User talk:Amitabho

Welcome!

Hello, Amitabho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kendrick7^talk 05:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please don't taunt the mentally ill users, even if they do post idiocy on the feedback pages. Thanks. DS (talk) 23:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Mahasweta Devi, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The image added by you is not in the public domain, as has been claimed by you. Please do not add such images again to articles. Shovon (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Abanindranath Tagore; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The image added by you is tagged as "For personal non-commercial use only", where as you have claimed that to be in the public domain. Please stop such false claims. Shovon (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk 17:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali people

Are you aware of the issues that have been raised about your introduction of an image file which appears to be a copyright violation? Copyrighted material may only be used in certain situations. Please ask for help before attempting to add it again. JodyB _talk 23:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite aware of the copyright issues and have taken a great deal of effort in correcting them. There should be no remaining infringement cases. Amitabho Chattopadhyay (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! JodyB _talk 11:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Amitabho reported by User:Kmzayeem (Result: ). Thank you. Zayeem ^(talk) 16:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Marxism

I will be very simple. Two neutral editors have closed the discussion as no consensus. You, as an involved party that has already opined in the discussion, do not get to say "I don't like it" and overturn the closure unilaterally and just redirect the article. The proper process, if you are so inclined, is to dispute the close on the talk page. If you continue to try to redirect/merge the article without proper consensus, I will block you for disruption. —Dark 04:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I remember this. It's funny how I was right in the end. — অমিত talk 20:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bengali people#List of people in the collage

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bengali people#List of people in the collage. Thanks. ~ nafSadh did say 15:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soumitra Chatterjee young.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soumitra Chatterjee young.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amitabho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amitabho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, will do. — Amitabho Chattopadhyay talk 14:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talent Agencies Act (California), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Industrial Relations. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Writ of mandate (California) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of California state constitutional offices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assessor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Special motion to strike

Hello! Your submission of Special motion to strike at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MartinPoulter (talk) 14:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've made some further edits since my review. Are you able soon to make the minor changes that will allow me to complete the review? MartinPoulter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Writ of mandate (California)

On 8 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Writ of mandate (California), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the only way for litigants in California to appeal most pre-trial rulings before a final judgment – and the only way to appeal some rulings at all – is by suing the court that issued the order for a writ of mandate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Writ of mandate (California). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Writ of mandate (California)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lawrence Striley

The article Lawrence Striley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^TT me 14:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

California Department of Tax and Fee Administration moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 16:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

California Department of Tax and Fee Administration moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:California Department of Tax and Fee Administration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amitabho! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Special motion to strike

On 15 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Special motion to strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that government-funded non-profits are not subject to a special motion to strike, and so are exempt from California's anti-SLAPP law? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Special motion to strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Special motion to strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ivermectin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The talk page consensus is very clear on this topic. The Am J Ther paper is not a reliable source. And your alteration of "misinformation" to "controversy" is not NPOV. We have a consensus on this. Search the talk page archives for the numerous numerous times it has been brought up and shot down. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 19:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See (from the talk page): [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]. This has been argued to death, brought back, killed again, and resurrected so many times that it is becoming absurd. We have a clear and present consensus against the inclusion of this material. Please do not re-add it.— Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 19:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Striley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lawrence Striley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 19:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Do not vandalize 1998 Sokcho submarine incident again. Mztourist (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lawrence Striley

Hello, Amitabho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawrence Striley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Marjorie Taylor Greene

Your recent editing history at Marjorie Taylor Greene shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly..

You seem to be clueless about how to interpret NPOV. It does not mean neutral sources or neutral content. It means we edit neutrally, IOW we faithfully document, without neutering, what RS say, which means that the result will often not be some "neutral", No Point Of View, statements. -- Valjean (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Marjorie Taylor Greene has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. " Go ahead, revert me three times in a row." is obviously a misuse of an edit summary. Doug Weller talk 13:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lawrence Striley

Hello, Amitabho. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lawrence Striley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Amitabho! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]