|
User talk:Centcom08/Archive 3
SummariesHey Centcom8, can you c/e my I Am Groot summaries? I added like a sentence or two and they're not that good. — SirDot (talk) 10:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
IG Port RevertHi, I see you replaced the wikilink I removed from a reference in IG Port. I don't think it's MOS compliant to call Wikipedia the publisher of a link located elsewhere. Maybe the right publisher is just plain IG Port, if that's their official name, or maybe it's IG Port Corp., Inc, LLC, etc? Kaylea Champion (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add The article said, "she may be playing a witch".[1] I see no point in adding rumors in an encyclopedia article, especially when her role will be revealed in a few months. So, why not wait until there's official information of her role? But if you want to include rumors in articles you heavily contribute to, then by all means. I'm not going to edit war over it. Good luck. Mike Allen 21:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Merry Christmas, Centcom08! Have a quantumanic new year! InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays! Trailblazer101 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Synchron Stage ViennaI know you undid the previous revision regarding the score of She-Hulk but I re-added it as Synchron Stage's MCU involvement is in the Ms. Marvel article. In short I'd say we keep it, but maybe look for a better source if we can. -- Zoo (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 release dateHi. May I ask you why you removed the release dates of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 in China and Japan in this edit? Template:Infobox_film#Release_dates says that "the film's earliest release" can be added to the infobox, which means that the countries where this film was released on 3 May, the earliest "public release" date, can be mentioned in the infobox. Furthermore, it seems that the sentences you removed from the "Release" section were properly referenced. --saebou (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Not vandalism of List of animated feature films of 2021I fixed double links, put foreign titles in English and removed redlinks. Hope you understand. 70.24.31.104 (talk) 16:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted Hi Centcom08, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers. Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 03:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Critical ResponseMuch of the language leans positive, even while audience reception of the film / tv show would have been considered negative. The Rotten Tomatoes score typically refers to both the critics (Tomatometer) and the audience scores. They can often wildly differ. Presenting only the critics score, or only the audience score, would only offer half the picture. I would suggest an amendment to the formatting then, if there needs to be a consistent opening line in relation to the rotten tomatoes score. Yokobaits (talk) 13:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
