Hi, this WikiPedia was created in 2011 , now we don't have access for it, to edit the content .The content am removing few things and adding new content. Nandalal acharya (talk) 06:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am sorry. I was in a hurry, and noticing the removal of content, I speedily categorized it as that. I forgot to check that you added content. Apollogetticax|talk06:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sheng Thao
I have a source link for my earlier edit, but I don't know how to reverse the reversion and add it. This is clearly an evolving story and I thought a timely update would be useful. Just the facts.
Well, you could see the diff between the versions, by pressing View History. Then you could restore that version. There is probably going to be a button that says Undo, or maybe Restore? If it's not there, then probably it's only for registered or autoconfirmed users. In that case I can revert to the original. Apollogetticax|talk18:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Apollogetticax! Your additions to Draft:New public service have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, what? I just copyedited and cleaned it up, not added new material! Though yes, I'll try in the future to avoid this problem, even though I didn't do it. First of all: I didn't add or deal with images. Secondly: I didn't add anything new, so I didn't violate the fourth point. And I didn't provide quotations, and I didn't even open the website of the source. So either you are mistaking me for someone else or I violated the fifth rule.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
Evading a block is always sockpuppetry, no matter how long you wait. We don't block accounts, we block individuals. You have to appeal your block before you can return to editing. On top of that, you were just blocked on your IP in June for block evasion, so you're evading a fresh block. Each time you have been blocked, you have made claims such as "finally unbanned" and such. So I want to make this clear: Until you successfully appeal your original checkuser block, you remain blocked. If you are caught by a checkuser socking again, your block will convert to an automatic community ban. This means instead of being able to appeal to an individual administrator, you will have to appeal to the entire community and be, essentially, voted on. You do not want that. -- ferret (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Part of unblocking where sockpuppetry is involved is deciding which account you will use in the future. You need to read Standard Offer and the guide to appealing blocks. You have evaded blocks twice in the last month, so the expectation is for you to appeal in six months without any further evasion. -- ferret (talk) 18:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is you've repeatedly made some disruptive edits. Those disruptive edits brought the eyes of administrators on you, who realized you were also sockpuppeting/evading. If your behaviors aren't improving, that's why the blocks are necessary. You have yet to appeal and prove you can adhere to our rules. -- ferret (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, I'll wait six months and then make an appeal. I thought Wikipedians had some shame! (I came to say thank you, and then you block me!) Apollogetticax|talk21:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also I don't want to have to wait 6 months to help Wikipedia again. But I'm not complaining; this is the way it works. How about {{2nd chance}}? Apollogetticax|talk18:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where have you appealed based on the Standard Offer? Please link to your past appeals if so, even if they were declined. The Standard Offer is not "wait six months, then sockpuppet again". It's wait six months without evasion, then appeal your block and explain why it's no longer necessary. Unless the appeal is accepted, you are still blocked and have not used Standard Offer. -- ferret (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just as an aside, being a new account and applying for a lot of advanced permissions and rights you aren't entitled to yet is a sure fire way to get admins to scrutinize your account and look at your editing history, Apollogetticax. It's part of the potential approval process so that was very unwise on your part.
Also reiterating, if you get community blocked for an additional block evasion, it will be almost impossible for you to ever get unblocked because you have shown you can't abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. The community doesn't have infinite amount of patience so this is your last chance. Don't edit, logged out or with an account, for six months. LizRead!Talk!00:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Tips
