User talk:CalculatinAvatar

You first post was a personal attack on me. Yeah, that'll work.--Asams10 23:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was neither an attack or my first post. I was pointing out you issued an ad hominem attack, and I have many edits as an anonymous user, as indicated clearly on my user page. --CalculatinAvatar 07:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that clears it up. To include video game information in an article about a firearm is juvenile.--Asams10 16:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not really a response to my comments so much as a reiteration of your own. Your opinion on video games is not that of a majority of the general population under, say, 30 or, I would think, Wikipedia's population; frankly, I don't see it as particularly relevant. Should you care to list reasons or otherwise detail how you came to the conclusion that popular culture references are inappropriate for firearm articles despite their routine inclusion in articles in general, I would be interested. --CalculatinAvatar 06:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just my personal opinion, it is the opinion of other gun nuts too. If you look at your own edits and the edits of those who are against it, they care nothing about guns and edit articles about video games, pop music groups, and Beavis and Butthead entries. The articles about firearms are about firearms, not video games. Unless a video game adds something significant to the story of the gun, it doesn't belong there. Whatever excuse you give for your first post as a registered user being an jab at me, nobody else would believe it.--Asams10 08:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asams10 has lodged a complaint about me.

Was wondering if you would be a character witness? On his character, since you don't know me from Adam, obviously. Here is the dispute page GameJunkieJim 16:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Such is done. --CalculatinAvatar 20:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Filthy Critic

Thanks for the heads up. Looks like you did a good job. Gershwinrb 01:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Critical (game)

I noted you changed the tags on Mission Critical (game). It's not on my watchlist, but on my userpage that I check when I get time - like now. :-) Would you like to babysit this one? If so, I will take it off my "free time" watchlist. meatclerk 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't do so effectively, as I've never played it, sorry. --CalculatinAvatar^(C-T) 23:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

You have edited several pages, by simply adding Pakistan, Please do not add something by guess-work, or by your own will. Thank you. --Yu5uF 09:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry... what? I don't recall adding mention of Pakistan to any article ever. Could you provide an example? --CalculatinAvatar^(C-T) 04:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did find http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zam_Zam_Cola&diff=next&oldid=66594381 upon searching, but you'll note that I didn't add reference to Pakistan, I simply moved it within the page. http://www.ip2location.com/free.asp shows that 202.91.109.6, who originally added the information, connected to the internet from Pakistan, so I doubt he had malicious intent. --CalculatinAvatar^(C-T) 04:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. --Yu5uF 17:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. --CalculatinAvatar^(C-T) 23:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nom.)

The Battlestar Wiki aritlce has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Feel free to add your comments to the corresponding discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 04:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Televisionset.png

The file File:Televisionset.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]