User talk:Ashokkumar47

Ashokkumar47, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ashokkumar47! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Wolverine (character)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wolverine (character), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:57, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Dark Knight (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Calidum 03:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I thought we can add them in Legacy section instead of main article. Thank you anyway. Ashokkumar47 (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Downey Jr., you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^(talk)(contribs) 11:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Betty Logan Ignorance"

Please see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Calling other editors "ignorant" is a personal attack. If you keep being insulting towards others, you may find your editing privileges curtailed. - SchroCat (talk) 14:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Ashokkumar47, aYou have been asked yseveral times not to talk about other editors. You have been uncivil to Betty Logan (and wasted her and other people's time in opening an quickly-closed ANI against her), been canvassing other users, and been generally disruptive in not listening to what several people have told you. If you continue to cast aspersions on other editors, I will have no hesitation in filing a report at ANI. - SchroCat (talk) 13:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An even more final warning

• 1. Stop opening reports at WP:ANI about things that are irrelevent to that board.
• 2. Stop casting aspersions about other editors at talk pages.
• 3. Stop spamming your issues across other irrelevant pages (i.e. WT:RFC). A dispute over the contents of a particular page should remain at the talk page of that article.
• It appears that there is a severe competence issue here, and you will be blocked indefinitely if you continue to do any of these things. Black Kite (talk) 16:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avengers: Infinity War edit

Your recent editing history at Avengers: Infinity War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
--Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 17:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Ashokkumar47, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spain doesn't exist

Spain as a country doesn't exist anymore Ashokkumar47 (talk) 10:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rafael Nadal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 12:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joker (The Dark Knight), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. JellyMan9001 (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Asqueladd (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Grand Slam men's singles champions. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including recent edit-warring to repeatedly try to maintain vandalism in pages. Considering the number of warnings you have had about your persistent unacceptable editing you should have been blocked from editing long ago. Please don't return to the same kinds of nonsense when the block is over; if you do so, you are very likely to be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 04:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]