User talk:Concernsavant

Welcome!

Hello, Concernsavant! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 12:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your edit to User talk:Concernsavant has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please quit copy-pasting content from other websites; we cannot accept it anywhere on Wikipedia. And, as you have already been told, Quora is not an acceptable source. (I cannot assess the book due to the language barrier; a German-speaker with a copy of the book will need to do so.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 19:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

And here is the link of notable: Here the visual citation of artwork by Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr at pages 126 from Notable book of Acrostic Paradise Lost BY Terrance Lindall-- https://archive.org/details/acrostic-bar-code-reduced/page/126/mode/2up And another visual citations and verification at the Acrostic Paradise Lost by Terrance Lindall, look at page 125 the photo of Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. from Williamsburg Art & Historical Center and category of autistic surrealist as a autism survivor. https://archive.org/details/acrostic-bar-code-reduced/page/124/mode/2up Concernsavant (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, anything Lindall writes is useless for notability due to his connexion with Banez. And I've just had to remove yet more copypasted material. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 03:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Terrance Lindall useless for notability? and how can Terrance have a Wikipedia? you are contradicted and violation of Wikipedia policy?! You should be careful what your written! if we analysis or evaluation about "You-(Jeske Couriano ala Korean?) and Terrance Lindall?" well Terrance Lindall have a notability comparing your name Jeske Couriano! let us be serious here in term of notablity! and Here is the translation from German the origin of English and you can read at wikimedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Images_of_Bienvenido_Bones_Banez,_Jr._listed_on_the_KUNSTHERZ_Art_World_Book_by_Gerhard_Habarta._(My_images_photo_screen_shot).jpg Here is the link of notable: Here the visual citation of artwork by Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr at pages 126 from Notable book of Acrostic Paradise Lost BY Terrance Lindall-- https://archive.org/details/acrostic-bar-code-reduced/page/126/mode/2up And another visual citations and verification at the Acrostic Paradise Lost by Terrance Lindall, look at page 125 the photo of Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. from Williamsburg Art & Historical Center and category of autistic surrealist as a autism survivor. https://archive.org/details/acrostic-bar-code-reduced/page/124/mode/2up Concernsavant (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because someone has a Wikipedia article does not make them a reliable source; doubly so if you're using them to cite an article on their colleague. You're still not listening to anything you're being told, and this is going to go over as well as it did last time. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 04:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! not reliable sources? despite have a wikipedia pages! Oh my goodness so weirdo policy! okey let us start again and thanks for your answer and maybe you are right tracking. But don't tell me even Gerhard Habarta have no reliable sources and he is a art historian from Lexikon Surreal Edtion One & Two see this link ..And take note Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. listed this art world book as a notable-- https://www.lexikon-surreal.com/k%C3%BCnstler-l%C3%A4nder/?fbclid=IwAR2ji4i6i0VVciTEACn-nvVrU8uvviFcGMevA-BSQ01TxmJWyMLGgJfs-m4 And here another KUNSTHERZ by Prof Gerhard Habarta is a considered the "RELIABLE SOURCES" (Redacted) https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=2jZPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA573&lpg=PA573&dq=bienvenido%20bones%20banez%20jr%20KunstHerz%20Gerhard%20Habarta&source=bl&ots=jQqXN8QN44&sig=ACfU3U3xnGxpofJHmHklaJdInxTQ41DO6w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiwkrmzi7j4AhWVSmwGHQPMD9EQ6AF6BAgWEAI&fbclid=IwAR27BXMwMcuDns688LYjgVdTno8x2uiai6YzOIC3CIYtWD85Gr-cuYmt4Xg#v=onepage&q=bienvenido%20bones%20banez%20jr%20KunstHerz%20Gerhard%20Habarta&f=false Concernsavant (talk) 04:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lot of these sources were discussed and dismissed, and your IP address was blocked for a week for refusing to heed that criticism. If that happens to your account, the block is more likely to be much longer than a week. Lexikon-surreal is under Banez' control, and the book page provided is a passing mention that says absolutely nothing of consequence about Banez. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 04:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POSSIBILITY-- Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is a male artist. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr.’s first verified exhibition was Selected Contemporary Works from the Permanent Collection Part 2 (2002-present) at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2009, and the most recent exhibition was WAH Salon 23rd Anniversary Show at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2022. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is exclusively exhibited in United States. Banez Jr. has at least no solo shows but 18 group shows over the last 13 years (for more information, see biography). A notable show was Togetherness & Oneness at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2021. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. has been exhibited with Susan Jacobs and Mary Westring. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is ranked among the Top 100,000 globally. Banez Jr.’s best rank was in 2022, the artist’s rank has improved over the last 10 years, with the most dramatic change in 2014. For a complete illustration of the artist’s career since 2009, please see the career chart on the trends page. https://artfacts.net/artist/bienvenido-bones-banez-jr/547969 Concernsavant (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of that helps them pass WP:NARTIST? Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:Concernsavant/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about "Lexikon Surreal Edtion One & Two listed here in Lexikon Surreal are part of Surreal Dictionary and KunstHerz are part of the Scholarly books and take note the word from german is "Lexikon" in Englis- "lex·i·con" a dictionary, especially of Greek, Hebrew, Syriac, or Arabic:

"a Greek–Latin lexicon"

synonyms:

dictionary · wordbook · vocabulary list · glossary · wordfinder · reference book · phrase book · concordance · thesaurus · encyclopedia

[ˈleksiˌkän, ˈleksiˌkən]

https://libguides.usc.edu.au/credible What are credible sources?

Fact checking. Sources for different purposes. DICTIONARIES & ENCYCLOPEDIAS. Books vs SCHOLARLY books. Types of JOURNALS. Peer-reviewed journals. NEWS & MEDIA. https://www.primidi.com/what_is_banez And here is the Dictionary of the Philippines and Bienvenido Bones Banez, listed in Aswang Project of Philippine Dictionary-- read this and you overlook or discrimination his race? https://www.aswangproject.com/bagobo-buso/ And another one Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. listed here in the Dictionary Sensagent! maybe another racist policy? instead universal wisdom and we know majority here in Wikipedia policy are White American & European White? maybe you racist this autistic visionary surrealist? lookk at these are varied sources and here is the link: http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Bienvenido%20%E2%80%9CBones%E2%80%9D%20Banez,%20Jr./en-en/ And another dictionary https://www.howtopronounce.com/bienvenido-bones-banez-jr- And another Surreal Dictionary with Encyclopedia take note Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. listed again this notable art world books from https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Fernal-Affairs-Cataloging-Garden/dp/2953458123 https://www.visionaryartexhibition.com/garden-of-fernal-delights.-(add html) THEREFORE, possibility "WE DOUBT THIS GOOGLE SUPPRESS THE ENTIRE INFORMATION" but we can search at Duck Duck Go or Bing Search and Yandex. MAYBE our common sense from suppression and racists? or discrimination? 2001:4455:1DD:6F00:F0B2:968:8344:A7D0 (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Concernsavant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time with appreciation and encouragement. Concernsavant (talk) 01:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Concernsavant! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 04:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks about this important policy... Concernsavant (talk) 04:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Concernsavant. Thank you. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 04:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bienvenido Bones Banez (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bienvenido Bones Banez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 15:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about this issue of Why Wikipedia Bias? we know the reality and here's from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023118823946 about WHO COUNTS AS A NOTABLE SOCIOLOGIST ON WIKIPEDIA, GENDER, RACE, and THE PROFESSOR TEST Our world bias and Wikipedia its seems turning Technocratic Wickedpedia Totalitarian Regimes. Concernsavant (talk) 03:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even reading what you're writing? The above is word salad and whatever point that paper makes seems to be irrelevant here since your focus is on a painter, not a sociologist. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 03:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use your common sense (Redacted) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023118823946 Concernsavant (talk) 03:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same as artists, sociologist and other important notability, the irony here porn star considered in wikipedia notability? laugh out loud hahaha Concernsavant (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Artists and sociologists have completely different criteria notability-wise (disregarding the general guideline), as you would have very quickly figured out if you'd bothered to actually read anything everyone else has said. I've removed the stuff you've copy-pasted from Allsides as yet another copyright violation. We are also aware of our systemic bias; it's irrelevant here because the article you're attempting to push is blatantly unacceptable from a sourcing, biographical, and (very likely) conflict-of-interest standpoint. You have been told this ad nauseam. Your refusal to listen is on you. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^a little blue Bori 04:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Legoktm (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]