User talk:CodeTalker

Archives (Index)

1 2

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Can you re-add my edit on Fagin

I know it's vandalism but it's hella funny 86.14.40.124 (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

edit: please

No. Providing false information, even if it is funny, is not consistent with Wikipedia's purpose. If you do not intend to contribute constructively, then please stop editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia with these disruptive edits, you will be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Academy Awards

Hi there, could you explain a revert reason in Academy Awards. The Polar Music Prize also using international/world some key words. It's make more clear for who the award for. Why I can't using these words in there? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevencocoboy You have made 6 changes to the article in the last couple of days, changing the awarded_for field to several different versions:

• Excellence in the worldwide film industry
• Excellence film industry in the world
• Excellence in the world of film industry

The last two are grammatically incorrect English and make no sense, which is why I reverted them. I did not revert the first one, but it was reverted by two other editors (User:Rhain and User:Chousic), for reasons they explained in their edit summaries. I agree with them that the word "worldwide" is unnecessary. It is generally not used in sources. Since your change is opposed by multiple editors, you should open a discussion on the article talk page and present sources that support the change you want to make. CodeTalker (talk) 02:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've open a new topic in Talk:Academy Awards. Unnecessary is feeling but I disagree. This is a key word to label who the award for, for american only or around the world. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indiscriminate reverting of all my edit

I noticed you removed the content I added to One taste. I’ve provided evidence on the article’s talk page to address any concerns. Please take a look when you have time.

Thank you Jackersony (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

correction on the article

hello CodeTalker Thank you for clarification. please take a look my correction when you have a time. Jackersony (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]