User talk:Chetvorno

I will reply to comments below on this page, in order to keep the dialog in one place

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loop antenna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on ferrite

Thanks for catching all my spelling errors--danger of late-night editing w/o LanguageTools turned on! DrKC MD (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crystal detector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rectification.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Nikola_Tesla Endy Angello (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gridiron pendulum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Ellicott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Ips

All 95 addresses are mine. Even ones you marked as "not" here [1]. You don't understand that some ISPs rotate addressed more frequently and often reuse them. I was posting only on Tesla board , none of other contributions of the 2 ips with more contributions are mine. The IP was reused and someone else made contributions. For ip 95.168.116.19, the only edit that is mine is from 5th July. Even the edit on 26th May which is about Tesla isn't mine. For IP 95.168.120.122, the only edit that is mine is from 4th August. All other edits before and after that aren't mine. Ip got reused and assigned to other users. Bdw, this is often the problem with Check User. It sometimes misidentifies editors because 2 editors can be assigned the same IP. Croatia is small and there is significant chance that 2 Croatian editors on the same board will be assigned the same address. Look. It happened to me on ip 95.168.116.19. Someone posted Tesla related post on 27th May and on 5th July I got assigned the same Ip and I also posted Tesla related post. If we had accounts, CU would identify that as a proof of shocking, but it isn't. Anyways, all 95 ips are mine.

Other editors are ip 77 who did vote and done discussioning. Ip 5.39.134.145 who just put a vote, didn't discuss apart from posting one comment from 93.141.183.145, and later from ip 93 challanged the consensus. Ip 31.217.16.206 who just voted. Ip 72.139.121.219 who didn't vote , but posted a comment attaching Trimpos2.

So to summerize, we had 5 people posting from Ips. I don't think anyone is socking here, but you are free to open SPI 95.168.124.26 (talk) 11:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. There has been some sock activity on the Talk page during RfCs in past years, so the question sometimes comes up when IPs join the discussion. Is it okay if I move this conversation to Talk:Nikola Tesla/Nationality and ethnicity since it concerns the RfC? --Chetvorno^TALK 12:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ground plane article

If you have a moment... could you check my edit to the Ground plane article? I found myself asking this specific question on SE because the Wp article implied that the reflector's connection quite simply didn't matter https://ham.stackexchange.com/questions/22968/ground-plane-connection-to-screen/22974 but there's a lot I'm unhappy about: the operating principle of a "no ground-plane" antenna e.g. magmount on a vehicle roof, the potential screening effect of a non-connected ground plane (could it be said to have any effect at all?) the difference between reflectors for a monopole and a yagi and so on: I've basically focussed on trying to make my edits safe, and a bit more use than the original.

Many thanks for your https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chetvorno/work6#Radiation_pattern which I found most enlightening. MarkMLl (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking me. I'll take a look. --Chetvorno^TALK 14:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

C band (IEEE)

added a link pointing to Router

S band

added a link pointing to Router

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C band (IEEE), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Router.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Double-slit experiment".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

TheWikiToby (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I apologize. I was just asking for suggestions and did not realize this post would happen. Johnjbarton (talk) 06:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Chetvorno^TALK 18:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

= I commented out your disputed mark on "short whip antenna" in the "antenna types" article .. I commented out your disputed mark on "short whip antenna" in the "antenna types" article on 30 November 2024 because you made no corresponding entry in the the talk:antenna types page. Please feel free to fill in the missing dispute and afterward remove the comment marks to restore the dispute. You might also copy some of the text you put into the change note for 30 Nov. (which was a chore to find, hence why you are obliged to write an explanation into the talk page).

I think you are mistaken; the text clearly states "short whip". I would propose that the definition of a "short" antenna is essentially that it is too short to naturally resonate. It also seems to me that any artificial impedance matching (e.g. a loading coil) is beside the point: It doesn't actually make a short whip itself resonant, it just compensates for its natural, but reactive and low-resistance feedpoint impedance. I embedded words to that effect in the commenting-out marks, so you might want to copy them into your own remarks on the talk page in order to refute my interpretation of "short".
12.75.128.53 (talk) 11:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

=== SirlupinwatsonIII (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC) I appreciate it! On this one, particularly I believe that you actually did not improve the article but reduced the slight improvements made and taken always the beauty of each combination, even if the amount was already low, the approach for each word that I had selected was pointing at the main article of interest. I am more than fine with this, still, this is named in bold chart about and says extremely high frequency, you then take out most of the related content I've applied, to offer a talk over the low frequency range. I don't think it's an improvement, and you bring much of an opinion as well.[reply]