Perhaps you have noticed that I did not give an opinion myself at that discussion. Personally, I couldn't care less if a hyphen is included or not. However, I do find it irritating that we now have a whole lot of articles and categories that don't use a hyphen and one category that does... Being the one who introduced the inconsistency, I think you should either start moving everything to include a hyphen, or undo the one outlier. --Randykitty (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, saw you deleted a Mitchell Mann article a few years ago, before he turned professional. Just wondering if it was about the snooker player or if it was possible to restore it as he is now a pro.--Snooker155 (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I didn't deleted the article, I just nominated it for deletion (because it was about an amateur snooker player). I also can't undelete the article, as I'm not an administrator. If you want it to be undeleted, than you should initiate a discussion at WP:DRV. ArmbrustTheHomunculus21:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Seen snooker.org's tweets hence I looked up Anton Waywod. Anyway turns out Vyacheslav Nikiforov normally goes by the name Slava Nikiforov found a PDF stating his club was CSC Regensburg so maybe you could ask them [1], they're also on twitter, but not so active. As for Ali Masoudi Alavi his club is SC Mayen-Koblenz [2]. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Kérhetem a segítségedet ezzel kapcsolatban? Az itt található üzeneteimet kellene lefordítani. (Kérlek, hagyd figyelmen kívül az ugyanott arra vonatkozóan tett megjegyzésemet, hogy kifejezetten ellenzem harmadik fél bevonását a fordításba, mivel időközben kiderült, hogy az állítólag anyanyelvi szinten magyarul beszélő szerkesztőtársunk valószínűleg egy szót nem beszél gyönyörű nyelvünkön.) Előre is köszönöm! Borsoka (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Wasn't sure who to ask this to. Since you usually close FPCs, most likely you know the answer to this. I randomly went on Tomato and noticed that File:Bright red tomato and cross section02.jpg is a Featured Picture itself. And as I was looking over it, I saw that the resolution for its height is lower than the required minimum in the criteria. But I'm wondering if because it has low resolution it warrants a delisting nomination. GamerPro6402:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
The resolution has raised a couple times. If it's only a little under resolution requirement, leave it; if it's way, way under, then it might be worth reconsidering. There are some people who hate resolution-only reasons to delist, though if it's really, really under, I think they'll need to shut up. Or if there's any other issues. Adam Cuerden(talk)02:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
For that one... well, we haven't had formal shots like that in a while at FPC, and I'd be inclined to leave it until we have someone able to replace it. Adam Cuerden(talk)02:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Got it. Honestly, I'm probably one who would not be sure about what issues a picture would have to be delisted anyway. GamerPro6403:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Alright. In that case, if possible could you pick a week's worth of images (I'm getting a bit better), and I'll handle the blurbs. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Armbrust-
Not that I plan to ramble needlessly, but is there a way to use one or two footnotes in a FP nomination - without screwing up other things? Thanks -Godot13 (talk) 02:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
...Well, now that the confusion regarding me knowing about WP:NACD and not that specific line in WP:RMCI has been resolved, I have a suggestion regarding something sort of related. Well, long story short, I wasn't basically on Wikipedia at all during your recent WP:RFA nomination. I was reading through some of the opposes, and it seemed like a few of them voted to oppose due to your disregard of WP:NACD when it came to some of the discussion closes. This is just my two cents, given something I had talked to you about in the past: an idea that may help "fix" that confusion, as well as help Wikipedia fix a contradicting policy, is to somehow propose that WP:NACD (and WP:BADNAC), WP:RMCI, and any other applicable closing instructions pages get synchronized to avoid other editors being confused between the contradicting policies, and then revert/oppose editors when only one of the policies is violated (like I did with you twice recently in the past few months). Do you have any thoughts on this? Steel1943 (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Alright, I'll do the scheduling. BTW, if you have a zoomable image (GArt, for instance) that you want but we don't have, let me know. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
MRV template override
Hi Amrbrust, I'm curious about this edit of yours.
The template documentation says the headers should remain on the page until the monthly log is archived.
The point I was trying to make is that closing admins don't put those headers there. The closing admin replaces the header with {{subst:MRV top|[[header]]|result}}, and that template then re-inserts the header. It seems that the best way to avoid having to remove them from closed discussions is to fix Template:MRV top rather than the symptom. I have just done so, although I am not sure if this will mess up the bot that archives that page, if the bot is expecting to see those headers and remove them. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
You placed an objectionable tag on the top of this article. As the editor who placed most of the results in this article, that's my work your are complaining about. There is virtually no prose in the article, so it is results. I placed the meet results site at the bottom. Every result on the page is one or two links off of that main page. Do you want 40 different sub-references to the same site? That would be absurd. Where would we put them? There is not another track and field results page that has something like that. What exactly are you expecting? Trackinfo (talk) 06:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Are you serious? 40 references because YOU don't know how to click on the name of the event on the currently sourced site? That has never been done before. Trackinfo (talk) 10:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
By the way, how do you close sets? I just checked my contribution history and made sure everything was updated with the second image; is there an easier way? Adam Cuerden(talk)16:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Not really, although closing one-image nominations is certainly easier. The generated text can be reused from step 2a to 5 and in step 7 & 8 with a little bit search and replace magic. ArmbrustTheHomunculus16:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Commonscat
Hi Armbrust, lange schon nicht mehr gelesen :-)
Setze, ab und zu, mal in Spieler Artikel die Commonscat zu den entsprechenden Bildern. weiß aber nicht ob sie an den Anfang oder ans Ende des Artikels kommt. Habe sie meist ans Ende gesetzt, da sie in der de.WP eigentlich unter Weblinks läuft. Ist das richtig so? Gruß aus Berlin. --LezFraniak (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Can you please tell me who requested the close, and on what grounds? There was a prior merge and delete request to merge IPT into Emerson, but the reviewer gave a detailed summary, and her reasons included there are issues that were not properly presented in the first request. They are now being properly presented, so I don't understand the reason for you closing the request. Thank you in advance. Atsme☯Consult20:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I looked it up, and believe the following is what happened. My merge request was made in June - GenQuest's in September. I had nothing to do with GenQuest's request to merge. My only involvement was a comment in the comment section Talk:Steven Emerson which is what was used to deceitfully have the merge closed. Of further relevance and importance is the review summary that was given for the closure of my June request to merge: Talk:Steven_Emerson/Archive_3 A few excerpts by the reviewer: .....as suggested by User:Aircorn, a reasonable argument under the second category might be that the IPT is exclusively associated with Steve Emerson, if evidence to this effect is presented. Also the following: Note that this close does not evaluate whether the articles are compliant with policy (e.g. WP:NOR); it would be a good idea for the editors here to resolve these issues, but they would only have become relevant to the merger question if so much of the article was noncompliant that nearly all of it had to be deleted, and arguments to this effect have not been presented. Good faith editors are simply trying to follow the suggestions of the reviewer, improve the articles, and present good faith arguments. The editor who requested closure did so in an attempt to game the system, and shut down discussion. Not good. Please re-open. Atsme☯Consult16:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm getting accused of deceit here and yet in request I link here Wikipedia:Proposed_mergers#AWAITING_CONSENSUS. Above Atsme says she wasn't involved in anyway with the request to merge yet at Talk:Steven_Emerson Genquest says they received the merge request at proposed mergers. Genquest provided the merge rationale in quotations. That merge rationale is the same as provided by Atsme on proposed mergers. I am missing the deceit. Well I see deceit but it's not on my part. I'm very sorry this has to come to your page.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 20:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Maybe this can clear some things up. The merge request from @Atsme: is in a several months long que that I have just gotten to due to my inability to be on Wikipedia much this past summer (because of a large project I am running at my real job). I have just again started working through the que a bit, and that is why this has popped up now. The request was made in June, and, as there was no discussion here, I posted the merge request—albeit—late, at the correct spot for such a discussion to have taken place. I was unaware of this having been discussed and closed elsewhere. Sorry for any confusion. GenQuest"Talk to Me"15:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing that up. I knew full well I had not requested a 2nd merge in September. Perhaps if Joe hadn't archived the results so quickly, you would have known. Atsme☯Consult01:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Based on Adam's comment on my set I am working to re-edit most of the images. I want to see how far I can get by mid afternoon. If I'm not making enough progress I may ask for a 24 hour suspension to let me finish the work. I will let you know in about 12 hours. Would this be okay if requested? Thanks.-- Godot13 (talk) 02:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
professional players
Thank you, "serious cat", for quality articles on professional snooker players such as Ronnie O'Sullivan and pool players such as Jasmin Ouschan, for your helpful bot, for living through retirement and returning, for encouraging others, for diligent work on infoboxes including your own, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Hafspajen has given you a Hershey Bar! Hershey bars promote WikiLove through chocolately goodness and hopefully this one has made your day better. Hershey bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Hershey bar, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of Hershey bars by adding {{subst:Hershey Bar}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Hey Armbrust, I added a category on the FFU template for requests that are now invalid because the associated article was speedy deleted, however for some reason it's not parsing right. I tested it in the sandbox and it throws a file accepted result instead of the file declined CSD result I want. Can you help? Thanks! RegistryKey(RegEdit)02:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
@RegistryKey: You got the accepted result, because that's the the default behaviour of the template. You should save the sandbox with your new parameter and than test on the testcases subpage. ArmbrustTheHomunculus17:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Still not working. I put {{subst:ffu|csdd}} in the sandbox after I added it to doc, then went to testcases and did a create and update and it pulled what was in the sandbox, but it's still getting turned into the accepted result. RegistryKey(RegEdit)02:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I have further expanded the content of the article eristalinus megacephalus, including the addition of the section "Etymology", more specific habitats in "Distribution", the inclusion of the insect's flight period and length, and more specific appearance of the insect in "Description". I have also added seven references and a “See Also" section. Word count is increased from 7 words to 226 words, not including the see also and reference sections nor the infobox. Evidently, this article is no longer a stub. Re@wakentalk19:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
I have expanded the article Austroicetes frater, including the addition of sections "Description", "Etymology", "Life Cycle", and "See Also". 10 references have been added, and word count increased from 29 to 284, excluding the references, see-also section, and infobox. Six synonyms and a more specific scientific classification system has also been added. With 1778 characters, the article is a start-class or possibly a C-class.
Re@wakentalk02:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Armbrust, I got into a little mess with the last nom - lost about 19 hours on it. When I finally added - the nomination before me has - Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2014 at 19:34:35 (UTC) - and mine is coming after - and ends like 21 Dec 00:14:07 (UTC). Can this be adjusted? Hafspajen (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
"Good Morning" Armbrust: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia! 13 December is the day when WE, THE Swedes perplex the rest of the world by showing up way too early in the morning dressed in white tunics, candles in their hair, singing and bringing saffron buns and breakfast in bed to nice people. Hope you have a bright day! Hafspajen (talk) 10:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Armbrust, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing, The Herald : here I am
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an AwesomeHoliday and a HappyNewYear, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys!Hafspajen (talk) 02:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
While we normally go with straight counts, this one is, quite simply, ineligible. It's not stable as an image in an actual article, outside of a gallery or infobox, anywhere: Talk:Vincent van Gogh affirms it's due to be swapped out.
The image remained stable during the suspension of the nomination (for one month). If the image will be swapped at any time in the future, then feel free to nominate the image for delisting. ArmbrustTheHomunculus10:23, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Cheers, Armbrust. I double-checked it myself after leaving this query and realised that it hadn't been redirected. In checking the closure, it was incorrectly worded, and there was a brief back and forth exchange about changing it which wasn't acted on. It's not my intention to hassle people over wording so long as the outcome is the desired one.
Hi Armbrust. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Wikipedia for a long time to come. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Dear Ambrust. You recently closed this featured image as "keep". Of 6 contributors, 5 expressed an opinion as to keep or delist. 4 stated to delist... that's 80%. Isn't 80% support to delist sufficient? I say this because it's strange that such an inaccurate image is still considered a "featured image" --Tom (LT) (talk) 06:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
There is a quorum rule in the delisting process of featured pictures. There needs to be five users (including the nominator) supporting it and therefore four isn't enough. ArmbrustTheHomunculus10:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
OK, fair enough. The image is inaccurate and so I will try again in 6 months and in the meantime ask for some help editing it to get it right. --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination order
Remember how a few years ago we voted that nominations in December should run two extra days?
I asked at the time whether I should try and make this degrade gracefully at the start of January, and was told not to bother. I think the best solution would be to leave the order for a few days, so that new nominations don't get pushed below older ones, then rearrange on the 7th or so, when being nearer the top matters less. Otherwise, all nominations from today and yesterday are kind of screwed.
I'm thinking I might change the code to add the graceful degrading, probably by just having all nominations on the 1st or 2nd of January end at midnight on the 12th of January. Adam Cuerden(talk)11:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
It's actually three days, but that's besides the point. Instead of reordering I left a hidden comment on the page. Also IMO graceful degrading shouldn't be done without a wider discussion. ArmbrustTheHomunculus12:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Eh, it was causing a problem, it's fixed now. =) I'll start a discussion, but there isn't time for one to take place before it becomes an issue... I mean, the problem goes away for noms after tomorrow, any fix needs to happen now, or it won't be good for a year. Adam Cuerden(talk)12:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
After being one of the most regular admins at PERM for a couple of years, I basically stopped approving/declining requests in March 2014 in order to concentrate on other areas and to give new admins something to do, so I'm a bit out of touch. I've noticed recently however (WT:PERM} that the archive bot appears to have been down for a long time. You used to be the de facto 'clerk' at PERM and did a good job of it but I also note that you appear to no longer do this. Has someone told you to stop? While we don't want to encourage all kinds of clerking at PERM, I think we could use your help there again. If you can get me up to date I'll try to get consensus for you to be the 'clerk' again - if you want to of course. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC).
I don't think so. The discussion about the "third foot" had a completely different indentation and it's clearly unrelated from your support !vote. ArmbrustTheHomunculus19:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to. (I didn't want to, because the current FP was my nomination.) I think part of the problem is that the user is French, and highly likely doesn't really speak/understand English very good. ArmbrustTheHomunculus14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
For your outstanding contributions for Featured Pictures in 2014 you have been awarded WikiProject Barnstar. Following your instructions, I have placed it on your awards page, leaving this courtesy message to inform you of your latest award addition. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
When you mark images as FP on enwiki, please mark it as enwiki FP on Commons too by adding {{Assessments|enwiki=1}}, please. — Revi14:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
@WolfmanSF: I haven't seen that when I reverted. I have to say that moving the file, then replacing it on all pages, and last uploading the version without de-noising would have been a better way to accomplish the same result. (Sorry for the rather later answer.) ArmbrustTheHomunculus17:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Wouldn't moving the file have moved the file history, FP status and zoomviewer caches along with it? If so, it would not have accomplished what we wanted. Evidently, the easiest solution would have been for Dschwen to have flushed the image's zoomviewer cache. WolfmanSF (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Armbrust, Given Crisco's comments about this nom being a 3D object and PD-Art not applying, I've left a note to withdraw the nom, rather than clutter the list. Does someone remove wihdrawals, or do they just run until they drop off after ten days? Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Replace with what? I don't see any replacement images in the nomination. Also IMO preparing the images would make that user involved, and therefore they shouldn't close the nomination. ArmbrustTheHomunculus16:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
About your (non)participation in the January 2012 SOPA vote
Hi Armbrust. I am Piotr Konieczny (User:Piotrus), you may know me as an active content creator (see my userpage), but I am also a professional researcher of Wikipedia. Recently I published a paper (downloadable here) on reasons editors participated in Wikipedia's biggest vote to date (January 2012 WP:SOPA). I am now developing a supplementary paper, which analyzes why many editors did not take part in that vote. Which is where you come in :) You are a highly active Wikipedian (51st to be exact), and you were active back during the January 2012 discussion/voting for the SOPA, yet you did not chose to participate in said vote. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me why was that so? For your convenience, I prepared a short survey at meta, which should not take more than a minute of your time. I would dearly appreciate you taking this minute; not only as a Wikipedia researcher but as a fellow content creator and concerned member of the community (I believe your answers may help us eventually improve our policies and thus, the project's governance). PS. If you chose to reply here (on your userpage), please WP:ECHO me. Thank you! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here16:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Armbrust, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
- T H (here I am) 12:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey there! So you live Hungary, do you? According to meta:Special:CentralNotice there is a fundraising campaign currently running for enwiki users in Hungary. There's also a gadget to hide fundraising banners that's incorrectly also hiding other banners. So, if you could be so kind to help me test out a little CSS? First make sure the two "Suppress display of..." gadgets are disabled at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets. If you aren't seeing the fundraiser banner, try logging into your enwiki account in the "private mode" of your browser (e.g. incognito for Chrome), or in a different browser altogether. The banners should show only any non-Special page. Once you've confirmed it's visible, try adding #frbanner { display:none !important; } to your common.css. I'm nearly certain that will hide it, but just wanted confirmation before updating the gadget. I know this is a lot to ask, so no worries if you can't be bothered :) Many thanks in advance! Best — MusikAnimaltalk03:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I don't know if I have said this before, but I really wish you would stop moving paintings with extremely common titles, like Painting of a Knight, to the undisambiguated title. This is very unhelpful to readers and editors alike, whatever the sometimes crazy disambiguation rules say. Johnbod (talk) 04:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
If it's really such a extremely common title, than why was it a redlink instead of a disambiguation page? Also if there isn't even one other article using a similar name, than disambiguation is certainly not needed and I don't see why the page shouldn't be moved. ArmbrustTheHomunculus08:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I totally realize that, don't worry. Nevertheless, it is often not a constructive thing to do to remove such disambiguators where they have been added to very common titles for works of art, where only one example happens to have an article at present. I wouldn't want Armbrust, who very often pops up on my watchlist doing this, to be under the false impression that his efforts are at all helpful to the project. Your wording seems to imply that notable paintings = paintings with articles. I can't begin to tell you how untrue that is. Johnbod (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Johnbod, I didn't mean to imply that. However, the current guidelines don't say to disambiguate things which don't have articles. Like, September Morn (film) doesn't become September Morn (2015 film) just because there was a film called September Morn in 1915. If an article on that second film was written, then yes, obviously the "film" disambiguator would not be enough. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, we know that, and you already said so just above. Nonetheless many such titles have (usefully in my view) been so disambiguated, and Armbrust goes around removing this disambiguation. I just wanted him to be aware that many people feel this is not at all helpful or constructive for the project. His comment above shows that he does indeed believe that notable paintings = paintings with articles. Actually probably fewer than 1% of notable paintings have articles, and in the case of common titles the ones with articles are very often not the most famous. Johnbod (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I would like to claim my prize for expanding Cerambycinae to Start or C-class article, since it is currently a start class article. Please leave the prize on my talkpage (I don't mind which barnstart it is!). Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Surfing through Wikipedia I saw that several years ago there has been a merge discussion about the article Galata and you have closed it saying that there was no consensus. However, it is clear that the three users who participated at the discussion agreed on a merge, with no objection or abstaining. Therefore your closure seems to be wrong. Are you sure you really read the arguments and proposals carefully? Have a good weekend. --141.196.196.99 (talk) 13:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
The consensus of the editors at this discussion was to speedy large numbers of category changes from 'military facility'/'military base' to the 2010 recommendation of 'military installation.' You've consistently opposed every CfD Speedy that I've raised, on the basis that some of the subcategories mostly use the base or facility term. But the entire focus of my listings has been to standardize the entire category to the 2010 recommendation of 'installation.' I'm quite frustrated with this, and intend to raise the matter at WT:MILHIST. Please put your point of view there, because I cannot fully understand your reasoning at present. Kind regards Buckshot06(talk)03:03, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
If you initiated a full discussion, then why couldn't you include all the categories in it? Also "whole tree" doesn't include military bases at all, because no such category is nominated there. ArmbrustTheHomunculus09:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
That doesn't matter. Only categories, which are added to the nominations and are tagged, are handled. Also that discussion is IMO too old to be used for any speedy renaming at all. ArmbrustTheHomunculus13:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
They all would have been moved if I was a category-moving expert, which I unfortunately am not. I'm a subject matter expert. I may not have fully understood the process. I imply from your comments that you would prefer I nominate the remaining subcategories through a full CfD rather than a speedy CfD. Buckshot06(talk)00:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Whenever there is a suitable picture I use to put a FP related to Portugal in our national day: 10 June. Would it be possible to replace the present picture of the day for 10 June with this one, which was recently promoted? Best wishes, Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the positive and quick reply, Chris Woodrich! Of course I will write the legend! But I'm not familiar with the process of creating - or replacing - the POTD templates. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Weirdly, this didn't send you a message automatically. Maybe I left off a User: or something. Anyway! Check I've done it right - it's been a while, but it's done. Adam Cuerden(talk)23:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Lua error in Module:Location_map at line 413: Unable to find the specified location map definition. Neither "Module:Location map/data/Mercer County, New Jersey" nor "Template:Location map Mercer County, New Jersey" exists.
FYI - I have now completed the (raw) conversion of the category to a list in the article LGBT Olympians and it is ready for deletion. Thanks. SFB20:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to thank you and say that your work keeping WP:GO operational is meaningful: Featured content report content is taken from it for the Signpost. And I've now also written a script for that purpose that uses the page as well. ResMar22:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
Resolved
.jpg)
,_Countess_of_Derby.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
