User talk:BlindEagle/Archive 1

August 2006

Hi BlindEagle, I really liked your entry on guard llamas (although the subject as such first makes you think of a joke). Very welcome to Wikipedia! You seem familiar with how it works around here, but I'll throw a couple of links at you anyway. Maybe you'll find one or two of them useful, at one time or another.

• Welcome, newcomers
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedian
• Sign your posts on talk pages, the best and simplest way is to use four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
• Wikipedia:Questions
• The community portal can be found in the link list in the left margin (if you use the standard style sheet, that is)

Don't hesitate to ask me questions on my talk page. I might not be able to answer everything, but hopefully I should know where to look for the answers... // Habj 18:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to wait so long to respond... my main focus is on Swedish Wikipedia (and I would certainly not call myself trilingual, my French is terrible. I understand some in writing though, so I figured that would be enough for the most basic level of knowing anything of a language...

Regarding the photos. It mainly comes down on who owns the copyrignt of the photos; most often, this is the photographer. If you took them yourself, you can decide to release them under a free license and put them on wikipedia, also enabling use of them on other places. If you do not want to do that, or if you do not own the pictures... well. Maybe, maybe it passes under the clause of "fair use". I am not good at these things, I really can not tell. We can always check with someone more knowledgeable about this specifically American twist in copyright laws. The best thing would be though, if you have some photos you have taken yourself. Even if they are of lower quality, it is much preferred. // Habj 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guard llamas

Hey Rboesen, it's unnecessary to link to guard llamas as they are not used in Wales and England where the lleyn sheep reside predominantly. Jack 13:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting to older version of a page

It is really very easy: you click on the "history" tab, pick up the version you want by clicking the date and timepoint of that version, then click "edit" and save the page. // habj 09:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

merino

I think it is wrong to link to guard llamma as they are not used extensivly to guard stock; in Australia Maremma_Sheepdog dogs and Alpacas are sometimes used. But I am not going to start an edit war over it. You decide which is more important wikipedia or the promotion of llammas Charles Esson 21:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This is much better than an edit war. USA represents 0.7% of the worlds wool production, 0.3% of the merino production. I wonder if llammas work? We use Maremma's they definitely do, they bond to the sheep and they protect them well. It is my view Alpaca's don't, but that is something I would never write in an Encylopedia.

Re: Change User Name

Is there a way to change one's user name here? Thanx. Rboesen 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can request username changes at Wikipedia:Changing username. Thanks – Qxz 16:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:66.244.91.174

Hi BlindEagle, thanks for helping out with Cold fusion as you did with the recent edit by User:66.244.91.174. Just a heads up that I tweaked your comment on that user's talk page in case the user's edit really was meant in good faith. Ronnotel 15:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange final warning notice

I noticed that you warned User talk:207.156.197.1 over here for their edits to Zeus... but I looked at the Zeus log -- I don't see where that edit was made. Perhaps you can direct me to their vandalism? MrMacMan 15:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I guess I was looking for specifically where the 207.156 IP made their vandalism. I see where you reverted the IPs 164.116., here when you reverted 198.237. and here where you reverted 140.211. But I don't see where the person you gave the warning to made edits. Can if you can show me some a diff I would thank you immeasurably. MrMacMan 18:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah like I said you reverted the edits of of IP address 140.211.69.11 then you warned the IP address 207.156.197.1. You might have warned the wrong IP address. MrMacMan 19:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

minor link edit

Bhutan pine

I notice that you reverted my edit of this article on the name. Your reversion is to an assertion about the name Bhutan pine, that 'this name is now avoided...'. Well, you may avoid this name, but I don't. It is common names we are talking about, and if you are trying to prescribe which ones people should use, then that is not only pointless, but goes against the principle of an encyclopaedia. Imc 15:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, glad that's cleared up. Imc 16:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

A lot of those links I'd already found by myself, but there are several that are new and look useful after a cursory examination. I've done a few minor edits before, but I finally decided to make myself an 'official' user.LifeIsArt 20:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Llama_sex.jpeg

The legitimacy of the source was questioned by two other editors and the uploader is no longer active to verify his claim. -Nv8200p talk 22:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

--Atilladrjb 06:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)I redirected William Boyd to Will Boyd. Cause his proper name is William James Boyd but his common name is Will Boyd. Like William Jefferson Clinton's Bill Clinton. Can you write William Clinton? No. Please change it, or let me change.[reply]

Karakul Sheep

I think saying that "black servant" is a translation of "karakul" is more of a Turkish play on words than anything else. I'm going to revert. Thanks for pointing this out (It's also the name of a lake in Tajikistan, btw). Twalls 20:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'd just like to say hello, and I've looked at some of the stuff you've done. A great job and a real inspiration. I'd also like to admit I'm a touch new to the whole article writing scene (Though I originally started on Wiktionary) And would like to ask if you have any advice. Thank you.

--Inabikari 20:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merino

Noticed you added a link to the Delaine merino association: Would you be able to add a page on the development of the Delaine merino to match the Rambouillet (sheep), being from Australia I don't have a feel for the importance of the various strains in the USA to know if it is needed. Looking at old texts I believe they are different strains with different associations and history. Charles Esson 10:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Delete warning

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Cotswold sheep. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 19:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense - you have twice ruined a stub article by adding pointless links. Please refer this matter to the arbitration committee without delay. Saga City 22:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please cease and desist from reverting edits that you have not researched completely. The interlinks placed in the Cotswold sheep article are perfectly legit. They provide the reader with information regarding the wool and related industry. This is your last warning. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 01:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Please explain "Perfectly legit", with particular reference to guard llama; it is you who should defend your actions, please do so Saga City 06:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since no activity was ever referenced by Saga City, the edits have been kept. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 16:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Curious Question

Actually, I had no idea I had - to me, until I looked just now, I entered the only information on that page. I don't know how the end result has come about, or how I ended up seemingly deleting all the information you had added. May be we should agree to revert it to the version you produced? As I said, I don't know how what I did caused the deletions, and it seems very odd.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I reverted it shortly afterwards, which is lucky, as more vandalism was warned about later.  DDStretch  (talk) 14:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Braille

Even if they do provide services to the entire US (and looking at the actual services they provide i can't see evidence that they do) i still think it's not appropriate to the score of wikipedia (which is international). However i wouldn't revert it again if added but i wouldn't be shocked if another editor did..harlock_jds 15:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warming Combating Ideas

BlindEagle, I have percieved you as a person with expertise in this field. I want to ask you if you have any creative ideas to combat this huge issue looming in front of mankind. This is why I have asked you.

                                                    Yours truly
                                                     Bilbillbilll

Llamas!

I disagree with your disagreement.  :-) The bit about North America belongs in Camelids, not in Llama. It also needs to be significantly reworded. The confusion about the name needs to be significantly downsized, and probably moved to the #Classification section. In any case, vicuñas, guanacos and alpacas should not be mentioned in the lead to the llama article. Cheers, Tomer^talk 20:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks me good. Tomer^talk 14:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, are you aware of this? Tomer^talk 20:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected Llama

I've got the Llama page semi-protected for 1 week.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 17:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Yeah, sorry about that. I had forgotten about a sandbox. Is everything on here about llamas? Ben 12:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to image question

Well, I'm no great photographer myself, but I'll give it a shot. In the general article space, there's no set limits, however, a featured picture has to be the best of the best. Artifacts show up in most JPG files due to compression. They appear as jagged boxes on the edges of lines, discolored spots and fringes all over the image, and blown highlights, where the bright areas of the image are completely white, with no detail. The quality standard for an image is balanced by the value of its content, whether historical or encyclopedic.

If you haven't read these, I suggest that you do, along with looking at the current featured images:

• Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria

(Especially the examples of problems)

If this is all redundant, sorry. Thank you for contributing. vlad§inger ^tlk 20:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Llama lede

Truly excellent! That's a great start. There's scope for a little more improvement, (I may dabble a little myself) — but that's great for now... I'm looking forwards to seeing what you'll do with the rest of the article! Verisimilus T 21:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea I'm afraid. That would explain some of the archaic language! I'd suggest that a good Google would be the best way to track down some more up-to-date, reliable sources. Verisimilus T 15:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

I was on here browsing and suddenly was bombarded by warnings, which are from march. And at the top it keeps saying "You have new messages (last change)." and I'm not doing anything. I don't even edit articles on here. what do I do? I cleared my cookies. Also my IP isn't shared it is locked and I am the only one on here so I have no clue why I am being warned unless someone stole my IP. Help me out please. 72.82.169.194 23:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Black Sheep Montadale North Ronaldsay sheep Cool (aesthetic) Luckhoff Amphibian Cama (animal) Swaledale (sheep) Perendale Lleyn (sheep) Andreas Hillgruber Mohair Lincoln (sheep) Gary Busey Madagascar Plan Trial of Saddam Hussein Frédéric Chopin Arno J. Mayer Combined Fleet

Cleanup Sumptuary law Bulimia nervosa Michigan Women's Hall of Fame Merge AOL Worsted-spun Hazing Add Sources Sheep station Playboy Tom DeLonge Wikify Icelandic horse Fresnel equations Arcas Expand Tongue-twister Gay pride Robot Chicken

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Welcome

As soon as I registered online I found many tools neatly placed to introduce a new editor to this encyclopedia and was promptly welcomed by you, an established user. I'm enjoying myself thus far and hope to make a go of it! Thanks for welcoming me and making me feel at home here. Regards, Havelock the Dane 12:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Llama - Literary Reference

I am concerned that you consider my addition of a quotation from, and link to, the poem "The Llama" by Hilaire Belloc to be vandalism.
Surely an encyclopaedia may contain references to literature as well as to biology and economics?

Best wishes - James Bryant

Llama - The Belloc Poem

I should like to replace this quotation and link.
My literary instincts say that it would do well as a forward, in italics, before the main text, in the same way as many books use quotations as chapter headings.
Do you feel that this is appropriate in Wikipaedia, and if not, where do you consider I should place it?
Best wishes JMBryant 20:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General guidance wanted, please.

I have just asked you a question about a proposed change to "Llama".
I feel that I should have asked it generally to all those with a recent interest in this entry
by attaching it somehow to the entry itself but I cannot see any way to do this.
Am I overlooking something?
Best wishes JMBryant 20:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:Alpaca

I outlined my reasoning on the Alpaca talk for you. Hope that's sufficient! VanTucky ^(talk) 17:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Thanks for the input. I just wanted everyone to know what's going on and weigh in appropriately. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.

You reverted the soay sheep entry after I added an external link for a farm site. The page you created for guard llamas links directly to Queso Cabeza Farm, which is a farm site. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TyMarrs (talk • contribs) 06:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that one single user is never responsible for any one article, and that all articles are the responsibility of all users. Thus, BlindEagle does not own the guard llamas article. Furthermore, finding link spam in one place is not an excuse to place it in another. Both should be removed. VanTucky ^(talk) 16:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointnig that out, albeit not necessary. However, this is a given. Nobody owns articles. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 16:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soay link

That link was exactly the same as link that I previously added that was removed multiple times. While the exact linked page is informational, its parent site is for a farm that sells soays. A commercial agricultural enterprise certainly fails WP:EL. VanTucky ^(talk) 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As to the guard llama link. The very first page that comes up when you click the link has huge bold letters saying they have stock for sale. This is far too much commercial content to be okay per WP:El. VanTucky ^(talk) 16:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. My mistake. I did not know it pointed to that front page. I agree. That should not be linked. I changed the link to their info page. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 18:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okaaay

so ive never messaged anything on wikipedia before but i felt that i was slightly compelled to do so today. The picture of the dead pig... hmmm.... a little bit one siided dont you think? There are so many sites on the internet complaining about all the cruelty to animals and crap like that. The truth is it isnt as bad as they make it seem. They show pics of the worst of the worst. a little bit more one sided eh?

make sure you are showing all sides here okay?

goody me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.77.66 (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really sure what you're talking about. Perhaps you could reference the article next time you feel compelled to post a comment. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 18:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Socko Energy

Mate, I was not refering to how long the article was up i was refering to the lack of time between the prod removal and the AFD and also the noms comment of Prod removed with no article improvement. some pople need to put there hand someplace else than on a keyboard for 2 secs. ExtraDry 00:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award Centre

I am afraid you must count them as you go along. Auroranorth 09:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that starting from when you signed up? I don't think it should include previous edits. Thanks, Auroranorth 13:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I mean 'signing up' at the Award Centre. Sorry for any confusion! Auroranorth 11:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming User:Delnatura

Why would you apply the user welcome template to an obvious spammer with a promotional username, who btw has an AIV report filed on them? They're just going to be blocked. Additionally, were you aware that the welcome template you used automatically adds your signature within the template? If that extra one was intentional, please just ignore me. Thanks, VanTucky ^Talk 20:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith does not, first of all, mean being ignorant of the facts as they clearly present themselves. A repentant spammer can be properly welcomed when they demonstrate in some fashion that it was a mistake. Second, the user would have had to get a new username anyway, as the name was promotional. But most of all, it was redundant considering a block was immediately inevitable. VanTucky ^Talk 20:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, thanks for being so polite. It's a good reminder... VanTucky ^Talk 22:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raccoon

Your revert of User:123.195.21.198's edits on Raccoon seems to be in mistake, as the edits of that anonymous user, while uncited, do not seem like vandalism. Mazin07^C₪_T 20:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I have reviewed WP:UTM and it does appear I placed the wrong template on the anon-IP's talk page. Thanks for stopping by. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 14:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian Curse

I rewrote the article. It's a book article now. Do you still have any objections that I can address? if not, could you withdraw your deletion support? Sijo Ripa 12:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

		With thanks!
		Thanks for participating in my RfA, which closed successfuly. I leave you with a picture of the real Blood Red Sandman! Note his 'mop' is slightly deadlier than mine! - - Blood Red Sandman ^(Talk) (Contribs) 18:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Report to AIV

Hi. I removed your report of an ip vandal to WP:AIV with the comment that the last warning was six days old, adding I would warn. When I returned to the ip talkpage I noted that your warning was there - so I checked the contrib history again and levied a 31 hour block. I would comment that your warning was not on the talkpage when I first reviewed it, but would apologise anyway for the terseness of my comment at AIV. Mark LessHeard vanU 21:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sequence of everts was that I reverted a bunch of vandalism by the anon-IP, added the entry to AIV and then added the v4im to the St. Pete talk page. I can see how you could have missed as it does take me a moment or two get put those templates on pages. However, after I reverted all that mess, the anon-IP went back at and that's when I added a second entry for the same anon-IP to AIV. No offense taken. Thank you for blocking the anon-IP! --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 21:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:Sierra Vista Mall

May I ask you re-examine the article in relation to this AfD. I would like your opinion if the added Citations show the relevent Economic Impact to the local area that you requested, sufficiently? Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's now a deletion review

Hello, BlindEagle. I'm alerting all of the editors that took part in the the deletion debate for the article Adult-child sex that it is now a deletion review, as seen in this link. I felt that you may want to lend your voice about this topic in its deletion review as well. More on what may happen concerning this topic is discussed here. After reading that, I'm sure that I won't have to tell you to watch for it being put up for deletion again, if this deletion review doesn't come out as Overturn and delete. I'll see you around. Flyer22 20:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VolksWriter AfD

Where are these articles on VolksWriter 3 that you speak of? Chances are that they do refer to the same program and would be very useful to improving the article. Andy Saunders 19:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help on my Birds revision. I need a tutorial on refs bad. I appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrougham (talk • contribs) 21:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture

Welcome and thanks for signing up! Please look around the project page and talk page for things you can do and feel free to add ideas of your own and things you notice that you don't have the time or knowledge to fix right away. A lot of work to be done on the sheep breeds, as you've noticed. I'm particularly interested in the heritage breeds and I try to patrol to the main sheep page for vandalism.--Doug.^(talk • contribs) 13:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, we could use help designing breed infoboxes. My preference is to have a single template based on the horse breeds template with which to base all the domestic species breed boxes, needs further discussion at the project though.--Doug.^(talk • contribs) 13:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the Horse and could not find the infobox you referred to above. However, I did find the taxobox. Is that what you're referring to? --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 14:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I think according to WP:TOL {{taxobox}} is really only for wild animals and the entire domesticated species or subspecies, not breeds. The breed boxes (which WP:TOL advocates using) are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Horse breeds, there are also breed boxes for dogs and cats, but they tend to list strings of registries. I just removed a {{taxobox}} from Heck_Cattle, there is no point to showing the taxonomy of each breed of a domesticated species as they are all the same.--Doug.^(talk • contribs) 15:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm willing to create the Livestock Breed infobox. I see where the code is within the Horse infobox and probably can copy and modify it as appropriate. However, I do not know how to create a template. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you simply get the code the way you want it (best to do that in a sandbox, or you could create a subpage of the project) and then move it to Wikipedia:Template namespace when it's ready. You may want to cut and paste it to the Template:Sandbox or one of the Templates X1 through X9 before you move (actually cut and paste so you don't create a redirect unnecessarily) it to it's own page, then you can add the template to a regular sandbox or user sandbox page to make sure it's working right. Don't worry, if you get the code to work, I can move it where it needs to go to be a functioning template. I suggest wherever you work on it, post a notice at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Agriculture so others can look at the work in progress and comment or help.--Doug.^(talk • contribs) 02:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • • • • • The code is all at Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture/Infobox. I copied it there (actually to my userspace back before the project moved out of there) a while back but let it languish. Let's work on it where it is now so it's accessible to all.--Doug.^(talk • contribs) 03:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This guard llama brochure

Hi BlindEagle,

I notice you've been the main contributor to Guard llama. I assume you've seen the above-linked pdf, which I found through an external link you've included in the article, to the site Queso Cabeza Farm. Nearly all the text in the brochure is an almost exact match to the text of the Wikipedia article. I'm a little confused:

• Did the author(s) of the brochure copy the Wikipedia article? If so, they've been a little disingenuous in citing other sources but not mentioning Wikipedia.
• Are you the author of both articles? In that case, perhaps we could work together to improve the in-text citations in the Wiki article, among other things.
• Did you base your contributions to the Wikipedia article on that brochure? If so, it might be a copyright violation, and even if it isn't, we should probably aim to rework the article using information from disinterested sources.

I do love the article by the way, and great job with all the vandal-fighting! Adrian J. Hunter^(talk•contribs) 14:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we produced the Guard Llama brochure and then I authored the Guard llama article. It is a free publication to anyone who wants it. So, I did not see any wiki violations when I produced the wiki article. I would be more then happy to improve the wiki article with you. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that makes sense, thanks for clearing that up. My remaining concern is that, as at least two other editors have commented, the wiki article does read a little like an advertisement. In particular, if it's true that a reliable source has suggested that llamas offer sacrificial protection – as some of your early edits indicate – that should definitely be noted in the article (even if you personally disagree). There are also spots where the wording doesn't sound as neutral as it could. I'll aim to try a little copyediting next week (no time this weekend), and maybe try to improve citations. Adrian J. Hunter^(talk•contribs) 15:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds wonderful. It is hard being unbiased when you are essentially the only editor for the article. However, I will try my best. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 16:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did some copyediting – hopefully the article doesn't sound so promotional now. Citations will have to wait til I'm less busy. I didn't quite understand this sentence: "Although llamas have been known to kill predators (including coyotes, woodchucks, and muskrats), they should not be considered attack animals." I'm just not sure what you mean by "attack animal". Perhaps this could be changed to, "Llamas have been known to kill predators, including coyotes, woodchucks, and muskrats."? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian J. Hunter (talk • contribs) 14:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why the warning of sorts was in there to avoid people thinking llamas always kill predators. This, in fact, is the exception as llamas are prey animals themselves. The goal was to convey to the reader that llamas should not be confused with a dog, for example, that can be trained to kill and will do so everytime in predictable situations. Does that help? --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that makes sense, thanks. Adrian J. Hunter^(talk•contribs) 15:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Llama

No problemo! I was just surprised that there weren't any Monty Python related Llama vandalisms, or am I just showing my ethnicity, age, and comedic leanings :) SkierRMH (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

May this season bring you success, good times and happiness. Looking forward to working with you in the future.
Hαvεlok беседа мансарда 07:06, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Textile Arts newsletter

Happy New Year! WikiProject Textile Arts is starting 2008 by initiating a project newsletter. The project had 7 new articles at Template:Did you know in December and we hope to see more of you in 2008. Cheers, Durova^Charge! 20:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Textile Arts newsletter

Hello again, this month's textile arts newsletter highlights the expansion of top-importance knitting and good article candidacy for Palestinian costumes. We've had several more new articles appear at Template:Did you know and other exciting developments. Regards, Durova^Charge! 23:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May we co-edit the Barbados Blackbelly page?

Hello BlindEagle,

I am webmaster for the Barbados Blackbelly Sheep Association Int'l as well as a breeder of Barbados Blackbelly sheep and founder of the Consortium that is struggling to conserve the genetics of this rare breed. Last fall I made continuing edits to the Wikipedia page on Barbados Blackbelly sheep to help reduce the confusion between Barbados Blackbelly and American Blackbelly. However, you undid my revisions.

It is really important that a page entitled Barbados Blackbelly Sheep not contain as its primary photo a picture of a horned American Blackbelly ram. I would like to re-edit the page but I think it would be a good idea if you and I try to work together to ensure that the information is correct and remains correct.

Could you please communicate with me so that we can discuss what changes are in order and how best to achieve those changes to ensure that the Wikipedia style is maintained and that the information is properly cited? Perhaps it would be better if I created a separate page for American Blackbelly sheep.

My personal email address is celkins at critterhaven.biz. Note that my Web site is also the largest compendium of information about blackbelly sheep on the Internet and I am author of the BBSAI brochure and most information currently available about the breed. I would sincerely like the Wikipedia article to reflect the same level of accuracy but I have no experience as a Wikipedia editor and need your help.

Celkins (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Carol Elkins[reply]

Your picture appears to be fine. Please resubmit it to the article. I was probably a little over zealous that day with the reverting. If there is indeed a difference in the two different breeds of sheep, there should be two pages. So, let's try to clean this one up first and then create the other one when we're ready. The big thing here is citations. If you cannot cite your work then it is original research and that's not allowed here. Look at some of the article off the main page and not how many citations are within those articles. That's where you want to go with this article. So, adding comments, conjecture or just observations about the breed without a written source is not usually looked upon favorably here. I would be glad to help. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 17:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Textile arts newsletter

Hi, the textile arts project had an exciting month in February: 7 featured pictures, 2 good articles, and 4 Did you know? entries. There's still time to join our featured portal drive. Our March newsletter has all the developments. Regards, Durova^Charge! 00:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic chicken

I undid your revert. The source I used is not a native speaker of Icelandic or a reliable linguist, they're just reliable on chickens. The editor didn't actually change the word, just the tense, so it's very likely that the editor was using the correct form. Hope you're well, Steven Walling (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears

britney spears is not gay, she has a kid and therefore is not gay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.211.78 (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid argument. BlindEagle^talk~contribs 13:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are gay, my edits were legit. Brittney Spears is not gay and you are libelous for deleting my posts and claiming she is gay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.211.78 (talk) 14:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from personal attacks. BlindEagle^talk~contribs 14:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 23:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

spelling: fibre/fiber

I have to put up with American (mis)spelling. Could you please have the courtesy not to Americanise accurate British English spelling, unless the article already generally uses American spelling, or is dealing with a specifically American subject? Peterkingiron (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sheep Shearing

Please explain the rationale for wikilinking common words such as today and person. I personally find such links annoying, but perhaps I am missing something. Cstaffa (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some digging. You are probably right. Overlinking is an issue and should be avoided. Feel free to revert. --BlindEagle^talk~contribs 15:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West African Dwarf (sheep)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of West African Dwarf (sheep), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/sheep/westafricandwarf/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of West African Dwarf (sheep)

A tag has been placed on West African Dwarf (sheep) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy to Commons

Did you know that you can actually upload freely licensed images directly to Wikimedia Commons? It's a sister project of Wikipedia, and works in almost exactly the same way, except it's for free media such as photos and videos. In the future, you might try uploading the sheep photos there. Thanks, Steven Walling (talk) 02:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ryeland sheep

Hi BlindEagle

In December 2005 I put the initial info on Wikipedia for Ryeland Sheep.

I note that the images on the page now show a black lamb and also distant Ryeland sheep. I presume that you are not a Ryeland owner. I would like to replace these images with more visually appealing images that better depict the breed. Are you able to help as I see I no longer have the 'authority' to make these edits

Deniseh (talk) 02:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sheep-start

Hey, we don't actually tag anything but stubs with in-article templates. Steven Walling (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Animal breeds originating in Israel

Hi there BlindEagle. Just letting you know that I've created Category:Animal breeds originating in Israel for you (which is what I'm guessing you intended to do when creating Animal breeds originating in Israel. I've nominated the latter for speedy deletion. Cheers - Kingpin^13 (talk) 11:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all :), easy mistake. Thanks for the stick ;) - Kingpin^13 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Could you explain to me what "nested" means in a tag? Thanks. --Againme (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brecknock Hill Cheviot

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brecknock Hill Cheviot, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/sheep/brecknockhillcheviot/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps

Thanks for contacting me. I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused about your comment. GA Sweeps is for reviewing the quality of good articles. Are you referring to the unassessed articles for the project? If so, nice reviewing. The GA Sweeps is for checking over GAs and ensuring that they meets the GA criteria. Instructions can be seen here. Let me know if you have any questions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:A flock of Armenian Semicoarsewool sheep.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:A flock of Armenian Semicoarsewool sheep.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^Copied from my talk Sherool (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I received your message regarding this file that I uploaded. It is taken from the FAO website which provides specific instructions on how to cite their work. Would this not imply that the articles and pictures are to be used elsewhere under the appropriate license? Regards, BlindEagle^talk~contribs 11:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What did those instructions say? The link on the image page no longer work and the current copyright notice on the FAO Website[1] says:

“

(...)Reproduction of material for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the written permission of the copyright holders.(...)

”

So they only allow educational, non-commercial use of the material. While the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license you tagged the image with have no such restrictions, so that license is not apropriate. Furthermore material restricted to only educational or non-commercial use is not considered free licensed (can not be used in all contexts) and may not be used on Wikipedia[2] (See also Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F3) except in some rare cases under the fair use doctrine as outlined at Wikipedia:Non-free content. -Sherool (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link to the site I used. [3] There is a Citation link on the left hand side. It leads you to a PDF file that provides instructions on how to cite images. BlindEagle^talk~contribs 14:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That just says how they would like you to cite images, it doesn't say anyting about the images beeing released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, and as pointed out above their copyright page makes it clear that their content is not "free for all", also the "Disclaimer" link on the same page[4] says:

“

(...)The images provided in the DAD-IS are provided by the copyright owners for your own noncommercial purposes provided that you do not alter or remove any copyright symbol or other identification concerning authorship(...)

”

So again, yes they allow non-commercial use and the citation page says how to cite their stuff stuff, but unfortunately they clearly do not allow unrestricted re-distribution of their stuff under a free license, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 or otherwise, wich means Wikipedia's rules won't allow this content to be used here (even thought Wikipedia is non-commercial in itself). --Sherool (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if that's the way it is. I suspect you can go ahead and delete the image now. I don't expect the status to change before 6/29. Thanks for clearing that up. I don't know if this one just sparked your attention or if you're going through and cleaning up the images here. However, there are many, many FAO images in the Creative Commons area though. I tried uploading several and received a duplicate image error something similar. Again, thanks for double-checking! I truly appreciate the effort. BlindEagle^talk~contribs 15:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found it while double checking images that has been transfered to Commons, yeah we probably have a large number of images from this and other sources that allow certain uses (typically educational/non-commercial and similar) but not the kind of unrestricted use Wikipedia require. Not the most intuitive aspect of Wikipedia I'm afraid, which is why I've decided to spend most of my time here double checking images and such. --Sherool (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AGRIS

Hello BlindEagle! Glad to see you on the AGRIS Discussion page and thank you for rating the article. Would you be interetsed in offering feedback as to its style/contents? It's just undergone some major rewriting and I have noticed that you had rated it on July 1. If you cannot comment, would you please refer me to someone who can? Thanks in anticipation, Isiaunia (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]