This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:CanonNi/Archives. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thanks for your contributions to Shanghai Art Academy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Good start. Needs much expansion. I added a couple of references. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bambu Lab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thank you. So if I need to contact an administrator in the future, I could just leave a message on one of their user talk pages? CanonNi (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent edit summary claims that that reference is 'generally unreliable' without elaborating on why. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and don't know much on this subject, and failed to see where the problem is. I wish you could elaborate on what made you say so. Hym3242 (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for pointing the problem out. It was my mistake, as I blindly removed the source as it was marked by the unreliable script as "generally unreliable". I've reverted my edit. Thank you for asking! CanonNi (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Now when he is warned about getting blocked, he is doing it with his sockpuppet @ajju109. Check the pattern of his edits on BrahminSanadhya BrahminPaliwal . He is a confirmed sockpuppet made for the purpose of vandalising wikipedia articles. Mahishya (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This guy himself is sockpuppet of @Andy Murray and using my name with other user claiming me a sockpuppet. Just check @Andy murrey & @Mahishya edits both are same one account joined wiki today for vandalism and other joined 4 days ago for complanied. Ajju109 (talk) 10:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
@Ajju109 You have been warned by @NoobThreePointOh to not to remove any content and you made another account without caring for wikipedia rules and still vandalising different articles without any explanation. If that's not the edit war, i don't know what is. Its a clear edit war from your side while trying to manipulate the admins. Mahishya (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Just because you believe certain parts should not be included is no reason to blank the entire section. If you believe they should be removed, please discuss on the talk page. CanonNi (talk) 03:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
If you feel there's any of those that is more than the trivial "This song appeared in X" (as are almost all of the examples) or similar "Song was recorded by X" or "X other song uses the same melody", you're free to go and look for sources to back it up. As it stands, the page you linked to also gives plenty of "reasons for content removal", including "unsourced information" and "irrelevant information". So no, I don't believe "certain parts should not be included", but rather the "the whole of the affected section should not be included", which is why I consequently removed the entire section. 184.162.200.211 (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
WP:UCR states that, "There are various reasons for removing content from an article. Regardless of the reason, it should be described in the edit summary. If there is any doubt the removal may be controversial, or if it has been restored following a previous removal, it should be discussed on the page's talk page prior to removal." Please start a discussion on the talk page if you wish to remove the section again. CanonNi (talk) 03:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
"it should be described in the edit summary" - you not reading mine is not a me problem. The long list in the British Grenadiers article is the archetypical example (something Wikipedia has such a bad rap for, it's even a well known fact of internet culture, i.e. the mention on xkcd) of bad (and almost entirely unsourced) "in popular culture" content. As I said elsewhere, songs being sung is pretty much par for the course and including every instance of it would be very indiscriminate and irrelevant. 184.162.200.211 (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Minor notification
What's up, CanonNi? Just letting you that after signing a fellow editor's guestbook
here, you forgot to sign by adding 4 tildes which produces your signature and time in UTC. Realised it was probably a little error so I fixed it for you. See you around! Volten001☎17:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The submissions were declined because their subcategories don't exist. Also, please stop pinging me with "Please review. The." Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for resubmitting. I have accepted the requests. In the future, please make sure the pages in the proposed categories exist. CanonNi (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Your recent editing history at Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. You are way over 3RR and against the consensus in the talk page section. There's no way there is consensus for the present tense, that's for sure.Jasper Deng(talk)04:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm so sorry for breaking the 3RR rule. The reason I reverted the edits is because they seemed like vandalism, as the accounts, such as Thatguy099 and Contributer2024, were newly created and felt like sock puppets of Happydays924. Again, I'm very sorry for violating the 3RR rule and will stop changing the article. CanonNi (talk) 04:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Then you need to read WP:NOTVAND, WP:AGF, and WP:DBQ. I once made the mistake of glossing over all of these, resulting in WP:BITEY behavior. I don't anymore and you shouldn't anymore, either. Reading other threads on your talk page shows that this isn't the first time others have had to talk about this with you so please refrain from reverting vandalism until you are sufficiently well-acquainted with what is and isn't vandalism.--Jasper Deng(talk)04:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the guides. I will read them fully and stop reverting edits until I have a full understanding of vandalism-related policies. Again, thank you for informing me and I'm sorry for my unconstructive reverts. CanonNi (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Per WP:VG/RS, Screen Rant is considered "marginally reliable" at best, so it's best to add more reviews from reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, CanonNi!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Still doesn't have sufficient reviews to qualify as notable under WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Online 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Fallout-4-Capital-Wasteland.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, CanonNi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teamfight Manager, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hi CanonNi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
Please, delete it! Alex Casanas, the Monument Mythos maker is menacing on his YouTube channel, Patreon, Discord and Reddit medias to suicide as he feels really mentally unstable and he can't hold it anymore! And he has tried to take his life other times for his past issue that we can't comment here! It's a Wikipedia article worth the taking of a live?! DeIIvelloper (talk) 11:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you declined a submission I made for an NGO called Heya Masr, can you please give me the reason why? You said that it seems like self advertisement, however, I have no affiliation whatsoever with this NGO. Also, I believe my article was 100% neutral so can you please tell what was not neutral about my draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by John koprivne (talk • contribs) 06:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The main problem was its wording. For example, you wrote " Through dedicated efforts, Heya Masr actively cultivates strong and enduring partnerships with institutions throughout Egypt, spanning from universities and large corporations to youth centers and orphanages.", which isn't in a neutral tone. Another issue, which was brought up by another reviewer, was that the draft does not cite enough reliable sources, as most of the sources are published by Heya Masr themselves. Please fix these issues, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask here or at the Teahouse. Thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I added more reliable sources that aren't published by Heya Masr themselves as a response to what the first reviewer said. Also, the first reviewer said that starting from 3 outside sources, the article is considered to be in accordance with wikipedia regulations. I included 5 sources that aren't' published by Heya Masr. When it comes to the wording, I believe that the article is neutral as like I said before I have no affiliation whatsoever with this NGO. However, the example you provided, now that I look at it out of context, does seem a bit subjective so I changed it. Please, let me know if you have other specific areas in the article that I should change as I resubmitted the article for review. John koprivne (talk) 06:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I will look at the draft later. In addition, I see that you asked the initial reviewer on his talk page, but I don't see any mention of 3 outside sources in his answer, nor in the pages he linked. Could you clarify where you saw that response? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Another reviewer is currently reviewing the draft, so there's not much you and me can do right now. Feel free to ask if you have any other questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, CanonNi. Good day to you. I would like to follow-up on my recent article submission which you have just declined. I'm hoping you would kindly shed light on the reasons why. Based on earlier feedbacks by other editors, I've made significant changes to insert independent and relevant external sources.
I believe the words used presently describe the company as a whole, and they are all factual instead of advertorial. Regarding a comment on COI, I have declared it on my profile and once again, the article draft is purely informational on the company. There are literally tons of big names/organisations out there with similar tone/language on their articles.
Don't mean to sound rude or anything, just curious how to proceed as best as I could because I noticed there are entries facing similar issues. Really appreciate any help I could get on this. Thank you so much. Looking forward to hearing from you. Stevienetto (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Stevienetto. The reason I declined the draft is because there wasn't significant improvement since the previous decline. It seems that no new sources were added.
Hi CanonNi, thanks for replying. To be fair, the previous decline was solely talking about the COI aspect, which I feel doesn't make sense because isn't most articles are created from someone being invested in the subject/object to begin with.
Anyway, not sure how much more external sources I ought to add because most of them are available from the company and it's not "reliable" to be included. Any chance the latest edits are any better (have taken out many website links)? Once again, thank you for the help; appreciate some specifics given compared to the previous figures. Stevienetto (talk) 11:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I would suggest removing the external links in the body first, such as in the "History" section. In addition, a quick Google search has found many sources, such as this one and this one, so maybe consider adding some? The recent edits are definitely improvements, but more changes can be made. Thank you for asking! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. Appreciate the feedback. Hope the new changes are good enough now. Do let me know your thoughts. Thank you so much for the help. Stevienetto (talk) 04:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you have added new sources and removed external links, which is great. If you're ready, you could resubmit the draft for review, and another editor will take a look at the draft shortly. (I won't review the draft myself, as I also contributed to it) '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. Sorry to bother you, just that you're the only one who has been kind and helpful so far. Apparently the draft has been declined and at this point I'm just so lost and frustrated about the whole process. Feels like every editor/reviewer has their own standards and it's impossible to tick all the boxes, hence a never-ending cycle.
Am wondering if there's a possibility a different editor overseeing my draft instead of the same person if I were to submit without any changes (since I genuinely don't know what else is there to add on)? I apologise for the troubles. Stevienetto (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello CanonNi, TheTechie has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hello CanonNi, and thank you for your edits to combat the editor currently engaging in edit war in the Black Sea slave trade-article.
The editor Someone Qırımlı are currently engaging in persistent vandalism of the article. They edit the article both from anonymous IP-adresses, as well as from their account, which had barely been used for anything than for editing this article.
They erase and remove referenced information describing the slave trade of the Crimean Khanate, referring to everything descriging the slave trade as non neutral "Russian propaganda", and either erase the entire topic from the article, or replace it with content describing the slavery as benevolent.
I wonder if the article can be protected somehow, or if the user can be blocked from edititing it? They clearly violate the rules of bias, vandalism and edit warring, but as a contributor I mostly write, and and know less about what can be done in these situations. Perhaps you have more knowledge as how do adress this? I have limited time dealing with this (I am travelling soon). My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I understand. No worries at all: I may not be able to be that available myself for a while, since I am due to travel, but I thought I should at least direct the attention of a serious user to the problem. I suspect this is going to be a long term problem, unless the user is stopped. They have now attempted to start their own article about the issue, "The Crimean slave trade", to further their opinion. The article appears to be appologetic to slavery in the Crimea, which is perhaps not a suprise considering their non-neutral edit warring. I do hope the article is deleted. --Aciram (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, the user seems to have started a discussion on the article's talk page about his recent edits, which other editors, such as Wikishovel and Draken Bowser have opposed. In addition, the editor in question has been seriously warned for his actions, as Draken Bowser says, "Again, you need to argue the source material and display a fundamental understanding of our rules. This is a difficult topic and needs to be discussed calmly. You need to collect your thoughts and slow down your posting or I will have to request that you be blocked to calm things down." So if the user continues changing content to his preferences, he might be blocked for vandalism and/or editwarring.
Thanks for reaching out to me, and I really appreciate your efforts in combating vandalism and protecting Wikipedia. Again, Thank you! CanonNi (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you created this talk page as there is no article here and hasn't been since 2008. So, there is no need for a talk page for a nonexistent article. These just get deleted through speedy deletion because they are unnecessary. Thank you. LizRead!Talk!03:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Liz. I created the talk page as part of an accepted request on WP:AFC/R, but the page itself was blocked from creation from 2008 and only the talk page was successfully changed. CanonNi (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
You reverted this
Dearest editor,
I saw you reverted here on Agricultural pollution. Well, I'm was about reverting it as well but remembered the input wasn't bad and doesn't seem like copyvio and maybe the editor may be taking to cite it (or that they don't know got to cite). I was about giving them tips on that before I saw your edits. Please clam down little and know that IP's are humans too. They may not have sources it but reading it makes sense and the article in question looks essay (..I). Just a reminder! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!01:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Please be careful when using editing tools like those for disambiguation pages. You created some broken redirects that needed to be fixed. You are responsible for all of your edits so please double-check and don't depend too much on the editing tools. Use your own judgment. LizRead!Talk!03:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I'm new to using the tool and have made some mistakes that I'm completely responsible for. I will check all my edits made using such tools from now on, and thank you for fixing my edits. CanonNi (talk) 03:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm currently busy and will review the requests later. Alternatively, you can try contacting other active editors at AfC/C. Thanks. CanonNi (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey @CanonNi,
I want you to know that sockpuppet master @Dinkar 108 is back with another Sockpuppet @Prominister.
Just look at his unconstructive edits with same pattern on same pages Paliwal, Hemu , Kannauj.
[Paliwal] [Bahun] [Kannauj] and [Hemu]. He is vandalising these pages with same pattern as @Dinkar 108. Brahaspatya (talk) 12:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I have seen it sir. You need to check his disruptive edits on Kannauj and Paliwal where he removed authentic sources same like @Dinkar 108 . His account date is also from the same time of Ban on @Dinkar 108. I informed you about this because you are the most active here when it comes to sockpuppets. Please investigate into this. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I'll look into it and will comment on the investigation later.
Also, thanks but I'm definitely not active with sockpuppet investigations. I've only ever participated in a few, and I mainly do maintenance tasks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Its saying that this page of checkuser list does not exist. I request you to mention some active Checkuser or experienced Sockpuppet investigator here if you don't mind. Thanks. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I really don't mean to sound rude but please leave me alone with the Indian caste edit wars. I don't care who is or isn't a sock, and to be honest, you sound like one too. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 07:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
IP users asking about usernames.
Hi, CanonNi. I notice that you have answered two queries about usernames on the Teahouse from IP users with, essentially "You are an IP user, so you haven't got a username". (That's not your exact wording, but that's the sense I took from it).
In both cases, reading between the lines, I think the message is from somebody who has an account, but either they've forgotten it, it's blocked, or they've just forgotten to log in.
Your answer is not wrong, but if I'm right (and I might not be) it's not very helpful to them. ColinFine (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello CanonNi, and thank you for this sock puppet investigation: [1]. This user now has a fourth (?) sock puppet: The user: Frankovsky S may be another sock puppet: [2]. I am a bit unsure how to handle the matter, since I am not that familiar with these things. Perhaps you know better how to add this account to the investigation? My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Note: the user claims that the three accounts are all three different individuals, who all have the same issues with the article subject. I am not certain how this affects the investigation.--Aciram (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Please explain this edit: [[3]], especially the edit summary. Your edit summary seems to be pure sarcasm, giving zero context to an editor who is still learning the ropes. Please elaborate. If this is not allowed, please just tell me that next time. Thanks --- thetechie@wikimedia: ~/talk/$02:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
CanonNi, you're flying too close to the Sun here. You were wrong to revert that edit for that reason; you should've asked the question on the user's talk page. In this particular case, G5 doesn't apply due to substantial edits for others, but in that case you really should let an admin be the one to decline it as it is clear that you do not understand WP:CSD enough to do so yourself.--Jasper Deng(talk)02:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I am extremely sorry for that error. I wrongly assumed that TheTehchie was trying to cancel the AfD as he created the article.
CanonNi, do you see the pattern here? You're consistently doing things that should be left to more experienced editors. You need WP:CLUE to participate in administrative processes. Focus on content creation first to get an understanding of how Wikipedia works so you don't repeat this mistake in other processes.--Jasper Deng(talk)03:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I understand and will go back to simple tasks for now. Thank you for warning and informing me, and I deeply apologize for any mistakes I made. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks but typo
You seem to have made a typo and accidentally inserted part of your edit summary into the article with your edit "Implementing talk page edit requested by NAME – short description of changes made" -- 109.79.161.90 (talk) 02:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
In my talk page, there was that mysterious user who reverted my edit on East Coast Jets Flight 81 and then notified me about his actions. When he notified me, his English was… advance. When you pointed out something suspicious about “his talk page”, he replied to you with jumbled English words, a sign that this user doesn’t know English at all. Then I looked back at my previous contributions to the Flight 81 article and came across something. About 21 days ago, this user made an edit to the Flight 81 article which I reverted, rightfully. I then notified him about MY actions. If you can go and check, you might notice that the notice I gave him is eerily similar to the notice that my stalker gave me! Then this completely and respectively different user replied with, “yes why not?”. I don’t even know what that means! Oh man, how random can Wikipedia be? So, days later, that completely and respectively different user probably logged in on another device, copied the same exact words and links I posted, and pasted it on MY TALK PAGE and reverted my other edit. You pointing out about “his talk page” link reinforces my claim! When you take a look at his contributions, he has only 4 edits. One to revert his edit and the other 3 for his claim and his disorienting argument. Justice was apparently going through his head, I guess. He probably just didn’t wanna be discovered. Well, this is all just a theory which is heavily backed up!(MH370) I don’t really know why I wrote all this junk, I just wanted someone, like you, to know. You can delete this discussion after reading. I don’t really mind. But, oh man, how random can Wikipedia really be? CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for messaging me.
I wouldn't worry too much about them for now, as they have not made other edits other than the ones you mentioned. If they persist, try talking it to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. I'm not experienced enough to deal with this issue though, try contacting administrators if you need further help. You can also ask about this situation at the Teahouse, and see if others have any solutions.
Thank you for letting me know. I will start a discussion on its talk page and communicate with the page's creator about the article's name. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
ದೇವಾಂಗ ಬ್ರಾಹ್ಮಣರ ಮೂಲವನ್ನು ಹೊಂದಿವೆ. ಅವರು ಪ್ರಾಕೃತ ಬ್ರಾಹ್ಮಣರು (ಹುಟ್ಟಿನಿಂದ ಬ್ರಾಹ್ಮಣರು ಎಂದು ಅರ್ಥ).ದೇವಾಂಗ ದೇವಲ ಮಹರ್ಷಿ ತಮ್ಮ ನೇಯ್ಗೆ ಸಂಪ್ರದಾಯದ ಉಗಮಸ್ಥಾನದ ಮೊದಲ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ. ಪರಶಿವನ ಹಣೆಗಣ್ಣಿನಿಂದ ಮಹರ್ಷಿ ಅವತರಿಸಿದರೆಂಬ ಪ್ರತೀತಿಯೂ ಇದ್ದ ಕಾರಣ 'ದೇವಾಂಗ' (ದೇವರ ಒಂದು ಅಂಗ) ಎಂದು ಕರೆಯಲ್ಪಡುತ್ತಾರೆ.ಅವರ ಮುಖ್ಯ ದೇವತೆ ಚೌಡೇಶ್ವರಿ.
I can't open the PDF, and, as I've said multiple times, please stop messaging me. I'm not the only editor of the article, nor am I familiar with the topic. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello
please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra
First of all, Quora is not an reliable source, see WP:QUORA. Secondly, the websites you linked say, "The Devangas are the descendants of sages Shri Devala (Devanga) who incarnated by the will of Lord Shiva, incarnated by the will of Shiva, to protect the dignity of the people of Trailokya without clothing, and for the initiation of knowledge, without sutra." How is this reliable and neutral? The third link you provided is a Wikipedia article, which I've explained in my previous reply.
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
I'm just a bystander, but Harishsk2022 has definitely caught the eye of at least one Admin. If the behavior starts again after the block ends, then I recommend leaving a note on the Talk page of the Admin, Nick Moyes, who created the block. David notMD (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, only update the article by switching the turnover.profit numbers from those from 2020 to those in 2023. I dont get why you reverted, seems hasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.107.214.216 (talk) 05:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
So, there is this new user who recently edited the Thai Airways Flight 261 article and removed some content about what the pilots said. The thing is that it was cited content, however, he says that he was a survivor of the crash and he knows that the pilots said nothing to them about returning back to Don Mueang International Airport. Now I'm not experienced enough to deal with this unusual situation and I know that you have way more experience than me so... yeah. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I've reverted their edit. To deal with situations like this, I would recommend using tools such as Twinkle, which can revert and warn editors with a few clicks. Thanks for contacting me. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't know if you remember me, but we both participated in a discussion on the talk page of Black Sea slave trade, and I appreciated your effort in that issue (the problematic user has reappeared there, but I hope and trust they will not be succesful, since the matter seem settled). A similar issue has recently came up. Since you were interested in protecting Black Sea slave trade against attempts of bias, you may also be intrested in the talk page of slavery in al-Andalus; nothing has yet been done, but it likely will be.
A user who have shown what I believe to be bias have been allerted to the article: [5] The first user have adressed valid concerns which I have adressed, but M.Bitton have shown bias in other articles in this topic issue, and from what is said, I am concerned that this article will be subjected to bias editing. You will see my concerns on the article talk page. Since posting that, another user has allerted me that M.Bitton may have been on ANI for bias editing, but I do not know if that is true.
Perhaps you could be persuaded to put the article in your watch list, and adress future bias editing by M.Bitton? I would have done it myself, but I must be honest enough to say that my health is not good enough to engage in such a thing, and I have been blunt enough to explain why in the talk page. But I am still concerned enough to want to at least attempt to do something to protect the article. Of course, there is no need for any action at all at present; but since I know you to be interested in the subject, I would be grateful to know that a non-bias and serious contributor with respect for a non bias view had the article under watch. If you are not intereted, perhaps you can recomend another user to contact? Thanks. All the best,--Aciram (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Aciram, and thanks for contacting me. I definitely do remember you, and I appreciate your great work. I will definitely monitor the article, and watch out to M.Bitton and other accounts. Thank you for trusting me, but to be honest, I believe that I'm not experienced enough to deal with things like this, and that my knowledge in the field is not enough to make decisions about the article's topic. I would recommend contacting active members of WikiProjects, such as WikiProject Human rights and WikiProject History. Again, thank you for contacting me, Aciram. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words, and sorry for not answering before. I am relived that you have put the article on your watchlist.
In these situations I feel rather helpless; while I am confident in my knowledge about the subject matter, and I know that every citation written can be fact checked in the digitalized books by anyone without much concern, my main occupation on Wikipedia is to write, and I have less knowledge about which regulations to appeal to and who to contact in situations like these. The fact that I suffer from exhaustion also creates an inhibition to attend to such issues. I am therefore grateful when a user with more knowledge and energy can provide advise.
I understand your hesitance when it comes to the article subject; but nothing has yet occurred, and when and if it does, it is good to know that you, who in contrast to me will at least know who to contact, will be allerted. I am aware of my own limitations, but the non-bias principle is important to me, and I was aware of the sensitivy of the topic beforehand. This is a relief. Thanks again!--Aciram (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi CanonNi. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily05:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Thanks for uploading File:Car Mechanic Simulator 2014 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Could you please provide specific details about how this page needs to be edited to conform to the Wikipedia standard? I don't see how it reads like an essay. It summarizes and cites peer-reviewed scientific literature - there are no opinions in the piece unless one takes issue with the word "seminal." The last section describes two alternative models for the mechanism of polyspermy block, but I feel this is an accurate summation of an unresolved and actively researched area. I am happy to continue to improve this page, but I don't understand the problem.
Hope you're doing well. Just asking for another chance to submit my Wikipedia drafts, My assistant is handling my profile writing. If you could give me another chance, I promise to take the time to gather multiple sources to strengthen my profile. I hope you'll give me another chance. Thank you!
Sorry, but after 4 declines and 1 previous deletion, it's hard to find the subject notable (WP:GNG, WP:NBIO). In addition, as you probably know by now, writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged per WP:AUTO. Even if you are not directly writing it, there is still a conflict of interest. Furthermore, as other reviewers have said at the help desk, the draft still remains largely unsourced. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Creating Page
Hi, i noticed that you declined my submission for the person i am writing a biography about. It says the the reference does not follow wikipedia standard. I did include tons of reliable sources including one from new york times and united nations and from a nobel peace prize laurette along with other national news outlet. I wonder if you can help me improve it. Milos2024 (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Okay, that's not an unreasonable position, CanonNi, but the principle is that the rejecting reviewer is who will hear an appeal. I don't think it would look nice if I were to effectively overrule your rejection (and that is how it would appear to a casual observer).
In any case, Awise1203 has so far only alluded to new evidence of notability; I note that nothing new has been added to the draft, so there is as yet no grounds for an appeal. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I signed up to create a new page on the Rao-Sandelius Shuffle. It is an algorithm that serves the same purpose as the Fisher-Yates Shuffle. I would appreciate a review of my draft. It's relatively short. It accurately summarizes the algorithm. It cites the original papers, and an additional paper that gives a succinct description of the algorithm.
Hi @Kylebutt and thank you for asking. Your draft looks good, but I would recommend adding some sources. I would also recommend reading MOS:CS and better format the draft. Other than that, the draft is in good shape. Let me know if you have any more questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I took a look at MOS:CS and tried to improve it. I added pseudo code and a paragraph comparing performance to the Fisher-Yates shuffle. I included a source for the performance claim that I just added. What other sources do you feel that it needs?
(talk page stalker) Hello @Jec Morgan and welcome to Wikipedia. I don't know which summary you're talking about but here, an edit summary is usually a a place to say what you did to an article. Did you correct mistakes? Did you add content, or removed one? It helps other editors know what the action of an edit were. You can also read WP:EDITSUMMARY which tells good things to know about how to write and edit summary. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!17:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I have already explained in my first edit that the text in “LGBT people annd Islam” are outdated sources, and that there should be reliable sources cited. It was not a mistake, and I explained why I made the edits. I think you made a mistake. Please revert your edits. Thank you. ElephantMario (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Please re-revert you were correct to revert elephantmario. The sources are still accurate in fact the constitution has not eliminated the death penalty for homosexual relations under Sharia, and ElephantMario is an alt of BalloonMario, who is a banned alt of another user. 2604:2DC0:101:200:0:0:0:1B1D (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, CanonNi! This might be a stupid thing to talk about this situation but I need help. This User keeps on adding back an image which has no REAL value in this article. He said that the image shows the same exact aircraft involved in the accident but working with a previous operator. I believe that showing how the aircraft, by detail, matters, so I replaced that image with this one. I told him this but he keeps on adding it back. Please help me out here. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I think Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lazy-restless is back. This was added by Bengali editor. Yesterday and today, two new IP added same text (see page history, also IPs editing history). I can request for CU but most likely will be declined. Their behaviour and editing preferences are very similar. Consider blocking those IP ranges (you can use this tool to calculate) or semi-protect the article so that IP cann't edit (they frequently edit those page). Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Why are you doing this? I started that article years ago and it has grown well. It is a small elementary school. Why are you bothering to try and have it deleted? Bob yo (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh I'm sorry about that I didn't know!! I was trying to help people learn about that boat!! The Northwestern is on here so I thought the time Bandit can be as well!! I'm not promoting anything though!! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Again I apologize! I was trying to show people about the boat and help them learn about it as the Northwestern is on it so I didn't think it was such a big deal! You can be upset with me all you want but this is the second time I have apologized! I am not gonna argue with someone who is most likely 12 years old when I'm almost 25 years old! We all have our differences and that's ok! but there is no reason to fight over it like this. I didn't have to apologize but I did and I apologized twice! I didn't have to apologize and if you don't want to except my apology well that's your problem not mine! I hope you have a good day because I am gonna head to bed now because I need to get some sleep! lets get real lol no one should have to argue over something that floats on the water! I'm new to this so I don't know much and I'm still learning because no one told me how to do things or what to do or what not to do! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Thats right nothing exactly nothing sorry I'm being snappy I'm tired asf I am trying to help out!!! But I'm not promoting anything!!!! Kaleb25 (talk) 08:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
What is lacking? I believe that this document satisfies the registration criteria because it contains numerous reliable media articles and original materials. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Could it be that you are biased? Why can you come to such a conclusion when you can check everything from various sources? Are you sure you've read all the relevant materials? Do you have dyslexia? 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I've rejected the draft. Different Wikipedias have different notability standards, and the draft doesn't meet the English Wikipedia's. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This man is a deeply racist and undemocratic dictator. This person's behavior is very immoral, rude and unreasonable. He simply rejected the materials without even reading them. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He does not read any of the submitter's material and simply rejects it. Rejecting a submission simply because the submitter is of a different race is highly immoral and discriminatory. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:CanonNi: He does not read any of the submitter's material and simply rejects it. Rejecting a submission simply because the submitter is of a different race is highly immoral and discriminatory. 59.9.253.65 (talk) 01:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Peruvian-Bolivian War 1841
Exijo la eliminación inmediata de resultados falsificados en los Resultados de los combatientes Bolivianos que no murieron en esa Guerra, mas frases que instan al odio que nunca sucedieron como una tal "masacre" a Bolivianos en el sur peruano, tiene que ser restaurada la pagina (Usuarios como: Eddu16 y Exterminador de Collas) manipulan resultados de guerras y eventos. Wiki de Fab (talk) 01:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No, La Wikipedia en Español si cuenta con supervisión para que gente no coloque resultados falsificados, la versión en ingles es la manipulable y esta demostrado con resultado falsos. Wiki de Fab (talk) 01:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, CanonNi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shanghai Art Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
@SteventotheStevens sorry, I, like many other AfC reviewers, do not do on-request reviews. Like the template says, This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,107 pending submissions waiting for review.'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Help for article
I have added more detail to the page. Any help editing, reviewing or getting it published would be greatly appreciated Countystat (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
to be more specific, what exactly in my artlicle is causing me to get deleteted because i have read everything i possibly could and your saying im using it for advertisment but how is that the case. I go and read other artist wiki article and saying the same things they are so what seems to be the problem? --Jalisa Avari (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
i spoke with someone already they used every excuse in the book on why i wasnt allowed to create the page. I will gather more references and then i will try again because that is what he ended up saying later on after every other excuse. Do you know a better way i can get my article on wikipedia without causing any violations. I am just trying to create an article similar to what you can find for any musician artist. Jalisa Avari (talk) 13:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
im not writing about my self it is for a friend i was trying to help her out. So other artist get on wikipedia but you dont know how their information is created? is his through fans or the distribution or the label or through who? Jalisa Avari (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand your question, but ideally you shouldn't be writing about your friend either, see WP:COI. Most Wikipedia articles are created by individual editors about notable topics. See WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, and H:YFA. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
perfect thanks so much. I will get the right resources to provide this information to the public regarding this artist Jalisa Avari (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you CannonNi. I have no questions for now.
Thank you for welcoming me and making yourself available to guide me on this engaging and intellectual platform.
Hi, I'm not able to find the 'Move' button in my sandbox, to make my article public.. My account is more than 4 days old. Can you help me with this? Thanks --Wikicd24 (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thank You for the welcome. For the time being, I am just browsing and reading up on how to do everything.
Thanks,
Kristin --Froggurl4life (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Awesome that you're my mentor, thanks for being there...now, I know this is a big no no in wiki-land...but I've began editing an article on myself, ego I know, but I swear it doesn't come from that place! I'm writing it from a neutral standpoint as best I can to provide knowledge on my musical alias Junk Season. A big part of this is just to build knowledge and trust for the artist, and having that come up on search results would be great at shedding light on the project.
I want to give this the best possible chance at being accepted...so as my mentor, what're my chances on a first look from your end? There's still some more references and information I want to add to give it some more credibility/notability. The idea being that this would act as the foundation for others to build upon as it grows.
@Hkendall93 first of all, welcome. I see that you've had a bit of a rough start, but it's good that your appeal was accepted. You have said that you won't make any edits related to yourself, and I will decline your draft for that reason. Don't feel discouraged though, as there are many other things you can contribute to (consider checking out the Task Center). Feel free to ask here or at the Teahouse if you have any other questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, as I am a guitarist and a musician. I wanted to make a sandbox about Indian classical music note "Anuvadi" Svara because, Vadi,Samavadi,Vivadi and Varjit Swara is available on Wikipedia but not Samavadi. As a newly joined Wikipedian, I am unable to properly make References and External links.
I will make the sandbox but can you make my references and External links proper. --Kharavela Deva (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi CanonNi,
I am trying to publish an article in the name of the company (Westlake Epoxy) I am working for but my article was rejected.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. I should rewrite my submission in a more encyclopedic format and avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
I don't know what they mean and how to proceed.
Could you help me?
This award is given in recognition to CanonNi for accumulating at least 25 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the edit requests at Talk:Israel this morning. I just thought I'd let you know the user had also vandalised the talk page - changing all but one of the "Article milestones" links from Israel to Palestine (see this diff). I've fixed it and given the user a 4im warning. I noticed you had used the Edit Request Tool to remove the requests, it might be worth also checking the talk page's history or the user's contributions when you see edit requests like this. Often it's not the only disruptive edits they've made. AdamBlacktalk • contribs11:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I see you closed the edit request by IP as not done because the article is not EC-protected.
However, even though the article is not extended protected, the IP is unable to edit that part directly anyway because of WP:ECR restriction on Arab-Israeli conflict CTOP, broadly construed, per WP:PIA. Stylez995 (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello CanonNi, I hope you are good. I submitted a draft a few weeks ago and it was reviewed by a reviewer, I made the suggested changes, however, since then, I am unable to contact that reviewer. I was wondering if you could have a look at that draft and review it. I would be very grateful to you. Synchaas (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
@Synchaas sorry, but I, like many other AfC reviewers, do not review drafts on request. It's in good shape though, and should be reviewed soon. Feel free to ask here or at the Teahouse if you have any other questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!
Orphaned non-free image File:F1 24 Champions Edition.webp
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:F1 24 Champions Edition.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi CanonNi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, CanonNi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Evan Kail".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, CanonNi. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 21:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
You're very welcome :) Do let me know if you have any questions about the permission, though I think things should be pretty straightforward. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm the writer of the Hotdesk draft. This is my 1st ever article and I wanted to know if you could give me a bit more insight on how I can get it approved.
@Gerardch12 there are several issues, but firstly, what is your relationship with the company? If you are an employee, you are required by the terms of use to disclose it by placing the {{paid}} template on your user page. The main issues are:
The sources aren't reliable. 2 of the 6 sources are the company's website (and are therefore not independent nor reliable), and the other 4 are about the founder, not the company (and are therefore not significant coverage).
I was reaching out for some guidance after you recently declined my draft for an article about Andy Hopper (Draft:Andy Hopper). I'm hoping you might be able to provide some guidance for better establishing notability. I have a number of other sources discussing Hopper and his election campaigns, but I want to make sure I'm providing sources that add to notability.
From the general notability guidelines, I feel with additional sources, I can establish all five components of notability, but I just want to make sure that it's not an issue of source quality versus number of sources. He has been covered by many professional media outlets in North Texas, including radio and television interviews. Also, I'm wondering what weight, if any campaign endorsements by other already established notable people might have? He has been endorsed by a number of people with national fame in the USA.
Thanks in advance for any feedback or advice you might be able to provide,
You recently declined my submission titled Draft:James Miller (professor), however, I find your response a little confusing. From what I gather, you declined my submission on account of subject Notability. After reviewing the relevant pages, I would like to offer a response. I believe that the subject in question here, can be easily connected to points 3, 5, and 8. Allow me to elaborate.
Point 3: The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor. The subject in question has been selected as a fellow of the United States Library of the Congress, which only selects a limited number of academics globally annually. This has been referenced by the Library's own website.
Point 5: The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. The subject had been appointed Chair of the Faculty Assembly of the University, selection amounting to leading the whole faculty of a major academic institution, as credited by the Duke University website.
Point 8: The person has been head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area. The subject in question is editor-in-chief of a Brill journal titled Worldviews: Global Religions, Cultures, and Ecology, the first journal to focus on the relationships between religion, culture, and ecology worldwide, established in 1997. This has been sourced by the journal's page on Brill.
Because of all the reasons above, I believe that the subject in question for this article qualifies easily on the Notability criterion, as well as using proper sources. Thus, I would like to hear your thoughts on this, and advice on how to improve the article, in order to better satisfy Wikipedia's needs in demonstrating these points even more clearly.
Hi there! I need to change the title of an article as the name of the institution mentioned is incorrect. It currently reads 'City Law School' whilst its brand name is 'The City Law School'. Do I need to make a request via the forum to achieve this? Or is there a quicker way since this is the entity's legal name? --Carodet (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Carodet, The process of changing the title of an article is called a move. Usually this is done because the current title does not fit our guidelines on article titles. If the move is straightforward and nobody objects, make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, and a page mover will do it for you. However, IMO, this case is rather complicated, as generally 'The' isn't included in article titles. But... City Law School seems to have an emphasis on the 'The' in its title, so a technical move might be challenged. Therefore, what I would do is to start a discussion called a requested move on the talk page. Let me know if you have any other questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. This is really helpful, however I do not understand how to use the request form. Apologies for wasting your time. Thanks for your reply. Carodet (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
No wories at all! The process can be a bit confusing for newcomers. I've started the discussion for you, so all you need to do now is reply to my comment on the talk page with your rationale for the move. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
hello, I am responding to the excessive intricate detail issue. I am a new editor, is it OK for me to delete a lot or do I need to stick to the punctuation copy edits for a time before I can make larger edits? thanks! --RKenDo (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
You scored 38 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this minor barnstar. Thanks for helping out!
Why did you delete everything from the talk and discussion page? You deleted a new entry, you gave one reason, when that reason was refuted, you deleted the answer. Also, you feel strongly about this. Why? 79.199.170.144 (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
What discussion page are you referring to? I didn't delete your draft, I declined it, like any other reviewer would have. Could you provide an example of me deleting an 'answer'? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
(Untitled)
I know, contrybute in wikipedia vietnamese is easily to do , but i know i need learn more english from the smallest things ,like contribute wikipedia to bigger things ,like learn with teacher.I know, my article seems bad, but I will try to make it better. Junurita (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@Junurita I understand that, I really do, but the problem is, and I'm gonna be blunt, your English is not good enough to edit here. There are many other ways to learn English, but editing Wikipedia isn't one of them, as your mistakes end up having to be fixed by others. My suggestion is that, if you really like editing Wikipedia, edit the one in your native language, Vietnamese; or if you insist on editing here, come back when your English is better. Thanks, '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Talk:War of 1812#Infobox and belligerents, with Spain on the list
Rather than removing something you disagree with, you should see whether there is any ongoing debate on the talk page for the article. Next time you find yourself in this scenario, it would be better to check, and if there has been recent discussion, to leave a message there as to what you are going to edit, and why, else it looks like an edit war. Keith H99 (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that you removed stub and BLP tags from my draft article. Is there a reference for how these tags should only be used in mainspace and not in draftspace? I have checked the page on drafts and on tagging and I don't see it specified there.
Since Wikipedia search doesn't return draftspace articles by default, I don't see the harm in including those tags in the draft article. Having a ready-to-publish version of the article in draftspace, with all necessary tags, makes more sense in my opinion.
@Animal lover 666 thanks for the reminder. I was wondering, since I saw a lot of these false positives recently, is there a way to 'update' the article so that it doesn't trigger the filter? Thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)23:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the filters probably don't, and never will, have the ability to check for the existence of other articles. (They can parse the HTML of the page, both the old version and the new, to detect red links.) Animal lover|666|06:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
DCWC August update
The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:
Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.
Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.
Request for Preliminary Review of Revised "Cyber Privacy" Draft
Hello User:CanonNi
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request a preliminary review of my draft article Draft:Cyber_privacy before resubmitting it for approval.
In response to the feedback provided, I have thoroughly revised the content to ensure that the sources cited are robust, reliable, and offer perspectives from various aspects of the topic. These revisions aim to create a balanced and neutral perspective, incorporating sources that are either directly relevant to the term 'cyber privacy'—explicitly mentioned in the text—or that contribute to the topic's understanding within the context of its provided definition. My goal is to ensure that the draft meets Wikipedia’s requirements for notability and verifiability.
I would greatly appreciate your expert opinion on whether this iteration sufficiently addresses the concerns raised, particularly regarding the coverage and independent verification of the term "cyber privacy."
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to any guidance you can offer for further improvements.
İ want to ask you 2 questions
First:Can i write Wiki pages in different languages?
For example
İm from turkey,but i choose to write at eng Wiki first
İts gonna be a problem to write at turkish Viki with same account or do i need a other account?
Second:How to write a New Wiki page from start? Stuka535 (talk) 12:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello
I'm really happy to have you as a mentor. please what are the things i need to know to have a successful publication? --Odoyin (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
@Stuka535 are you asking if I could write the article? Sorry, but as I have no knowledge nor interest in CRT monitors, I cannot write the article. Is there anything specific you need help with? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)00:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
@Stuka535 Do you mean sections?, If yes then here's how you can make different sections. The same thing that I asked to CanonNi and he explained me in a simple way.
== Example ==
By the use of two equal to signs, you can easily make up sections. Basically, it's used for Reference and External links. Regards, Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to edit an article and would also like to supply my own picture but as I am now I am unsure of how to do this. I am using mobile. Thank you. --Lamanopeluda (talk) 18:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
I am trying to edit my husband's bio page with his death date and some brief biographical edits. I haven't hit "publish" yet because I don't think I formatted the footnote/references properly. --M.A. Carlebach (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Okay, rather than edit it myself, I'll forward the references here. Or there is also the option that I can ask a professor in the field of journalism to write something on the significance of Michael's first history of photojournalism, "The Origins of Photojournalism in America" which he was too modest to do himself. I can also provide images of his photographs or from his books.
Here (attached below) is the (not very well-written) obit from the Miami Herald, and a better, more detailed one from the University of Miami newspaper. I have copies of book reviews which I scanned but am unable to attach here. Let me know if I can send them another way. The reviews are from: Publishers Weekly (14 Sept,1992), Journalism Quarterly (Summer, 1993), News Photographer (vol. 49, no.7,July, 1994. 12), The Los Angeles Times (25 Oct, 1992), Brown Alumni Monthly) (n.d.).
In addition to the addition of his death date and some minor corrections on his resume, this is what I proposed to add in the edit:
As a historian Carlebach's book, The Origins of Photojournalism in America, was considered seminal as one of the first histories on the earliest years of news photography in the U.S. It became a standard text in the field. Carlebach argued that periodical publications in the United States began supplementing print journalism with photographs by converting them to engravings or woodcuts long before the half-tone printing process was invented which allowed the mass reproduction of photographs.
Hi CanonNi. Thank you any and all advice, etc! Although I'm new to Wikipedia editing, I've read many, many articles and I'm an expert in my scientific field. I've just drafted a new article about Paul Sniegowski, who recently became the President of Earlham College. I think my article fulfills everything expected of a biography of a living person. One thing that I could use help on is how to add the box that gives information about a scholar (education, positions, mentors, and the like), typically seen on the right of the entry. Thanks again! --Factsnfigurestoo (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Just submitted my second article, also a biography in my area of expertise. This one is Draft:Jeffrey Barrick. Again, many internal links to Wikipedia entries as well as external references to verify factual statements. I'll update the categories once the article is approved. (Seems like categories can't be added until then, except for automated ones labeled draft, pending, AfC, and the like.) Factsnfigurestoo (talk) 01:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Question from Evgeny U-gin (14:06, 27 August 2024)
Good afternoon!
I’m quite new to Wikipedia.
Recently I have made discovery and realized that Wikipedia have no evidence of thing which I have discovered.
I would like to share my discovery with the world.
What steps should I follow to publish it?
Evgeny U-gin --Evgeny U-gin (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:
Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!
Due to physically being in Mainland China, I need to use VPNs in order to access WMF sites. I was recently granted the global IP-block exempt right after appealing on UTRS (see here), but as my IP is also blocked locally here on enwiki, I'll need a local IPBE to edit. Thanks for considering my request.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)04:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am Wales and I am very glad to have been assigned to you.
I noticed I was blocked by AmandaNP hence I haven’t been able to make any edits or do anything else.
Can you help with this please? --Zwales (talk) 08:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello guy, I hope you guys are doing will as I am
My question is how can we make our studend to become sk intellegent.
This is my question for today --Isaac Danso Amoah (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!
In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.
The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...
We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.
Thanks for uploading File:Last Call BBS.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
Please stick to one account only. To quote the template, This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,315 pending submissions waiting for review. Please be patient. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)09:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Declining my article in a previous edit, but now still waiting for review
Hello! Earlier today (or yesterday depending where you live) My Article was declined in a old edit. But right now, it says waiting for review again. It also said you were the one to decline but I guess undecline. My question is is it declined or not? And if it is, what can I do to make the article better? Draft is: Draft:Hurricane Isaac (2024)JAFactsDude (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Please review and tell me about the errors and Fix the problems so that I would understand my errors and will keep in mind next time. Regards,Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@CanonNi Thanks for telling about my errors. I have fixed the reference error by own and now I will try to adjust footnotes, Please review my page again and If you see any error again, kindly make me notice. Regards, Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 13:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Is in Wikipedia, talking about personal matter in discussion is allowed? I have seen a Wikipedia user and his girlfriend are misusing discussion page. I don't remember the name of that Wikipedian,he and his girlfriend might be blocked.?? Kharavela Deva (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
No problem, I don't dispute that some museums are more credible than others, and that some museum claims are either out of date, overly nationalistic or just patriochal about their community's achievements. Just good to give that detail when communicating with article writers. ϢereSpielChequers10:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
As a Hindu, you have no rights to change anyone's belief. Its the basic human right so please forcing anyone to be theist is not good. Hare Krsna, Regards Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
understood, thank you, though i believe what you said is enough information, i guess i'll just add an efn template in the image. 152.32.99.39 (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
do you think simple “mental health support” is going to solve all the pain and suffering in the world? no. therefore it is useless to direct me to any hotlines, WP:EMERGENCY or any of that. it’s not my problem, it’s humanity’s problem and you’re being complicit to my suffering. i don’t want to deal with your ignorance anymore. you’re the problem.2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:A8A5:BCAF:5476:2D2 (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you said some of my sources such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube for example are not reliable. but when compared to other biographies such as Jackson Hinkle the source for his birthday is his own twitter https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1835270134036090986 / this is a pretty big double standard especially when TikTok twitter and Instagram are actual sources you can't just say they're not just cause its social media. I don't know how twitter and TikTok are at different levels of quality when it's both someone saying the same thing but in different media formats. I did review the notability requirements for people and i will definitely add some more sources showing why he's notable for now I'll give you some examples here. Eddie was in a jubilee video with 1.3 million views, a debate with well-known twitch streamer vaush 241k views
and a debate with another well-known streamer Destiny (streamer)426k views Gingercom1 (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
I think she is just a good Actress that has been working for years. Like a whole life basically and I think its unfair that in Instaiable that the things she thought of didn't came true maybe because she keeps shooting on a wishing star but it really said bye bitch next time. Eris-sabia (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your speedy response. While I've got you, is it at all possible to implement something into the code to bypass the warning about leaving a CTOP on someone's talk? TarnishedPathtalk14:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
At the moment I can see the option to leave you a CTOP in my actions menu. So maybe? I'd have to get back to you after I've next had need to leave someone a CTOP. TarnishedPathtalk14:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
This article exists for a different language version of Wikipedia, so I don't see why it cannot exist on English Wikipedia. I would love to improve my article, however, the guy who declined my submission never answered me after months of me replying to him regarding my confusion. CandleWickipedia (talk) 18:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, for some reason i can’t request a move for the israel-hezbollah conflict article as it’s locked to avoid vandalism, can you request it for me somehow? 78.182.130.19 (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
I propose taking action on the article "Bhavishya Malika Puran" as it solely presents propaganda spread by news channels for financial gain.
Context: The article is highly disputed, and its accuracy as a translation of the original Bhavishya Malika remains unverified. News channels have extensively covered this topic, primarily repeating the claims made by the Pandit. Unfortunately, the errors in this translated book, which appears to be motivated by financial interests, have gone unchallenged.
Having carefully examined the book and its issues, I recommend one of the following actions:
1. Archive the article until credible evidence supporting its claims is provided.
Or
2. Add a disclaimer to the article stating that it is a controversial issue and establish a Reception section to present a balanced view.
What I want: I want to learn how to demand for a action, or delete the article. And if you help me in this action. I would be very much obliged. Regards, Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, CanonNi! I wanted to let you know I marked Miki Kaeok, which you reviewed earlier today, as unreviewed. Unfortunately, the creator has been creating articles using LLMs. For this particular article, it appears all the ref links are broken, which shouldn't be the case since the article was created today. I just wanted to let you know. :) Take care! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
I create a Article on World Labs, I want to Publish that can you review that and Also Help me to "How to Publish that Article." --KunalKore (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Added 'In 2021 he featured in Series 7 of "The Brokenwood Mysteries". In Mystery 28, "Something Nasty at the Market" he played Johnny Oades.' Lastest film/TV info stopped 2020. Have just watched the dvd. Only added what he was credited with in that show. May be in earlier episode also but can not recall which one so when eventually rewatch series would add that too. Auctionvibe (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
The validly bought dvd is a source. Anyone can see him in the episode and there is no reason not to add it to his workography. Not competent woth formatting of tables so could not add to the one there whixh is why it was put in as a statement. Go watch the dvd and verify it is correct. Auctionvibe (talk) 11:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello CanonNi, I see you've reverted my two edits on the article Bushi (region) because I didn't provide a good source. Now I translated most of my work from the French article on the Bushi Kingdom, but admittedly forgot to copy the references, but I assume the problem is with the source worldstatesmen.org (which the French Wikipedia also used, so I assumed was okay)? I can re-add the stuff without the king list, but with the proper sources if so. Preupellor (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
November 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
Citation Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to CanonNi/Archives for collecting more than 7.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I have created an article for her given the support for it on the move discussion on the Hawk tuah talk page. Requesting that the discussion be officially closed now per your comment - thanks! jolielover♥talk09:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
I may have been blocked,as I tried to move page Ashoka by changing the name the great severe times. And, by reading whole Block and Banning policy. I feared because I have made 1 account 3 years ago which was blocked, and then I created this account, by the same IP. But, this time I have'nt abused any rules or policies of Wikipedia and also I am trying to reduce the vandalism department in this Bunch of knowledge. Will I be banned? Regards, Ved SharmaKharavela Deva (talk) 13:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Because you’ll probably see it, I accidentally clicked the revert button on your closure of the RM listed above. That was simply an accident and the revert was reverted back to your version again. TiggerJay(talk)06:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello CanonNi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Legend of the Pineapple, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi CanonNi. Thank you for your work on Star Trucker. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work on your new article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed.
Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words.
Hello CanonNi, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, GrabUp - Talk18:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Overcrowd screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 11:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your time to review the Wiki. I got the review messages all about reliable and independent sources, actually I think we got some news sources like:
And we also got sources from CommCon 2023 and 2024, which is a conference in London:
Winlin, Yang (21 June 2023). "Sub-Second Latency Streaming Technologies and Applications". 2023.commcon.xyz/talks/sub-second-latency-streaming-technologies-and-applications/
Winlin, Yang (6 June 2024). "Oryx: AI-Powered Media Kit for Everyone" 2024.commcon.xyz/talks/oryx-ai-powered-media-kit-for-everyone/
SRS (Simple Realtime Server) is a open source community from 2013, about 11 years ago, and famous project in streaming industry, but we are not a commercial project, so we have many users and developers all over the world but not too many news reports.
I'm also new to wikipedia, if you need more information about this project, please let met know.
Hey this is David and i was trying to put a history, expansion and mission page, and sources on the st. henry distirct high school page, and aparently, it all got erased because for some reason it has copyright violation and unfortunately it has a bad history of it too, when someone did the same thing 2 years ago, except it had no sources whatsoever, but still got copied from the School's website. apparently I got little upset that it got taken down, and i didn't realize i was copying off the other website, like i was just putting sources on it. so i wanted to say i'm sorry from copying the school's websites, using copy and paste and putting the sources along with it. i did it because this school on wikipedia did not have a history or anything on there, with just blank information at the bottom and just the school info alright. David the researcher (talk) 16:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hi CanonNi, the following entry appears in AlertAssistant for me:
Additionally, could you please update to include Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Yasuke? Finally, not an issue with the script, but would you consider adding support for the {{gs}} templates, or, if you're feeling ambitious, expanding the userscript to enable adding talk page or editnotice templates? Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 22:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Voorts, I'll look into the issue and (hopefully) update the script to fix it soon. Yasuke should be an easy addition, but {{gs}} uses a different set of codes, so implementing that might be harder. Either way, I'll let you know when the changes are ready. Thanks for the message! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)10:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
@Voorts, the script should be fixed now. I also switched from using Morebits to OOUI to make it look more modern, though usage is the same. Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks, '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)09:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Codex
I was wondering why you chose to rewrite AlertAssistant in OOUI instead of mw:Codex, which is replacing and deprecating OOUI, especially for things that don't need certain features only OOUI has right now. I also wonder if you've heard of comboboxes (OOUI, Codex). Still, it's pretty cool to see another OOUI script! Aaron Liu (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
@Aaron Liu hmm... I didn't know Codex existed when I rewrote it (which is weird considering how it's mentioned in a massive box in OOUI's doc), but I'll look into that. Thanks! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)11:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
A suggestion
Sorry to disturb my mentor. Just as the fictional depiction I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons regarding,Kharavela at King Kharavela of Odisha.png was deleted and hence my page The photo has been removed from there too, so I wanted your opinion on which new profile picture should I put so that people recognize me regarding Kharvel. And please don't suggest about Kharavela.jpg picture as it is copyright of a king Harisha. And I also wanted to know, why my picture has been copyrighted and not his, Thanking you. Regards,Ved Sharma (talk) 13:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
@Kharavela Deva well, the image has been deleted, so I can't tell why it was a copyvio. About the other file you mentioned, I've tagged it on Commons as it also seems to be copyrighted (though I'm not certain). Also, no need to worry about disturbing me, feel free to ask questions anytime you like! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs)11:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
