User talk:Becky613

What a relief. Thanks. Ki imanu kel (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you enable email from this page? You don't have to use your real email for wiki purposes. Just create a Becky account at gmail. At any rate the email address is not disclosed. It enables wikipedians to send email to you without necessarily seeing your email address. If you go to my homepage or userpage, look under "toolbox" at the left side of the screen, and click on "E-mail this user". You can also configure your page so wikiusers can send you email without seeing your email address. To find out how to do this, click on "my preferences" at the top of the page. Tkuvho (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Immanuel Beit Yaakov controversy

Hi Becky613,

Here are some of the outstanding issues with the article:

• There is extensive use of primary and/or unreliable sources. For instance, court transcripts should not be used as sources. Other problematic sources include BeHadrei Haredim and Israel National News (Arutz 7).
• The article is not formatted properly and doesn't include enough internal links. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of style for more details.
• The article is not written in a neutral or encyclopedic tone. Just taking a random quote:

When discussing allegations of ethnic discrimination, it is important to review the ethnic self concept of the parties involved.

Why is it important? Have you ever seen an encyclopedia written in this style? And more importantly, in some cases the articles takes a clear stand for or against a certain party, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

• The article has too many quotations—this is self-explanatory. Remove the less important quotations and paraphrase some of the important ones as regular prose.

I hope the above was helpful. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 10:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women For the Wall (August 29)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Women For the Wall.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 17:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Becky613. You have new messages at APerson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

APerson (talk!) APerson (talk!) 18:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Women For The Wall (traditionalist women's group) was accepted

Women For The Wall (traditionalist women's group), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 17:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Civil resistance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the barrier between men and women (which allows for traditional worship) for most of the day. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-04-24/florida-jewish-journal/fl-jjps-</ref> <ref>
• |first=Shmuly |url=http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/women-at-offor-the-wall/ |title=Women AT [of/for] the Wall | Levi Margolin | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel |publisher=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. An edit that you recently made to Julius Wellhausen seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tgeorgescu (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]