User talk:Chapultepec

Click here to leave me a message
Remember to sign your name by typing ~~~~ after the message.
Archive
Archives

Welcome!

Hello, Chapultepec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 21:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... Chapultepec 21:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!

I love the pictures on your userpage! Do you mind if I add them to my gallery? —Khoikhoi 22:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly you can add them, those are my contributions to everyone...
Chapultepec 22:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :) Did you get caught up in the violence in whlie you were in the Caucasus? —Khoikhoi 22:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's interesting. So you were only in Ingushetia? That's a pretty small area, I would figure that you've been to Chechnya, or even Dagestan as well. —Khoikhoi 23:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps someday I'll go there, too...take care. —Khoikhoi 23:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.Khosrow II 15:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You just broke 3RR. However, if you revert it back to the last version by me, your changes wont count, and you wont be subject to a block. Its your choice, be blocked or unmake your changes.Khosrow II 17:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, in fact you broke the 3RR. If you count the reverts you made you can get it. And if you go to the article and see what I did and what I wrote in the messages of the last edits I made, you can easily understand it...
Chapultepec 17:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since you accepted my proposal I will not report you.Khosrow II 17:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In fact you did at least four reverts, and you deserve to be reported for it. But I think we came to a compromise and I don't think to report you too....
Moreover, I did not accept your proposal. Your proposal came after I thought the change and made my actions..
Chapultepec 17:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm glad you guys worked it out (at least I hope). In the future the place to go is WP:AN/3RR (new reports go at the bottom). —Khoikhoi 18:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Khoikhoi...
Chapultepec 18:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Violations

Report them to WP:AN3 using the format specified at the bottom of the page. alphaChimp(talk) 19:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you AlphaChimp. I don't think to report him for the time being.
Chapultepec 19:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baklava

This article is horrible written this sentence doesn't even belong there.

"The history of baklava, like that of many other foods, is not well documented. Though it has been claimed by many groups, the best evidence is that it is ultimately of Central Asian Turkic origin, but that its current form was developed in the imperial kitchens of the Topkapı Palace." Nareklm 11:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You erased my edits without reason. I cited a valid source, next time tell me why you reverted. --152.216.11.5 13:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you revert my edit? --152.216.11.5 13:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Above question was addressed to Chapultepec, not Nareklm --Oguz1 14:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
my mistake, sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oguz1 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re: Yeniceri_aga.jpg

You might want to ask that question at Wikipedia:Media Copyright Questions and they will be happy to help. —Pilotguy (ptt) 23:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed your adding external links, and with spam a major concern, we try to keep an eye on people adding lots of links to Wikipedia, please don't think I'm accusing you of any impropriety, but I am curious - is there any reason you've added links to over 100 pages today ? Do the articles absolutely need this information and have you contacted anybody before adding these links. ? --Kind Regards - Heligoland 02:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rumelia

Okay, Britannica might be one source, but any Turkish dictionary you open you'll find out that 'rum' translates to 'Greek' or in modern times 'Greek of turkish citizenship'[1][2][3]. Most importantly, there's a different word to say "Roman". 'Rum' comes from the Arabic 'Ram', which was a name for Byzantium and sometimes for ancient Greece. Either way in post-Byzantine times 'Rum' refers only to Greeks, and it's still in used today for Greeks of Turkish citizenship and Cypriots. Denying this fact is like reducing the status of ethnic Greeks in Turkey and Cyprus to a subjet people who doesn't have the right to claim an ethnicity. Miskin 20:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of English words of Sanskrit Origin

Thanks for your great work on this page. I noticed that there are a number of quotes from the On-line etymological dictionary. Since the dictionary material is copyrighted, I just wanted to make sure the extensive quoting was not a problem. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! OK, great, so you have it under control. I should add that you have done a great job on that page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 12:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yıldız

Sure, good idea. I've also fixed the links at Çırağan Palace, Cinema of Turkey, Golden Horn, and Bezmiâlem. Khoikhoi 05:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. If you look at Category:Islands of Turkey and Category:Islands in the Sea of Marmara, you'll see that both are used. I guess it depends on which island, but we should use whatever name is most common in English. I prefer "Marmara Island" over "Marmara Adası", but I have no problem with just "Avşa". Cheers, Khoikhoi 06:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tahn

I guarantee you, Tahn is exactly the same as Ayran. It is normally a flat drink, though in some places you have the option of getting the version with gas in it... but you always have the flat version option as that is the normal Tahn, the default - what you get at Zankou Chicken and all the other restaurants. --RaffiKojian 15:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoghurt

What makes you think it was invented somewhere? —Michael Fourman 00:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. I'm happy with the Bulgars etc., but in any warm region of the world yoghurt just happens - it really is a matter of discovery, rather than invention. And then you find it happens faster if you add a little of the old yoghurt as a starter, so the better strains get selected.—Michael Fourman 01:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I've tidied a bit more, and put first back. OK? —Michael Fourman 07:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oghuz Turks

Hey. The source is very outdated. Since then, genetic testing has been done, and genetic testing has shown no Oghuz descent. The only Oghuz connection is linguistic, its more accurate to say that the Oghuz Turks are the linguistic ancestors of todays Turkic speakers in Europe/South West Asia.Azerbaijani 14:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert College has been nominated GA

Would you like to contribute to the nomination process or peer review the article? SEE: Robert College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Maestro 10:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Maestro 11:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish cuisine

Hi, our friend Zy is adding lots of good material to the Turkish cuisine article, but I fear he is adding too much material which is redundant with other articles. Please take a look at my comment in Talk:Turkish cuisine and see what you think. I wanted to make a joke with patlama dolması or something, but it's hard to be funny when you're at the dictionary+grammar stage of learning a language.... --Macrakis 05:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE Turkish Cuisine

The problem is that you should first put how a thing is called in Turkish and then in brackets. For example I think it is better to first give "sucuk" as it is and to write thereafter its pronounciation "sujuk". The same thing can be said for musakka, pilav etc.

None of the information I have put so far is redundant. Sometimes I may be tired and careless about grammar and wording however I am always coming back to correct or improve the text. But senseless/baseless removals make me upset gentlemen! I will continue to keep a close eye on your edits —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Z y (talk • contribs) 22:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Kebab

Kebab has many variants, shish kebab is very popular so it should stay. Doner kebab is not relevant or notable enough to stay, the other section I removed because dictionaries don't seem to be a good reference since they don't provide enough information. Artaxiad 09:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish cuisine: Reiterations

Simdi tekrar yapmak su sekilde kacinilmaz: yemekleri birbirleriyle iliskilendirerek benzetmeler yaparak farkliliklarini soyleyerek anlatmak gerek. Dolma meselesi mesela. Tamam dolma diye ayri bir bolum var ama simdi zamaninda vejetaryen yemekler kismi acilmis. Simdi orada da bahsetmek gerek. Hem amac bilgi vermek ise tekrar iyi bile sayilabilir. Pekistirir.

Ingilizce karsiliklar tabii ki verilmeli. Aksi dusunulemez. Dedigim suydu; tamam brackets icinde ingilizcesi verilsin ama Turkcesi de mutlaka verilsin. Paranteze Turkcesi de alinabilir ama duz yazi olmamak kaydiyla, yani renkli olmali ki yemek adi gorunsun. Lokum mesela. Elbet Turkish delight denecek ama lokum da yazilacak. Adamlar bizim fonetik uzerinden ingilizce yaziyorlar zaten. Yani simdi kofte'ye sadece meatball yazsak olur mu?

Su kirmizi mavi meselesine gelince o isin teknik kismi, diger article'lara referans mavilerle otomatik olarak veriliyor zaten. Dikkat ederseniz diger cuisine article'larinda da hep boyle. Illa renkli yazimin arkasinda bir article olmasi gerekmiyor.

Sometimes repetition turns out to be inevitable. I think it is necessary/better to explain specialities by setting out their similarities to and differences from other dishes and by making references to other titles. Dolma for instance. Ok there is a part dedicated to dolma but it should be mentionned in the vegetarian dishes part as well. Aside from that if the aim is to provide information, repetition strengthens the infrastructure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Z y (talk • contribs) 09:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC).--Z y 09:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Cuisine

I sincerely do not agree that coloring the names of the specialities harms readibility. On the contrary, if we transform it into a paper without any difference in presentation (plain black), it would be less interesting from readers' perspective. Cause most of the time you pick the words and then read it.

Aksini dusunsem sizinle yazisma zahmetine girmezdim. Size de kolay gelsin. Iyi gunler.--Z y 12:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Bugun "must" ile konustuk bir template hazirlamak istiyorlar Turkish cuisine ile ilgili bakalim. Boylece diger ilgili article'larda dogrudan atif verilebilecek sayfanin altinda. Ama basliklar ve altbasliklari iyi oturtmak lazim. Siz de fikirlerinizi soyleyin.--Z y 19:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 


        Valla sustainability cok onemli..

Yaylag

Thanks for removing the categories from my Talk page, but I placed back the List of Turkish words category to the Yaylag page, since there is no Turkic words category, while yaylag definitely belongs to Turkish as well as to all Turkic languages. Plus many in West, and even Turkey, don't differentiate between Turkic vs. Turk, even calling Kirgiz, Uzbek, Kazakh as "Turk lehcesi", or Turkish dialect, as opposed to language. That's why I find that it's appropriate to have that category there. Wisconsin96 23:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I nominated the article for Did you know?, hopefully it will be featured. Please keep an eye the article too. Wisconsin96 23:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Türk mutfağı

Şablonlar için fikirlerinizi iletin.Karşı çıkma konusunu yeri gelince düşünelim diyorum.Selam.Must.T C 10:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Must.T C 14:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • Teplate in wikipedia now;

Template:Turkish_cuisine

I tried to add your offers in. Needs to organizing, some further formatting, adding categories etc.I will be here for further ideas,offers.Regards.Must.T C 13:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

user Hah Sayfada 4RR yaptı. raporlayabilirmisin.Acilen çıkmam gerek.Sağol.Must.T C 17:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bulgaro-huns

I decided to discuss this first. Look at the bulgars article. Bulgars were swept by the huns, but nevertheless remained bulgars. Sorry for the revert - I even found a source for your version myself :) --Laveol 13:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One truth worth more than a thousand lies. You cant generalise Origin based on no evidence and foulthy information. The subject of the Ethnic Origin of the Bulgars is been controversial for many years now. However there are several different theories , and none of them have been proven definitive. Some claim that they are of Turkic Origin ,which arose doubts and controversies, since there is no objective evidence to support it. Other Historians lately claim that Bulgars are of Iranian descent, based on resent archeological research and facts. --ortis12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ortis12 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kımız

Kumis sayfasını Kımız sayfasına nasıl taşırız?Must.T C 16:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Şablon;Turkish cuisine

Şablonu yeniden düzenliyorum. Yeni hali; Tarhana , Kebab, Cağ kebab sayfalarında var. Yeni hali ile; şablonun bulunduğu sayfa hangi guruba aitse o guruptaki diğer maddeler gösteriliyor.Yani; Kebab sayfasında; turkish kebabs alt şablonu, Tarhana sayfasında ise Turkish soups alt şablonu açılıyor.Görüşler??Must.T C 14:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Türk mutfağı

Selam,

  • Şablona tekrar bakarmısın.;
{{Turkish cuisine}}
  • Türk mutfağı ile ilgili çok fazla redlink var, bu maddeler için (en azından stub seviyesinde yaratmak için) yardım gerekiyor.
  • Şablon, otomatik olarak ""List of Turkish cuisine X"" sayfalarına link veriyor. Bunlardan iki tanesini başlattım.Diğerleri ilgi bekliyor.
  • Varolan maddelerin(bulabildiğim) tümüne şablon eklendi. Kontrol etmelte yarar var.

Selam.Kolay gelsin. Must.T C 07:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Desserts

Bu sayfaya Turkish desserts'i nasil ekleyebiliriz? "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Desserts_by_country"


Cok guzel. Tesekkurler...--Z yTalk 21:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Origin

One truth worth more than a thousand lies! You cant generalise Origin based on no evidence and foulthy information. The subject of the Ethnic Origin of the Bulgars is been controversial for many years now. However there are several different theories , and none of them have been proven definitive. Some claim that they are of Turkic Origin ,which arose doubts and controversies, since there is no objective evidence to support it. Other Historians lately claim that Bulgars are of Iranian descent, based on resent archeological research and facts. You can revert my posts or block me, but cant BLOCK the Truth!!! --ortis12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ortis12 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi Chapultepec, please see my reply on my my talk. thank you. Samsam22 21:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shajar al-Durr

Hi Chapultepec, Please see what I wrote you on my talk. thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsam22 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Seventh Crusade

Hi Chapultepec. Thank you for correcting. Please read my notice in Talk:Seventh Crusade. I think this article needs correction. Thanks Samsam22 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soru

Selam. Yine ben. Yunan Mutfagi sayfasina su sacmalik konmus ve ben bir turlu kaldiramiyorum? Bugun en son boyle uyarilar falan geldi, yok senin edit'lerini bloke ettiricez falan diye. Ne kadar dogrudur bu? Anlatmaya calistim ama olmadi. Ben de surekli siliyordum. Devam edeyim mi?

Such Turkish staples as kebabs, stuffed vine leaves and stuffed vegetables were Byzantine staples. Börek, halva and baklava are well-attested in Byzantine and classical texts. The arts of baking and viniculture were also unknown to the Turks when they arrived in Anatolia and the latter remained a Christian prerogative at least as late as the sixteenth century. The food of the ordinary people of Byzantium was very similar to that of today's Anatolian peasantry -bread, beans, lentils, olives and olive oil, vegetables fruit and dairy products.

Bir sey yapamaz miyiz? --Z yTalk 17:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tesekkurler...--Z yTalk 20:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hotels in London

Hi, sorry i had a brain fade moment and wasn't sure whether you were saying the list should be deleted or not! Tx for clarifying Thundernlightning 09:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hotels in Istanbul

Selamlar :) maddeyi (Istanbul'daki hoteller) silmekten kurtardigin icin cok tesekkürler :) maalesef tartismaya katilamadim internet baglantim haftalarca kopmustu :) actigin yeni metin daha da güzel olmus benim actigim ilk madde sadece bir listeydi ama simdi tam bir madde olmus :) her hangi bir katkida bulunabilirsem haberim olsun... ben daha cok alman vikipedisine katildigim icin buraya fazla bakmazdim:) selamlar --Azec 18:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

al-Said Barakah

Hi Chapultepec , I added a new article about Sultan al-Said Barakah. Please visit and read discussion. Regards. Samsam22 (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chapultepec, please can you go to page al-said Barakah and connect link of Golden Horde . I tried but it still not link. Thanx Samsam22 (talk) 20:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chapultepec, I see you are editing . Thank you. If you like you can also add birth/deah date of al-said born 1260 died 1279. thank you Samsam22 (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job. By the way what do you think to wait with this sentence "who would take the Mamluk throne after the reign of his brother Salamish." till the article ready as this will be confusing and anyway will be mentioned later.Samsam22 (talk) 22:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think now we can start with a new paragraph. Baibars will die and Barakah becomes a sultan. You think we go on or make a new title ? If you have a title you can put and I will start with it tomorrow.Samsam22 (talk) 23:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, very good. Thank you. Tomorrow we do the rest Samsam22 (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chapultepec, I added new things, look and see whether something need change. It is slow but info scattered over so many resources.:) Samsam22 (talk) 20:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chapultepec,the article almost ready . read and see what needs change. u can cut to subs. tomorrow I add last part. thnx Samsam22 (talk) 03:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing. I think we can finish it today. Salamish was 7 years old and no big story about him. Shall we add him on page of Barakah and link his name to Barakah page or we make a s mall article about him on own page ? Samsam22 (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it is ready. you can adjust it. Good job. Thank you very much. Samsam22 (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , We started a new article about Solamish ( name is Solamish not Salamish ) Isa Alcala created the article I will add more later. but no much to be said about this young Sultan. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 03:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chapultepec, I finished the article of Solamish. Please see whether you like to edit or organise article. Read also the discussion because I added some info about the name. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you. I added something to discussion. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yörük maddesine kaynak.Keşke şu ingilizce maddeyi çevrebilsek ve Kailar, Ottoman diye madde oluşturabilsek.

Bir de yörük maddesinde sorunumuz var. İlgili maddenin Kailar Yörüks bölümüne geçenlerde isimsiz bir kullanıcı fact etiketleri ekledi. Maddede bu bölümle ilgili bir kaynak bulamadığım için ilgili bölüme bir referans ekleyemedim. Sanırım bu konuda sizin bilginiz fazla. Eğer bildiğiniz bir kaynak varsa ilgili bölüme iliştirebilir misiniz? Eğer isterseniz benimle kendi sayfamdan bağlantıya geçebilirsiniz. Teşekkürler. --Chapultepec (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beyefendi yakın ilginize çok teşekkür ederim. Geç vevap yazdığım içinözür dilerim. Bu konuda bu bilgilerin tamımına yakını Osmanlı ve Bizans arşivlerinde mevcuttur. Hatta Türklerden ilk müslüman olanların Rumeliye yerleştirilmesi olayıda ilginçtir. Yörük maddesine ilişkin bazı kaynak bilgileri aşağıdadır:The 1911 Edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica about Yuruks, Kailars and Konariotes

see link {{cquote2| The first Turkish immigration from Asia Minor took place under the Byzantine emperors before the conquest of the country. The first purely Turkish town, Yenije-Vardar, was founded on the ruins of Vardar in 1362. After the capture of Salonica (1430), a strong Turkish population was settled in the city, and similar colonies were founded in Monastir, Ochrida, Serres, Drama and other important places. In many of these towns half or more of the population is still Turkish. A series of military colonies were subsequently established at various points of strategic importance along the principal lines of communication. Before 1360 large numbers of nomad shepherds, or Yuruks, from the district of Konia, in Asia Minor, had settled in the country; their descendants are still known as Konariotes. Further immigration from this region took place from time to time up to the middle of the 18th century.

After the establishment of the feudal system in 1397 many of the Seljuk noble families came over from Asia Minor; their descendants may be recognized among the beys or Moslem landowners in southern Macedonia .

At the beginning of the 18th century the Turkish population was very considerable, but since that time it has continuously decreased. A low birth rate, the exhaustion of the male population by military service, and great mortality from epidemics, against which Moslem fatalism takes no pre-cautions, have brought about a decline which has latterly been hastened by emigration

The Turkish rural population is found in three principal groups:

See link:1911 encyclopedia.org

The Byzantines retained the southern regions and Salonica, which temporarily fell into the hands of the Saracens in 904. With the exception of the 1 Also Alexander, Perdiccas, Philip, &c. maritime districts, the whole of Macedonia formed a portion of the empire of the Bulgarian tsar Simeon (893-927); the Bulgarian power declined after his death, but was revived in western Macedonia under the Shishman dynasty at Ochrida; Tsar Samuel (976-1014), the third ruler of that family, included in his dominions Uskiib, Veles, Vodena and Melnik. After his defeat by the emperor Basil II. in 1014 Greek domination was established for a century and a half. The Byzantine emperors endeavoured to confirm their positions by Asiatic colonization; Turkish immigrants, afterwards known as Vardariotes, the first of their race who appeared in Macedonia, were settled in the neighbourhood of Salonica in the 9th century; colonies of Uzes, Petchenegs and Kumans were introduced at various periods from the 11th to the 13th century. While Greeks and Bulgarians disputed the mastery of Macedonia the Vlachs, in the 10th century, established an independent state in the Pindus region, which, afterwards known as Great Walachia, continued to exist till the beginning of the 14th century. In 1185 southern Macedonia was exposed to a raid of the Normans under William of Sicily, who captured Salonica and massacred its inhabitants. After the taking of Constantinople in 1204 by the Franks of the fourth crusade, the Latin empire of Romania was formed and the feudal kingdom of Thessalonica was bestowed on Boniface, marquis of Montferrat; this was overthrown in 1222 by Theodore, despot of Epirus, a descendant of the imperial house of the Comneni, who styled himself emperor of Thessalonica and for some years ruled over all Macedonia. He was defeated and captured by the Bulgarians in 1230 and the remnant of his possessions, to which his son John succeeded, was absorbed in the empire of Nicaea in 1234. Bulgarian rule was now once more established in Macedonia under the powerful monarch Ivan Asen II. (1218-1241) whose dynasty, of Vlach origin, had been founded at Trnovo in 1186 after a revolt of the Vlachs and Bulgars against the Greeks. A period of decadence followed the extinction of the Asen dynasty in 1257; the Bulgarian power was overthrown by the Servians at Velbuzhd (1330), and Macedonia was included in the realm of the great Servian tsar Dushan (1331-1355) who fixed his capital at Uskiib. Dushan's empire fell to pieces after his death, and the anarchy which followed prepared the way for the advance of the Turks, to whom not only contending factions at Constantinople but Servian and Bulgarian princes alike made overtures.

Macedonia and Thrace were soon desolated by Turkish raids; when it was too late the Slavonic states combined against the invaders, but their forces, under the Servian tsar Lazar, were routed at Kossovo in 1389 by the sultan Murad I. Salonica and Larissa were captured in 1395 by Murad's son Bayezid, whose victory over Sigismund of Hungary at Nicopolis in 1396 sealed the fate of the peninsula. The towns in the Struma valley were yielded to the Turks by John VII. Palaeologus in 1424; Salonica was taken for the last time in 1428 by Murad II |[4] -- 3210  (T) 19:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baklava

Hello Chapultepec, First of all, great pictures on your user page, but regarding your arbitrary control over the Baklava page: Yes, Baklava is currently popular in modern countries once belonging to the Ottoman Empire, but this generalization does not include countries such as Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and India -- all of which were Persianates (heavily influenced by Persian culture to the point of virtual assimilation) or were ruled by a Persian Dynasty at one point in time. The Qajar Dynasty of Persia popularized Baklava within its domain as well as in many of these countries. In order to validate this fact, it is necessary to mention it along with the Ottoman Empire. I understand your nationalistic desire to put Turkey's name on Baklava, but frankly it's not native to the country of Turkey. You have be fair to other countries,

thank you, Bagrationi

Talk:Seventh Crusade

Hi Chapultepec, I added something for you on Talk:Seventh Crusade. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names

Hi again Chapultepec , what do you think about writing names ? Adam has an opinion. You can see it in my talk. Regards. Samsam22 (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lajin

Hi Chapultepec , I finished article of Lajin maybe you like to read and edit. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr

Hi Chapultepec, I started an article about Sultan Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr please visit discussion page and the following page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Saif_ad-Din_Abu-Bakr

Thank you. Samsam22 (talk) 02:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Hi Chapultepec, the article of Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr is as good as ready. Thank you for editing. But we have a little problem. If you look in article of Aybak you will see below in the succession box that Al-Mansur Ali is red and not linked. The same is in page of Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr the name Kujuk in the succession box also not linked. the two sultans were not very significant and thus there is no much to say about them. In itself this is not a real problem. But there are people here who as soon as I start an article jump in and try to delete it with the excuse that the Sultan was not important and therefore does not deserve an article. But this makes it hard to link the articles of the Mamluks sultans as some names in the succession box remain red and thus reader can not follow. What do you think ? Is here someone we can talk with about ? so that we can add the two sultans with little info but with succession box so that the circle is complete. Please let me know about your opinion. Thank you and regards. Samsam22 (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kujuk

Shihab ad-Din Ahmad

Hi Chapultepec, Shihab ad-Din Ahmad article is as good as ready. If you like, please read and edit. Tamam. Thank you and regards Samsam22 (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kızılören

No. That was my mistake. The space was unnecessay. I self-reverted. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baraba language

Yeah, I self-reverted. BTW, you are doing a good clean up job. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baibars

Hi Chapultepec , How are you. I am not very busy with adding new info on Wikipedia at the moment but I saw someone tried to change something in article of Baibars but you saw it. gj. I added ref. with pages about that point so maybe it helps. Regards. Samsam22 (talk) 03:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aybak

Hi Chapultepec , Thank you for fixing things in article of Aybak. As you noticed I added some info and ref. and number of pages . I think it is ready now. Please, if you like, see whether you like to add or change something. I will start with fixing article of Shajar Adurr which is full of mistakes . :) Regards. Samsam22 (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shajar al-Durr

Thanx Chapultepec. Look now whether you like. I will go on with fixing this article and add ref. Tamam. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx again Chapultepec. I arrived to the part of the death of as-Salih. When I am ready I will of course tell you so you edit. when ready you should send me nice Turkish baklava :) Samsam22 (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dumlupınar (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dumlupınar (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Dumlupınar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

selamlar

sayfalara resim koymak icin yardiminizi rica ediyorum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masumisyan (talk • contribs) 19:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images and maps

Hi Chapultepec, I added some images and maps in some articles. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil

Yes right I saw the article. I think we have to fix it and add ref as Khalil was an important sultan. I will start fix tomorrow and if you like you can adjust. I did not go further with writing new articles till we fixed old ones. Tamam Thanx Samsam22 (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Chapultepec, Ok I checked sources. But I have difficulty with two points 1)

conflict Turkish Mamluks with Circassians and 2) conflict because of Ibn al-Salus. No source mentioned that. The rest can go though need to modify and add info. Tamam . Let me know what do you think. Samsam22 (talk) 20:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi , I did not finish the Khalil's article yet but I arrived to the case of Alexander and changed to : " ...by Khalil who was described on some of his monuments as Alexander.[49]". On the article of the Siege of Acre (1291) actually not much said about the Conquere of Acre. Maybe we can later copy/past the part from Khalil article. I also made a map ( lol ) for Acre 1291. anyway, Tamam. Regards Samsam22 (talk) 23:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cumans

Why do you remove the Bulgarian name??? The Cumans played important role in Bulgaria as co-founders of several dynasties and as participated in the Bulgarian army. Restore it. --Gligan (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of reference? Usually there are no references for the names in different languages. --Gligan (talk) 19:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The other names beside it have references for example, that kind of reference will work. --Chapultepec (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Turkey museum

Template:Infobox Turkey museum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Adoniscik(t, c) 21:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish bands and singers in persian wiki

Hi,

I'm working on Turkish music related articles in Persian wikipedia. It would be great if you help us in finding suitable references and free photo for expanding articles. The list of Turkish bands/singers in persian wiki is here and here. Thanks in advanced. -- Meisam.fa (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Çaka Bey and Chaka of Smyrna

Chapultepec, this is a friendly notice to inform you of an ongoing discussion about merging the articles Çaka Bey and Chaka of Smyrna, and the most appropriate name for the merged article. Your significant contributions to the latter article suggested to me that you might want to contribute to the discussion. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor
Image placeholders
Image placeholders debated
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Climates.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Climates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul Archaeology Museum

hi there Chapultepec, I left a message on your Commons page about "Istanbul Archaeology Museum", I haven't received a response yet if we can move ahead and move the whole category, let me know ok? thanks Gryffindor 12:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

You edited a page I also edited. I think your edits were much better. I like wikipedia a lot as well as languages and would like to do more translation and so on as well as learn more languages... Perhaps you could tell me a bit about your time here in Wikipedia? Take care.--Kiyarrlls-talk 00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost
Wikimedia Deutschland case
Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de
Wikimedia events
Wikimedia Events Roundup
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

İsmail Bey Camii at Devrekani

Mehaba, Chapultepec. Do you have any information about an architecturally significant mosque at Devrekani called İsmail Bey Camii? I have a rather old Kümmerly & Frey map with an important mosque marked in that town but have been unable to find corroboration. Do you know anything? I have observed and appreciated your work with the small towns of this region. Thank you very much. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 05:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I suspected. Thanks for taking a look. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Meze

Hi. Thanks for explaining. I understand your point, but these languages have been part of the consensus version for a very long time now. So I would let them be (without trying to add more languages at this stage). I hope you agree. Best. --Zlerman (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Döner

Merhaba eski STFA'lı mühendis arkadaşım :) Üstteki meze konusunda kıllık yapan arkadaş şimdi de Döner sayfasında döner'in alman olduğunu kanıtlamak için uğraşıyor. Bi boş vaktinde bakabilir misin? Tüm günümü verdim makale'yi adam etmek için oysa, akademik referanslarla falan, ama nâfile :(

--67.212.185.173 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

İskele Mosque

Can you fix (stub sort, xternal links, infobox, spelling...) on İskele Mosque, like you did on Şemsi Pasha Mosque and Atik Valide Mosque. Thanks. --Kebeta (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pasha

Sorry, was removing abusive edits and got distracted. Back now. Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TR CUISINE

Selamlar --Z yTalk 08:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qalpaq

I'm not sure that the word "Kalpak" can be considered to "come from" the Turkic words. I wouldn't consider Kalpak to be an English word in its own right, but rather simple usage of the various Turkic forms in English. So something other than "from" should probably be used there, but I'm not sure what. Any ideas? —Firespeaker (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(In response to your response on my talk page.) Hm, I think they're all basically the same thing. There're a lot of pages I've encountered recently (all Central Asia-themed, but that might just be because of what I've been poking at) which talk about a sometimes wide variety of things that fall under one term (whether the term is even cognate across languages), but have differences depending on region, etc. Some examples include qurut, plov, and samsa (donno why food are the first examples that came to mind, hmm).
Given this sort of thing—which is probably appropriate—I'd say that keeping calpack and kalpak as one article is probably the best route. They really are the same thing, just with regional variation. An example of something that's not like this might be kobyz and komuz, where the word is the same, but the regional differences in use have resulted in two distinct things which should probably have separate names in English (and likewise, the references to Azeri and Caucasian instruments in the komuz article are probably inappropriate).
So what do you think?
P.S. Starling should be used with a grain of salt, since its intended purpose is to demonstrate "proto-World," and even a specific fringe theory within that fringe field. That said, it can be useful to find a word's cognates across Turkic. —Firespeaker (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so I think the questions have become:
  • If we consider Calpac(k) an English word, what's the pronunciation?
  • How do we reword it to say that the English word comes from Turkic without taking a position on which Turkic language it came from? Or, if we think it's from Turkish specifically, then what do we do with the other Turkic cognates?
  • What does the word mean in English (if different from the Turkic words), and how (if at all) should the usages be indicated as distinct in the article?
Given those questions, I propose the following solution, in the form of an outline for reformatting the article:
  • "Calpack [and variants...] (/ˈkælpæk/???) is an English term of Turkish origin (Turkish: kalpak, IPA: [kɑlpɑk])[source] referring to a type of high-crowned hat, usually made of felt or sheepskin, worn by men across the Near East, including ... (or whatever...). It can also refer to specific styles of hats in these areas, e.g., Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, etc."
  • [maybe new section for region-specific referents?] "In Kyrgyzstan, kalpaks (Kyrgyz: калпак, IPA: [qɑlpɑ́q]; include plural too?) are made of wool and are usually white, with decorations (oymo) in silver, gold, or black, which were traditionally used to indicate tribal affiliation. Today kalpaks are worn by most Kyrgyz men on formal or festive occasions, by many non-urban males of all ages while working outside, and by older men in the cities as a sign of ethnic pride or of sentiment for the traditional. (source needed)"
  • "In Kazakhstan, ..." etc.
  • [maybe new section for other uses, or words derived from the term?] "Certain Ethnic groups are named after their kalpaks...." —Firespeaker (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Barnstar of National Merit

The Turkish Barnstar of National Merit
Please accept this long overdue Turkish Barnstar of National Merit for your tireless efforts to improve Turkey-related articles. CeeGee (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mosques

Merhaba. I am thinking of formatting {{Mosques in Turkey}} by mosques in Istanbul and other cities in Turkey. Do you think it's a good idea? Kolay gelsin. - Darwinek (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the template. Please have a look and let me know what you think. - Darwinek (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I am planning to create articles on Üç Şerefeli Camii and Eski Camii of Edirne but next week inşallah, because I am going today again to İstanbul for a few days and I'll be out of the internet for that time. Kolay gelsin. Hadi görüşürüz. - Darwinek (talk) 08:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire/archive1

Hi, Chapultepec! Sorry to disturb you, but I saw from this category that you are a member of WikiProject Turkey, and the List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire is currently a featured list candidate. If you could take some of your time and review it on its nomination page, I would be very grateful. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 03:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support for deleting the Category:Anti-Armenianism

Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?

It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.

Thank you

81.214.147.154 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.147.154 (talk) 19:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Namik Kemal Yolga.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Namik Kemal Yolga.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Abydos Seti I.jpg

File:Abydos Seti I.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Abydos Seti I.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Abydos Seti I.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Chapultepec! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 11 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Mehmet Ali Erbil - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kilyos

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kilyos. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

--Ronz (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sirt

Hi, I'm a journalist writing a story on Sirt in Libya and I'd like to ask you about your photographs. I can be reached at saki.newyork@gmail.com. I'm on a tight deadline so if you could get back to me early today that would be great. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.236.128.13 (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A M M Muze2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A M M Muze2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I removed Erzincan image gallery created by you (on 26 Oct.2009), because there were no images. Cheers Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Serpent Column changes

I have suggested a reworking of Serpent Column article, to which you made significant contributions. If you'd like to comment on my proposed changes, I'd welcome the input on the article's talk page. Rupert Clayton (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kazım Orbay (1887 - 1964).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kazım Orbay (1887 - 1964).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elâzığ Province has been nominated for discussion

Category:Elâzığ Province, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoAC Jewelry 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MoAC Jewelry 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoAC Phryg Cybele.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MoAC Phryg Cybele.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Omer Seyfettin 2.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Omer Seyfettin 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kara Koyunlu rulers

A tag has been placed on Category:Kara Koyunlu rulers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Beshogur (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ahmed Adnan Saygun.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ahmed Adnan Saygun.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TRT International for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TRT International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRT International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of STFA Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article STFA Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STFA Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Göktürk rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:Göktürk rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yildiz Aerial.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yildiz Aerial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 05:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]