User talk:Btspurplegalaxy/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Btspurplegalaxy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Happy New Year!

Btspurplegalaxy,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 10:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year 2025!

	Happy New Year 2025!

Aidillia^(talk) 10:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Btspurplegalaxy. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for asking! I’ve completed the interview. :) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 10:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk it over

Instead of trying to wage in a edit war anda vandalize articles, remember you can always use the talk pages to discuss why something should be added or removed. You not only never replied me in the specific page's talk page but you acted in malice by deleting my topic in here, making basically a hostile envirovement where you simply ignored someone and kept editing without trying to solve it. 2804:3D5C:B300:7B0:540A:406B:F7AF:C17D (talk) 12:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

It's self-explanatory. You are adding content with no type of sourcing to support the content. Furthermore, you just said: remember that half the page is lacking sources, and the only source you need to confirm the added information is to watch the second season. It doesn't help, you're adding unsourced information when you know it's already lacking sourcing, so why add more? Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 13:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Instead of taking it to a talk page you decided to justt delete it - that is vandalism

You could use the right tools to add a "source needed" tag infront, anyway, yet opted to vandalize the work of fellow Wikipedians. I did add the source so enough of being a vandal, do not remove it anymore. 2804:3D5C:B300:7B0:540A:406B:F7AF:C17D (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Btspurplegalaxy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 04:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Soobin and HueningKai

Heads up, I've WP:BLAR'd Soobin and HueningKai as I don't believe they have yet demonstrated notability outside of the band (WP:BANDMEMBER) and won't hold up at AfD. There doesn't seem to be enough content outside of the TXT realm to justify full articles yet.

If you disagree you can revert and it can be brought for a full discussion at AfD. Thanks! RachelTensions (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

If you’re opposed to the article being in the main space, you’re welcome to bring it to AfD yourself. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 02:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

That's fine :) RachelTensions (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Good with me! :) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 02:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of HueningKai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HueningKai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HueningKai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RachelTensions (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)