User talk:Cahk/Archive 14

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cahk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 19

Question about the old prod template

Hi. You placed a BLPPROD tempate on an article I was translating from the German wikipedia (Charles Enz), and also placed an "old prod" template on its talk page. I quickly satisfied the BLPPROD problem, and the BLPPROD was duly removed. I would now like to remove the irrelevant "old prod" from the talk page, but another editor is contesting this on the grounds that "old prod" templates, one placed, must be perpetual. Is this actual policy, and if so, can you point me to the relevant document? Sorry to bother you with such a dumb question, but I haven't been able to find the document on my own. Thanks in advance for your help. Eleuther (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

@Eleuther: I see you already had a very length discussion on this matter with other editors. What I will say is if any other editors (that use Twinkle or similar scripted program) tries to tag the article for deletion, they'd get a notification that the article was already previously nominated for deletion (and obviously survived the tag to remain live on Wikipedia). --Cahk (talk) 08:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Cahk, thanks for the information about Twinkle. However, I'm not really concerned about future PRODs. If they come, they come, I won't oppose them personally. At the moment, I'm only concerned with the much smaller and specific question of locating the WP documentation of the policy that says that an old-prod template, once placed, may never be removed. Do you know of such a location? I haven't been able to turn it up with google searches on obvious things like "wikipedia old prod template", but WP policies are sometimes stored in non-obvious places.

The closest I've found is an inconclusive discussion on the template's talk page (here), where CapnZapp supports my position that it should be okay to remove the template, once the notability of the subject has been established, and TJRC disputes this. However, neither of these editors cites an official WP policy. Thanks in advance for your help. Eleuther (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

The policy clearly states [Proposed deletion (PROD)] may only be placed on a page a single time, see WP:PROD.

There likely is no stated regulation on the {{Old prod}} template, since its whole existence is to help support the PROD policy. As its documentation states: The purpose for this template is to reduce repeated proposed deletion (PROD) nominations of the same article.

My best answer, then, is: it's up to local consensus on each article to remove old PROD notices - and when I say old I mean "clearly very old and no longer serving its purpose". I would suggest (as a personal observation only) the argument "the talk page header is long and cluttery as is" works better than "the old prod notice acts like a badge of shame". That is, don't remove it just because you don't like it, remove it because it helps readability of the talk page. And if someone objects, respect that and leave it.

All this said and done, I will note my removal of template at the Lost in Space page (after the linked discussion came to a close) remains uncontested. Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks everybody, I'm sorry to have been bothering you with such a dumb question. I take the conclusion to be the following. There is no official WP policy that says an old-prod template may never be removed, or that states the circumstances under which it may or should be removed. So the removal must be decided on a page-by-page basis, with respect to all the other WP policies regarding consensus. Eleuther (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination

Hi, I saw you put a CSD A3 tag on the article SVR Sons. However, I just talked to the creator of the page, and gave him up to 08:50 UTC, perhaps even 08:55. Thanks for noting. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message; contribs) 08:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@The Lord of Math: It was tagged as A3 because the user has been creating numerous new articles in a short span, all had the same information before blanking them out. As a new page patroller, I tagged those pages so others don't have to waste time to review it again. If the author decide to add content, the administrator will simply ignore my tag and remove it. I will leave it for now, but please don't revert simply because you want to give more time to the editor. I placed the tag only after reviewing 6 articles from the same person.--Cahk (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry for all this inconvenience caused, but I didn't know about this user. And by the way someone else marked it as a blatant hoax (why?) so I guess it won't be much of a difference anyway. I'm new too, so thanks a lot. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message; contribs) 08:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@The Lord of Math: It's likely a hoax because the source URL on Sanapala Vallabha refers to a different person. The person is also linking various similarly named organization as "his" own.--Cahk (talk) 08:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HKSAR2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HKSAR2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your message

Hi Cahk, you left me a message to tell me it looked like I wrote an article about myself. I did not. The article that exists about me was written by someone else many months ago. What I did yesterday was translate it, as I believe I could, and saved it as personal draft, which is what I was allowed to do. The page that exist about me is legitimate and should not be deleted. I am a published author and artist with a legitimate biography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariogoldenuniverse (talk • contribs) 17:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Cahk,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

help

Hi Cahk

Ok hands up, not sure what im doing.

I run 2 companies Swanky Pixels - web designers and im a wedding photographer. Is there a way to get these on Wikipedia without advertising, was it the external link? or the whole think?

Do you write wikipedia entrys for people/clients?

regards Pete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanky Pixels (talk • contribs) 10:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Splendid work at AIV this morning dealing with spamfarms; good job! Yunshui ^雲水 11:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Sheriff CoA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Sheriff CoA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

User talk:DavidAngulo00

How is User talk:DavidAngulo00 eligible for WP:G5? Could you point me at the block that applied at that point? Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Cabayi: spambot, plus account globally locked.--Cahk (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

WP:G5 - "To qualify, the edit or page must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion."

However, there's nothing preventing you from overwriting the talk page with {{Locked global account}}. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your complaint about my edits

Hi. What edits did I do wrong? Please be specific. --Saalberg af traam (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Rymc59

I left that message on User:Rymc59's talk page because he is a sockpuppet and a vandal. He creates accounts just to vandalise and troll. I am warning him and Wikipedia. --Saalberg af traam (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

@Saalberg af traam: Sock should be dealt with either at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations or Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Leaving a message like that is not the proper way of handling the matter.--Cahk (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay. --Saalberg af traam (talk) 08:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

The "The Seven Spirits And Fourteen Powers" spammer

Hi Cahk. Looks like we might need an Wikipedia:Edit filter request in this case. How are your regex skills? I'd do it myself but... OK, the internet starts off with all these teeny tiny magnets that are either "1" or "0"... and ends up with an ethernet cable to my desktop computer. All the things in between may as well happen by magic for me. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@Shirt58: I think I'll have to leave that one to you - I am only good at sniffing spammers out by keyword searches.--Cahk (talk) 18:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Wow. TIL that you can do "keyword searches" on Wikipedia? Your technical skills are way ahead of mine! --Shirt58 (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Shirt58: See [1][2] for the latest round.--Cahk (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@Shirt58: 2 more [3] and [4]. --Cahk (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted post of

Cahk, I was creating my sandbox for a test. IT was NOT public yet, and it was my first post. I asked you guys why you deleted and got a bunch of non-sense replies; "try to avoid working in the company..." What?? I'm just helping out a friend to share public information of his new-to launch startup with the public information about the company that is in the website.

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdigital01 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@Mrdigital01: "startup company where I'm an intern at" means you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Beyond that, G11 speedy does not imply you were selling anything per se, but the content was promotional in nature. Sandbox content is not immune to speedy deletion if it meets the criteria. While I tagged the page, I am not an administrator that deleted the page.--Cahk (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Sheriff CoA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Sheriff CoA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:C. K. Kumaravel

I wasn't the article's creator, I just moved it from Draft:CK Kumaravel to Draft:C. K. Kumaravel. I fully support the speedy delete but you may wish to notify the article's actual creator, Sakthikkumaranv (talk · contribs). Dan arndt (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: Blocked.--Cahk (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Who is blocked? Hopefully not me.... Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: Oops. I meant deleted ... I am clearly not as awake as I thought I was. --Cahk (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Well that's a relief. There is still Draft:C. K. Kumaravel to consider though. Dan arndt (talk) 09:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: There was another account editing another draft - that account was indeed blocked just now. With respect to the draft you mentioned above, I've reverted the latest edit. --Cahk (talk) 09:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Good work!. Dan arndt (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Aabha Hanjura

Hello Cahn, I was wondering why the sandbox article 'Aabha Hanjura' that I am creating is tagged for speedy deletion. I'm not so good with policies and let me know if the sandbox has an issue, or how to get it to the right place. Ambar (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ambar wiki: I can't see the deleted page anymore but I am pretty sure you ended up creating a mainspace article instead of sandbox. A user sandbox will always begin with "User:XXXXX/sandbox". --Cahk (talk) 09:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Cahk,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Liu Musix [Important] update

Hi Cahk, Thankyou for your response ! Anyway I was asked by my manager to create some words for Wikipedia and send to him, He said that more of my fans require more information about me since I did not have a lot of open social medias and early life stories to be shared before. So I did not know that by creating this template is automatically posted to wikipedia ! I was just typing and it seems interesting for me. For sure you can delete this, however the one who gonna post the words that I have arrange might be my manager or someone who will write about me ! Thank You for your concern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liu Musix (talk • contribs) 11:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Tomfoolery - Tomos (Tom) Roberts

Hello... The Wikipedia page I am creating is for Tomos (Tom) Roberts. This is not me and I have no relation to Tomos. Tomos recently created the video called "The Great Realisation" - which has over 60 million views across various online platforms. It has also been turned into a book by Harper Collins ("The Great Realisation"). Tomos is also a movie producer and co-founder of "Odds On Productions". Following "The Great Realisation", he's been interviewed by The Washington Post, The New Zealand Herald and The Today Show. He also recently wrote a poem in June's edition of VOGUE Italia entitled "What Are You Drawing?"

https://www.probablytomfoolery.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/probablytomfoolery?sub_confirmation=1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw5KQMXDiM4&t=1s https://www.oddsonproductions.com/ https://www.harpercollins.com/9780063066366/the-great-realization/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/ https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12329669 https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8955108/

If you require additional information, please do not hesitate in messaging me.

Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomfoolery (Tom Roberts) (talk • contribs) 09:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Tomfoolery (Tom Roberts): While you may not be related to Mr. Roberts, your username would appear otherwise and that's the issue here. --Cahk (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Tomfoolery - Tomos (Tom) Roberts

Please let me know how you'd like me to proceed. My name is Ryan Girard, I live in Sudbury (Ontario), Canada ... I can provide government-issued ID ... I can even take a photo of me holding up my ID or holding up a message that says whatever you request ... I'm simply trying to create this page and to contribute to Wikipedia. I'm working diligently to create this page and I'm certainly not looking to deceive or to do anything untoward or against community standards. Again, please let me know how you'd like me to proceed. I'm open to any suggestions and will do my utmost to comply. Kindly, Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomfoolery (Tom Roberts) (talk • contribs) 19:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Tomfoolery (Tom Roberts):You may wish to review Wikipedia:Changing username with respect to perhaps changing your username. I am not an administrator so don't need to show IDs or anything to me. Thanks. --Cahk (talk) 08:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Tomfoolery - Tomos (Tom) Roberts

Thank you for kindly communicating with me. I do appreciate your willingness to assist me in this regard. I will follow your recommendations so as to meet community standards and various requirements.

Thank you, once again.

Ryan Girard

Regarding Draft of Biography for Mr. Gene Pelc

Dear Cahk,

Thank you very much for your note on this page.

It is not autobiographical. It is biographical and I am a 3rd party to the subject trying to create a page for him within WIkipedia.

Since I am not sure how to proceed, can you provide instructions that might help me get this submission live?

Here is the link in reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gene_Pelc

Thank you,

Greg Culos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genepelc (talk • contribs) 03:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@Genepelc: While you may not be related to Mr. Pelc, your username would appear otherwise and that's the issue here. You may wish to review Wikipedia:Changing username with respect to perhaps changing your username.--Cahk (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

I see and makes sense. Thanks for this explanation. I will remedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genepelc (talk • contribs) 07:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

I have created a new user for myself ("Sixtrees66") since I wish to make a number of contributions. You can see I have published and requested review of the page: "Eugene Joseph Pelc." I will no longer work through the username ("Genepelc") I initially created, and will seek its deletion, along with the original article attached to it.

Thanks again for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sixtrees66 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Per your message

You are correct. I couldn't cite a source, but 100% of scientists agree with me 60% of the time. There's that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malkire (talk • contribs) 11:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Why Question my belief/theory’s of humanturnaffectionnisom + H.T.AN

Who are you to invoke my article I have I have no Interest nor intended to hurt people by providing my knowledge On what I have discovered by you putting a block on my article I feel that your trying to belittle my way of thinking and or beliefs. Wikipedia is away to provide knowledge to people who have none or for people to gain . knowledge is free and key to strengthening one mind My research is my belief and it may be a theory to you but did not Albert Einstein have theory’s You should have at least emailed me so I can explain my side instead of playing god with one work but I will not let you stop me cause I have a strong belief and I will continue to provide my belief and or “theory” to mankind and to those who wish to listen “Wikipedia is an online free-content encyclopedia project that aims to help create a world in which every single human can freely share in the sum of all knowledge” did you not forget what Wikipedia stand for or it’s intentions even if my knowledge seems lunink you have no right to tamper with my work. Voinatl (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

@Voinatl: Wrong, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that just summarizes other published sources. We're not your personal webhosting service, we're not your pulpit, and we don't use original research. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Stan VanderWerf - Wikipedia Page

Hi! I'm working on the Stan VanderWerf page and wanted to make sure it meets the requirements for Wikipedia. I'm relatively new in contributing to Wikipedia and my interest is in learning how to create good living biography pages. I hope to create more biographies that can help people find factual information about significant people who are contributing to the community at large. I would greatly appreciate any tips you can give!

I noticed that some of the verbiage used is considered promotional, which I'm adjusting now. I've been reading the guidelines closely and I'm working to make sure that I meet those guidelines in the articles I create.

Currently, I'm working on citations for this page and noticed that there were some problems with local citations. It seems that I need to find more prominent, recognized articles which I'm looking for.

Mr. VanderWerf is a highly decorated veteran who has went on to become a Commissioner in Colorado Springs. I'm wanting to place his military decorations into the article as factual support.

I would appreciate any tips you can give me to better this article. I'm using other living biographies like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Cotton as guides to creating a good biography page.

Is there anything specifically I can be working on to help this page?

Thank you, for your insight! It's much appreciated!

PeytonRose (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC) PeytonRose

@PeytonRose: I quickly scanned the comments on the deletion discussion, and it appears the subject is not necessarily widely known outside of the locality. Having military/state order may increase notability (albeit marginally), it would require additional sources (i.e. newspaper, articles, etc.) to ensure the article will survive the deletion process. I would suggest engaging the editors who have commented on the deletion process for further guidance. --Cahk (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cahk Thank you, very much for the insight. Yes! My main intention is to begin recognizing Combat Veterans who received Medals of Honor and went on to contribute to society. I realized that an FOI was needed to cite Mr. VanderWerf's Military accomplishments (as indicated by another editor). His story, like a ton of our Veterans, is pretty amazing. I'm reaching out to the other Wiki editors who are wanting it deleted to see how we can go about recognizing Military Veterans who have great accomplishments in service and in society. I come from a military family and saw Mr. VanderWerf's story and thought it would be a great place to start in recognizing accomplished veterans. PeytonRose (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Question about deleted pages.

Hello Cahk,

I am new at this, so I hope I am reaching out to you correctly.

I was in the process of creating the Manuel A. Montilla page, but realize I should have created a draft as I had not added what makes him notable. Furthermore, I was adding a list of publications to another page (it took me a while) and they were removed. I understand why, but did not realize how quickly things would be deleted if they did not have proper citations and references. Is there anyway for me to retrieve the work I did so that I can edit the page once more, but ensure everything is acceptable before publishing?

Thanks so much, Tensack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tensack (talk • contribs) 19:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Tensack: It was moved to Draft:Manuel A. Montilla.--Cahk (talk) 20:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

I edited a page, made several mistakes, which were quickly deleted. I replaced the existing page with what it was before I did any editing 15 minutes ago. Is this okay? I'm simply trying to put it back the way it was before I did anything to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tensack (talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Poaching the question. @Tensack: added copyright protected content to Daniella Ohad - deleted. The activity on that article resulted in an editor deleting other content that was not supported by suitable references - also deleted. Tensack attempted to restore a version, but that effort was reverted. David notMD (talk) 09:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

why delete articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angomango130355 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

AIV Reports

Hello Cahk, I have removed some of your reports from the AIV noticeboard. I have made the reports on your behalf at WP:UAA which deals with username violations. The AIV noticeboard is only for reporting obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Just a heads up to let you know of my action. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@Synoman Barris: If you look my edit history, I am pretty sure you can see I am well aware of the processes here on Wikipedia. Each administrator has different opinion about which board to report to - this has been the subject of numerous discussions on my talk page in the past, and everyone came to different consensus.--Cahk (talk) 12:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

BLOODY IDIOT

WHO HAVE BEEN TOLD YOU THAT WE HAVE WRITTEN THIS POST BECAUSE WE HAVE THINK THAT THIS WIKIPEDIA IS A FREE HOSTING ,YOU STUPID FELLOW ,MIND IT OK WIKIPEDIA'S DOG.

INDRTECH94 (talk) 11:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!

YOU STUPID FELLOW MIND YOUR STUPID MIND AND BLOODY LANGUAGE,MIND IT OK WIKIPEDIA'S DOG.

INDRTECH94 (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Legal status of comment regarding guardian of a child

934293-lb-6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C856:F400:808B:5997:7661:4217 (talk) 11:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

child safeguarding

Confirm original post-IP and source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C856:F400:808B:5997:7661:4217 (talk) 12:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Article for website

Dear Cahk, I want to write a artile about web application which is run on android as well as web. www.nareshdhungana.com.np which was create bu Naresh Dhungana and is for physics education. Naresh dhungana is Physics teacher. Please help me for creating Page 'Sunresh'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunresh (talk • contribs) 01:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your article did not meet the requirements for a notable individual. Wikipedia generally frowns upon individuals writing about themselves. Visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you wish to ask more questions on writing on Wikipedia.--Cahk (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Patch design.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patch design.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Cahk,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cahk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 19