This user may have left Wikipedia. Aitias has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Sorry to see that it worked out the way it did. I hope you'll stay active on Wikipedia, but either way, the best of luck for the future. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC) (P.S. You may want to get your user page create-protected. Vandals can be vicious.)[reply]
Best Wishes for the future.Feel really sorry for you after all the hours you spent particularly vandal fighting and more so as a Absolutist.Who are sadly a rare breed today.:) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I do hope we see you around again after a break. All the problems at RfAR were indeed unpleasant, but I hope you do still contribute. All the best whatever you decide. ~ mazcatalk09:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Aitias, you have contributed enormously to ameliorate en.wikipedia. I hope you will stay, and work to ameliorate the encyclopedia. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 14:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, actually I did...
You need to work on your edit summaries. I was giving friendly advice, hoping for a collegial conversation, but if you want we can move to warnings, up to you. Because you're on a bad path. ++Lar: t/c18:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK then, have it your way, going forward, I'll only come by when I feel the need to warn you about something, or let you know you've been blocked. Try to manage your affairs so I never feel the need to come by. Best wishes. ++Lar: t/c19:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, Lar, there will never be a need to warn me; also, be assured that someone like you does not, by any means, possess the authority to warn me. As for your second point: There will never be a need, let alone a reason, to block me — as such, you can be assured that this would be your last block. :) In conclusion: You can see that there will never be a need for you to edit this page and therefore I hope the above edit was your last one. I wish you all the very best, Aitias (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Majorly. No, I am not "deliberately trying to antagonise people". If it "comes across that way", you can be assured that this is a misinterpretation (on your part). Thanks for your message anyway, it is much appreciated. Best regards, --Aitias (talk) 22:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's a misinterpretation on Majorly's part at all: in both the votes Majorly listed above, I got the same impression he appears to have (I should also note that in both candidacies the oppose sections contained people who endorsed your RfC, and your vote on Sam Blacketer's RfA was criticized both here and on WR), and in one case you accused everyone in the oppose section of being hypocritical, which is hardly a good thing. This was also concerning and even appears to contradict your response to Majorly. I'd like to point you to this warning from Tznkai, and seriously encourage you to take his advice and Lar's above. Finally, don't consider this a warning (which it isn't): consider it an attempt to help you. Acalamari23:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Power Pirate
I have revised the page for Power Pirate, which had some notability issues, to be in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines on that subject, and I would like to recreate that page. But, as the deleting administrator, I am contacting you first. Sabrebattletank (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the course of an ongoing case, the Arbitration Committee has decided to collect all relevant information regarding Malleus Fatuorum's block log and, as such, has created a table of all blocks, which can be found here. Since you either blocked or unblocked Malleus Fatuorum, you are welcome to comment, if you wish. SalvioLet's talk about it!13:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noli turbare circulos meos! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
