User talk:Bovineboy2008/Archives/2014


WINX CLUB 3D

I asked another user and he said its allowed to stay there! So please stop with your edits! Best regards 87.161.196.223 (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you finally stop to remove the time of the nickelodeon dub! Its allowed to stay there! Deal with that finally! Best regards 217.251.94.236 (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Accept others editings. Its official that the nickdub takes only 45 minutes...If you contiune to make it undone we will call the police! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.251.94.236 (talk) 22:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Stop to make the edits in Winx Club 3D undo! I called the police and they said if you dont accept other edits the whole page will be delete! 217.251.81.35 (talk) 17:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

It is your last warning! If you make an edit undo (Winx Club 3D) which is user's opinion your site is offcially allowed to delete Source:Police! Have a nice day 87.146.200.16 (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Just noting in passing that the above editor's latest IP address has been blocked (and one of the related pages semi-protected) because Wikipedia policy WP:NLT forbids threats like this. If they exhibit similar behaviour again in the future, you may wish to mention it at WP:ANI. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Objection

May I ask why you removed secondary release dates from Waar. UBStalk 07:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure. Go and check out WP:FILMRELEASE. In the film infobox, we only include the premiere date and the date of first release in the country/countries of origin. All other release dates can be included in the prose if they are notable. BOVINEBOY2008 11:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Objection. The Patrol film

Hi you undid an edit to The Patrol film listing. Please note the changes were replacing the sales agent poster with the cinema posting and correcting the year of release. The original page was a UK stub and out of date. Ref www.thepatrolfilm.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptc113 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you have again relisted the film as 2013 not 2014. This is not correct, though I am not going to correct your edit if you can watch the ref page imdb The Patrol if imdb relist it correctly then I think it is fair to relist this a 2014, year of general release. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptc113 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:FILMRELEASE. On Wikipedia, we list the films release and year by their very first premiere, including film festivals. Not all other institutions follow this, but this was decided through consensus. Because The Patrol did show at a film festival in 2013, we consider it a 2013 film. BOVINEBOY2008 16:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

ok can you send me the ref for that decision because it's not industry standard.Ptc113 (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC) ok got it in your text. I like to challenge that. Because films with no distribution would therefore appear released Ptc113 (talk) 16:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The best place to start film discussions would be at WT:FILM. BOVINEBOY2008 16:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Nobody's Perfect and that means me

O wise one, is the oddly capitalized 2008 doc NoBody's Perfect sufficiently disambiguated from all the other film uses at Nobody's Perfect? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Very clever :). I would say no. I think that CamelCase in general should be avoided, as it is technically a stylization. For this one in particular, I've seen it written as NOBODOY'S PERFECT as well, which tells me that the title is truly Nobody's Perfect and not a CamelCase of No Body's Perfect. I would use a year disambiguator and possibly change the casing. BOVINEBOY2008 00:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Invitation

Hi. I am conducting a survey of most active Wikipedians, regarding reasons they may reduce their activity. I would be very interested in having you participate in it. Would you be interested? (If you reply to me here, please WP:ECHO me). Thank you for your consideration, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Equals (film)

Regarding your edit, is there a certain notability policy on film articles I failed to pay attention to? I rarely edit pages in that field so please enlighten me. Thanks, Shannon 03:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I would direct you to WP:NFF. BOVINEBOY2008 03:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Rita Dove: An American Poet. Hi! We noticed your {{Notability}} on the article we are currently working on "Rita Dove: An American Poet” We have posted references from three independent sources such as Weekly C-Ville, The Daily Progress and UVA Today. More is coming out every day. The film has three major Academic distributors such as “Alexander Street Press” and Filmakers Library” . We will continue to update the entry responsibly and as the reviews become available. Would you please consider removing the alert? Sincerely, Ocantos.

"Rita Dove: An American Poet." Hi! We noticed your "Notability|films|date=February 2014" on the article we are currently working on "Rita Dove: An American Poet” We have posted references from three independent sources such as Weekly C-Ville, The Daily Progress and UVA Today. More is coming out every day. The film has three major Academic distributors such as “Alexander Street Press” and Filmakers Library” . We will continue to update the entry responsibly and as the reviews become available. Would you please consider removing the alert? Sincerely,Ocantos (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, for "foreign" films can you not remove the links to the film pages? For instance Amarcord the 1973 should link to List of Italian films of 1973. It just makes it convenient to link to the years in Italian film as the categories don't cover it. It would be different if it linked to 1973, but it doesn't. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

No, I won't. That is an WP:EGG link which has been discussed before in greater context and should not be used in the way that you suggest. BOVINEBOY2008 18:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
That's a rather warped view of the guidelines. WP:Film has been linking to years in film for years. I don't see how WP:EGG applies here. It is useful to have that link to the year in Italian film.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Having a link on 1973 point to a list of Italian films released in 1973 is extremely counter intuitive. BOVINEBOY2008 19:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
How? It's more useful to link it than to not link it. And the MOS guidelines state that you can link the year provided it has some useful purpose. Common sense has far more value than any of our invented guidelines and common sense tells me that it's useful to provide a link to Italian films of same year from 1973.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

the guilty of William Roche

William Roche (Redacted) yesterday.

- TasbekinstanIsReal (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Cool story bro. BOVINEBOY2008 15:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

PROD

Hello Bovineboy2008, I would like to get you involved in a problem I created in past days, as you seem very experienced in film related articles. Please take a look at my talk page, I admit I did mistakes but it's not all my fault. I proposed the future film articles for creation at "Requested moves" so they were moved after review, I didn't create them directly in article-space, everyone can see that (like I proposed to you once. So I want your opinion in that, I suggested to redirect those to their directors/parent pages. I've worked so hard on those articles, I hope you'll look forward to it better. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 10:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Move the page back

You moved the page Darr @ The Mall to Darr_@_the_Mall but the movie title is with a capital "T" in "The" so please move the page back. I suggest you to google it up before moving a page, especially when it's a move or something. 123.63.97.78 (talk) 05:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

In Secret

The film In Secret premiered at 2013 Toronto International Film Festival but has a 2014 release date. What year will be written in its lead and category, 2013 or 2014? And should we write "upcoming" in the lead and in category? --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 17:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

It is a 2013 film. BOVINEBOY2008 19:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Choomanthar

Choomanthar3d (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC) why you are deleting choomanthar 3d page I can't understand please reply soon

Please read WP:Article creation as to how you should begin an article. We don't use user pages to stand as encyclopedic articles. BOVINEBOY2008 20:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mumbai 125 KM 3D, you may be blocked from editing. Again, stop assuming that the original release of this film release date is July or June. If yes, then add a source to prove. Stop patent nonsense editing. Thank You. TekkenJinKazama (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyamoham

If an AFD debate is closed as no prejudice against speedy renomination because nobody commented on the AFD nomination, I thought the lack of prejudice also applied to proposed deletions. Is that not the case? If anything the lack of debate on the AFD is proof that the proposal was uncontroversial. Wieno (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe that to be the case; that caveat is not mentioned at WP:PROD. I agree with your nomination and I would suggest taking it to AfD. BOVINEBOY2008 22:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll renom if I'm guaranteed at least one comment. Or maybe you do the renom and I'll comment so it's a bit less awkward? Wieno (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll do the latter. BOVINEBOY2008 15:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Epic

I noticed you moved Epic (film) to Epic (2013 film) because of Epic (1984 film). Wouldn't you think Epic (2013 film) is the primary topic over some obscure short from the 80's? I think you should have done a requested move first. Koala15 (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

There is no primary topic for "Epic", as such Epic is a disambiguation page. Please read WP:NCF: "Do not use partial disambiguation such as Titanic (film) when more than one film needs to be disambiguated." BOVINEBOY2008 15:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes but Epic (2013 film) is the primary topic out of all the films. Koala15 (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Please read WP:NCF: "Do not use partial disambiguation such as Titanic (film) when more than one film needs to be disambiguated." BOVINEBOY2008 14:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyamoham (2nd nomination)

As the film's existence is not in question nor is their doubt that it is one by a notable director, How about a redirect to filmmaker K. G. George, specially in considering the difficulties inherent in finding coverage for pre-1990 Indian films? Schmidt, Michael Q. 18:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to a redirect. BOVINEBOY2008 14:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Dabs vs SIAs

Back in 2012 this edit[1] converted a dab page to a SIA. That has the effect that any editor placing a link to Barsaat in an article (e.g. Nimmi) doesn't get a bot-generated warning that it's an ambiguous title (and nor are such links likely to be fixed by disambiguators). Are there any reasons why it's better as a SIA than as a dab ? DexDor (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bovineboy2008. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Cab to Darwin.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Schmidt, Michael Q. 01:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

What to do if the person might be living/dead but is under the age of 90?

Since I was about to add a page for the film editor of Deliverance, Tom Priestly who was born in 1932, yet I can't find any info if he is living still, but of course he isn't 90 yet-so would I put living or possibly living you think?

Wgolf (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay the guy had a page it was misspelled, but it is a good question what do you do about people like that? Wgolf (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

It is a good question, one to which I'm not too sure of the answer. I don't often edit BLP, so I would ask at WP:BLPN. BOVINEBOY2008 23:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay thanks! I was going "why the heck does this guy not have a page???" as it turned out someone put the name wrong once, now that makes sense. But yeah it is a tough call, like a child star from the 1940's who nobody has heard of since then could be alive but of course are not even close to 90. Wgolf (talk) 23:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I notice you have moved a a number of film articles to create a lot of disambiguation links that need fixing. I will do some of it, but I'd like to draw you attention to WP:FIXDABLINKS. StAnselm (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Tenali Ramakrishna

Hi dude! About half a dozen films have been inspired by Tenali Ramakrishna. The upcoming 2014 film being just one of them as can be found here. I think it needs a disam page. Can you take a look and do the needful including fixing the extra dab as and when required? Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 11:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Spy (film)

Hello Bovineboy2008. You've made a technical move request here. This scheme for disambiguation doesn't appear logical to me. Even if an admin performs the move as you requested, we will have:

  1. Spy (2012 film)
  2. The Spy (2012 film)
  3. Spy (2015 film)

We'll have two films, both made in 2012. We would be using 'The' for disambiguation. That doesn't seem very reader-friendly: how will they remember which one has 'The'? One alternative might be Spy (2012 Russian film). If you check IMDB, they list this film as 'Shpion'. Would you consider that option? I'd also suggest making the other 2012 film into The Spy (2012 Korean film). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and disambiguated further Spy (2012 Russian film) and The Spy (2012 South Korean film). I agree that the "The" is not sufficient for disambiguation. Let me know if everything looks alright. BOVINEBOY2008 01:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks to both of you for the reasonable solution. EdJohnston (talk) 02:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ek Villain

The Ek Villain issue needs to be fixed as soon as possible. Can you help? Bubaikumar (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014 film) categories

I'm afraid I'm not understanding your reasoning here. The guideline you are citing, WP:FILMCAT, states, "In general, articles and categories should be placed in the most specific applicable categories, and should not be placed directly in a "parent" category if they are already present in one of its sub-categories." Category:2014 3D films (already present) is more specific than its parent category, Category:2014 films (which you are adding. Similarly Category:American 3D films -> Category:American films, Category:2014 3D films -> Category:2010s 3D films. Am I missing something? - SummerPhD (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

I understand this logic. However, there is a consensus that each film be included in its primary year, country and language category, and then to include more specific subcategories. That allows for the categories to work as a directory of all films in that category, as oppose to searching through subcategories. BOVINEBOY2008 14:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

TekkenJinKazama socks

I probably don't need to point this out, but TekkenJinKazama (talk · contribs) was blocked a few weeks back for repeated copyright issues on images, mostly Tekken related. They've since socked extensively and use a couple of IP ranges for editing that are probably familiar to you. 42.104.0.*, 42.104.2.* and 42.104.3.*. I see you've reverted them already today. I'm following WP:RBI for IP and obvious sock edits and if they are persistent/annoying enough will file a new SPI on the account. Annoying but they've got a lot of energy at the moment and until that runs out they'll probably continue to edit. Those ranges are Vodafone in India so it's unlikely a rangeblock is possible so extra work falls on anyone in the areas TJK likes to edit. Let me know if I can help - I'm going to be using some API searches ({https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=usercontribs&uclimit=500&ucuserprefix=42.104.0], [2] and [3]) to periodically search and revert their edits to help. Ravensfire (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

MPAA ratings

When you say something like "no MPAA ratings" in the edit summary, you should put a link to where it says that. So, I did a search and finally found WP:FILMRATING. But it says to "avoid indiscriminate identification of ratings." It is relevant to mention it on Moms' Night Out, but it should be more in depth. --Musdan77 (talk) 03:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Ticket to Bollywood

Caps need or not? 101.62.158.111 (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

The article is titled correctly per WP:NCF and WP:NCCAPS: Ticket to Bollywood. BOVINEBOY2008 16:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Found Footage 3D

You have nominated our article for deletion because we undid your edits, which you re-instated because filming had not yet begun. This is false, filming for Found Footage 3D began in May 2014 and is currently in progress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.144.179 (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Can you please provide citation that the filming has begun? BOVINEBOY2008 21:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
There are valid sources, but it may take up to a few hours to get them to you. In the mean time, please do not delete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.144.179 (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Please provide a verifiable third-party source confirming the filming. BOVINEBOY2008 21:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Is IMDB considered a verifiable third-party source? 70.115.144.179 (talk) 21:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
No, see this essay describing the current consensus on common links. Something like Dread Central is preferable. Also, you should be aware of editing with a conflict of interest, i.e. being involved in the production. BOVINEBOY2008 21:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Understood. There will be an article released very soon regarding filming and production. Until we can get that to you, please do not delete the article but rather revert it back to a redirect. 70.115.144.179 (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
First, I don't have the power to delete articles, as I am not an administrator. Secondly, I cannot restore the redirect as it was before as the film has begun the AfD process. I would recommend that you make a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Found Footage 3D speaking to the notability of the film, specifically on how it may or may not meet the guidelines at WP:NF and WP:GNG. Other editors will comment on whether or not the article is kept and then after about a week, the consensus will be determined. If there are articles that are published in that period, I encourage you to add them to the article as to bolster the notability. BOVINEBOY2008 21:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled Mary Kom biopic

Hello Bovineboy2008! Two months ago you moved film article title Mary Kom biopic to Untitled Mary Kom biopic, but The article sources claim that This Mary Kom biopic is the finalized Title! So please check and fix That. 115.245.148.125 (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Fantasia

No offense, but are you really that clueless? Have you ever heard of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? Some things are more notable than others. I guarantee you 99% of people are looking for this film and not some Chinese independent film. You should have just started a requested move. Koala15 (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

No offense, but WP:NCF. If you oppose the move, than request it back. See WP:BRD. BOVINEBOY2008 01:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
You didn't even answer my question. You continue to ignore WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and make misinformed edits. If your gonna do something like this at least admit your mistake or have a real answer. Koala15 (talk) 02:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I know about Primary Topic. The word Fantasia has a primary topic and it is not the 1940 film. You are thinking about secondary topics. Otherwise, Fantasia wouldn't have had a disambiguation in the first place. BOVINEBOY2008 02:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
What? The 1940 Fantasia film is the primary topic of movies named Fantasia in this current day. 99% of people are looking for the Disney film not an independent Chinese film. Koala15 (talk) 02:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
The primary topic applies across topics, not just for films, otherwise we would have a tiered nomenclature. And we have disambiguation pages to help direct people to the correct article. BOVINEBOY2008 02:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes i know that, but there is such a thing as being the primary topic of a film's name, but obviously you don't think so. "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." Koala15 (talk) 02:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

A user has contested a PROD you placed

JuggaletteJen216 (talk · contribs) has contested your proposed deletion of The Crimson House (2013 Film). G S Palmer (talk) 18:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice

Please check out my comments on the AfD for Mobilize. This could probably be speedied, but it's kind of uncovered a somewhat larger issue. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galipatam

Hello, Bovineboy2008. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galipatam.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Article has been improved to show filming as completed and project moving into post-production. Might you consider a withdrawal? Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 14:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Animated films work group

Hello! Thank you for all your work in {{WikiProject Film}}, specifically in adding animated films to the Animated films work group. However, please try to remember that the correct parameter to add the articles to the proper categories is |Animated=yes, not "Animation". Also, that parameter is sorted by importance too, so if you add |animated-importance=low, it will prevent the article from showing up as unassessed. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 20:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Earth to Echo.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Earth to Echo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Small Town Deb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AFI
The Girl from Scotland Yard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AFI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Vanishing Act for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Vanishing Act is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vanishing Act until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

36 MM 3D, Savita Barbie, and Monologues of a Sex Maniac are also being discussed at the same page. Cnilep (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Drohi.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drohi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Seven (1995 film)

Hi Bovine. I was just wondering about the criteria for moving the article from Seven (film) to Seven (1995 film). Surely this film is the primary topic as per WP:NCF and takes a great deal more precedence than the little heard of 1979 film? Quentin X (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Specifically from WP:NCF#Between films of the same name, Seven (1995 film) is not the primary topic for all (film and non-film) topics, therefore we add the year into the disambiguation. Look specifically at the Titanic example. BOVINEBOY2008 09:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I get the idea with the Titanic example, but surely that is has something to do with the other films being noteworthy in their own right? The 1979 Seven film is barely heard of and an article has only just been created. I would have thought it was more like the football/soccer player Frank Lampard and his father of the same name. The son used to be known as Frank Lampard Jr. until he rose to prominence and when he did his father became known as Frank Lampard Sr. Quentin X (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Sleeping Dogs

Excuse me, are you available for contributing to the Sleeping Dogs (video game) page? It's almost at GA, and you don't need to know anything about it; just knowing how to edit. Contact me if yes. URDNEXT (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flunked may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''Flunked'' has won Best Documentar] at the San Fernando Valley International Film Festival in Los Angeles, Best Educational

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Are you my neighbor DVD.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Are you my neighbor DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Larry boy fib.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Larry boy fib.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:King George and the Ducky.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King George and the Ducky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Larryboyandtherumorweed.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Larryboyandtherumorweed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kudumba Thalaivan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | producer = [M. M. A. Chinnappa Devar]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Removing projected dates - just curious

Hey, like your edit on Dirty Weekend (2014 film), you removed the projected date and the in the release date parameter? Just curious as to why the removal of the projected date and why not keep the hidden film date template since it'll be used later on? LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I remove the hidden code just out of habit. It can be readded when it is needed. I remove the projected release year because typically, that is an unsourced projection of release either by media or the production company and not an actual official release date. To me, it doesn't meet WP:CRYSTAL to say that a film has a release date of sometime in 2014. Of course, if solid citations are provided then it can and should be included. BOVINEBOY2008 11:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Ok, thankss :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Untitled

u have nominated a page for deleted.... then what are ur thoughts on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shall_We_Dance%3F_(2004_film) - this is a film which has no sources yet wikipedia has allowedit. y dont u nominate this for deletion as well. --MinkyThePet (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Shall We Dance? (2004 film) has several notable secondary references, including a New York Times review and a Roger Ebert review. Doing a search for references on the article you have created, I cannot find anything that does not merely copy and paste what was written on the official page. That is not coverage by secondary sources, and thus is not notable. BOVINEBOY2008 21:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The news has been covered by news in Pakistan.... they will have a plot of the story to write about. The documentary is yet to release but there have been 1 news coverage atleast. the article should be given atleast 1-2 weeks before considereing it for deletion. the coverage of the documentary is being picked up!--MinkyThePet (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you provide a link where it is covered? We should not be creating film articles before films are notable in the hopes that they will get coverage; we should only create the articles after they are markedly notable. It would be acceptable to move it into a Draft space, or even a sandbox so you can work on the article until you get the sources you need. BOVINEBOY2008 23:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

File:Prescription for Romance.jpg

Better to remove the watermark than delete the image don't you think?♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

From Sunuraju

the Korean film Insiders is already filminghere by --Sunuraju (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

Hornblower episode articles

FYI: There are three other Hornblower episode articles with titles that don't conform with naming conventions. In fact, each follow a different logic of naming:

The last one was moved "to help compliance with the Manual of Style" without citing any specific policy. I think that going with WP:NCF with the rest of them is the appropriate thing to do. Will you please look into this? Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 15:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I will look into it. BOVINEBOY2008 19:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Bakgat title

Hi Bovineboy2008. Could you please clarify as to why the exclamation mark in the title of the film Bakgat! should be omitted in the article title (for future reference). Thanks. Knyzna1 (talk) 14:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Please read MOS:TM. BOVINEBOY2008 18:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
I did, twice, and can't seem to find anything mentioning punctuation? And other pages, e.g. Airplane! and The Informant!, include the exclamation point in the title. I am not questioning your judgement as you are clearly knowledgeable in this field, I just want to know for future editing. Knyzna1 (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
"Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words (e.g., ♥ used for "love") or for normal punctuation." See the example "skate." vs "Skate" under the 6th main bullet point. BOVINEBOY2008 19:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Ok, will keep that in mind. But then why Airplane! and The Informant!? Knyzna1 (talk) 19:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Kaaviya Thalaivan

Hi. I can't understand what user Vivvt is trying to putforth. See Kaviya Thalaivan and Kaaviya Thalaivan may have pages the way I have spelled the respective films' names. Kaviya Thalaivan is released in 1992 and the latter is scheduled for 2014. Both the spellings are different. For example, if there exists a film name title as Karz and yet another film titled Karzzzz. The stories may or may not be same but the meaning in Hindi translates as 'debt'. Similarly, in case of Kaviya Thalaivan the title translates to 'epic ruler' in Tamil but the fix of 'a' is enough to differentiate the two. Even IMDb or official publishing of the page writes the respective spelling which I have given above. What source Vivvt has given (Youtube) is not so reliable for the spelling (See here [4]).
WP:PRECISION, WP:DAB convey it clearly.
I kindly request you to remove the redirects and disambiguation. It is unnecessary. Under the move log of 2014 film Kaaviya Thalaivan, (See here [5]) user Fortdj33 has also tried to keep the disambiguation away.

Message from D3323

I did explain about it I the "Talk:Devil Dolls" and this page has not been created for a long time. It's unacceptable and inappropriate to leave the pages uncreated and blank like this. Everyone should know that.

Reference Errors on 31 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

Then what exactly am I supposed to use? Everyone else uses it.

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mei Mei may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | released = {{Film date|2009|08|22|Slow Film International Film Festival]}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to That Should Not Be: Our Children Will Accuse Us may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • = {{Film date|2008|10|15|Montréal International Festival of<br />New Cinema and New Media)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The gifted may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Heard and Hidetoshi Nishijima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Lakeplacid3.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lakeplacid3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwight Henry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Template: Film date

FYI - I've created this category to track what articles are using the film date template. Compare with the ever useful Category:All stub articles, for example... Thanks! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 14:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiMedal for Janitorial Services

WikiMedal for Janitorial Services
I am both pleased and honored to present you with the WikiMedal for Janitorial Services in appreciation for all of the various janitorial tasks you've done, both major and minor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm sure that there's a better template out there for this, but I think that you honestly deserve this. I've seen you do more cleanup and small, usually thankless tasks such as article assessments and other assorted odds and ends- things that a lot of people overlook (sometimes deliberately). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Tokyo, I appreciate it. BOVINEBOY2008 14:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

Now -- The Peace

If you have a moment, would you mind moving Now -- The Peace to the correct title? I'm not sure whether an em or en dash is appropriate. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

Laugh and Get Rich

Thanks for taking the time to assess the article. Still new to this, so I was wondering why you rated that article a stub, rather than Start or C class, which is what I would have rated it, looking at the criteria. Am I missing something? Thanks for your help. Onel5969 (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

It's probably closer to Start-class than stub class. However, ignoring plot and cast, which is necessary but not truly substantial to the article, all the article has is a short lead and a single sentence for both reception and "notes" (which could be merged up to the lead). Expanding the Reception section to include more than just one review would push it up to a C-class and adding more sections would improve it more. BOVINEBOY2008 12:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Adurs.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adurs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

The photo film

Hi Bovineboy2008 Thank you for the edit the photo (film) page.Manimihan (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

DOA Death of Amar

Dear Bovineboy2008, please check my new citations before undoing my revision on redirecting DOA Death of Amar to Amar must die. I placed all citations with new title but you keep undoing my work. Please check and advise.Moviecrazed (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

WP:Precision

Hi! There is still a lot I have to learn about WP. Had often wondered about this (in other words, why didn't we simply title all films to include their years), now I understand. Thanks. Onel5969 (talk) 13:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

Reply for your suggestion

Hello, Bovineboy2008. You have new messages at Political Cricketer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Film infobox,template

Thanks for mentioning. I actually was using 'name' then started using 'title' as the name of the film was still posted in the template and we actually in using good English refer to a film by it's 'title'. But I can return to 'name'. No problem. Also Imagesize to Image size, which could be dispensed with altogether as most template images, promotionals, slides are relegated to being thumb size. I've made a checklist for this updates. ThanksKoplimek (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

invitation

Hello, Bovineboy2008. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Ghost (film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Schmidt, Michael Q. 19:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Virtuous (2014 film)

I de-prodded this, because the cast is notable. Bearian (talk) 00:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Another Earth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | language = English]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

invitation

Hello, Bovineboy2008. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbai Delhi Mumbai.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Care to look in and comment? Best, Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2014, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The Defender (1988 film) or (1989 film)

See the article's talk page as this is one that defines conventional film release dating. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Also, seeTalk where your opinion/contribution/comment may be valuable/useful/important. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

Redirect page at Moonlight Sonata article

This works fine; thank you for doing it. Opus33 (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. BOVINEBOY2008 21:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

Upcoming Indian films

Hello! While I appreciate your good faith edits, please do not add Category:Upcoming films to articles that already have Category:Upcoming Indian films. Per WP:DIFFUSE, it is redundant for those articles to be in both the parent category and the diffused sub-category. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

I strongly believe that Category:Upcoming Indian films is a non-diffusing category. See WP:DUPCAT. BOVINEBOY2008 12:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't believe that it is. Please keep in mind that Category:Upcoming films does not contain {{Allincluded}} like Category:Indian films does, and per WP:CATEGRS, nationality, although sometimes correlated with ethnicity, is not the same as ethnicity. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
I posted the issue here for additional input. I would appreciate it if you would stop adding that category to Indian films until we can come to a consensus. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Now that Category:Upcoming Indian films has been deleted, those films have been upmerged to Category:Upcoming films, which means that all the films that you re-added that category to, now have the category listed twice. Could you please see to it that the redundant category you added on those films is cleaned up? Thank you. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hatnote points to redirect?

I am not sure about the modified hatnote on The BFG. The link The BFG (2016 film) is a redirect, and may be one for some time. Is it useful for such a hatnote to link to something that redirects to itself? Elizium23 (talk) 21:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

I modified the hat right before I redirected the latter. I will modify it. BOVINEBOY2008 21:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Country Wedding.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Country Wedding.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jinn.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jinn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Buddha Mil Gaya may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

Moo

I saw your name and thought I would give you a moo! :) The Wookieepedian (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

Che (film)

Hi there- if you're going to create a dab page, please go ahead and create one (and, of course, correct incoming links). However, if you're not going to create one, the article on the biopic should really be at that title. There is no point redirecting a less disambiguated title to a more disambiguated title. J Milburn (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

2013 in film

I think the release dates on 2013 in film should be listed as the release date from the countries that produced that movie rather than the earliest date released, regardless of WP:FILMYEAR says. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

I'll tell you why. Because people from certain countries like America and such will get easily confused about the earliest release dates and doesn't even list which country that had the earliest release date. We got to be more consistent and precise with the countries that produced the film and when they are released from those countries. I think the countries that produced movies should the movie should have the release date, not the earliest release date. That will be fine. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Infobox & standalone articles

Hi - you made a note on the Marty Glickman article that film infoboxes should be reserved for standalone articles on a film. It sounds reasonable, but I couldn't quickly find anything that documents it. Can you point me in the right direction? Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baby film.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baby film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Baby film.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baby film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amador (movie poster).jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amador (movie poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Baby film.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baby film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles (series) (logo).gif
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles (series) (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Dragon Tales class assessment

Hi! I noticed that you are listed as a work group member for the American animation section of WikiProject Animation and I was wondering if you could assess the article Dragon Tales against the criteria for C-Class and possibly B-Class. It is currently listed as Start-Class, but I've been working hard on it for nearly a month now and I think it's definitely above Start-Class now. If you can't right now, I understand, in which case I would appreciation direction to someone else who might be able to do it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

Your Be Quiet (film) PROD

It was deprodded. I AfDed it on the same grounds as your concern. DMacks (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baby film.jpg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baby film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Bovineboy2008/Archives,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

The Signpost: 31 December 2014