|
User talk:Ankitbhatt/Archive 4Per your requestHi. Per your request, I've undone your self-requested block. Sorry for the delay; as I said in email, I hardly ever check that email account. If you ask for a block again, please remember that any administrator will undo it if you ask at your talk page. For that matter, I'd have seen it here, as I was keeping you on my watchlist just in case. :) I didn't block your access to your talk page. :) Unless something has triggered an autoblock, you should be good to go. Please just leave a note here if you encounter any issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC) WelcomeHope to see you back again. Good luck Ankit! -- Karthik Nadar 04:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC) WTFDid U see this? Jai (2012 film) --Meryam90 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC) BarnstarTo be honest, I realized how much I missed you in the gap, though I am, by no means, an SRK or Salman fan. :) Hope you forgot those people who tried screwing your work here and I wish we meet in other articles, hopefully in a much better situation. Thanks. X.One SOS 13:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:ChammakChalloCombined.jpg A tag has been placed on File:ChammakChalloCombined.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC) Hi!Hey dude, did u noticed me in Wikipedia Fundraising appeal? -- Karthik Nadar 13:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ankit, the gross for Don 2 is given as 205 crore, but the source clearly says it is just an expected figure. Please remove it or add a note saying "expected worldwide gross" in small font next to it. Thanks. X.One SOS 07:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of List of accolades received by Ra.One for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of accolades received by Ra.One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of accolades received by Ra.One until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC) Hi Ankit. The article is good, and has a good chance of becoming an FL with a bit more effort, but based on my deeper look, the sources given for the Apsara awards seem totally unreliable, especially that indiawest.com, which says in its TOU that "indiawest.com will use reasonable efforts to include up-to-date and accurate information in this Internet site, but makes no representations, warranties, or assurances as to the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information provided." I have come across a few sites, which were judged unreliable because of such a disclaimer. I managed to replace the pinkvilla source for Stardust awards, but the Apsara awards are not mentioned in any RS's I could find, like this, this and this. They only mention the music awards, and I'm afraid the reviewer will not pass the article if such sources exist. Please replace the sources if you feel the same, or you can ask at WP:RSN. Regards. X.One SOS 08:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Om Shanti Om awards sectionI have a serious problem with the awards section of Om Shanti Om because it only states the wins and not the nominations which is seriously wrong, even the tables in which those wins are stated piss me off...:/ I am gonna have to turn it into a simple list. --Meryam90 (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Becoming AdminHey, I was wondering how one becomes an admin. The Don 2 page is out of date. I told X.One to edit it but he didn't. The awards list it outdated and it has some factual errors. (Asher Madan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 15:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Sharukh KhanHi, Please have a look here and provide your comments. --HereToSaveWiki (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC) A very bad idea.I appreciate you may have been annoyed, but seriously, did you think this edit was a good idea? People usually come to AN/I to get admin assistance, not to draw admin attention to themselves. In short: *no-one* can be ordered by anyone to anywhere in Wikipedia, not even by arbitrators to an Arbcom case. Do NOT do it again. Manning (talk) 11:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Re: Did you see this?Duuuude, why are you shocked? Scieberking, X-One, Bollywood Dreamz...and the list goes on and on, they're full fledged SRK haters...did U check my page ya? This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meryam90#Stuff_I_like_here ?!! There is even MORE stuff on some talk pages! Don't be shocked again :D --Meryam90 (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I have not stated that you have a grudge against me. I know that there is no reason for that. Over-rule SM, with the unmatched support of Scieberking? You have got to be joking. And now he has found a new troll to mentor. Clarify as to exactly which "SRK fans" have targeted you or attacked you. If you are referring to Ashermadan, let me bring it to your attention that I have never supported his way of speaking, especially the "fanboy" and "go cry to your idol" sort of stuff; if you wish to believe that I do, then I am in no position to help. Your, pardon me, stupendously hilarious comments on the Talk:Shahrukh Khan page, however, beg to differ from your statement that you are not a hater. I have already made it known as to exactly which statement(s) of yours are pretty conflicting with your declaration (especially on the unforgivable George Bush issue). You may have been targeted by people like Ashermadan, but clearly you have failed to see the sort of attacking going on against some SRK-related editors, not the least of which include "paid editors", dramebaaz, etc. I could go on and on, but that's not the point. This matter about neutrality will never subside, especially if some agenda-based trolls are continuously encouraged to add trash into articles. I meant no personal insult or any such thing, but you have to understand the sort of tension-filled atmosphere in Bollywood-related articles. The last time I asked an editor to explain his double-standards, he coolly gave a lecture and ignored all sorts of rather obvious evidence of his non-neutrality. I hope you do not take to that path, and can satisfactorily assuage me of any doubts. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Integrated? Now that's what I called a bore. I do not wish to reveal further details, forgive me, for I love my secrecy. Some of the faculty are annoying but most of them are good. Whenever you say Kilpauk, you are bound to get people teasing you about the .... Adyar is well, better if not the best. X.One SOS 14:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Ankitbhatt, this round of accusations and personal attacks is now getting outright nasty. I don't feel like writing here, neither I'm here to explain anything. And I don't want to take it to the next level by reporting it to some noticeboard (that may lead to another "wiki-break" or, in any case, breed ill will). If we can't be friends, let's just not discuss each other and "live and let live". Thank you very much. Adios. Scieberking (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
If I remember correctly you ppl discuss US freely, (my page is proof of it). You can't complain if we do the same. Anyway, I've tried hard to even stay out of the SRK talk page dispute and some ppl couldn't get over themselves still. --Meryam90 (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Don 2its nice to see u agian anik.....i want to say u about the topic of Don 2..there is no update in the box office report..if u can update this thanks..(Cute754 (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)) Reference FormattingHey, I updated the Don 2 page after the crazy embargo but can you help me out with formatting the references? Like how to properly put them? Asher Madan 16:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Bodyguard Worldwide GrossScieberking is vandalizing the Bodyguard 2011 page. He is changing it to 253 crores when we still use BOI for HINDI ONLY films. Help me stop him. He has gone crazy with the mad-for-Salman disease. Asher Madan 00:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Multiple Incidents of VandalismI have warned him twice now and he still is not stopping. He has reverted edits twice. Once by some other person and once by me. I explained what you said to him but he is not stopping. Please advise. What should I do? Asher Madan 06:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Is there a restriction to use BOI only unless BOI does not provide the data? Asher Madan 06:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Ok, he is not stopping. Now even Kartik has joined in. What do we do? This is just ridiuclous. Asher Madan 07:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC) The link Sperking is using is old from CNN. A new CNN article from December 19 2011 said that Ra.One was at 240 and Bodyguard at 229. Can we use this information against these ridiculous actions? Asher Madan 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
I just read your comment in Kolkata. Yes we have to start working on West Bengal article, too. It would be great to have as many interested editors as possible. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
ReYou are the one jumping to conclusions, not me. X.One SOS 14:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Can you please ask for protection of the Don 2 pageCan we make it semi protected? Can you please do that? Ashermadan (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Box Office IndiaJust wondering... What is the status of the website Box Office India now? Is it considered as a reliable source? In the past, it was difficult to use, and was not sure what was its status. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC) On West BengalThanks for the work-list in the talk page. We need to go slow, but steady! First, we need to upgrade and update references. I have started doing that gradually. Please have a look at Economy of West Bengal, that article has been improved and increased in size, with updated references. Plan is to bring a summary from that article to the Economy section here within a few days. We can go similarly for other sections. I requested DanaBoomer for a few days leeway, as we are still busy saving Kolkata in FARC. We do not ned to go for an FARC of West Bengal right now if we can slowly yet steadily work on the article. The plan, as discussed above, would be to first update, upgrade, rectify references (if there is some glaring copyedit issue that comes to attention in the process, we can fix that too). After a stable and updated referencing, copyediting would be the issue, for which we will need the help of other editoes with nice English writing capacity. We shall request them later. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Ra.OneARG, U're about right however, I just can't let those kind of ppl barge in and act like they own it or something just because they happen to hate SRK! As for the admin, he's not part of the gang, he just happens to be an old editors of Indian related articles and guess they're kinda friends, he's a friend of mine as well...so he's cool! :D Plus, seriously, How the HELL are we gonna get Ra.One to FA if these is constant edit wars?!! I am worried :S--Meryam90 (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC) One QuestionH r u?? its zee..i have a question to ask...i have taken picture of salman khan at the set of Ek tha tiger during shooting in cuba....and of Katrina also..can i upload this photo and put it in the article of Ek tha tiger..Thanks Cute754 (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC) Talkback Message added 07:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. X.One SOS 07:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC) InfluencingDo you have an email id Ankit? X.One SOS 07:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Dhoom 2I will see what I can do. That was my first GA, and I hadn't done as much work on it as on the later ones. Much of that stuff was already there, and I just cleaned it up. You are of course free to modify it too, I don't own it. I will however try to address your points. BollyJeff || talk 17:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I don't agree with all of your changes.
I hope you see fit to correct some of this, but if not I will let it go. Thanks for the heads up on the problems. BollyJeff || talk 12:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
I fixed some of the mess in LRMB. You know, all of our GAs and FAs require periodic inspection and maintenance! BollyJeff || talk 16:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC) VFXWell RCE VFX updated their website and they have uploaded a gallery of before/after pictures of some shots from the film. I thought that maybe we can use one of them in the VFX section in Ra.One. what do you think? --Meryam90 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Join the Community!Hi Ankit, Do consider joining the WikiProject India Mailing List (https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en) which provides communication for the community. You may also like to add WP:INB to your watchlist. Be sure to update yourself at Geographical distribution of Indian Wikipedians. AshLin (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Canadian Motion Picture Park
A tag has been placed on Canadian Motion Picture Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC) DYK for Millennium Park Bus Depot
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 17:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Aaron • You Da One 13:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC) DYK nomiation of Vicky Donor
Requests/complaintsI think my deletion of the lines are quite justifiable and I assure you that there is no bad intention regarding this, but if you don't agree with me than there it is. RaOne-pageWhat I can assume is that you are sensible enough not to put every quote and series of operations printed/published in newspapers. It will simply not going to serve the purpose- no one is interested in line by line story, if they are than surely they need to refer more detailed versions-and it simply increasing the magnitude of the data only, nothing else. I agree that there might be issues you specified but I am reiterating that there is no such thing.Jpmeena (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC) ReplyMalaysia, South Korea (main), Taiwan (main), Morocco (:P), Germany (main)? X.One SOS 10:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
ReLOL believe it or not, I am not the most avid BW fan out there...I have a very very carefully selected list of films and actors I watch in BW :p and I have a private theater...so doesn't really matter if cinemas don't screen BW films here...I hardly go to cinemas anyway :P --Meryam90 (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 10:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Have started the Review Process. You can comment in Problem sections and if you do find any other issues please state them on Talk:Don 2 and not in GA Review ASHUIND 10:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4Hi. When you recently edited Chammak Challo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC) License tagging for File:SKYP.JPGThanks for uploading File:SKYP.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC) Re:Ra.OneIsn't a table needed for overseas reviews, just like the Indian ones? Uniformity gets disrupted, otherwise. X.One SOS 15:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
And before I forget, if images are from Bollywood Hungama, their source urls must be updated as they are likely to be dead. X.One SOS 16:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC) LOL... no bud I wasn't addressing you. I was just thanking Secret of success for his kind gesture. Anyways, how are things with you? The reason why I was MIA was due to my busy schedule and unfortunately this is going to continue for a while. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Is this really needed? User ratings need not necessarily be reliable. X.One SOS 11:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
And, don't you think Ra.One needs a "themes" section? Or have they been mixed with the other sections? X.One SOS 13:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Never mind, the article does not fail GA because of that. Its the age of machines, where all man needs to do is put up a simple effort in making it and then he lazes around and becomes fat. Ah, why don't people appreciate and implement hard work these days? I have formatted around 100 references in each of ZNMD and Dabangg before GA. That doesn't matter now. X.One SOS 15:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Could you look into the budget concern I raised for Ra.One? X.One SOS 08:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. X.One SOS 10:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for your message. I have to sign off now & go to work. If he does it again (delete without verification) you can report him for vandalism to WP:AIV - there an administrator will check the edits & make a decision about blocking, etc. Hope this is of some help. Regards. Denisarona (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC) (P.S. he should have been warned about the previous edits - admins really want to see 4 warnings for persistant vandalism). Denisarona (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
London IshqAnkit, this is to inform you that once a poster is released for the film, the first look should be deleted. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 11:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC) ArchivingSorry, its just that four one-liners with a bold signature look a bit odd. I just removed all the customization of my signature. Secret of success (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Do you think this was really needed? Khan lost weight, fine. But he could not eat or drink? Secret of success (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockstar (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC) WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 ContestHello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it. As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012. If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so. You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way. ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators) Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Ra.OneAnkit, for one thing, I'm glad you are sincere enough in actually pointing out flaws. Some wouldn't really bother to do it, and leave it all to those who oppose its FA or its PR. Second, I removed the rating of LA times, because the review does not have it. Metacritic's observations sound like their own works, nothing more. Why is Gulf news in "India"? It is published from Dubai, right, and that is certainly out of India. Gulf News also follows the same story. I removed it. Secret of success (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Well, then I'll be clear. The photo is small, the other photo was also made small for uniformity. If this is removed, then the other photo can be brought back to normal size, and it will be fine. Secret of success (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I know that. I even undid an edit by an user who moved the page. Just that I was lazy to type the whole thing. Oh, and my hols have begun too, spanning over a period of 3 months!!!! Feeling jealous? :P Feel like having all the time in the world in my hands. :-) Secret of success (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ankit, as agreed on Secret of success' talk page and on the article talk page, I fail to see the Ra.One gross removed from Infobox. I am sorry to say that I believed you will keep up your words. For now I've added the Bodyguard's gross back and will keep adding it since the consensus was to remove the figure in all the three articles and not just one. Hope you understand. --HereToSaveWiki (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Secret of success (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 19Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC) A cheeseburger for you!
Tag and Assess 2012Hi Ankit, Thanks a lot for being part of Tag & Assess 2012. Please mark importance on the subprojects as well(ex. Talk:Nagore Durgha - tn importance is missing). Ssriram mt (talk) 22:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Untitled Tom Cruise Project
Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 16:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Secret of success (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Chak De India...I hear from Meryam90 that you are a genius. :-) I'm trying to round up people to push Chak De India to FAC. I pushed it to GA in 2009 -- it needed some amount of clean up which a few of us have done but we need a lot more. See my talk page for the discussion. Cheers -Classicfilms (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Again You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. 2012 BRICS summittheres a discussion on the language addition on the talk page.Lihaas (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
BRICS LogoI have replied to your request at the lab. NikNaks talk - gallery 10:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Ra.OneHey Ankit, I remember once we had reached a consensus for italicizing only the newspapers like Hindustan Times, The Times of India, and not websites like Sify and CNN-IBN. So why they are italicized now? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 4Hi. When you recently edited 2012 BRICS summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharamshala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Highest-grossing Bollywood filmsYes, I know all about the troubles. The problem with this particular list is that without at least one reference, "creative extension" looks like "original research". If you could at least add a line or two about how the list was developed it would help. Same goes for the 'throughout history' list. I thought there actually was a page like this at BOI, but I have trouble finding anything there. One more thing, I was surprised not to find Krrish on this list, as some sources say it was a record breaker. Do you know anything about that? BollyJeff || talk 13:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
And another confusing thing; BOI ranks them in different order on different lists. If you rank them as on the list, and then put the net, some will appear to be out of order. On this list they are not ranked by gross or net, but by distributor share. Arghhhh! I was trying to fix Bollywood films of 2006, but the order will change depending on which figure is used. Right now there are some pretty random number in there. BollyJeff || talk ThanksThanks for the barnstar! I appreciate. TalkbackMessage added 15:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Redtigerxyz Talk 15:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Ra.One Ghanta and Kela AwardsSince when have we started adding some random awards shows for negative awards in a page for a film? What the heck are the ghanta and kela awards? what you're doing will not make this article into a featured article at all. Ashermadan (talk) 06:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the barnstar :)Glad you found the tool useful :) YuviPanda (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC) Tag and Assess 2012Hi, with contributors like you, Tag and Assess 2012 has reached mid stage. To speed up the activities, certain special awards have been announced. User:Yuvipanda has created an excellent tool to help editors who are assessing manually. The tool is under Beta release and I request you to please install, use it and give him feedback. Please see the details in https://docs.google.com/document/d/176bySLlr-fRcMYw-h4k-btL5x08qegY7Ipj2DQLHdQE/edit?pli=1. Thanks again for your contribution and wish you continued support to take the drive to completion. Ssriram mt (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Talkback Message added 21:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Ra.One reference style issuesIndia Today ( a magazine) should be in italics (in |work parameter in case "cite web" is used).--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Answers to your questions
Disambiguation link notification for April 16Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Blogger's reply on Image usageHey. Have you ever got any reply from any of the bloggers giving permission to use the images from the blog? I got one recently but then I do not know what to do next? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 18:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Re NFAThese two films have been awarded with Best film on Social issues in non-feature film category. Most of the sources are referring them the way you stated, which is incorrect. Official release from PIB is referred while expanding the article. Rather when I created the article, it was stated wrong as Best Film on National Integration, which I later on updated per official source. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Invitation
MessageDeliveryBot (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of IPL at 19:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC). CCI didn't copy everything tho, but yeah, It did sound off to me to paste the whole thing, but I can't do any large edits/copy editing right now considering the conditions I am in. I mostly edit these days for the sake of few sentences at a time and mostly because I am bored where I happen to be. (Kinda of a very long story I'd rather not speak of here on such a public platform). --Meryam90 (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 23Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC) References cont164.Nahta, Komal (October 26, 2011). "Ra.One Movie Review". Koimoi. Archived from the original on April 17, 2012. Retrieved October 26, 2011 Movie-->movie. Same for Ref 163. 155. "Ra.One mixed verdict: Are the audiences divided?". CNN-IBN. October 27, 2011. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012. Retrieved October 27, 2011. Are-->are 152. "Shahrukh to pay 1 crore to lift a ban: Writer who sued Ra.One". e-News Gulf. October 22, 2011. Retrieved October 23, 2011. The title in the source does not include "writer who sued...". 133. Pahwa, Nikhil (October 7, 2011). "Shahrukh Khan: Could never release Ra.One in 3,500 prints if not for digital; 50–60% digital prints". MediaNama. Retrieved October 17, 2011. Could -->could 129. "Top worldwide openings (All Time): Ra.One and Don 2 lead". Box Office India. January 25, 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2012. "all time" 121. Ra.One: Exclusive and authentic movie merchandise". Seventymm. Retrieved October 20, 2011. "exclusive". 98.S, Anusha (September 27, 2011). "SRK's superhero power: Turning Ra.One to marketing gold". Business Today. Retrieved October 3, 2011. "turning" 66. Dasgupta, Sagorika (November 12, 2011). "The Ra.One Effect". BoxOfficeIndia.co.in. Retrieved April 14, 2012. "effect" 24. Dasgupta, Sagorika; Shah, Jigah (September 25, 2011). "Ra.One: Decoded". BoxOfficeIndia.co.in. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2011. "decoded". Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 30Hi. When you recently edited Ra.One, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI and Reflection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Ra.One referencing continued
Is "Mumbai Boss" the publisher of The First Post. Looking at the website, it seems Mumbai Boss itself is a sort of magazine (I am not sure, you should verify). At the end of the interview, there is a line "This story by Rubina A Khan was originally published on Firstpost.com.". So, best would be to cite the original interview in First post, with the actual name of the author.
Why both Mid_day and In.com again?
Why The Express Tribune within brackets, and not italicized? It is a newspaper.
Incomplete wikilink and italicization of newspaper.
The newspaper is within brackets!!
Again in brackets.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Why caps in All Time?
Caps again.
R.one --> Ra.One; Newspaper in brackets.
Movie should be movie.
Quite -->quite
Wrong title.
Does not mention source (newspaper, website etc)
Spelling
Does not mention author.
Probably needs an ndash. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC) More on refernces117. S, Anish K (October 14, 2011). "Ra.One game no.1 on iPhone appstore". Technics Today. Retrieved October 14, 2011. This is a blog, and may not be considered as a reliable source for the information it supports.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 262. Khan, Shahrukh; Jackman, Hugh. Hugh Jackman likes SRK's Ra.One. Mid-Day. Does not mention retrieval date. And Lehren seems to be the actual publisher.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 242.Nahta,Komal (September 19, 2011). "How Shahrukh Khan's Ra.One Will Recover 150 Crore". Koimoi. Retrieved September 23, 2011. Is koimoi.com considered a reliable source? I am not sure. If you retain this, there should be a space between Nahta and Komal.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 238.^ "Top openings overseas (All time updated) 21/02/12". Box Office India. February 21, 2012. Retrieved April 07, 2012. "All time" should be "all time". Same for reference number 236, 229, 227, 222, 215. 230. ^ "Family powers Ra.One on Day I". The Telegraph. October 27, 2011. Retrieved October 27, 2011. Day one should be day one. 225. Ra.One (Hindi) has good extended first week". November 4, 2011. Box Office India. Retrieved November 4, 2011. The publication date following the title is in italics. Should be non-italics. 211.Ra.One advance: Excellent". Box Office India. October 25, 2011. Archived from the original on April 11, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2012. "Excellent" -->"excellent". 204. Roy, Priyanka (October 26, 2011). "Ra.One raises price bar at plexes; Fans sing rah-rah Ra.One - City shows willingness to pay more for SRK’s big Diwali release today". The Telegraph. Retrieved April 10, 2012. Fans-->fans; City-->city. 185. Sen, Raja (October 26, 2011). "Raja Sen: Ra.One: What a letdown!". Rediff. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2011 "What"-->"what" Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Post-productionAnkit, I read the post-production part. Nicely written. The process, and multiple delays causing anxiety is almost tangible! great work. Only thing that I would mention I had some difficulty in a few technical or technique-oriented terms. For example, ...making use of a global digital pipeline. What is a global digital pipeline? Any wikilinks available for this? Also, Filmmaker Vikram Bhatt later criticized films which featured converted 3D as opposed to filmed 3D (including Ra.One), saying that conversion was a "great disservice"... I think mention "including Ra.One after "converted 3D" rather than after "filmed 3D". Also, The process of inter-mediation (DI) of the film was completed in Prime Focus' mainframe facility... You are using the abbreviation DI for the mentioned term "intermediation", which really do not tally. Use the full term Digital intermediation once, then give DI, then you can use only DI subsequently. Other than these minor ones, this section is a very nice and entertaining read. Well done!--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC) HighBeam It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Ocaasi t | c 11:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC) The Week source for Ra.OneHere is a copy of the article that I skimmed off a Google cache:
I've collapsed it in a convenient table to save you some space on the talkpage. Hope this helps. -Thibbs (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Re: Ra.OneI may review your article (so far, I'd only suggest more "the film", "it", "the production" to reduce the repetition of Ra.One, as you shortened an issue I had noticed before, high number of fair use pics) and even try to do something to Tron (though it'll hardly get to GA level by tomorrow or Monday). igordebraga ≠ 17:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 12:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC) I could not verify that the author releases it as PD. Can you please show where in the link is this info given? --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChammakSample.ogg Thanks for uploading File:ChammakSample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kareena Costume CC.jpgThanks for uploading File:Kareena Costume CC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Economics of Ra.OneHi Ankitbhatt! I just saw the new page you created, Economics of Ra.One. It looks like you split it from Ra.One, but you didn't say where it came from in your edit summary. This is actually a violation of Wikipedia's content licence, as the text you copied needs to be attributed to its authors. Have a look at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for the details. Thanks! — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 15:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Thank youThanks a lot for the barnstar. And great job on Ra.One, wish you all the best. :-) Smarojit (talk) 04:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:SRK as G.One.jpgThanks for uploading File:SRK as G.One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Making of Ra.One poster.jpgThanks for uploading File:Making of Ra.One poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Ra.OneHi Ankit. Ra.One is at a very high level, not at FA level currently, stability being a major issue. I suggest after the reconstruction is complete, get it peer reviewed and then you come back to FAC. I know you have worked hard and improved the article immensely and come a far way since your Afro-Asian Games days. Let me know if you need constructive criticism after the reconstruction. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
[See main] doesn't work. Wikipedia:SUMMARYSTYLE#References--Redtigerxyz Talk 10:11, 12 May 2012 (UTC) See Talk:Ra.One#Post-production_summary_comments. Please do not strike reviewers' comments. It becomes difficult to check if issue is addressed. Write "Done" instead. --Redtigerxyz Talk 11:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC) Ra.OneIf you intend to keep working on Ra.One, I will gladly continue my prose review on the article's talk page. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Re: topicYea, that's certainly a feasible topic, although I'm a bit surprised at the number of sub-articles. Are you sure none of them can be merged back into the main one? Books are incredibly easy to do. Check out this book. You just have to list all of the articles. As far as I know, this would be the first topic for a singular movie, fwiw. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SRK as G.One.jpgThanks for uploading File:SRK as G.One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC) Krrish reviewI made the initial change requests and have been waiting for more comments, however I may have limited access to WP this weekend, so no rush. Cheers, BollyJeff | talk 20:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC) Hello. A discussion about a controversial piece of material with regard to WP:BLP is taking place here. Please spare a few moments to comment. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC) List of World Heritage Sites in IndiaSorry that I didn't get to this earlier; I just plain forgot about the message on my talk page. My apologies. As for the list, I think it's in reasonable shape, although I see a few things that FLC reviewers may take issue with. If I was to offer recommendations, I'd say to limit photos to one per site – there's a lot of ugly whitespace in the entries without multiple photos now – and consider asking for a copy-edit for the descriptions, which look a bit long at first glance. Also, make sure the descriptions in the tentative list are cited, and that all tables have the necessary accessibility updates for things like row and column scopes. The lead could probably be added to a bit as well. Despite these issues, I think FL status is doable. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 20:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 20:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Ra.One :)You and Ra.One are inseparable and I can probably guess that you are also a huge SRK fan. Came across this and found it funny. Thought of sharing it with you. No offense intended!!
Re Shahrukh Khan filmographyIt is extremely bad form to move an article to another title immediately after an RM decision, especially without consulting the admin who made the close decision. Had you wanted the title you suggested, you should have participated in the RM. However, the title you suggested would probably not comply with WP:Title's consistency criteria since almost all other filmographies are named [subject filmography]]. I have move protected the article for 60 days.--Mike Cline (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Kahaani nominated for GAHi Ankit, I've finally nominated Kahaani for GA after months of expansion. Will you be interested in reviewing the article and help it to reach the desired status? I've asked SOS too for the same. Thanks in advance --Msrag (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC) You are needed.......over here. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Centenary_year. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC) KrrishAre you still reviewing Krrish? BollyJeff | talk 11:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Not sure if you have applied for this or not but in a recent article on a 2004 independent Filipino movie I found this to be an incredible resource and found lots of Filipino newspaper articles not picked up by google. I strongly recommend this for anyone who edits articles on films and cinema personalities to get this asap as it wil be an invaluable research tool and will often turn up detailed articles which will not appear in google. You can gain access to the full articles by applying for it at Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications. For sure it'll have tons on Indian actors and films which so far you've been unable to access on google. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Mughal-e-AzamSir, I really appreciate ur work with Mughal-e-Azam article. But have you noticed that the article shows too much bias about the film's budget and classiness, also there are only 14 references in the whole article? So pls improve it, and all the best. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I was interested in it, but was finding it hard to get solid sources, as you may have seen by now. I don't know what the requirements are for comprehensiveness to reach FA, but it would certainly be unfair if only new movies (and other subjects) could reach GA/FA, just because there are more sources, when there exist other, much more significant movies (and other subjects), that have less sources available because they are old. Certainly there must be a way around this. We should look around for "short" articles with GA/FA status. BollyJeff | talk 18:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi :) . Thanks for taking the time to extend the greeting and glance at the article. I have moved it to mainspace. Would be listening in for any suggestions you and others may have later. AnshumanF (talk) 22:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Re:CongratulationsHey Ankit !! Thank you so much for the that. Phew.. So finally after 3 months, Kahaani is a GA now. Co-incidentally I started editing on the article on 11-March-2012 and today on 11-June-2012, it passed. And yea I am looking forward to make it a FA, but will be taking a short break from the article (not WP) since I even started dreaming about it in my sleep. :P I got a whole load of stuffs which I actually wanted to add it for GA but couldn't do so because of time constraints and meanwhile, I'll start looking into other articles. And yea I shouldn't delay in acknowledging that the review was indeed quite comprehensive pointing out so many minute details which will be really helpful for my next GA. Thanks for your patience for pointing out all that stuffs. Reg review of another article, I guess I'll be only able to take it up from next week as I am held up finishing my work related tasks this week. If any article is still listed by then, I'll start or else its fine. Thanks once again dude. --Msrag (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
section splitI'd like u to take part in this discussion: Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#section split. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC) imageI just wanted to let u know that Bollywood Hungama still has some images of the premiere of Ra.One in London and toronto.--Meryam90 (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia Help SurveyHi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way. Thank you for your time, 59th NFAHey..With the official catalogue released last week, I finished the article editing with the help of Animesh. Can you quickly check and let me know if you find something before we push it for PR? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Talk backMessage added 00:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. OpinionWould you mind weighing in your opinion here. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Signpost and the Indian Cinema Task ForceSounds like there are some exciting things going on at the Indian Cinema Task Force. I can definitely get the project an entry in next week's news sidebar and throughout July if you'd like. We're currently working on a special series of interviews with sports projects which will take up all of July and most of August, so the earliest I can get the Indian Cinema Task Force scheduled for a full-blown interview will be late August to early September. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC) X-Men: First ClassHi, Ankitbhatt. Absolutely. We're getting to each point, and will keep you apprised when done. And I just want to say that I and I 'm sure our compatriot editors appreciate very much your taking the time and making such a thorough effort! With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Re: jstorMy access is through my university. I am not sure if individuals as such can access it.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Re
mughal-e-azameveryone is impressed with your work on the article Mughal-e-Azam, congrats. but it appears to have been assessed as "C" or "stub" class in the talk page. can u pls get that corrected? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC) GANEven though I'm not in a hurry (specially as I could use the 60 points in July), still waiting for more comments in Talk:X-Men: First Class/GA1. igordebraga ≠ 04:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Worked some more and did what you requested, can you go further on the review? (maybe we could get it done by Thursday!) igordebraga ≠ 19:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC) You said it was on your watchlist, yet I reply "done" and you don't continue. Oh, well. igordebraga ≠ 03:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC) I know you have some reviews. But I'll just be patient and wait for when the review can go further. Sorry about bothering you. igordebraga ≠ 12:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Final Destination 2You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Re
Orphaned non-free media (File:Dhoom 3 logo.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!Pls share ur thoughts here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#GA_nomination ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC) My apologiesBut I won't be able to finish the review of your article. Don't be discouraged, it's not uncommon for articles to go a couple weeks without comments and eventually be promoted. Good luck, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 28Hi. When you recently edited Mughal-e-Azam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI and Docket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Indian film songs articlesIf you get a chance, please express your opinion here. - VivvtTalk 17:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Awards sourcesAfter my comment here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Bollywood_Awards, four other editors agreed that first party sources are okay for simple awards listing. No other editors were opposed. As one of them mentioned, the official Academy Awards site is used everywhere for Hollywood films. If other reliable sources can be found, they maybe should be added, but first party is okay if not. BollyJeff | talk 18:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC) FA Expansion of KahaaniHi Ankit, can you please have a look here and voice your opinions about the same. ...Msrag talk2me 12:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC) A cup of coffee for you!
Orphaned non-free media (File:Mughal e Azam movie Color BW comparison.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Mughal-e-Azam Pyar Kiya Toh Darna Kya.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Red Chillies VFX Ra.One Award.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Red Chillies VFX Ra.One Award.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC) FAC nominationI tend to make comments on FA or FL candidates spontaneously; I'll certainly have a look at the article sometime in the next few days and get back to you -- I am currently preoccupied with work and am focusing on getting the GA nominations down. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Gangs of WasseypurThought you'd like to know that I have listed Gangs of Wasseypur to be moved to Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1.Ayanosh (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Cast of Ra.OneJust Added talk page on Your daughter article ThanksThanks for your help. Andreas has been harrassing me and threatening edit-wars, and making multiple personal attacks. I feel they are trying to tarnish my image at wikipedia. So thanks. I am so sick of getting bullied around by him, and it was nice to have someone stand-up for those being abused (me). You rock! ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC) PostersPlease make sure that posters do not exceed a resolution of 500*500 before you upload them. As per WP:NFCC, "Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used" for non-free media. I have uploaded a new version of a file you recently uploaded, and changed the fair-use template to Non-free use rationale poster, which explains the rationale in greater detail. Secret of success (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC) ClarificationIf I may clarify my point, there is nothing wrong with asking MRG for advice. As is evident, she gives great advice. However, a call for admins to take some action should not be on her site. I was reacting to that request.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Anarkali as Madhubala.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Your behaviour Andreasegde/GabeMcI have observed your response to the request from User:GabeMc regarding User:Andreasegde and I think your response was quite inequitable or lopsided. You used scolding and belittling tone to Andreasegde here and praising and forgiving tone with GabeMc here for the same type of misbehaviour, arguments, and insults flung back and forth. Both editors have been involved in this mud slinging down a long and winding road. It would appear you have taken the side of the whiney one, that approached you first, without sufficient research into both sides. GabeMc is good at image politics and thus I have reported his behaviour at [WP:ANI] for others to have a look at. This behaviour pattern has ben disruptive for too long as he attempts to push the same issue for years. 99.251.125.65 (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC) HiI mentioned your name in a comment I left at ANI. It's no big deal, certainly nothing bad, but I think I'm supposed to notify you. This is what I get for being foolish enough to throw my hat into that drama-fest. Regards. Joefromrandb (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Final Destination 2Article revised and updated. Tuned in for your next reviews. --FDJoshua22 (talk) 08:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC) Are you coming back to this anytime soon? Is there something else that I should work on here? I feel that it could almost go to GA review now. BollyJeff | talk 01:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Uttar PradeshHi, I've listed this article for peer review.Please give your important suggestions.Thank You -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 06:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Nomination of Hai Ye Maya for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hai Ye Maya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hai Ye Maya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mughal-e-Azam BW Colour comparison.jpgThank you for uploading File:Mughal-e-Azam BW Colour comparison.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Oblivion Promo.jpgThank you for uploading File:Oblivion Promo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Phijigee Mani poster.jpgThank you for uploading File:Phijigee Mani poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ra.One Cubical Formations.jpgThank you for uploading File:Ra.One Cubical Formations.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shanghai Poster.jpgThank you for uploading File:Shanghai Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Boseritwik (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Arjun Rampal Ra.One.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC) Could you continue / complete your review here? It's been three weeks since it was last edited. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:20, 4 August 2012 (UTC) Indian Cinema Task Force in the SignpostThe WikiProject Report would like to focus on the Indian Cinema Task Force for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC) revewingHi Ankitbhatt. Did you run the usual checks for possible copyvios and close paraphrasing when you reviewed this article?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC) LOHGBF listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LOHGBF. Since you had some involvement with the LOHGBF redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ironholds (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 16:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mabeenot (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum. Since you had some involvement with the Ye Kahan Aa Gaye Hum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BollyJeff | talk 19:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC) Beatles RfCHello Ankitbhatt; this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 22:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:SKYP.JPGThanks for uploading File:SKYP.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 17:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC) what is this of youdid u know? in Ra.One (a good article), a lot of content has been deleted by IP users and you never took notice of it? pls go through the article, and also check revision histories to help restore deleted content. the article should have a permanent protection from IP users bcoz they can remove anything without telling and its difficult to be notified of their misdeeds. I say this to User:Bollyjeff also. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC) JSTORHi there. Good news: you're up next for a free JSTOR account, since you signed up Wikipedia:Requests for JSTOR access. JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling
The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so ASAP or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. We're waiting to deliver access to everyone until we have the 100 recipients collected, so the sooner you reply the quicker everyone can start using JSTOR. Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
ReviewerI have requested for reviewer rights but I don't know how to review an article. Can you please help me?----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 10:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
