User talk:Awilh37

User:Awilh37

THIS IS MY TALK PAGE!!! Welcome and enjoy :)

Talk

Nice userpage :P Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 18:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ty also what other commands r there i want to learn them all😝 Awilh37 (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So the things in double braces {{Example}} are called templates. There are currently 618674 templates on Wikipedia. Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 19:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find some of them at Wikipedia:Template index Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 19:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a useful template for making message boxes. Template:Tmbox Thriftycat ^Talk • Contribs 19:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nice talk :p TheRomanian24 (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :p Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 18:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and please come back again soon! --Awilh37 ^Talk

Hi! You recently removed an edit that I made, saying that I needed to cite a reference for my change, but it was not necessary for such a change as I made, as it was simply clarifying a misleading statement. The statement leads people to believe that the Anglican church is not Protestant, when in actuality, it very much is (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Anglicanism). I believe that the edit I made, while misinformed on actual formatting, is relevant and important to the content of the page, Christianity in the Ante-Nicene period, as it can be misleading to lump together the three churches of Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican, while the first two are not protestant, and the third is one of the main denominations that spawned from the Protestant reformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.130.77.172 (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User!

Thank you for responding to my revert[1]. I viewed the source, and it does have credible authors. I will restore your edit, and add the source [2] you provided me with to the edit as well. In the future, when you make edits, please check that your source is included in the references section of the article.

Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 14:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit has been restored with proper citation. Thanks!

Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 14:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ulmus minor Umbraculifera Gracilis

Hi. You reverted my recent edit (fairly) because I didn't explain why I removed one doubtful herbarium specimen. I'll revert your "undo" and restore the specimen I removed. Everything else in my edit was just changing External links to inline citations, as requested by User:Kevmin, and eliminating duplication, with nothing else lost. User:Kevmin pointed out that herbarium specimens should be integrated into text as inline citations, not lumped together in External links which can also mean duplication. Am busy correcting the relevant articles in line with his request. Hope that's OK. 193.39.159.73 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.159.73 (talk) 13:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your explanation. This makes much more sense with context, and this edit was a difficult decision to revert. Thank you for your contributions, and have a great day! Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deleted specimen now restored to article:

• Naturalis Biodiversity Center |id=L.1586951 Sheet described as U. carpinifolia Gled. cv. 'Gracilis' var. Späth; formerly known as 'U. montana umbraculifera gracilis' (Dahlem Hortus specimen, 1925)

Nothing else removed. Thanks, 193.39.159.73

What are you doing down here?

Stop now.

I said stop.

If you're not gonna stop, I'm just gonna be quiet.

●●●

... You're still here?

Ok then.

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

User scrolled too far on Awilh37's talk page.

{whaleme}

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aaron (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geardona,

I hope you are enjoying your day. Thank you for reviewing my mistake. I was warning someone for vandalism, and I must have accidentally clicked the button for a double rollback. Thank you for catching it, and it will not happen again.

Thanks! Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 11:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Westminster and my talk page.

Hello. I am 94.10.105.239. I see you have reverted my edit on Westminster and claimed on my talk page that i didn't show why. On your save your changes page where you put a review, i said WP:CITELEAD, meaning i done it because of that page. If you read that page, you will find out that citations are not needed to be put in the lead. 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Awilh37 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 94.10.105.239

Thank you so much for the clarification, I will revert your edit later today. Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 16:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westminster&diff=1258580989&oldid=1258413885&diffmode=source#redirectLatestRevision Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 14:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Awilh37/Android vs. Apple

User:Awilh37/Android vs. Apple, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Awilh37/Android vs. Apple and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Awilh37/Android vs. Apple during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 00:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted for AHA reversion

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for making this reversion on American Heart Association and claiming a BLP violation. The information the user added was correct,[1] and was not in violation of any policy. While it was unsourced, it was not contentious and thus not subject to removal per the BLP policy. Since it was the anonymous editor's first edit, I'm particularly bothered by your use of {{uw-disruptive1}} on the user's talk page, as the edit was constructive, not disruptive. In the future, please do not bite the newcomers. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 17:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dan Leonard,

Thank you for alerting me of this information. While viewing the edit, there was no description or reason for the change, and I assumed that this was incorrect information. Thank you as well for updating the information and adding a reason. Awilh37 ^Talk | Contribs 16:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. Clair, Walter K.; LoRusso, Francine (2024). "Introducing AHA's new president: Keith B. Churchwell, MD". Journal of the American Heart Association. 13 (15). doi:10.1161/JAHA.124.036260.