User talk:Aliyahasan

Welcome

Hello, Aliyahasan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ninney (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Thanks for uploading File:RevolutionMedia. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Revolution Media page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Direct Ishq Poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Direct Ishq Poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vraddhi Sharma

added links pointing to Model and Agneepath

Revolution Media

added a link pointing to Final Cut

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Nishant Sharma content uploads at filmikafe.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nishant Sharma content uploads at filmikafe.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Nishant Sharma to play lead in Full 2 Dhamaal.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nishant Sharma to play lead in Full 2 Dhamaal.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Revolution Media, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) How can i do ..? Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nishant Sharma, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Naved farooqui. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naved farooqui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David.moreno72 11:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

{{help me}}

Please help me with... Two Years old Our Revolution Media Page was on Wikipedia . Please Re Store - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_Mediahttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_Media

Aliyahasan (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 13:30, 30 July 2017 by User:Brookieas G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I see no reason to restore. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aliyahasan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Onarbor.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. : Noyster (talk), 09:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} ^(Whisper...) 16:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Based on this edit summary, I conclude the following warning is necessary:

Hello Aliyahasan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aliyahasan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aliyahasan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for help

How can i do ..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliyahasan (talk • contribs)

• It is clear from a number of postings you have made that you would like for the Revolution Media page to be restored. This page will not be restored. It was deleted under our criteria for speedy deletion #G11, which means it was unambiguous advertising or promotion. Wikipedia is not a means of advertising your company or that of your clients. We are an encyclopedia, not a billboard. Further, it is unlikely we would restore the article to a draft space where you could work on it to develop the article as you appear to have a financial vested interest. Being paid to edit on behalf of a company is strongly discouraged here. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RevolutionMedia

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RevolutionMedia. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC) | logo_size = | image_file = | image_size = | image_caption = | category = Media Planner, Digital | founder = Aliya Hasan | firstdate = | company = Revolution Media | language = English,Hindi | website = www.revolutionmedia.in }}[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to File:Ishq Ka-Manjan 2017.jpeg— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 12:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ishq Ka-Manjan 2017.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Ishq Ka-Manjan 2017.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^(Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolution Media

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Revolution Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about When obama loved osama

Hello, Aliyahasan,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether When obama loved osama should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When obama loved osama .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 11:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Movie

Category:Hindi Film Aliya Pr (talk) 19:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When obama loved Osama is producer Jaivindra Singh Bhati

jaivindra Singh Bhati is one of producer “when obama loved Osama “ Aliya Pr (talk) 19:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with When obama loved osama. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please update

Approve this page all information about upcoming Movie when obama loved Osama Aliya Pr (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which are the reliable sources, independent of the movie, that have written about it? —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All Deatails of when obama loved Osama web link- https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7926824/reference?mode=desktop& Aliya Pr (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC) (copied here from User talk:C.Fred to keep the thread in one place)[reply]

IMDB is only reliable for the purpose of cast lists. A cast list alone isn't enough to justify an article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sending you another Deatails

http://filmyakkie.com/bollywood-news/when-obama-loved-osama-will-split-you-into-laughter/ Aliya Pr (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a wp:COI with this film?Slatersteven (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

Hello can you exiting our when obama loved Osama wikipedia Page . Because I am not understanding Aliya Pr (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Wikipedia talk:Bots are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. The "Wikipedia talk" pages are for discussing improvements or practices related to the "Wikipedia" page they are attached to. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at When Obama loved Osama. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry by mistake

By mistake from my side Aliya Pr (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was it also a mistake you renamed the AFD?Slatersteven (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

Over the course of almost three years you have been clearly editing for the purpose of promotion. You have repeatedly been told that doing so is unacceptable, but have continued to do so. You have edited in a promotional way in relation to your own business, which, as has been made clear to you, is contrary to the guidelines on conflict of interest. You have edited in promotional ways in relation to companies in precisely the line of business for which your business provides what you call "PR, Promotion & Marketing", making it clear that you are editing in violation of the Wikimedia Foundations requirement for disclosure of paid editing, which you were informed of more than seven months ago, but you have continued to do so. In addition, you have edited in disruptive ways, such as making attempts to interfere with deletion discussions by removing AfD notices from articles and removing comments from discussion pages. In view of these facts, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ishq Ka-Manjan 2017.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ishq Ka-Manjan 2017.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Sandbox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Anchorvale ^T@lk | Contributions  01:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aliyahasan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20918 was submitted on Mar 19, 2018 12:24:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aliyahasan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20931 was submitted on Mar 19, 2018 21:00:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider our issue for unblock

Please do Wikipedia teams Aliya Pr (talk) 21:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aliyahasan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20963 was submitted on Mar 22, 2018 07:39:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliyahasan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Dorsetonian (talk) 08:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]