|
User talk:Ali AhwaziPlease can you upload your information? I am reading some of your write up and I wish to know whose write up am reading. Copyright problem: Husayn ibn AliHello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Husayn ibn Ali, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://en.wikishia.net/view/Imam_al-Husayn_b._'Ali_(a)#Imamate, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Husayn ibn Ali saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 31Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abbas Ka'bi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Deletion discussion about Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi TalibHello, Ali Ahwazi, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, Slatersteven (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC) DYK nomination of Sayyidat Nisa al-Alamin
Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Taqi Shushtari
A page you started (Al-Atabat Al-Aliyat) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Al-Atabat Al-Aliyat, Ali Ahwazi! Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Onel5969 TT me 00:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC) Hello. Last month, two users left messages on the nomination page regarding the article, and they have pointed out that there are still some issue that need to be addressed. Please edit the article to solve these problems; as the article has not been edited since April, and the comments have not received responses, the nomination will be marked as stale and may be closed in the next few days unless a prompt response is done. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew Muhammad Taqi Shushtari moved to draftspaceThis article is almost completely incomprehensible in its present form. Was this person an Islamic scholatr, an author, a poet? When did he live - that one date in the article (1902) is obviously completely off the mark)? What was his significance? Just listing a lot of names does not make an accpetable encyclopedic article. Please add some intelligible substance here, otherwise this won't be usable on Wikipedia. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC) A page you started (Muhammad ibn Musa al-Kadhim (Sabze Ghaba)) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Muhammad ibn Musa al-Kadhim (Sabze Ghaba), Ali Ahwazi! Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Talkback Message added 13:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Taqi Shushtari (September 24)
Invitation to join WikiProject Military history
Hello Ali Ahwazi! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.
 October 2018
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Cut-and-paste move of Ali Hashemi (weightlifter)I see that you have already been warned, but let me do it again since it was apparently not clear. You have copied the article from Ali Hashemi to Ali Hashemi (Weightlifter) and created a disambig article at Ali Hashemi. The problem with that is that the editing history of the article was lost, which is technically speaking a copyright violation. Another, minor, problem is that weightlifter should not have been capitalized. I solved both by moving the old version to Ali Hashemi to Ali Hashemi (weightlifter), and redirecting Ali Hashemi (weightlifter). Now you can create a disambig at Ali Hashemi. Note however that all the links from the articles related to the weightlifter now go to Ali Hashemi, and they must be fixed before the disambig has been created.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC) @Ymblanter: firstly I appreciate your consideration/edition; secondly I was wondering if you meant that I currently can create a disambig in this page (by removing all of its current content, and add the disambig instead?)? (e.g. like this page?) Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
"View History" of Dhakir@Ymblanter:, Would you please tell me that: how can I clean the extra history of Dhakir? I mean: I created a text (as a page) in my sandbox by the name/topic of "Dhakir", then I pasted it in the page which was the redirect of "Dhakir" to "Dhikr". Currently, the problem is that: when I refer to the "view history" of the new independent created page of Dhakir, then the activities of the "view history" of the previous/another page (Dhikr) can be seen -- as well as Dhakir's history), would you kindly fix it? P.S.: then, an user changed it, and wrote: "redirect target is both older and better developed. RV to redirect". So, I don't exactly know what I should do now to revert it. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Sadiq Ahangaran) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Sadiq Ahangaran. I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Britishfinance (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Taqi Shushtari (February 4)
Deletion discussion about U.S. intervention in VenezuelaHello, Ali Ahwazi, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Jamez42 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, U.S. intervention in Venezuela should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. intervention in Venezuela . You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Jamez42 (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Ways to improve U.S. intervention in VenezuelaHello, Ali Ahwazi, Thanks for creating U.S. intervention in Venezuela! I edit here too, under the username Jamez42 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Jamez42 (talk) 21:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad Taqi ShushtariHello, Ali Ahwazi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad Taqi Shushtari". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Nomination of Hedayatollah Behboudi for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hedayatollah Behboudi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedayatollah Behboudi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Personasiran (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Mohammad Qomi for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Qomi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Qomi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Personasiran (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 1Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Ali Jafari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 8An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alef-Laam Khomeini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Ali Ahwazi Thank you for creating Hormuz-2 (missile). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) North8000 (talk) 12:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC) A barnstar for you
Nomination of Operation Dawn 7 for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Dawn 7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Dawn 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 03:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC) War of 1812There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Elinruby (talk) 08:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC) War of 1812 some moreThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theory/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Elinruby (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Sharh-e Esm (book) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharh-e Esm (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharh-e Esm (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ladsgroupoverleg 18:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC) NavigationHallo, Thank you for creating Hoveyzeh (armored car). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Hoveyzeh), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 08:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Lighthouses and militaryHi you and other Wikipedians may be interested to take part in the discussions at Talk:Lighthouses in Hong Kong, Talk:Military of Hong Kong and Talk:List of lighthouses in Macau. 219.76.24.203 (talk) 10:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 11An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 26An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVIran Barakat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YJC. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 27An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Iran's parliament representatives (10th term), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenjan. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 4An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Ehsan Foundation (Iran) for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Foundation (Iran) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Persia ☘ 07:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Beseh-Rahbari for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beseh-Rahbari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Persia ☘ 08:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Nomination of 4030 Call System for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4030 Call System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Persia ☘ 08:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC) September 2021 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding hoaxes to articles with faked citations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Honestly, I was surprised to see that I became indef, but I must admit that I had to be much more careful. You wrote in your comment that I have mentioned senators who do not exist. I have to explain that: in this edition, by Nick Zenfon, I actually meant Nick Xenophon. This has been my negligence and I am sorry about that. Nick Xenophon's remarks can also be seen on the BBC and The Guardian (Please ctrl + f "heartbreaking"). The deportation of Logan Robertson can also be seen in this source. This explanation is not to say that I do not accept my mistakes, but in fact I intend to request that I be given another chance to continue my editing. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Decline reason: I am not convinced that these sorts of mistakes will not recur. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. @Nick-D:, @331dot:, I want more help from you. I have tried to make constructive edits and contribute to the encyclopedia. I reviewed my contributions and for the start I think I should be more careful when using sources. The accepted sources for Wikipedia is defined WP:Reliable sources. My mistakes were not intentional and I should work harder to avoid them in future. But I still need help and guidance to continue this activity. I would like to request you unblock me and I will be more careful when making edits. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)  Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: @Nick-D:, @331dot:, I want more help from you. I have tried to make constructive edits and contribute to the encyclopedia. I reviewed my contributions and for the start I think I should be more careful when using sources. The accepted sources for Wikipedia is defined WP:Reliable sources. My mistakes were not intentional and I should work harder to avoid them in future. But I still need help and guidance to continue this activity. I would like to request you unblock me and I will be more careful when making edits. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Accept reason: The editor has provided assurances they will take care. Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
@Nick-D:, @331dot:, of course, I mentioned it before, but I wanted to say again that I realized my mistakes and now that it is blocked, I really need you to give me another chance to be able to use credible sources more accurately. Also: You wrote in your comment that I have mentioned senators who do not exist. I have to explain that in this edition: in fact I meant "Nick Xenophon" but wrongly I wrote "Nick Zenfon"; And I do not mean just this, and there must have been other mistakes, too. This has been my negligence and I am sorry about that. Therefore, I will try to make the next edits more carefully. Thanks a lot. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
If you would like your unblock request to be taken seriously, please provide more detail on how you will avoid similar problems in the future. For instance, please explain how you will identify reliable sources and take care with editing to avoid adding inaccuracies to articles. Nick-D (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Thank you dear 331dot. @Nick-D:, I did more research and as far as I realized: the more challenging content should provide a more credible source for it. A source that has a reputation for fact checking can be considered credible. In this regard, I can get help from other users through this page. Users need to be more careful about living people. Sometimes content needs to be attributed to the source. But in general, there are many things and details that I gradually learn. Thank you for considering my request. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
@Nick-D:, I will be grateful if you see my request. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 14:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
@Nick-D:, In a message I wrote at 15:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC) I explained how to identify and find valid sources. In addition to Wikipedia: Reliable sources / Noticeboard I can also use Wikipedia: Reliable sources / Perennial sources to identify a reliable source. . In the same comment, I stated that in the case of Living people, resources should be chosen more carefully. I have also reviewed the contents of Wikipedia: Competence is required and there were some useful points in it. These points included the importance of identifying reliable sources and reading them carefully and the ability to communicate with other editors. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deprecated sourceIf you look at this edit of yours you will see a "Tag" that says "Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source". This means you're using a really bad source, so bad that it was WP:deprecated. If you ever see that, I think you should self-revert. This edit was in the sandbox so its ok, but make sure to not move that to an article. In this case the bad source you're using is globaltimes.cn. If you do ctrl+f at WP:RSP you will see it is deprecated. Please note that just because you don't see the tag doesn't mean the source is reliable. Most unreliable sources will not give you that tag. You should carefully look at WP:RSP for what is not a reliable source.VR talk 16:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC) @Vice regent:, thank you for mentioning these helpful points in regards to using good/bad sources. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Discretionary sanctions alert for the topic of Covid-19 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place Doug Weller talk 10:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC) کمک و راهنماییسلام و ادب حس میکنم شما با زبان فارسی آشنایی دارین کمکی میخواستم Ashkeemperator (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Missing signatureFYI, you didn't sign this post. Best regards, Iskandar323 (talk) 06:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Oh, yes, you are right; thanks for mentioning it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Ali Ahwazi. Thank you for your work on Sayyad-4 (missile). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JoseJan89 (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JoseJan89 (talk) 09:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC) CS1 error on Violent crime
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC) August 2023
@SamX: I appreciate your attention for the mentioned point; Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC) September 2023
Dear SamX, thank you for your guidance; I will try to note them more. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC) For instance, I performed an instance based on your guidance, and I hope I have done it well. Actually, I wrote the mentioned necessary sentence(s) in the summary based on what you mentioned. That's this. Thanks for your previous help. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 21:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 attacks on Palestinians evacuating Gaza City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PRCS. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Addition of reference to Fandom wiki in Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Disambiguation link notification for January 3An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diplomatic impact of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honduran. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Invitation to join New pages patrol Hello Ali Ahwazi!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) Arbitration case requestYou are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration case requestYou are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use. Thanks, 182Line (talk) 08:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC) March 2024
Greetings to you. Oh, yeah, you are right; you mentioned profit matters. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Ali Ahwazi. Thank you for your work on Talaiyeh (missile). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 19:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC) April 2024You have added multiple named references to the article Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2024, but they were never defined with a full citation, according to the articles history. Here are just three examples, out of many - Diff 1, Diff 2, Diff 3 — cite error 1, cite error 2, cite error 3. Please add full citations to the named references you have added to the aforementioned article. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC) I appreciate you for telling the mentioned point; I'll pay more attention to it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 10:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) June 2024On the Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (12 January 2024 – 6 May 2024) page, you made 5 edits between 12 June and 13 June. I have reverted one of them for duplicate content, see full reasoning here, and will note that 2 more of these need to reverted as well due to the following reasons:
Per the WP:1RR policy listed as a notice on the edit pane, no more than 1 revert can be made in a 24 hour period. There are exceptions including: "Considerable leeway is also given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the Main Page." Although this is not a featured article, a link to it does appear on the main page. This quote implies that the significance of an article appearing on the main page raises the need for potential reverts. As such I will revert your recent edits due to incorrect dates and duplicated information in wrong location. Relspas (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC) I appreciate you for paying attention to the mentioned point. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
CategorizationWhen adding categories to articles please keep WP:CATPOV in mind; For example, if something cannot be stated in Wikivoice (for example, if we cannot call a politician a criminal in Wikivoice) then we cannot categorize them as a criminal. BilledMammal (talk) 23:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) Thank you for paying attention to this matter. Good luck.Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC) July 2024
If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC) CCI NoticeHello, Ali Ahwazi. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC) CategorizationI noticed that you have been adding categories to several articles related to Iranian military UAVs. Many of the categories you have added are parent categories of of the subcategories already present in the articles (for example, Category:Unmanned military aircraft of Iran is a subcategory of Category:Unmanned military aircraft (via Category:Unmanned military aircraft by country), which itself is a subcategory of Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles. Per WP:PARENTCAT, "an article should be categorised under the most specific branch in the category tree possible, without duplication in parent categories above it." This is primarily to avoid overcategorization. - ZLEA T\C 08:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Hello. Honestly, it is very important for me to comply with copyright law; In the middle of doing numerous edits, this mistake happened inadvertently, and I am sorry for this. I have thought about the importance of keeping Wikipedia free from copyright violations and so will pay more attention to this matter. On the other hand, after I noticed warning about “unattributed copying within Wikipdia”:, I tried to use the following code (in edit summary) based on Wikipedia’s rules, i.e.: Decline reason: In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Note additionally we probably need to wait until the copyright investigation at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20240708 is concluded. This is a significantly large investigation. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC) Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Hello. I was asked to answer these 5 questions, then I answered them as follows. (Meanwhile, you can read my request reasons in here [4]) What is copyright? In short, copyright is considered a right that is given to the holder/maker of a creative-work in order to prevent other individuals from taking copy of it. On the other hand, a creative-work can be consisted of a book, a phrase, a picture, and so on. Additionally, buildings built on/after 1, 12, 1990 can be eligible for the purpose of copyright (of course in the United States). How is Wikipedia licenced? A license actually can act like a contract; it allows to copy a work solely in accordance with the terms set by the copyright holder or in cases where other exceptions to copyright law are applicable. In fact, Wikipedia's contents are copyrighted in an automatic form, (and are under the Berne Convention); it is also licensed in a formal form to the public under one/several free licenses. The majority of the texts/images of Wikipedia are considered to be co-licensed under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and GFDL (unversioned, without any front-cover contents, invariant sections, or even back-cover contents) … and so on. Actually, we can say that Wikipedia articles are all free content and their texts are covered by the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and in most cases the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Having copyrighted content on Wikipedia without permission leads to the violation of others rights and it is against law. On the other hand, having free content on Wikipedia facilitates the use of contents by readers around the world. This is a free encylopedia. Wikipedia typically requires permission in order to utilize copyrighted materials. In short, Because Wikipedia intend to protect the right of the copyright holder/maker of a creative-work, in order to prevent others from copying it. Creative works are protected by copyright under international agreement, unless they are in the public domain or the copyright is explicitly disclaimed. In most cases, Wikipedia requires permission in order to utilize copyrighted materials. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? In some cases we can have fair use. Fair use is considered a principle which is based on the legislations (of the U.S.A) that gives the permission for the restricted utilization of the copyright content; and on the other hand, it doesn’t need to get authorization from the owner of copyright. Fair use is as a limitation to copyright laws which aims to make a balance between the rights of copyright holders and the public's interest in having access and usage of copyrighted content. It provides a defense against copyright infringement claims for specific limited uses that would otherwise be considered as violation." The right of fair use can be named as a broad exemption which is applicable to various uses of all forms of creative works. Typically, the fair use doctrine in the United States is more expansive compared to the fair dealing rights found in many countries across the world that are following English Common Law. In the U.S.A. the fair use right or/and fair use exception are considered to be in accordance with a flexible proportionality test that in fact evaluates the use goal, the amount used, and also the impact on the original work market. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? If we are going to apply a copyrighted text/content, at the first step, we have to make sure to rephrase/reword the mentioned text so the degree of similarity is decreased to the point that our text or content could be taken as a new work. Of note, In cases we want to utilize a material which is free, I have to credit the copyright owner or holder, and also the source (the mentioned matter is depended upon the license as I figured it out). On the other hand, it should be noted that, in cases we intend to apply a photo, it ought to be released under an accepted license in Wikimedia projects such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licenses that in fact match with the restrictions/limitations in the project. At the time that we have a doubt(s) (in all cases), it is good to ask for helping from related admins or even update ourselves by going to related pages. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC) Decline reason: I don't believe that it's in Wikipedia's best interest to unblock you while other editors have to spend their volunteer time extensively reviewing your edits at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20240708. I understand that it's frustrating to hear and it is hard to tell editors who want to edit that they can't, but copyright is a really big deal and being the subject of a current, massive CCI is pretty much an automatic decline for me. Ponyobons mots 21:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. @Ponyo: Best greetings; Firstly, thanks for your attention and time. Secondly, I'm so sad about being blocked, and I am even more upset to see my contributions caused troubles. I did not really intend to do so. I'm very interested in enhancing the projects status and I really wish to have the chance of doing so. Considering that I figured out my mistake, responded to the questions, could I ask you to give me the last chance to be active in the project. I'll do my best regarding the mentioned copyright warnings. Thank you so much. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC) September 2024 unblock requestAli Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Best greetings; considering that I figured out my mistake and also tried to respond to the asked questions, I like to ask for having another chance to be active in the project. I will do my best regarding the mentioned copyright warnings. That said, I respect the opinion of the previous administrator, but I still believe that I can be effective in improving the level of Wikipedia encyclopedia and I need another opportunity to show this. Thanks a lot. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC) Decline reason: Your prior unblock request contains errors concerning copyright policy, and significant chunks of it appear to be copied from sources without fully understanding them. signed, Rosguill talk 17:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Invitation to participate in a researchHello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement . Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Nomination of Al-Ahvaz TV for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Ahvaz TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
