User talk:Bigbubblemedia

Welcome!

Hello, Bigbubblemedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Craig graham, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tchaliburton (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig graham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Craig graham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Graham

The article Craig Graham has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tchaliburton (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Craig Graham, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Widefox (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen (Bigbubblemedia) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

1. It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
2. Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Craig Graham. Thank you. Aus PR company. Assuming COI due to geo. Widefox (talk) 00:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Zumbo (TV series). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Widefox (talk) 01:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Graham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Craig Graham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Graham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Craig Graham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Craig Graham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. and Zumbo (TV series) Widefox (talk) 01:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig graham

A tag has been placed on Craig graham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Widefox (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hi Bigbubblemedia. It may not have been your intention to do so, but recent edits to the Craig Graham article removed a properly sourced reference from the work. If you have any issues with references placed in the article, please make them known on its discussion page - otherwise, please be careful not to remove references without stating a valid reason for their removal. Thank you. MarkBurberry32|talk 01:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss?

Hi Bigbubblemedia, are you willing to talk about your editing? You seem to be ignoring all attempts to communicate with you. Why? I have reported your username to admins as for reasons above. Further, you have carried on editing pushing this article instead of talking. Why? Do you have a COI with this person/media business? If so, please disclose. You must also change your username as above. If you do those, you may not be blocked. Widefox (talk) 01:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good, first of all please read the username policy above as it is your company name, correct? Then I suggest you create your first article in your userspace, so there is no danger of it being deleted and you can get feedback. OK? As Bigbubblemedia is a PR company, how can you convince us you have no connection with this subject? An easy way is to edit other articles and leave it, OK? Widefox (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pls see "changing your username" above. There is some handy stuff in the things above Widefox (talk) 01:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig Graham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Graham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Graham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Widefox (talk) 02:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sydneysider1979

Hello, are you the same user as Sydneysider1979 (talk · contribs)? If so you should read the policy on multiple accounts. As a rule, you are not allowed to use multiple accounts. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, --kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, I see that you were given a notification above, so you are likely following advice from another user, who is correct in the need for a name change, just make sure that you only use one account (in this case, the other one). Regards. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.  7  05:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]