article anthrosexual was deleted but it think the talk page should be reinstated do to it's contents value. I can see the article being recreated in the future when proper sourcing comes to light. And the talk could be of value. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Michael Jackson imagesHi, I've had to comment out fair-use images here because fair-use is only permitted in Article space, not User space. I've left links in, and free images, however. Cheers. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 19:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Stop playing games with images on Michael Jackson. Admins here and on Commons are not so stupid that they can't see where these images are coming from. The next breach of copyright gets you blocked. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC) PicturesI removed your latest incarnation on the michael Jackson page. In no way did it bring anything useful to the issue of his humanitarian statues so would cause the article to fail FA. However if you want to add anymore pictures, particulary to the charity section, i actually need your help. Looking at the pictures we have shoots from 1984, 1987, 1995, 2005. We need a picture from the Dangerous era (1991-1993) that ilistrates his humanitarian stuff with the heal the world foundation. If you can get something on that it would be very useful. Realist2 (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Its not relevant to the humanitarian issue, there are pictures on his humanitarian efforts that ARE useful but that is not. As you are good with pictures i would appreciate it if you could find something from the early 90's that would be very good there. Realist2 (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a picture of him singing and the page say: "Michael Jackson performing at the Democratic National Committee's "A Night at the Apollo" voter registration drive & fund-raiser at The Apollo Theater in New York City. April 24, 2002.". But it is not from the early 90s. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Yes i looked at the site myself just now, that picture of him singing live would be much more relevant, shame its not from the early 90's but its better. Im dumbfounded that you never choose that in the first place, you dont intentionally have to add pictures that portray Jackson in a bad light when there is a perfectly good one right next to it. Realist2 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Before you add any more pictures i advise you consult me first. You consistantly miss name or misrepresent them. Your lastest picture is most certainly not a bad era picture. Realist2 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Firstly we already have a good picture for the bad era and seconly its not a bad era picture. Its from his history world tour. Just look at his face its obvious its 1995 onwards. Realist2 (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Also all pictures bar two had to be removed as part of the FA review. Realist2 (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Can you upload this and this from flickr onto wikicommons. These will be able to pass wikipedia requirements. That last picture will be very usefull as it shows all the faces at the same angle and hoe he changed over 20 years. I believe they will be allowed on an FA reviewed article. Realist2 (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tv martin bashir doc michael jackson.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson, LAS VEGAS - OCTOBER 27, Radio Music Awards.JPG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson-Democratic National Committee's A Night at the Apollo voter registration drive & fund-raiser.JPG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson-London 15th July 1988 bad tour.JPG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Image in signatureHi Cooljuno, You've got an image in your signature now. This is against the signature guideline at WP:SIG#Images. Would you please remove the image? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Aleta Sing 21:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Day of Silence section in West Hills High SchoolHey CoolJuno411, this is just a heads up that the section needs some third-party references in order to remain in the article. You can check out its discussion page for an explanation...thanks! --99.231.118.172 (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC) California same sex marriageIf you want to suggest it, put it at WP:ITN/C. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 00:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chug and chaseA proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chug and chase, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 23:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Your comments on ITNYour comments on ITN are unwanted and innapropriate. I do not appreciate you saying "Your a fuck'n ignorant and hypocritical peace of shit." You need to calm down. I have the streange impression that same-sex marriage is very improtant to you - why I do not know - but that does not excuse what you've said. You need to read WP:CIVIL. I have reported you at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. --PlasmaTwa2 23:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Warning about WP:NPAOkay, first of all WP is not a forum, so take the political discussion elsewhere. Nobody cares. Cooljuno411 (talk · contribs), please refrain from making personal attacks like "you people" and the like. Lemmey (talk · contribs), stop trolling. You made an offensive comment, people called you on it, and so you freaking bolded it just to rile people up further. Everyone should be reminded of WP:CIVIL, and move on as this is not going up as is. -- Grant.Alpaugh 17:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC) StopChug and chaser was deleted, so stop reverting Chaser to include it or else you will be blocked for disruption. --Stephen 22:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Same-sex marriage in the USA.SVGI'm not sure why you have taken such a negative tone in the talk page for the above article, but it is not necessary. If you think I am challenging you because I don't support same-sex marriage, you are wrong: I do support it. If you are upset merely because I am disagreeing with you, then please take a deep breath before writing. It is possible for people to have an honest disagreement and the talk page is a place to air that without getting nasty. Based on my knowledge of the law and the practices I have seen on Wikipedia on a variety of topics, I believe it would be wrong to act as though California has same-sex marriage before 17 June. -Rrius (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC) What is an "orientation" anyway??Hi. The question of whether to label certain things as "orientations" or not is often a very ideologically charged one, and one on which different writers strongly disagree. For example, the article about zoosexuality (attraction to animals), which you just restored to the list of sexual orientations, describes one of these controversies. By including the controversial term on a list of sexual orientations, we would be taking a side in that controversy, which of course is against the Neutral Point of View policy. Excluding the term may look like just taking the opposite side, but this isn't the case if we are careful to follow published academic consensus rather than any one private opinion. The controversy over what an "orientation" is is notable in itself, and can be discussed at length in the main sexual orientation article. Individual forms of sex that some people call orientations (and some people don't) can be listed as part of that discussion. Dybryd (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC) edit warring warning
no references in templatesCooljuno, please don't put references in templates. they don't belong there, and they can really screw things up on other pages when they get transcluded in. Sexual OrientationCooljuno411, I have undone one of your edits to sexual orientation. The wording you used in the lede was extremely confusing. I do not think that it was even a proper sentence. Skoojal (talk) 08:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
SignatureHello, Using <big> tags in your signature is not advised by Wikipedia's signature policy. You might want to consider removing them. Thanks, Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 18:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
CivilityCooljuno411, you left the following message on my talk page: 'Please stop removing Template:Sexual orientation from articles, you've already done it to sexual orientation and homosexuality, they are there for a reason. And do not remove Non-heterosexual, that is a term use is sexology and was places on the articles for a reason.' Please be more civil and constructive in your comments. There is no use in saying that something is there for a reason unless you say what the reason is. Regarding "non-heterosexual", you seem to be referring to the fact that I suggested this article be deleted. Since I have a right to have different opinions from you, I also have every right to make that suggestion. Skoojal (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC) AhemDo not experiment with Templates.[5] follow the link and hit edit. You can then copy that version to your own userspace and experiment there. Banjeboi 01:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC) July 2008 Cooljuno411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This is ridiculous, i even referenced the template, template:sexual orientations. It's not my fault someone believes that zoosexuality is not a sexual orientation, when it is. I've come to learn this whole blocking thing works by banning the person who wasn't the first one to claim a case, next time i'll be sure to be the first one to run to admin in a dispute, then i won't be the one blocked. Decline reason: Well, what we've learned is that the burnt fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire. You were blocked for this behavior before and continue to indulge in it, and you get blocked again and your unblock request shows that you've learned entirely the wrong lesson. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That just got you another 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Fact tagHi, you might find {{fact}} useful when tagging items for verifiability. p.s. I'm glad you're back. Banjeboi 14:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC) August 2008
Sexual OrientationCooljuno411, I have undone your latest edits to the Sexual Orientation article. Please do not remove the quote marks from the definition of sexual orientation - it doesn't help things to obscure the fact that the definition is a direct quote from the given source. Also, the wording you used (eg, Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes, however, some people may use different labels or none at all) was confused. In that sentence, it's unclear what the 'different labels' part refers to (different labels from what?) or what it has to do with the definition itself. You might try using a reworded version of this. The different labels bit should be part of a separate sentence, in my view. Skoojal (talk) 02:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC) SweetieI'd appreciate it if you stopped calling me "sweetie." It's not exactly professional. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC) AN/IHello, Cooljuno411. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 07:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC) Renewable energyI removed your addition to renewable energy. It was wp:OR and wp:SYN. NJGW (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC) MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAPWikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:San Diego transit topicsTemplate:San Diego transit topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC) New template
Beginning a sentence with a "however"Hi, it's actually ok in the Sexual orientation instance that you changed - see grammar articles like However at the beginning of a sentence & Starting a Sentence With "However". --EqualRights (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:WeBot.png)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:WeBot-iPhone-screenshot.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:Sexual orientation labels, identity, and referendaTemplate:Sexual orientation labels, identity, and referenda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ludwigs2 04:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents FYIAn issue involving you has been brought up on AN/I. --Onorem♠Dil 14:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Your sigI notice this has been brought up at AN/I two times now. Stop changing it so that it is that big. I notice that every time you are warned, you change it back, then a little time passes and you make it big again. Change it to small, and leave it small, or I will take this to AN/I. This kind of behavior is disruptive, please stop.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 06:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Your sig, again. Final warning:Please see this AN/I discussion about you. Please therefore reduce the size of your signature, and do not again alter it. Should this matter be raised again it is likely that you will be sanctioned.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 01:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
go easy on the "fact" tagsIf there's an article or section of an article that doesn't cite its sources, just use a general tag rather than a billion "fact" tags. They make the article unreadable. Thx. 76.216.113.120 (talk) 07:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Little context in Political positions of George W. Bush Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Political positions of George W. Bush, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Political positions of George W. Bush is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Image:Tiny star for rating.gif listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tiny star for rating.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Use of talk pagesThe use of talk pages on articles is for discussing the improvement of that article, it is not used for noting people of related pages that need work. Please read WP:TPG, for more info on how to use the talk page of an article. Secondly, if you want help expanding the article you were linking to, I suggest you try and create a wikiproject, or join an existing project, to allow others to notice, and improve upon the said article.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC) ArchivesWhat are your plans for that group of old article versions you have saved in your archives?—Kww(talk) 20:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Please check your "facts" before placing accusations in the edit historyAnd please don't misquote other people when doing so. I reverted this edit, which did not contain a I've asked for more eyes on thisHello, Cooljuno411. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Banjeboi 13:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
