Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.
Problems with upload of File:Mr. Govind Dholakia.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Govind Dholakia.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Govind Laljibhai Dholakia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE💕16:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
June 2022
Hello Brakshit23. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Brakshit23. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Brakshit23|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕16:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
Thanks for the brief idea about this thing i was not aware about such practices. i am a law student and the subject belongs to my city and that's why i felt that i should contribute in this matter because someone has made effort to write this book. I try my best and apply much due diligence before writing anything over here. 2nd why speedy deletion i have no idea. everything is right and truthfully done. Brakshit23 (talk) 17:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Regular deletion is meant for situations where the article subject's notability is in question. In those cases, discussion is allowed (and expected) to find consensus about whether the article should be deleted or not.
On the other hand, speedy deletion is meant for articles that are blatantly unencyclopaedic or for copyright violations, where there is no need for discussion because the answer is obvious and unambiguous – these articles must be deleted according to Wikipedia policy, no matter how well-written they are... even if, as you say, "everything is right and truthfully done". Since the article copied text directly from a website which does not allow such copying, it was deemed a copyright violation and so deleted as quickly as possible. I hope you understand the reason for speedy deletion now.
Please do not add copyright violations again—instead of copy-pasting material, you must write in your own words when referencing a source.
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Brakshit23, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.
That is a really myopic and Western centric view. A lot of names that are non-Westernized contain some variation of "shit" in them, we shouldn't be blocking because we see a vague curseword... PRAXIDICAE💕18:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I find it somewhat heavy-handed to block an editor for their username because part of what is presumably their real name coincidentally looks like profanity when transliterated into English. --Kinut/c18:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And users on the English-language Wikipedia are supposed to work out which names are profanity and which are genuine...how exactly? GiantSnowman18:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Common sense? A quick search of our own website? Not having such a small minded view of what a name should be? It's not like the name was fuckpoop69. PRAXIDICAE💕18:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But that is not the user name, the username is 'Brakshit23'. So, again - so is somebody meant to work out which parts of a username might or might not be a real name rather than profanity? GiantSnowman18:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, common sense. B Rakshit. Ask the user first? Their edits were promotional but not otherwise disruptive. Is this not the standard procedure? I've seen people with more blatant username violations that are offensive and not actual names be given more leeway and at least a discussion. This just reeks of ignorance. PRAXIDICAE💕18:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a really bad block GiantSnowman. It wasn't done in bad faith, but now that it has been explained that it's a common surname, please undo the block.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots18:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
dharma eva hato hanti dharmo rakṣati rakṣitaḥ tasmād dharmo na hantavyo mā no dharmo hato'vadhīt
—
धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः तस्माद्धर्मो न हन्तव्यो मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत्
The English translation of the quote by Ganganath Jha is "Justice, blighted, blights; and justice, preserved, preserves; hence justice should not be blighted, lest blighted justice blight us."
It is the motto of Research and Analysis Wing, the Indian foreign intelligence agency and National Law School of India University.
this text is available on wikipedia only.
Just because of your wrong assumption and feeling and someone else's wrong belief of violation and infringement allegation i lost my both articles. please reactivate it. i am a small enthusiastic editor who put right information with appropriate source and valid quote of source. please reactivate page "Govind Laljibhai Dholakia" Brakshit23 (talk) 04:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How to explain im failing at that point. if that renowned personality haven't kept any copy right conditions to Rough Polished writer than how Rough polished tabloid or journal can ask for the copy right.. 2nd its not from the given source. Looking similar is not proves that its from this link or source only.. Upto you mate.. you people act as your will say..
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Govind Dholakia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govind Dholakia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Govind Dholakia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Brakshit23!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk07:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In none of the versions I've looked at can I see that he's notable. What is more apparent is that he tried to write his autobiography, failed, and that you have now taken up the task. Your assertive pursuit of the biography at the Admin noticeboard, BLP noticeboard, and four admins' talk pages does not strike me as the response of someone who is not being paid.
Your statement that you are "a law student and the subject belongs to [your] city" does not directly answer the question of whether you were paid, or receive any other consideration which ought to be declared under the WP:PAID policy, or under the conflict of interest policy. Cabayi (talk) 09:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So, do you believe that i am paid by Govt. of India, respective pages of notable players or Ashes paying me for that??? Dear its just and just what i read and no one take care of editing or contributing to respective page. Here, stickiness of mine to this page being my statement of justification or truthfulness is not satisfactory to you on that note i can explain or meet me here at Surat, Gujarat you will get to know. Just out of passion and dedicatedly contributing to articles where no one cares to put a word i am just making may efforts. Noting else.
i am having issue with one thing, 5-7-9 years ago some one tried and failed on same subject and i am working on same so what's wrong with that.. i am regularly contributing with qualified and reliable and trusted sources. If someone will see and take Labour of seeing all sources and web links which i have quoted in my irrespective of contributions you will find that i just don't go with my words i am having proper references and where no one is contributing there i am rying to do something...
Again i am telling, i can not control or force anyone's will to do what i want or believe what i believe the only difference is i am less experienced and whoever is experienced are neither helping in a right manner or helping or contributing in a very right manner. Why i don't know. Someone had problem with my user name they blocked , someone has problem with why i am editing , why i am trying to contribute.
One last time i am telling that, neither i am being paid, nor i am a person who do anything by force. I am just contributing and where no one sees i am trying to see and contributing without any expectations and gain. That's me, Period. Brakshit23 (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Multiple deletions, coupled with likely UPE, the barrier for this to be created is high and there's no evidence the subject meets it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govind Dholakia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Govind Dholakia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Dear Star Mississippi, Thanks for the review and your inputs.
Agreed, multiple deletion were there but what was there in past and what is now both are different. Who tried earlier i have no clue and not at all interested. Like responsible editors like you and other i too want to contribute and be a part of Wikipedia community. I am genuinely trying to be a part of but i am being restricted. Why to go with past why no one wants to what is there now? what sort of improvements are there. what is the lacking that one senior editor/ administrator can make and contribute at a larger scale. Why people are not thinking in collective manner and approach to build this in a truer sense and meaning. Yes we have to protect it too but still along with protect we have to build it too... Brakshit23 (talk) 04:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
Hi Brakshit23! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Want to edit or create Major Article Draft:Govind Dholakia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Govind Dholakia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Friend
i have found notable links and individual articles on Govind Dholakia should i rectify the same, update a bit and proceed further??
Hello, Brakshit23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Govind Dholakia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dudhala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lathi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
