User talk:Goszei

Proposed deletion of Tamizhaga Dravida Makkal Katchi

Notice

The article Tamizhaga Dravida Makkal Katchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved 15 years. Run of the mill small regional party. Tagged as possibly not notable for over 4 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 22:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu • teacups 04:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset Fire

Why did you delete picture of the Sunset Fire? I will upload it again and I ask you to please not take off this contobution again.

it alighns with all wikipidia policies and it was taken from my work and it is very relevant so please dont take it off again, thank you. YisroelB501 (talk) 04:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was by mistake, perhaps as the result of an edit conflict. I have edited it back in. — Goszei (talk) 04:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Barbarossa

While it seems clear to me that you have good intentions, your recent edits to the article summary (lead) of Operation Barbarossa were reverted. Just so you know, that article is in GA status and has been thoroughly worked (content and citations, as well as summary) by a host of experienced and academically credentialed editors. In the future, I would advise you to discuss your planned content edits to a lead and justify them accordingly for all articles already in GA status. This generally means getting some consensus from the main contributors on the Talk Page first. Obenritter (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum, it is a major oversight that the current lead contains basically no detail on military movements like dates and cities, which are obviously highly relevant to the operation and should be included in any summary of it. I think you will agree that the current lead is not perfect, and will perhaps agree that there were at least some improvements in my edits. I will take it to talk soon. — Goszei (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]