User talk:AmazingJusAwesomemeeos, you are invited to the Teahouse!
July 2016Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Magic cube. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Awesomemeeos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Fair Use in Australia discussionAs an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC) This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery Nomination of Åsa Apelkvist for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Åsa Apelkvist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Åsa Apelkvist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Re:Tagalog DiacriticsWe don't really use the diacritics in normal use that's why I don't fully know how it works. Tagalog diacritics in the past are heavily based on the Spanish system. So far, I only understand the acute accent (as in á) and the circumflex (as in â).
There's actually a website on this: Here Raku Hachijo (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Message delivery...is User:MediaWiki message delivery, the automatic spam stuff about boring ArbCom elections. It doesn't mean personal messages. Although frankly I dislike those too. Equinox ◑ 00:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC) Pashto
Re:Tagalog troubleSorry for the late reply. Both the [ and [ (sometimes also the [) are used to pronounce the Tagalog <a>. However, [ɐ] is almost exclusively used for fast, casual speech and when the <a> is unstressed. There are just some speakers that pronounce the letter A as an [ɐ] anywhere. Raku Hachijo (talk) 14:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Re: "are you a Brit?"(from Talk:God Save the Queen) Yeah, I live in the south-east. Haha, I'm pretty much a republican though, so don't get the wrong idea from me editing at GSTQ. I edit every damn thing I can get my sticky fingers on. Equinox ◑ 23:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC) Hello, AmazingJus. You have new messages at wikt:User talk:Nibiko#Romaji + another question.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Interwiki talkback}} or {{Itb}} template. Suzukaze-c (talk) 08:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wiradjuri language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Possum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Gunai languange and lingusticsHello mate, Are you an expert-level linguist? I might need some help on the phonological inventory for the Gunai-Kurnai language of Victoria, Australia. I have a source on the pronunciation of the language, but I am not sure if it is fully accurate, or if my interpretation is incorrect. Which languages are you specialized in? Are you specialized in Australian Aboriginal linguistics? I'm an American by the way. If you can help me or offer me information, I would be grateful. Thanks! Fdomanico51997 (talk) 01:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Re: Straya IPAI'll help you with that, but could you vote on Help_talk:IPA/English#RfC:_Proposed_deprecation_of_.2F.C9.94.C9.99r.2F? Mr KEBAB (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Mr KEBAB (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC) Your messageYou can reinstate your message on my talk page. I probably know what you mean and might have something. Mr KEBAB (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Re:有關宗教的問題貴安,非常高興能認識閣下!即使極左翼時常與無神論相關,但我其實是有宗教信仰的極左翼人士。我覺得擁有宗教信仰能審度自己的行為,並且更能對大自然表示崇敬,和其他極左翼人士不太一樣。嚴格而言,我是臺灣民間信仰的信仰者,同時還信奉圓神教。當然,我更加信奉一切的科學,所以個人非常欣賞墨子,而他也有宗教信仰。 Hello, Nice to meet you! Even though the far-left politics are often related with atheism, I am a far-leftist person with religious beliefs actually. I think that having religious beliefs can reflect on my own behaviour, and I am more respectful of nature, it's not completely same as other far-leftists. Strictly speaking, I am a believer in Taiwanese folk religion (Jade Emperor, Xuanwu, Nezha, Guanyin, Baosheng Emperor, Mazu, Tudigong, Wenchang Wang, Guan Yu, etc.) and Madokami. Compared to this, I believe in science more, so I admire Micius very much, and he also has religious beliefs. -- TembinP Iūstitia*Spēs~☆ 12:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
GreetingsHello Mr. Meeos! I am from wiktionary and i feel ur writing and editing style is really cool XD A pity that you're blocked for a year . Only a few months of that block are left. Please come back after the block is over.
Martin GarrixGarrix is pronounced [ˈɡɛɹɪks], not [ˈɣɑrɪks] - see [1]. Because of that, we don't need it as it's just a dutchified version of the English name.
Haha, a few seconds later he does say [ˈɣɑrɪks], noting that it's the Belgian pronunciation. My bad, because I turned it off as soon as he pronounced it the first time (my Dutch is too bad to understand the interview). But [ˈɣɑrɪks] is still regular, since loanwords with /ɡ/ are pronounced with [ɡ ~ k ~ χ] in the Netherlands and [ɣ] in Belgium. English /æ/ is [ɛ] in the Netherlands and [ɑ] in Belgium. Mr KEBAB (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Theology of Pope FrancisHi, You recently added a POV template to the article Theology of Pope Francis without an explanation on the talk page. The Template's instructions state, "Please also explain on the article's talk page why you are adding this tag, identifying specific issues that are actionable within Wikipedia's content policies." Would you please let us know what issues concern you so we can try to make appropriate changes. Lacking such guidance, we cannot address your concerns and the template may be removed. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 02:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port Talbot English, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Why go to editors' talks, not articles'?Just curious, why do you post questions on specific editors' talks as opposed to on the talk page of the article about the topic? I know Wikipedia doesn't necessarily discourage going directly to editors' talk pages to ask questions, but especially when you don't know if the editor is going to be able to give you the answer right away, it creates an awkward situation where the editor may feel pressured to give you an answer. I think it's almost always better to ask the question on the talk of the relevant article and ping editors there than to go directly to their talks. That would also help other editors and readers who have the same question or are able to give you the answer. Not that I'm judging you, but that's my two cents. Nardog (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
NoticeOfo and Mobike employ people to put their bikes on street in a massive way to compete for market shares in China. Those bikes on the picture are not near sidewalks, they block the whole sidewalk. People are encouraged to take buses instead of driving. "Avoid taking buses" is not good English. Ofo's nickname is not just from people who don't use Ofo often. Please stop distorting the original meaning and edit war. 螺钉 (talk) 13:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The CURE vowelThanks for the correction. Could you check the corresponding table on New Zealand English phonology? Mr KEBAB (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
ScouseDo not put pressure on me as you did on User talk:Mr KEBAB/Scouse and Scouse. That behavior was unacceptable. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 21:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
PronunciationThe introduction of iQOS (pronounced, EYE-kose[50])… Can you fix the pronunciation in my draft? QuackGuru (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi I'm an ADHD specialist and interested in a lot of areas, but these articles are in need of attention because of linguistics. Would you mind commenting on either RfCs as we seem to be interested in a lot of similar areas? Thanks so much E.3 (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Italy#Template:WikiProject Italy. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageIPA / IPAcHi Jus, I've seen some edits like [2] and [3] and I remembered a conversation we had on my talk page a few months ago, and I was wondering if you think those edits are ok. It seems to be the opposite of what you advised, and also it looks to me like the new version actually contains less information than the old version, which I have much preferred since you showed it to me. Dr. Vogel (talk) 20:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add File:Bandag logo.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bandag logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add If you're so inclinedI wonder if you'd be interested in cleaning up Category:Pages with English IPA. Nardog (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |