User talk:Alternativity

Archived Discussions and Checklists

Old Wikithanks, DYKs, and Events

Barnstar

The Philippine Barnstar
Alternativity, I award you this Philippine Barnstar for your contributions on Filipino culture. --Lenticel (talk) 05:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine-mythology barnstar protection amulet

Philippine Barnstar amulet The Philippine Barnstar Protection Amulet
For your contributions in creating, expanding, and rewriting various Philippine-mythology articles especially those that were requested by WikiProject Philippines. Thank you and please keep up the good work! -- Dragonbite 20:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiyanak

Updated DYK query On 18 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tiyanak, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

we did it thanks!--Lenticel (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHoOOOOhooooo! :-D hehe. What do we do to let others know it? :-DAlternativity 09:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Already posted it to the WP:PINOY page--Lenticel (talk) 10:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibirthday thanks

Thanks! :) Actually, I'm just taking grad studies in U.P. I teach at the other place across the street (but not right now, going back after I finish my thesis). :D Shrumster 07:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 5 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siniloan River , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 19:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

congrats--Lenticel (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 29 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tigmamanukan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats for the DYKd Tigmamanukan. BritandBeyonce (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone! The truth is, having the Tigmamanukan article DYKed is a very pleasant surprise, and warms my heart more than all my other DYKs put together. Somehow that article is very close to my heart. Alternativity (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gliricidia sepium

Updated DYK query On 2 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gliricidia sepium, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kaleidoscope Pattern Barnstar

Kaleidoscope Pattern Commemorative Barnstar
Alternativity, I award you this Kaleidoscope Pattern commemorating the passing of Francis Magalona. It is given in recognition of your tireless efforts to improve the Francis Magalona article, and protect it from vandalism, honoring the memory of "the man from Manila" who believed in freedom and respect amidst diversity, just like the wiki way. --Jojit (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Every color and every hue is represented by me and you. Take a slide in the slope. Take a look in the kaleidoscope. Spinnin’ round, make it twirl in this kaleidoscope world! -- Francis Magalona (1964 - 2009)

Jojit! Thank you! This means so much to me. Thank you. -- Alternativity (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Here.

Minsan lang ako mabigyan noo kaya maraming salamat.

23prootie (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress

I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're on a wikibreak but...

Thank you for adding the copypaste tag on the article Bakunawa. I have removed the copyrighted text and the template appropriately. Minimac (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your rewrite of History of the Philippines (Before 1521)

Thanks for your rewrite here. It is much improved over my original ham-handed version. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wtmitchell. I only wish I had more time to be active. :S

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Philippine Native Plants Conservation Society

Hi Alternativity,

Thanks for reviewing Philippine Native Plants Conservation Society. I really just created the article because I saw the Society red linked in the article you created about Leonard Co. The article about him was quite interesting and well done. I hope I did not step on your toes by starting to create the article about the Society. Please feel free to expand the society article if you are so inclined. I have done a bit of research on the society and will be adding a few more references in the coming days. I do enjoy working in collaboration with others! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 08:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Carriearchdale! :D Thanks. :D I have to disagree about the Leonard Co being "well done" at this point because it's only about a tenth of the quality it should be. Hehe. But thank you. :D Thanks for getting to work on the society article. I've got a huge "to create" list still to get to and I'm afraid the society page isn't very high on my priority list yet. So I'm WAY glad someone's working on it. Hm. One suggestion, btw: are you active on Tagalog Wikipedia? Because there's a lot of work that needs doing there, making articles for native Philippine species. Anyway. Thank you for your work. Knowledge is an important weapon in the movement to protect Philippine biodiversity. And every helping hand is a step forward. :D Happy editing! -- Alternativity (talk) 11:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missionedit has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Philippine Barnstar of National Merit
This barnstar belongs to you for all those 10+ years of hard work in improving the quality and credibility of Philippine history-related articles. Keep up the great work!--RioHondo (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
this WikiAward was given to Alternativity by RioHondo (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Discussions as of August 2017

Just FYI all. Talkpage Material before July 2017 has been archived.- Alternativity (talk) 07:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Ismael Abubakar

Since you seem to be the most active person on the Philippines noticeboard, would you possibly be able to find any sourcing on this individual? I cleaned it up from being an obit, but most of the sourcing that is needed comes from the early 90s, which means I suspect it isn't available easily online for someone in North America. The original article creator linked to his official bio, which makes the claim he was the first speaker of the regional assembly. I can't verify that through other sources. It also claims he died, so any public obituary would likely be a good source. If you could be of any assistance, it would be much appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TonyBallioni. Well, the existing sources are from the Philippine Star, which is about as reputable a newspaper source as they come, here in the Philippines. I'm also familiar enough with the PCID to trust the facts presented on their website as generally true. I'll look for other sources. What's the level of urgency for this article? If it's not too urgent (no afds, tags notability or POV issues, or anything along those lines?), I'd like to contribute to that page slowly and carefully. This person's profile seems rather straightforward, but the politics of the ARMM can be a bit complex so I want to be able to double check everything. If you want to do more searching yourself, I'd suggest doing a keyword search career-point by career point (variant combination of search phrases using offices, years, and his name). SPEAKING of which, this urgently needs to be moved from Ismael Abubakar to Ismael Abubakar, Jr., as there seem to be other individuals using the name/alias "Ismael Abubakar." I'll help more when I can, if that's okay? Do feel free to keep me updated if you like. - Alternativity (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. No real urgency, there is a new user who is currently trying to make it an obit based on the PCID source, which is not ideal. I'll revert and add some basic biographical facts from there. My main issue with the PCID source is that it is clearly promotional. I posted on BLPN about the name thing, but since you think it should be moved, I'll go ahead and do it now. BLPN is moving slower than usual. Really the most urgent thing at this point is confirmation of death. We shouldn't list him as dead unless we have a source saying so. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greater India and Ancient Philippines

Hi @Alternativity:..ǃ Since I learn that you has vast knowledge on Philippines matters, I really need your advice in Revisiting and questioning the degree of Indianisation in the Philippines. This is because other than Pre-Hispanic Philippines-related articles, several Hindu-Buddhist-related articles such as Greater India was affected by the edits of our notorious sockmaster JournalmanManila, that many of his edits are skewed POV pushing fiercely promoting the thesis of "Strong Hindu-Buddhist Culture of Ancient Philippines" in some of those articles. I need to address this issue fairly to put things in perspective. Really appreciate your opinion, thank you. Cheers..ǃ  Gunkarta  talk  16:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Posted a long comment there. :D Hope it helps. On a peripherally related note, please note that I've re-nominated Kingdom of Tondo to be renamed, since the previously suggested name was deemed to vague. Perhaps you'd like to look at that re-proposal? :D Thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 04:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Singkil, Ramayana and lack of references on statements connecting them

Hello Alternativity!

I've visited the Wikipedia page about Singkil and apparently the page tried to link Ramayana to the Maranao epic Darangen. Since you're the expert on pre-colonial matters, I might need your suggestions regarding possible source materials about the connection between that specific Hindu epic to the Maranao folk epic. The only material I have right now is the "Darangen: The Epic of the Maranaws" written by Mamitua Saber which compared Darangen to both Ramayana and the Greek epics.

Thanks in advance for the help! Stricnina (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been traveling lately so I just got this. I'm heading into a season of busy-ness but I'll do what I can to help. :-) - Alternativity (talk) 00:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Initial response: Hi Stricnina, a quick check of the sources used on the page seems to indicate that the writer has conflated the Darangen with a different M'ranao epic, the Maharadia Lawana, which actually is the M'ranao version of the Ramayana. For reference, look at this search within the google text of Artemio Guillermo's Historical Dictionary of the Philippines. I'll start cleanup by creating a stub article the Maharadia Lawana. But like I said earlier, I'm pretty busy. Let's just edit at the same time. :D - Alternativity (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


SPI

I just opened an SPI here. (N0n3up (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Apparently my SPI has been deemed by an admin as stale and wants more evidence/support for my argument saying that diffs are not enough. Can you help me out with this if possible? I think tbh we need to find a permanent solution to this, constantly making an SPI is becoming time-consuming with this troll. (N0n3up (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Hi User:N0n3up. Two immediate thoughts in response to your query.

  • 1. I think the quickest solution is to come up with a table of comparisons for each of the suspected sockpuppets, based on the criteria set forth in the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Guide_to_filing_cases guidelines. ( This will make the similarities between each sockpuppet immediately evident to the admin concerned. The main problem is that admins won't have the time to study each case in details, which is why this admin told you '"and the list goes on" won't work."' The problem is where to host such a table. If you're willing to host it on your talk page, that might be viable (we can copy the appropriate rows and columns to investigation pages when we need them.) If you figure out where, tell me and I will try to help you populate/fill up the table. (Unfortunately as the victim of many many threats and violent verbal attacks in the past, I now have a policy of not hosting such material on my own userspace - maybe you are less sensitive to these?)
  • 1b. The evidences I see are
    • A) that Skyrim seems to be pushing a specific POV favoring extensive "Indianization" or "Sinification" of all the Philippines, associating philippine polities with the large empires that s/he seems to think are more important parts of history than smaller independent polities;
    • B) Grammar cues give him away, since s/he talks the same way;
    • C) S/He seems to relish value-laden arguments and grandiose descriptions (aka peacockery, but s/he doesn't seem to understand what peackockery is);
    • D) S/He has a history of misusing sources - either oversimplifying them or misquoting them, but generally jumping to conclusions that favor his/her "truth" (interpretation of the facts);
    • E) S/He rejects nuanced interpretation of facts in preference for "Simple" expressions of (his/her) truth;
    • F) S/He launches persobak attacks editors who disagree with him/her.
You may wish to add to this list, I'm sure you've noticed a few more. But what we need are links to instances where each of the sockpuppets are guilty of them, which is the evidence the admins need. That's what we need to put in table form.
  • 2. Skyrim is confusing the issue by arguing against the labeling of the Philippine section as "vandalism" (which is what JournalManManila always does, as you know.) Personally, this confuses me too, since as you know I agree with his assertion that Francisco is a Reliable Source, and that the section should be there based on scholarly sources. (Ms Sarah Welch has even cited supporting tertiary sources.) To me, this is not a big issue, because I believe the consensus process will eventually resolve the matter. (I'm a wikipedia eventualist in that sense.) I think we should point out in the investigation page that the claim of vandalism isn't the issue at hand, but rather the act of sockpuppetry. I think I can make that point in the investigation page, but it would be better if we are also ready to present evidence (see point #1) first.

I'll give this more thought, but those are my immediate inputs. - Alternativity (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, anyone want to volunteer edits on [1]? How do you make the "Standard Format" show up immediately?

Katipunan ng Kabataan

Hoax?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Dlohcierekim. Yes. As I indicated on the talk page, the article has been tagged as a potential hoax in that it presents the Katipunan ng Kabataan as separate from the Sanguniang Kabataan and SK Chairperson, as already covered by the Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) article. As explained in the SK article, the Katipunan ng Kabataan seems to have been consistently defined as "all the youth (people of a certain age, the exact age has changed a few times) in the barangay", which elects the SK and SK Chairperson. Which means it's basically the constituency of the SK. This article makes it sound like the Katipunan ng Kabataan is a separate entity. The information in the rest of the content of the article seems to refer to the long-defunct Kabataang Barangay. The overall effect is to give the impression that the Kabataang Barangay continued to exist and became a parallel organization to the Sanguniang Kabataan. Which of course, it did not. All the sources clearly state that the Kabataang Barangay was disbanded and replaced by the SK. Unless of course, there's an ultra secret shadow counterpart of the SK that I've never heard about.- Alternativity (talk) 06:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's gone now. I don't read that language and must go slow in deletion. If they're secret, they are not notable anyway. If they are defunct, then they were, so not really a hoax. Maybe a redirect to SK? But it's gone now and probably not notable and as a deletionist, I mourn its passage and then move on.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorta. It was just weird. Like being told that a pop star that died in the eighties had been doing weekly concerts in some obscure bar. :D Anyway. Either way, thank you very much! :D - Alternativity (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Talkback

Hello, Alternativity. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Aya Hirano.
Message added 23:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Aya Hirano

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 23:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Roberto Benedicto

Hello! Your submission of Roberto Benedicto at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Reidgreg (talk) 19:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971

Hello, I've left some comments on your DYK nomination of Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971. Please respond to them as soon as possible. Salamat. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks, I shall look into Template:Did you know nominations/Jose Yao Campos and Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971 as soon as I can. I'll leave comments on the nomination pages. - Alternativity (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jose Yao Campos

Hello! Your submission of Jose Yao Campos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roberto Benedicto

On 11 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roberto Benedicto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roberto Benedicto was so close to his fraternity brother, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, that he had full access to the presidential quarters in Malacañang Palace? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roberto Benedicto. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Roberto Benedicto), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Article Rescue Barnstar
awarded to User:Alternativity for their rescue of the Ilocos Norte Tobacco Excise Tax funds controversy. I wasn't able to attend the relisting of the Afd but I hope this works too :) Lenticel (talk) 01:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Yay thanks User:Lenticel! :D I get such a hoot out of these and I haven't gotten one in ever such a looong time. - Alternativity (talk) 14:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jose Yao Campos

On 14 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jose Yao Campos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that businessman Jose Yao Campos admitted in 1986 to having organized 40 different shell companies through which Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos could hide his wealth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jose Yao Campos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jose Yao Campos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 03:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Alternativity. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971.
Message added 09:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971

Hello, it has been some weeks since your last comments on this nomination. Do you still wish to pursue it? If there is no response there within the next few days, I will mark the nomination for closure. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your hard work on Comedy in the Philippines

The Original Barnstar
Thank you so much for your hard work on the Comedy in the Philippines page, it is so appreciated! You have completely transformed it from the initial edits I did it some weeks back. Thank you! Citrivescence (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, what a pleasant surprise. Hehe thanks Citrivescence, I do love barnstars. :D I remain concerned about that last section with problems, though. I actually feel that the article needs to have about two or three times more content, with headings for subject themes (Satire would be a sub-section, Colonial experience - reference Dolphy's "translation" gag - would be another, gender issues yet another) and unique cultural practices (physical comedy, translation comedy, etc). Lotsa work still left to do, and I don't have many sources. :S Do you have access to any good Filipino comedy books? :D - Alternativity (talk) 02:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't. I do have access to Jstor which is how I found the academic article I cited, but I don't have access to a library with Filipino comedy books. Sorry, wish I could be more helpful. Thank you, again! :) --Citrivescence (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to add new sections,to help seed expansion. :D Feel free to expand them, if you like. :D - Alternativity (talk) 07:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971

Hello! Your submission of Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971

On 18 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine Constitutional Convention of 1971. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alternativity. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alternativity. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Economic history of the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos

Hello! Your submission of Economic history of the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comedy in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael V (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added proof of the Buddhist advent in your Ma-i article

You should check out the religion section of your article in Ma-i since I edited the context because Henry Otley Beyer found a Buddhist Icon in Palawan, just Southwest of Mindoro (Ma-i). Unfortunately the icon was destroyed in World War 2, however, pictures of it survive. I think people who dismiss the Buddhism came to Mindoro ignore the fact that this Buddhist icon was excavated in an island near Mindoro in relatively modern times.

Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the heads up. I want to raise several points.
  • First, unfortunately, we aren't allowed to draw conclusions on Wikipedia, based on the rules you can read at WP:SYNTH. If you can find a scholarly text that makes an explicit connection between the Palawan Boddhistava and the archeology of Mindoro based on proximity, then we are allowed to quote the scholar. We are not allowed to draw our own conclusion/s. BUT if you do find a source that makes that connection, feel free to cite it. I've examined the Churchill article several and can't see any statement where it says Palawan was so near Mindoro that there must have been buddhist iconography in both places.
  • Second, just because Mindoro and Palawan are near each other doesn't automatically mean they were politically or even culturally contiguous at the time. If you can find a reference that explicitly says so, then, again, by Wikipedia rules, you can quote your source.
  • Third, the most recent research has cast doubt on the idea that Mai must be in Mindoro simply because there is a place there called Mait. As raised elsewhere on the wiki, Bai in Laguna has an equally strong claim. And Bai is far from Palawan.
  • Fourth, I don't disagree that Buddhism was practiced in the archipelago long before the arrival of the Spanish. My concern is that we don't forget that aside from Buddhist or even Hindu iconography which may have been on the islands, there was also a significant present of indigenous iconography, which persisted well into the sixteenth century. Or even if it WAS Buddhist iconography, it would be important to note whether it came directly from India (not supported by evidence as far as I can see in the literature, even Churchill's article which recognizes the likely intermediation of Majapahit), or inderectly through Majapahit. which is a fellow Austronesian culture. This concern for not downplaying the vitality of the indigenous Austronesian culture is the reason I'm such a stickler for not drawing conclusions other than stated in the scholarly literature.
I don't feel that the inclusion of the new paragraph is merited by Wikipedia's rules, or defensible on scholarly grounds. But maybe I'm wrong. I will study the Churchill article more closely and see if there's anything I missed before I go back and do any further edits on the article. Thanks! - Alternativity (talk) 08:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for critique. I don't think my source is just exclusive to Palawan though, the Churchill text also mention Buddhist icons in Batangas which is nearer Laguna de Bai.

Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Economic history of the Philippines (1965–86)

Hello, I have completed a partial review at Template:Did you know nominations/Economic history of the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos. I have noted some questions, and will finish the review shortly. Feel free to respond there, even though I am not finished yet. Cheers. Flibirigit (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sinosikat?

Notice

The article Sinosikat? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability, too few sources exist for an article of substance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vmavanti (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Five pop culture article references from major Philippine publications, and one from a Philippine music industry website added, having been found on the quickest of searches. A great deal more has been written about the band, even if one does not include articles focusing on the vocalist. The problem is that the article is poorly written and badly needs wikifying, not that it doesn't have souces - Alternativity (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Economic history of the Philippines (1965–86)

On 25 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Economic history of the Philippines (1965–86), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the economy of the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos saw its first crisis in 1969 because of heavy borrowing in preparation for the Marcos re-election campaign? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Economic history of the Philippines (1965–86)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Manila (1258) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Manila (1258) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Manila (1258) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stricnina (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seal (East Asia)

Hi, Alternativity! I want to know, do Filipino people use East Asian style of personal seal in the past like East Asian people (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) do nowadays? I have read that from this article Seal_(East_Asia)#Filipino_usage, it seem out of topic and I suspect that subsection was wrote by one of JournalmanManila sockpuppet. Thanks! -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 02:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Ibrahim Muizzuddin! I have not managed to be an expert on the supposed Butuan Ivory Seal, and thus can't say anything defintive. But that sockpuppet has a tendency to take one artifact as evidence of an entire culture, if it serves his agenda of projecting early Philippine polities as "Asian" (not Austronesian) and "Royal" (in the eurocentric fairy-tale sense). I'm not sure what to suggest, but yes you are correct to be watchful of his claims. - Alternativity (talk) 17:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinions and contribution here would be appreciated

I feel as if the said person deleted too much of the history section of the Philippines especially the Islamic era, even though I agree with him that the article is excessively detailed, I also feel that the said deleted portions were crucial and necessary, can you chime in on this? Thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Philippines#PH_0447's_deletions_of_many_Islamic_era_history_paragraphs

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordillera Central (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Teresita Llorente

Hello, Alternativity,

Thank you for creating Teresita Llorente.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

See note on talk page

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

North8000 (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Felix Huerta

Notice

The article Felix Huerta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:DEL#7 & WP:DEL#8

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nightvour (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dondi Ledesma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dondi Ledesma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dondi Ledesma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marcos jewels

On 2 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marcos jewels, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ousted Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos and his wife Imelda left 400 pieces of unlawfully acquired jewelry in their palace and were caught smuggling out another $5–10 million worth of gems? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marcos jewels. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Marcos jewels), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Laportea interrupta" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Laportea interrupta. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Laportea interrupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elements Music Camp alumni has been nominated for listification

Category:Elements Music Camp alumni has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tampo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tampo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tampo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mr. Gerbear|Talk 17:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ramon Barba

On 17 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ramon Barba, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 12:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films Directed by Vim Yapan

A tag has been placed on Category:Films Directed by Vim Yapan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Josefa Edralin Marcos

Hi! I see you did the article about Doña Josefa Edralin-Marcos long ago. I want to do a separate article for her just like President Rodrigo's mother who's also a school teacher. EBPCarpio (talk) 06:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's what I have published but was reverted by a user from NY, USA.

In this Philippine name for married women, the birth middle name or maternal family name is Quetulio, the birth surname or paternal family name is Edralin, and the marital name is Marcos.
Doña Josefa Edralin Marcos
Personal details
Born
Josefa Quetulio Edralin

(1893-02-15)February 15, 1893
Sarrat, Ilocos Norte, Philippines
DiedMay 4, 1988(1988-05-04) (aged 95)
Veterans Memorial Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
Spouse
​
(m. 1916)​
Domestic partnerFerdinand Chua [1]
Children4 (Ferdinand, Pacifico, Elizabeth Keon, and Fortuna Barba)
OccupationTeacher

Josefa Edralin-Marcos (born Josefa Quetulio Edralin; was a Filipina teacher. She was the mother of Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos who was President of the Philippines from 1965 to 1986, and the grandmother of current Philippine president Bongbong Marcos.

Early life

Marcos was born as Josefa Edralin y Quetulio to a landed family on February 15, 1893 in Sarrat, Ilocos Norte to Don Fructuoso Edralin y Carpio (1843-1933), former vice-gobernadorcillo and Doña Emerenciana Quetulio y Taganas (1867-1958).[2]

Personal life

Doña Josefa was married to Mariano Marcos, a lawyer, educator, and politician from Batac, Ilocos Norte, Philippines and one of her co-graduates at the Philippine Normal School. They had four children:

Death

She died at the Veterans Memorial Medical Center on May 4, 1988, at the age of 95.[3] [4]

References

  1. ^ "Ferdinand Chua". www.geni.com. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
  2. ^ "Josefa Quetulio Edralin". www.geni.com. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
  3. ^ "BURIAL OF MARCOS' MOTHER IS ISSUE THAT WON'T DIE". www.washingtonpost.com. Keith B. Richburg. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
  4. ^ "The woman Marcos left behind fleeing the EDSA revolt". verafiles.org. MIGUEL PAOLO P. REYES AND JOEL F. ARIATE JR. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

EBPCarpio (talk) 06:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bantayog ng mga Bayani has been nominated for deletion

Category:Bantayog ng mga Bayani has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Authors of Spanish ethnographic accounts of the Philippines in the 16th century has been nominated for splitting

Category:Authors of Spanish ethnographic accounts of the Philippines in the 16th century has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Primary sources on Philippine history in the 16th century has been nominated for merging

Category:Primary sources on Philippine history in the 16th century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1971 has been nominated for merging

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1971 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1940 has been nominated for merging

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1940 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1967 has been nominated for merging

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1967 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1981 has been nominated for merging

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1981 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1986 has been nominated for merging

Category:Philippine Military Academy Class of 1986 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Primary sources for early Philippine history has been nominated for merging

Category:Primary sources for early Philippine history has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rodrigo Ponce Jr.

A tag has been placed on Rodrigo Ponce Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chieharumachi (talk) 01:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]