Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Roblox games. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The one source added is not one that would change its notability status. It is still better off as a section in the List of Roblox games.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doors (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:
Most of the references are direct Youtube, Twitter, or Apple Music links. I would recommend replacing these with indirect and reliable sources instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dream (YouTuber) discography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Brachy0008!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SlySabre (talk) 22:50, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cranbourne line
Thank you for taking the time to review the Cranbourne line article for GA status- much appreciated! Best wishes for your future wikipedia edits! HoHo3143 (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Brachy -- thanks so much for doing these reviews! Came here from the drive page, and just a quick reminder that GA reviews should have "some evidence of spotchecks", so quickly looking at sources before you pass to make sure they say what the article says, see if there's any more info that might be worth adding, that kind of thing. I'm not seeing you say you did spotchecks in those reviews -- just double-checking if you looked at anything? Thanks so much for what you've done so far, and I really hope to see more reviews from you soon :) Vaticidalprophet01:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
