This is an archive of past discussions with User:Conifer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pok Pok until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thanks for the message at my talk. I've pinged you but will add here in case you miss it. In no way was I casting aspersions on you personally. I can see how it may have seemed so, just as in my eyes the article seemed very PROMO. Glad it isn't: I've already withdrawn the nomination and it's been closed (you have lots of new references to follow up!). It was in no way personal to you. I did check your edit history, but my Internet link failed so perhaps it just gave me the most recent etc. There has been a spate of Portland redirects at RfD, my usual hangout, so perhaps I was over suspicious for which I apologise. I certainly meant you no harm and if you feel I have, anything I can do to say sorry more publicly I surely shall. I am not in the habit of hurting people's feelings. Si Trew (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
