User talk:Annabel

Welcome!

Hello, Annabel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Flcelloguy 15:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

As a Wikipedian user I'm most of the time active on the Dutch Wikipedia, where I'm regisered as user nl:Gebruiker:Annabel. To contact me, please drop me a line in Dutch, English or French at my talk page on the Dutch wikipedia. When you refer to this wiki-project, please insert a correct link so I'm able to help you further with any question.

Regards, Annabelleke 07:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rien Poortvliet

(Warning auto'd - ignore it) I have a question about a page you recently edited, Rien Poortvliet. It seems there were some non-english changes you made which I almost reverted, could you explain them to me? --Draicone 13:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a test. I was contacted by User:Tmalmjursson by IRC. This document is currently under translation and I wanted to help him. Annabelleke 13:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your reply. I'll make a note not to revert that article in future. --Draicone 13:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished reading. I will ask other dutch speaking wikipedians to correct the text even further. Annabelleke 13:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Annabelleke, Thank you so much for the work you hhave done on this article, you have sorted out some of the words that the English wikipedians could not find in the dictionary, which has made the text almost totally readable! And could you please thank the other guy on #wikipedia-nl who was talking to me, I can't remember his name. Your help has been very warmly received, and I thank you once again. Thor Malmjursson 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Thor's Pet Yack (Talk) Thor - Talk Page (nl.wikipedia)[reply]

OK I will let him know. Greetings, Annabelleke 08:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milkcap addition

Hi Annabelleke, thanks for the lactarius addition. I was just wondering how to format it to look like others - can you reorganize your original table into the series and sections and stick on the page - eventually it may format a little like this:

• Thiele and Ladiges' taxonomic arrangement of Banksia

see list of species a ways down the page - but with common names and edibility icons attached.

(I figured it'd be easier for you as you had the original excel document.) cheers Cas Liber 22:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you're intetrested in fungi, you may want to cast a vote as to what fungus collaboration to work on on the Wikiproject fungi..

Hi Cas,

I'm not familiar with the guidelines used on this wikipedia (I'm mostly active on wikipedia NL). Do you want a species list where indents are used? Then I guess, it would not be so easy to add the subgenus, section and subsection to the list. If you have an other example (with this kind of information included), I may have a better idea, of what needs to be done.

If you're interested in the table, you can also drop me a line, by using the "e-mail this user" functionality. I used Quattro Pro's text functions to preformat the table as a wikitable (inserting a Dutch word where an enter should be inserted) and thereafter I used WordPerfect to do the text-replacements to enter the hard returns.

Annabelleke 09:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Down the page on the Banksia page above was what I'd figured. The simplest would be to re-upload your table but reorganized in sections and subsections rather than straight alphabetically (as in the banksia page above) and then I can proceed in formatting it later. cheers Cas Liber 12:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ;-) Annabelleke 13:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPC file format

Can you incorporate this info into the spectroscopy article, or an appropriate related article? --Lexein 20:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this, as soon as I find the time. Annabel 07:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lactarius

Hi! I saw your contribution to the List of Lactarius species and was interested in the source of your inputs on subgenus, section and subsection. I'm starting a new wiki on Lactarius scrobiculatus and I want to make use of your information, but I also want to cite a source. I've searched the web for a suitable source to quote, but nothing comes up on this species.--Paffka 12:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all information I have used can be found in a book written by Heilmann-Clausen et al. It gives an overview of the Lactarius species in Northern Europe. I added the reference to the article. Annabel 16:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Thanks.--Paffka 19:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

Hi! I saw that you are bureaucrat on nl.wikipedia so I need little help from you about one problem. I tried to manage my global account (SUL) but I could not do that because I realized that there are other accounts with the same name on other wikimedia projects (http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=conquistador). All these accounts are inactive, except on the Portugese Wikipedia (en.wikiquote.org, es.wikipedia.org, fr.wikipedia.org, ja.wikipedia.org, nl.wikipedia.org, pl.wikipedia.org, pt.wikipedia.org, tr.wikipedia.org, zh.wikipedia.org). There is one account that was edited and filled with some data. That user has not edited his account since the 21st December 2005, the same day he opened his account. Furthermore, he has made only 5 edits in total. I opened my account on the Croatian Wikipedia on the 3rd May 2005 and I have made 1128 edits since then. According to Help:SUL I have the superior claim on this username, so I am asking you if you could help me in merging these accounts with mine, so I could have global account. Thanking you in advance. --Conquistador (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conquistador, I've usurped the account on the Dutch wikidia. Kind regards, Annabel (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Structures

I am sure that your additions are very well-intended, but I am unsure what kind of message you are trying to send. But what you are showing do not exist except in outer space. When was the last time you saw a naked Be2+ ion? This situation has been discussed previously in Chem-wikipedia. It might be fun if you slowed down your drawing business and talk some.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smokefoot, I was not aware of any discussion on this topic. I have nowhere shown a single ion or atom in the drawings, the combination of both ions is expressed with the rectangular brackets. So, as far as I know, this is the most elementary way of showing the molecular structure (off course it would be better to show a cristallographic image of a cell, but I do not have these). Anyhow, I would be happy if you can point me to the discussion on this topic. Regards, Annabel (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the deal: these materials are 3-D polymers with very strong M-O bonds. In solution, the cations are highly solvated (I dont know the coordination numbers). Be2+ exists in water as an oxocluster, I recall. Naked dications dont exist except in mass spectrometer champers, the ultra-high vacuum of the interstellar medium. So the way you depict these complex materials is a form of misinformation. I realize that this perspective comes across as highly pedantic (or worse), but we aim to tell readers that physical reality is much more complicated that many might otherwise think. Check out sodium chloride, ferrous chloride, caesium oxide, etc.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I never said this is the 3D structure (it is a solid ;-) ), only it was the best impression that could be given for both ions in a crystal structure. However, as you requested, I have reverted my changes. Regards, Annabel (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Annabel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Annabel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Annabel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]