User talk:COMPFUNK2

Orphaned non-free image File:Another Bad Creation Grady Baby Compilation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Another Bad Creation Grady Baby Compilation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marija Miletic Daïl

The article Marija Miletic Daïl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and references. Fails WP:BLP and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JJ98 (Talk) 23:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thom Huge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thom Huge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Huge (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Wikipedians

I know you probably won't receive this message, but in light of your departure, reasons for doing so and your contributions to our community, I've added you to the page above. Sorry to see you've gone, but if you come back please remove your name from the list. God bless, LazyBastardGuy 18:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thom Huge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thom Huge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Huge (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^(What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"On the spot disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect On the spot disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the On the spot disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Baby talk disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baby talk disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Baby talk disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"On-the-spot disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect On-the-spot disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the On-the-spot disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ice Cream Cones (cereal)

The article Ice Cream Cones (cereal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability - sole reliable source is the daily meal, the rest of the sources are self published, see WP:BLOGS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 04:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ice Cream Cones (cereal)

The article Ice Cream Cones (cereal) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^(What did I screw up now?) 00:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ice Cream Cones chocolate chip.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ice Cream Cones chocolate chip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ice Cream Jones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ice Cream Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karen Peterson (animator)

The article Karen Peterson (animator) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minimal if any coverage outside of databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Garnet (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]