User talk:BpthurstonWelcome
Problems with upload of File:Graph for 2nd Order Interpolation.pngThanks for uploading File:Graph for 2nd Order Interpolation.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC) VerifiabilityHello Bpthurston. I recently patrolled Second-order polynomial interpolation, a new article you created on July 19, 2012. I noticed the article was completely unreferenced. On Wikipedia, any information that is challenged, or likely to be challenged, must be attributed to a reliable, published source. Please do not create new articles and leave them without in-line citations to show the source of your information. Please see WP:REFBEGIN and WP:Verifiability for information about how, and why, we show the sources of information in Wikipedia articles. Happy editing! Dolphin (t) 05:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC) Hello Dolphin, thanks. I think the idea for this type of interpolation is an original idea of mine, so at first I put a link to my blog where I first described the idea. But someone thought this was supposed to be called biquadratic interpolation, which I've researched into and is actually a different method. Anyway that person removed the citation I had on there and the line I added about myself being the discoverer. I wrote to them, actually two different people about it but they haven't writeen me back. I'm new to wikipedia so I don't know if this is where I should be putting this reply but if you are watching this page I guess you'll see this? Bpthurston (talk) 01:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply, I considered what you're saying before I posted it. The reasons I thought it might be ok was that in the section I read on what counts as a reliable source it mentions that a proffesional blogger can be considered a reliable source. I realize now that shouldn't also be myself. Though it's a math idea so there's less chance for bias. That's the nice thing about math :) I guess I'll try to get it published somewhere. I was just thinking I look on wikipedia for math ideas not journals, so I thought I'd just skip straight to where people look, but I can see how it would lead to problems if that was allowed. Thanks. I'll save the page as a draft, you can feel free to delete it.Bpthurston (talk) 10:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Graph for 2nd Order Interpolation.png missing description detailsDear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia