Hi CanonNi. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily05:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Thanks for uploading File:Car Mechanic Simulator 2014 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Could you please provide specific details about how this page needs to be edited to conform to the Wikipedia standard? I don't see how it reads like an essay. It summarizes and cites peer-reviewed scientific literature - there are no opinions in the piece unless one takes issue with the word "seminal." The last section describes two alternative models for the mechanism of polyspermy block, but I feel this is an accurate summation of an unresolved and actively researched area. I am happy to continue to improve this page, but I don't understand the problem.
Hope you're doing well. Just asking for another chance to submit my Wikipedia drafts, My assistant is handling my profile writing. If you could give me another chance, I promise to take the time to gather multiple sources to strengthen my profile. I hope you'll give me another chance. Thank you!
Sorry, but after 4 declines and 1 previous deletion, it's hard to find the subject notable (WP:GNG, WP:NBIO). In addition, as you probably know by now, writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged per WP:AUTO. Even if you are not directly writing it, there is still a conflict of interest. Furthermore, as other reviewers have said at the help desk, the draft still remains largely unsourced. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Creating Page
Hi, i noticed that you declined my submission for the person i am writing a biography about. It says the the reference does not follow wikipedia standard. I did include tons of reliable sources including one from new york times and united nations and from a nobel peace prize laurette along with other national news outlet. I wonder if you can help me improve it. Milos2024 (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Okay, that's not an unreasonable position, CanonNi, but the principle is that the rejecting reviewer is who will hear an appeal. I don't think it would look nice if I were to effectively overrule your rejection (and that is how it would appear to a casual observer).
In any case, Awise1203 has so far only alluded to new evidence of notability; I note that nothing new has been added to the draft, so there is as yet no grounds for an appeal. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I signed up to create a new page on the Rao-Sandelius Shuffle. It is an algorithm that serves the same purpose as the Fisher-Yates Shuffle. I would appreciate a review of my draft. It's relatively short. It accurately summarizes the algorithm. It cites the original papers, and an additional paper that gives a succinct description of the algorithm.
Hi @Kylebutt and thank you for asking. Your draft looks good, but I would recommend adding some sources. I would also recommend reading MOS:CS and better format the draft. Other than that, the draft is in good shape. Let me know if you have any more questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I took a look at MOS:CS and tried to improve it. I added pseudo code and a paragraph comparing performance to the Fisher-Yates shuffle. I included a source for the performance claim that I just added. What other sources do you feel that it needs?
(talk page stalker) Hello @Jec Morgan and welcome to Wikipedia. I don't know which summary you're talking about but here, an edit summary is usually a a place to say what you did to an article. Did you correct mistakes? Did you add content, or removed one? It helps other editors know what the action of an edit were. You can also read WP:EDITSUMMARY which tells good things to know about how to write and edit summary. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!17:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I have already explained in my first edit that the text in “LGBT people annd Islam” are outdated sources, and that there should be reliable sources cited. It was not a mistake, and I explained why I made the edits. I think you made a mistake. Please revert your edits. Thank you. ElephantMario (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Please re-revert you were correct to revert elephantmario. The sources are still accurate in fact the constitution has not eliminated the death penalty for homosexual relations under Sharia, and ElephantMario is an alt of BalloonMario, who is a banned alt of another user. 2604:2DC0:101:200:0:0:0:1B1D (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, CanonNi! This might be a stupid thing to talk about this situation but I need help. This User keeps on adding back an image which has no REAL value in this article. He said that the image shows the same exact aircraft involved in the accident but working with a previous operator. I believe that showing how the aircraft, by detail, matters, so I replaced that image with this one. I told him this but he keeps on adding it back. Please help me out here. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I think Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lazy-restless is back. This was added by Bengali editor. Yesterday and today, two new IP added same text (see page history, also IPs editing history). I can request for CU but most likely will be declined. Their behaviour and editing preferences are very similar. Consider blocking those IP ranges (you can use this tool to calculate) or semi-protect the article so that IP cann't edit (they frequently edit those page). Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Why are you doing this? I started that article years ago and it has grown well. It is a small elementary school. Why are you bothering to try and have it deleted? Bob yo (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh I'm sorry about that I didn't know!! I was trying to help people learn about that boat!! The Northwestern is on here so I thought the time Bandit can be as well!! I'm not promoting anything though!! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Again I apologize! I was trying to show people about the boat and help them learn about it as the Northwestern is on it so I didn't think it was such a big deal! You can be upset with me all you want but this is the second time I have apologized! I am not gonna argue with someone who is most likely 12 years old when I'm almost 25 years old! We all have our differences and that's ok! but there is no reason to fight over it like this. I didn't have to apologize but I did and I apologized twice! I didn't have to apologize and if you don't want to except my apology well that's your problem not mine! I hope you have a good day because I am gonna head to bed now because I need to get some sleep! lets get real lol no one should have to argue over something that floats on the water! I'm new to this so I don't know much and I'm still learning because no one told me how to do things or what to do or what not to do! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Thats right nothing exactly nothing sorry I'm being snappy I'm tired asf I am trying to help out!!! But I'm not promoting anything!!!! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
What is lacking? I believe that this document satisfies the registration criteria because it contains numerous reliable media articles and original materials. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Could it be that you are biased? Why can you come to such a conclusion when you can check everything from various sources? Are you sure you've read all the relevant materials? Do you have dyslexia? 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I've rejected the draft. Different Wikipedias have different notability standards, and the draft doesn't meet the English Wikipedia's. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This man is a deeply racist and undemocratic dictator. This person's behavior is very immoral, rude and unreasonable. He simply rejected the materials without even reading them. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He does not read any of the submitter's material and simply rejects it. Rejecting a submission simply because the submitter is of a different race is highly immoral and discriminatory. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:CanonNi: He does not read any of the submitter's material and simply rejects it. Rejecting a submission simply because the submitter is of a different race is highly immoral and discriminatory. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Peruvian-Bolivian War 1841
Exijo la eliminación inmediata de resultados falsificados en los Resultados de los combatientes Bolivianos que no murieron en esa Guerra, mas frases que instan al odio que nunca sucedieron como una tal "masacre" a Bolivianos en el sur peruano, tiene que ser restaurada la pagina (Usuarios como: Eddu16 y Exterminador de Collas) manipulan resultados de guerras y eventos. Wiki de Fab (talk) 01:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No, La Wikipedia en Español si cuenta con supervisión para que gente no coloque resultados falsificados, la versión en ingles es la manipulable y esta demostrado con resultado falsos. Wiki de Fab (talk) 01:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}