|
User talk:CinemaandpoliticsAnarchism Hi Cinemaandpolitics, I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself! And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions. Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 10:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Thoughts about taking it to DRN?They're finally accusing us of being the same person. The supposed "third opinion" went mask off. Looking through their talk page, their correspondence goes way back. I can try to write up a report or if you're fine with the situation, let me know. I don't want to drag you into something you have no interest in. Symphidius (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
Your recent post on the TPB talk page contained several false accusations, was a direct personal attack, and even if true should have been on either my talk page or at AN/I, not on an article talk page. Indeed, it was very strange coming in response to a perfectly civil, eight-week old post. You will find that disagreements are a part of the nature of a collaborative project. Assumption of good faith and civility are most important aspects of this collaboration. O3000, Ret. (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Introduction to contentious topics You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. – bradv 02:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Potential Trumpism description RfCHello Cinemaandpolitics, thank you for your engagement on talk page for the Trump article. If you write up an RfC on the subject of adding a brief Trumpism description to the lead, could you please run it by my talk page before you post it? I would like to review the exact wording first. — Goszei (talk) 05:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Quick questionOut of curiosity, why did you choose to ping me to the discussion at Talk:The Blair Witch Project? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
Pattersonuwu (talk) 10:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Request for Comment on Sisi ArticleAbdel Fattah el-Sisi has an RfC Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Firecat93 (talk) 17:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) Regarding your recent rewording on Sisi ArticleHello Cinemaandpolitics I saw your last change to the Sisi article and wanted to explain a few points. 1. I assume the reason why it said "deaths" and not "killing" before is because not all of the deaths happened in the camps, there were many deaths included in the figure that happened elsewhere, see Republican Guard headquarters clashes for an example. If you use "killing" because of the directive to disperse camps (which sounds fair enough) then you'd have to exclude deaths that were not caused by this directive from the 3000 figure. 2. Furthermore, if we keep the "killing" wording, the number would then have to be changed from 3000, as per the source listed on there, the number of civilians who died as a result of protests and clashes is around 2529 (please note the article doesn't attribute all deaths to the security forces and that 60 police/soldiers died as well, hence my hesitation to use the term killing for all of the deaths). The rest of the deaths were caused by terrorist attacks or other violent acts unrelated to protests. See figure 1 in the source cited for that sentence. I believe this complication with the numbers and attribution is the reason why the article originally had "deaths" rather than "killing". Serienwiki (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays
|
