User talk:Antmqr/Archive 2015

Orphaned non-free image File:Acibademlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acibademlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warning

I hope that you stop making those edits (Turkish Kurdistan for example). Editors like you usually get blocked quickly and their edits reverted as if they never were. This isn't a Turkish Nationalists forums. Do not engage in edit-wars as I dont have the time to deal with you and will just report you then you will get blocked like your other friends (or vandals). My advice is for you to engage in the talk pages since obviously you know exactely how to edit even though you are new and a vandal case will be a piece of cake to prove.--Bruskom (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have to stop certain individuals from attempting to spread propaganda on this page. True and real documents can not be deleted my friend. I am not Turkish Nationalist. I am just with real information. Your aim to show Kurdish majorites are larger. You are deleting registered information in spite of the fact that you know they true and real. You dont have any real source. This page is not propaganda place. Stop VANDALIZM. Antmqr (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warning

Your recent editing history at Turkish Kurdistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bruskom ^talk to me 16:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are making vandalizm. Stop to delete the information which has source. You are not authority which is true or not. This information are important for the page to reach the correct information. Turkish general election shows the majority and ethnicity map is objective created by German. STOP VANDALIZM.Antmqr (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Antmqr, Thanks for bringing Turkish Kurdistan to my attention. I see you've been in a content dispute with User:Bruskom on this article for a little while. By rights, I should be blocking you both, instead I have protected the page to allow discussion to happen. Wikipedia has strict rules about how to solve content disputes - through discussion and consensus. Constant reverting will never help, so stop doing that. Absolutely. Ever again. If you cannot reach consensus between the two of you, follow the steps in WP:Dispute resolution. Finally, Antmqr, stop referring to Bruskom's edits as vandalism. Vandalism is a specific term on Wikipedia, which attributes malice to the edits - i.e. comparing them to replacing walls of text with swear words. I have seen no evidence of malice - I am sure Bruskom is also trying to improve the encyclopedia. If you carry on falsely calling his edits vandalism, I will block you for disruptive editing, as you will never be able to come to agreement if you are not open to it. Worm^TT(talk) 18:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. I try to be in rule. But this users delete everything which explains the article without showing any source. He is not bona fide users. He tries to keep the page how he wants to show. Please, just check the edits. You will understand who is right. I didnt delete anything without reason. But only things he did that. He tries to show Kurdish majority areas larger, Kurdish population more. I dont know purpose of him. The source which could show the reality is always deleted by him. Just check the edits. I am patrol in Turkish Wikipiedia. True and real information is important for me. The information has to be proven. Antmqr (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's important to adhere to a neutral point of view and I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable enough about the subject matter to make a good judgement on which is the "right" answer. It's in cases like this that discussion is the important factor. There has been zero discussion on the talk page of that article today - so neither of you have attempted to follow Wikipedia's way of solving disputes. That's where the discussion should happen. Worm^TT(talk) 19:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. We have to discuss about the information firstly. I will follow it. But please make page semi-protected. The information on the page has to be replaced with in a control. Most important thing the information which is added has to have a source not personal. There is no need to have information about the article. Just check the scourse and follow the discussion page. It is important for the objectivity of the page. Meanwhile deleting the proven information without any source and reason we accept as vandalism in Turkish wikipedia.Antmqr (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you come to an agreement I (or any other admin) will drop the protection. Otherwise, I'm afraid you'll just have to live with the "wrong" version for a time. Worm^TT(talk) 20:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]